Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans: Tennessee; Approval of Revisions to the Nashville/Davidson County Portion

Federal Register: August 18, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 160)

Rules and Regulations

Page 48127-48130

From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]

DOCID:fr18au08-5

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52

EPA-R04-OAR-2008-0051-200805(a); FRL-8705-3

Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;

Tennessee; Approval of Revisions to the Nashville/Davidson County

Portion

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Direct final rule.

SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final action to approve a revision to the

State Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by the State of Tennessee on

October 19, 2007. The revision affects the Nashville/Davidson County portion of the Tennessee SIP. Specifically, the revision pertains to the Metropolitan Public Health Department, Pollution Control Division's

Regulation Number 8, ``Inspection and Maintenance of Light-Duty Motor

Vehicles.'' The revision is part of Nashville/Davidson County's strategy to meet the requirements of EPA's 1997 8-hour ozone standard.

Regulation Number 8 is amended by reducing the vehicle emission inspection fee to $9.00 and updating the definitions section. This revision is considered by the Tennessee Department of Environment and

Conservation (TDEC), to be at least as stringent as the State of

Tennessee's

Page 48128

preexisting requirements. This action is being taken pursuant to section 110 of the Clean Air Act (CAA).

DATES: This direct final rule is effective October 17, 2008 without further notice, unless EPA receives adverse comment by September 17, 2008. If EPA receives such comments, it will publish a timely withdrawal of the direct final rule in the Federal Register and inform the public that the rule will not take effect.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R04-

OAR-2008-0051, by one of the following methods: 1. www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments. 2. E-mail: hou.james@epa.gov. 3. Fax: (404) 562-9019. 4. Mail: ``EPA-R04-OAR-2008-0051,'' Regulatory Development Section,

Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division,

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW.,

Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. 5. Hand Delivery or Courier: Mr. James Hou, Regulatory Development

Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management

Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth

Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. Such deliveries are only accepted during the Regional Office's normal hours of operation. The

Regional Office's official hours of business are Monday through Friday, 8:30 to 4:30, excluding federal holidays.

Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. ``EPA-R04-OAR- 2008-0051.'' EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in the public docket without change and may be made available online at www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be

Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit through www.regulations.gov or e-mail information that you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected. The www.regulations.gov Web site is an

``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without going through www.regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses. For additional information about EPA's public docket visit the EPA Docket Center home page at http://www.epa.gov/ epahome/dockets.htm.

Docket: All documents in the electronic docket are listed in the www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically in www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Regulatory Development Section, Air Planning

Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW.,

Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. EPA requests that if at all possible, you contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to schedule your inspection. The Regional Office's official hours of business are Monday through Friday, 8:30 to 4:30, excluding federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. James Hou, Regulatory Development

Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management

Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth

Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. The telephone number is (404) 562-8965. Mr. Hou can also be reached via electronic mail at hou.james@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

1. Analysis of Submittal

   On October 19, 2007, the State of Tennessee submitted a revision to the Nashville/Davidson County portion of the Tennessee SIP, which included a revision to the Metropolitan Public Health Department,

   Pollution Control Division's Regulation Number 8, ``Inspection and

   Maintenance of Light-Duty Motor Vehicles.'' This revision was promulgated by the Davidson County Metropolitan Health Department, which is the local agency overseeing implementation of air pollution control regulations for Davidson County, including Early Action Compact

   (EAC) related obligations. The SIP revision currently at issue amends

   Regulation Number 8 by reducing the emissions inspection fee for light- duty motor vehicles from $10.00 to $9.00 per inspection. The revision also updates the ``Definitions'' section by clarifying the definition of `Carbon Monoxide,' adding the term `Catalytic Converter,' and clarifying the definition of `Heavy-Duty Motor Vehicle.' Specifically, the definitions will be changed to the following:

   Carbon Monoxide--means a compound consisting of the chemical formula (CO).

   Catalytic Converter--means a pollution control device containing a catalyst for converting automobile exhaust into mostly harmless products.

   Heavy-Duty Motor Vehicle--means any motor vehicle having a combined manufacturer vehicle and maximum loading rate (GVWR) to be carried thereon in excess of 10,500 pounds (4773 kilograms or more).

   The above revision is consistent with the EAC Protocol \1\ and is considered by the State of Tennessee to be at least as stringent as preexisting requirements under the SIP.

   \1\ The EAC Protocol can be found at http://www.epa.gov/air/eac/

   .

2. Final Action

   EPA has reviewed the submittal and determined that is consistent with the requirements of the CAA and EPA's Policy. Therefore, EPA is approving the aforementioned change to the SIP. EPA is publishing this rule without prior proposal because the Agency views this as a noncontroversial submittal and anticipates no adverse comments.

   However, in the proposed rules section of this Federal Register publication, EPA is publishing a separate document that will serve as the proposal to approve the SIP revision should adverse comments be filed. This rule will be effective October 17, 2008 without further notice unless the Agency receives adverse comments by September 17, 2008.

   If EPA receives such comments, then EPA will publish a document withdrawing the final rule and informing the public that the rule will not take effect. All public comments received will then be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second comment period. Parties interested in commenting should do so at this time. If no such comments are

   Page 48129

   received, the public is advised that this rule will be effective on

   October 17, 2008 and no further action will be taken on the proposed rule.

3. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

   Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable

   Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:

   Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);

   Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);

   Is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory

   Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);

   Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded

   Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);

   Does not have Federalism implications as specified in

   Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);

   Is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);

   Is not a significant regulatory action subject to

   Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);

   Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the

   National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of voluntary consensus standards would be inconsistent with the CAA; and

   Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under

   Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).

   In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.

   The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the

   Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the

   United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of

   Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal

   Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).

   