Air pollution; standards of performance for new stationary sources: Broadly applicable alternative test methods,

[Federal Register: January 30, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 19)]

[Notices]

[Page 4257-4262]

From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]

[DOCID:fr30ja07-61]

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-8273-6]

Notice of Broadly Applicable Alternative Test Methods

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of availability.

SUMMARY: This notice announces broadly applicable alternative test method approval decisions that the Environmental Protection Agency has made under and in support of the New Source Performance Standards and the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants. Although we have made both site-specific and broadly applicable alternative test method approvals in the past, most recently we have issued only site- or facility-specific approvals. This notice announces our plan to issue broadly applicable alternative test method approvals in the future. We will post these broadly applicable approvals on our technology transfer network Web site as well as announce them in the Federal Register. The publication of these broadly applicable alternative test method approvals on our Web site will provide information about options and flexibility for the regulated community. In addition, this information may reduce the burden on source owners and operators in making site- specific alternative test method requests and the permitting authorities and the EPA

[[Page 4258]]

Administrator in processing those requests.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Broadly applicable alternative test method approvals may be accessed from the EPA's Web site at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/emc/tmethods.html#CatB. For questions about this

notice, contact Robin R. Segall, Air Quality Assessment Division, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards (E143-02), Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711; telephone number (919) 541-0893; fax number (919) 541-0893; e-mail address: segall.robin@epa.gov. For technical questions about individual

alternative test method decisions, refer to the contact person identified in the individual approval documents.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

1. General Information

   1. Does this action apply to me?

      This announcement will be of interest to entities regulated under 40 CFR parts 60, 61, and 63 and State, local, Tribal agencies, and EPA Regional Offices responsible for implementation and enforcement of regulations under 40 CFR parts 60, 61, and 63.

   2. How can I get copies of this information?

      You may access copies of the broadly applicable alternative test method approvals from the EPA's Web site at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/emc/tmethods.html#CatB .

2. Background

   Broadly applicable alternative test method approval decisions that we have made in the past under the New Source Performance Standards (NSPS), 40 CFR part 60 and the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP), 40 CFR parts 61 and 63 are identified in this notice (see Table 1). Most of our prior alternative test method approvals have been on a facility-specific basis, but we plan to issue more broad (i.e., source category-wide) alternative test method approvals in the future, and we will post these broadly applicable approvals on our technology transfer network Web site. We will also announce them in the Federal Register. Source owners or operators may voluntarily choose to use these broadly applicable alternative test methods. Use of these alternatives does not change the applicable emission standards.

   Table 1.--Approved Alternative Test Methods and Modifications to Test Methods Under Appendices A or B in 40 CFR Parts 60, 61, and 63

   We are announcing alternative As an alternative or number

   modification to . . .

   For . . .

   You may . . .

   Alt-001............................ Method 7, Determination Sources required to use Measure NOX emissions of Nitrogen Oxide

   Method 7 or 7A and

   when the SO2 Emissions from

   which have

   concentration is Stationary Sources and concentrations of SO2 greater than 2100 ppm Method 7A,

   greater than 2100 ppm. by either increasing Determination of

   the absorbing solution Nitrogen Oxide

   concentration or by Emissions from

   using Method 7E, 40 Stationary Sources--Ion

   CFR, part 60, appendix Chromatographic Method.

   1. Alt-002............................ Methods 10 and 10B, Sources required to use Determine carbon Determination of Carbon Methods 10, 10A, or 10B monoxide (CO) Monoxide Emissions from in certifying

      emissions using gas Stationary Sources and continuous emission tanks instead of Method 10A,

      monitoring systems at Tedlar bags. Determination of Carbon petroleum refineries. Monoxide Emissions. Alt-005............................ Method 5, Determination Sources required to use Use Teflon bags in lieu of Particulate

      Method 5.

      of glass weighing Emissions from

      dishes. Stationary Sources. Alt-006............................ Method 12, Determination Sources required to use Use Inductively Coupled of Inorganic Lead

      Method 12.

      Plasma--Atomic Emissions from

      Emission Spectrometry Stationary Sources.

      (ICP-AES) to analyze samples. Alt-006............................ Method 101A,

      Sources required to use Use Inductively Coupled Determination of

      Method 101A.

      Plasma--Atomic Particulate and Gaseous

      Emission Spectrometry Mercury Emissions from

      (ICP-AES) to analyze Sewage Sludge

      samples. Incinerators. Alt-006............................ Method 104,

      Sources required to use Use Inductively Coupled Determination of

      Method 104.

      Plasma--Atomic Beryllium Emissions

      Emission Spectrometry from Stationary Sources.

      (ICP-AES) to analyze samples. Alt-006............................ Method 108A, 40 CFR part Sources required to use Use Inductively Coupled 61, appendix B,

      Method 108A.

      Plasma--Atomic Determination of

      Emission Spectrometry Arsenic Content in Ore

      (ICP-AES) to analyze Samples from Nonferrous

      samples. Smelters. Alt-008............................ Method 6, Determination Sources required to use Measure stack gas of Sulfur Dioxide

      Method 6.

      moisture for Emissions from

      correction of Stationary Sources.

      pollutant concentration and flow rate. Alt-010............................ Method 11, Determination Sources required to use Measure hydrogen of Hydrogen Sulfide Method 11.

      sulfide using Method Content of Fuel Gas

      15 or 16 (40 CFR part Streams in Petroleum

      60, appendix A) in Refineries.

      lieu of Method 11. Alt-011............................ Method 2, Determination Sources required to use Check the thermocouple of Stack Gas Velocity Method 2.

      calibration at a and Volumetric Flow

      single point in lieu Rate (Type S Pitot

      of two points. Tube). Alt-012............................ Method 5H, Determination Sources required to use Measure particulate of Particulate

      Method 5H.

      emissions from a Emissions from Wood

      woodstove stack one Heaters from a Stack

      foot or less in Location.

      diameter with gas flow between 5 and 15 feet per second, or from stacks or ducts where there is no stratification of the tracer gas.

      [[Page 4259]]

      Alt-014............................ Methods 306 and 306A, Sources required to use Omit the filtering of Determination of

      Methods 306 and 306A. Sample Container No. 1 Chromium Emissions from

      when there is no Decorative and Hard

      observable sediment in Chromium Electroplating

      the impinger liquid and Anodizing

      when sampling at Operations.

      electroplating and anodizing operations. Alt-016............................ Method 14, Determination Sources required to use Use scintillation of Fluoride Emissions Methods 14 and 14A. anemometers in lieu of from Potroom Roof

      propeller anemometers Monitors for Primary

      to determine effluent Aluminum Plants; Method

      velocity from potroom 14A, Determination of

      roofs. Total Fluoride Emissions from Selected Sources at Primary Aluminum Production Facilities. Alt-017............................ Method 18, Measurement Sources required to use Use direct interface of Gaseous Organic

      Method 18 or Method 106 gas chromatography/ Compound Emissions by under the subparts of mass spectrometry (GC/ Gas Chromatography, 40 CFR parts 60, 61, MS) in lieu of GC with Method 106,

      and 63 specified in Alt- limitations specified. Determination of Vinyl 017. Chloride from Stationary Sources. Alt-018............................ Method 9, Visual

      Sources with multiple Allow a single visible Determination of the emission points subject emission observer to Opacity of Emissions to visible emissions conduct up to three from Stationary Sources. observations under 40 visible emissions CFR part 60, subpart observations from LL, Standards of

      fugitive, stack, or Performance for

      vent emission points Metallic Mineral

      simultaneously. Processing Plants and subpart 000, Standards of Performance for Nonmetallic Mineral Processing Plants. Alt-019............................ Method 24, Determination Entities using Method 24 Use ASTM D6053-96 in of Volatile Matter

      for analysis of

      lieu of Method 24 to Content, Water Content, electrical insulating determine the VOC Density, Volume Solids, varnishes.

      content in electrical and Weight Solids of

      insulating varnishes. Surface Coatings. Alt-020............................ Method 204 of 40 CFR Bakery ovens required to Use the alternative part 51, appendix M, use Method 204.

      procedure entitled Criteria for and

      ``Negative Pressure Verification of a

      Enclosure Qualitative Permanent or Temporary

      Test Method for Bakery Total Enclosure.

      Ovens'' to determine capture efficiency. Alt-021............................ Method 25A,

      Marine tank vessel

      Determine the total Determination of Total loading operations. gaseous organic Gaseous Organic

      concentration using Concentration Using a

      Method 25B in lieu of Flame Ionization

      Method 25A. Analyzer. Alt-022............................ Method 25C,

      Sources required to use Drill the sample probe Determination of

      Method 25C.

      in one step without Nonmethane Organic

      backfilling. Compounds (NMOC) in MSW Landfill Gases. Alt-023............................ Method 25C,

      Sources required to use Use teflon lines Determination of

      Method 25C.

      instead of stainless- Nonmethane Organic

      steel liners; use leak Compounds (NMOC) in MSW

      tight teflon tubing as Landfill Gases.

      a sampling line; use non-perforated probes if they meet the gas gap equivalent; use composite samples from different sample probes in a single vessel; use a hand- driven pump and bag setup for the probe purge. Alt-024............................ Method 25E,

      Sources required to use Use 40ml VOA vials as Determination of Vapor Method 25E.

      alternative sampling Phase Organic

      vessels. Concentration in Waste Samples. Alt-025............................ Test methods,

      Sources required to use Use the Method 205 gas performance

      multiple calibration dilution system in specifications, and gas test methods.

      lieu of using multiple quality assurance

      calibration gases. requirements that require the use of multiple calibration gases. Alt-026............................ Method 18, Measurement Sources subject to 40 Use Method 316 to of Gaseous Organic

      CFR, part 60, subpart measure formaldehyde Compound Emissions by III, Standards of

      emissions in lieu of Gas Chromatography. Performance for VOC Method 18. Emissions From the Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry Air Oxidation Unit Processes.

      [[Page 4260]]

      Alt-027............................ Method 18, Measurement Sources subject to 40 Use Method 316 to of Gaseous Organic

      CFR, part 63, subpart measure formaldehyde Compound Emissions by F, National Emission emissions in lieu of Gas Chromatography. Standards for Organic Method 18. Hazardous Air Pollutants from the Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry and 40 CFR part 63, subpart G, National Emission Standards for Organic Hazardous Air Pollutants from the Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry for Process Vents, Storage Vessels, Transfer Operations, and Wastewater. Alt-028............................ Test procedures in 40 Ethylene oxide

      Use CARB Method 431 in CFR Sec. 63.365

      sterilizers subject to lieu of procedures (including Method 18, 40 CFR part 63, subpart (including Method 18) Measurement of Gaseous O, Ethylene Oxide

      in 40 CFR Sec. Organic Compound

      Emissions Standards 63.365. Emissions by Gas

      from Sterilization Chromatography).

      Facilities. Alt-029............................ Method 308, Procedure Pulp and paper mills Use NCASI Chilled Water/ for Determination of required to use Method Impinger/Silica Gel Methanol Emissions from 308 under 40 CFR part Tube Test Method in Stationary Sources. 63.

      lieu of Method 308 Alt-030............................ Method 306,

      Sources subject to 40 Use SCAQMD Method 205.1 Determination of

      CFR part 63, subpart N, in lieu of Method 306. Chromium Emissions from National Emission Decorative and Hard Standards for Chromium Chromium Electroplating Emissions from Hard and and Chromium Anodizing Decorative Chromium Operations--Isokinetic Electroplating and Method.

      Chromium Anodizing Tanks. Alt-031............................ Method 2, Determination Sources required to use Use Method 2G (three- of Stack Gas Velocity Method 2 under 40 CFR dimensional probe), and Volumetric Flow parts 60, 61, or 63. Method 2F (two- Rate (Type S Pitot

      dimensional probe), or Tube).

      Method 2H (taking into account velocity decay near stack wall) in lieu of Method 2, as appropriate.

      Alternative test methods and procedures are necessary for various reasons. In some cases, there are inherent restrictions in test methods which warrant a deviation from a specific requirement in the method. For example, the sampling equipment specified in Method 5 is not appropriate at stack temperatures greater than 1200 degrees Fahrenheit, and in such cases, water-cooled probes are necessary. As another example, it is problematic to measure volatile organic compounds (VOCs) at concentrations below 50 parts per million (ppm) using Method 25 (40 CFR part 60, appendix A), so other methods (notably Method 25A) have been approved for this situation. Also, new and improved testing techniques are developed over time. As pollution controls improve and emissions decrease, it may be necessary or desirable to utilize newer methods with advantages such as lower detection limits.

      The EPA Administrator has the authority to approve the use of alternative test methods to comply with requirements under 40 CFR parts 60, 61, and 63. This authority is found in Sec. Sec. 60.8(b)(3), 61.13(h)(1)(ii), and 63.7(e)(2)(ii). In 40 CFR part 63, Sec. 63.2, test method is defined as ``the validated procedure for sampling, preparing, and analyzing for an air pollutant specified in a relevant standard as the performance test procedure. The test method may include methods described in an appendix of this chapter, test methods incorporated by reference in this part, or methods validated for an application through procedures in Method 301 of appendix A of this part.'' The term ``reference method'' is used in 40 CFR parts 60 and 61 instead of the term ``test method.'' In 40 CFR part 60, reference method means ``any method of sampling and analyzing for an air pollutant as specified in the applicable subpart.'' The definition in 40 CFR part 61 is similar. For simplicity, we use the term ``test method'' in this notice to refer to both ``test methods'' under 40 CFR part 63 and ``reference methods'' under 40 CFR parts 60 and 61. Citations and definitions in all three of these parts refer to the use of alternatives to test (or reference) methods. Under 40 CFR part 60, alternative method means ``any method of sampling and analyzing for an air pollutant which is not a reference or equivalent method but which has been demonstrated to the EPA Administrator's satisfaction to, in specific cases, produce results adequate for his determination of compliance.'' Again, 40 CFR part 61 contains a similar definition. 40 CFR part 63 defines alternative test method as ``any method of sampling and analyzing for an air pollutant that is not a test method in this chapter and that has been demonstrated to the EPA Administrator's satisfaction, using Method 301 in appendix A of this part, to produce results adequate for the EPA Administrator's determination that it may be used in place of a test method specified in this part.''

      Over the years, we have performed thorough technical reviews of numerous requests for alternatives and modifications to test methods and procedures. Based on these experiences, we have found that often, these changes or alternatives would be equally valid and appropriate to apply to other sources within a particular class, category, or subcategory. Consequently, we have concluded that where a method modification or a change or alternative is clearly broadly applicable to a class, category, or subcategory of sources, it is both more equitable and efficient to approve its use for all appropriate sources and situations at the same time.

      [[Page 4261]]

      This approach would not change the practical outcome of whether any specific request would or would not be approved. However, approving broadly applicable alternative test methods would expedite the approval process, provide additional flexibility for the regulated community, and reduce the burden on source owners and operators, the permitting authorities, and the EPA Administrator. Where technically appropriate, we will continue, as always, to approve the use of an alternative test method or modification to a test method for a specific source only. It is important to clarify that alternative methods are not mandatory but permissible. That is, no source is required to employ such a method but may choose to do so in appropriate cases. By electing to use an alternative method, the source owner or operator consents to thereafter demonstrating compliance with applicable requirements based on the results of the alternative method until approved to do otherwise.

      If you are aware of reasons why a particular alternative test method approval that we issue should not be broadly applicable, we request that you make us aware of the reasons within 60 days of the Federal Register notice announcing the broad approval, and we will revisit the broad approval. Approvals for broadly applicable alternative test methods will be announced on our technology transfer network Web site http://www.epa.gov/ttn/emc/tmethods.html#CatB soon

      after they are issued, as well as through periodic notices of this kind. Likewise, any objection to a broadly applicable alternative test method as well as the resolution to that objection will be posted on the same Web site and announced in the subsequent Federal Register notice. If we should decide to retract a broadly applicable alternative test method, we would continue to grant case-by-case approvals, as appropriate, and would (and States should) consider the need for an appropriate transition period for users either to request case-by-case approval or to transition to an approved method.

      Section 63.90(a) of 40 CFR part 63 defines three categories of alternatives or changes to test methods: minor changes, intermediate changes, and major changes. A major change to a test method includes modifications using ``unproven technology or procedures'' (those not generally accepted by the scientific community), entirely new methods, or changes that apply to a category or subcategory of affected sources. Such changes will almost always set a national precedent. Under 40 CFR part 63, Sec. 63.91(g), a State may ask EPA to delegate the authority to approve minor and intermediate, but not major alternatives to test methods. The Agency's policy has been to retain the authority to approve major changes to test methods at the national level to assure uniformity and technical quality in the test methods used for enforcement of national standards. Likewise, broad approvals to alternative test methods would be made only at the national level or as part of a revision to a State or Tribal implementation plan.

   1. Criteria for Approval of Alternative Methods

      The definitions of ``alternative method'' in 40 CFR parts 60 and 61 and ``alternative test method'' in 40 CFR part 63, establish the principal criterion for approval of an alternative test method: The EPA Administrator or his authorized representative must be satisfied that the test method alternative will produce results adequate to determine compliance. In other words, the EPA Administrator or authorized representative, such as a State having delegated authority, generally must be assured that a test method change provides a determination of compliance status at the same or greater stringency as the test method specified in the applicable regulation.

      The General Provisions to 40 CFR part 63 provide a number of specifications regarding the content and process for alternative test method requests. In particular, Sec. 63.7(f)(2)(i) stipulates that the source owner or operator must notify the EPA Administrator of the intent to use an alternative test method at least 60 days before the performance test is scheduled. Section 63.7(f)(2) clarifies that a written application is required for approval of an alternative test method and specifies that the submittal to the EPA Administrator must include the results of the Method 301 validation process as well as justification for not using the test method specified in the applicable subpart. The 40 CFR parts 60 and 61 General Provisions are less specific. Nevertheless, based on our experience in responding to hundreds of alternative test method requests over the last 30 years, we ask that alternative test method requests include the applicable Federal regulation and test method, a description of the process and controls to which the alternative method will be applied, a description of the alternative testing procedures as well as the justification for use of the alternative and Method 301 validation data required under 40 CFR part 63.

   2. Procedures for Submission and Review of Alternative Methods

      Considering that the different levels of alternatives or changes to test methods (minor, intermediate, and major) may be acted on by differing levels of government (e.g., State, local, and Tribal agencies; EPA Regional Offices; or EPA Headquarters), we recommend that the owner/operator of an affected source consult with the responsible agency to determine how and to whom a request for a particular request for an alternative method should be submitted. Review processes may vary depending on the agency involved. The process described here is typical of how EPA Headquarters might handle a request for an alternative test method. Upon our receipt of a written request, the request is recorded in our tracking system. Within a few days of receipt of the request, a technical expert determines whether or not the request is complete (i.e., contains sufficient supporting data and information). The technical expert then acknowledges receipt of the request and notifies the requester that we are evaluating the request. The reviewer evaluates the request and supporting information to confirm that the proposed alternative is justified, technically sound, and that it will produce results adequate to determine compliance with the emission standards. The reviewer analyzes all necessary information to check the accuracy and repeatability of the alternative method. As previously noted, Sec. 63.7(f)(2)(iii) of 40 CFR part 63 specifies that the results of a Method 301 validation and justification for not using the specified method must accompany a request for approval to use an alternative test method. Method 301, Validation of Pollutant Measurement Methods from Various Waste Media includes procedures for determining and documenting the systematic error (i.e., bias) and random error (i.e., precision) of a measurement system. The procedures involve introducing known concentrations of an analyte or comparing the test method against a validated test method to determine the method's bias and collecting multiple or co-located simultaneous samples to determine the method's precision. Method 301 validation testing or data in a form responsive to Sec. 12 of Method 301 should also accompany requests for major changes to test methods under parts 60 and 61. During the review process, all relevant documents (e-mails, letters, and other supporting materials) are retained and filed. Once the review process has been completed, we issue an official letter providing

      [[Page 4262]]

      written notification of approval/disapproval of the alternative test method request under Sec. 63.7(f)(3), Sec. 60.8(b), or Sec. 61.13(h)(1).

   3. Recording and Publication

      As noted earlier, approvals for broadly applicable alternative test methods will be announced on the EPA's Web site at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/emc/tmethods.html#CatB as soon as they are issued. The notification

      on our Technology Transfer Network (TTN) Web site will clearly indicate each class, category, or subcategory of sources for which the change or alternative test method is approved. We intend to publish a notice annually that summarizes approvals for broadly applicable alternative test methods.

      Table 1 in this notice includes a summary of broad approvals that have been posted to the TTN. Complete copies of these documents may be obtained at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/emc/tmethods.html#CatB.

      Dated: January 19, 2007. Jenny Noonan Edmonds, Acting Director, Office of Air Quality Planning, and Standards.

      [FR Doc. E7-1338 Filed 1-29-07; 8:45 am]

      BILLING CODE 6560-50-P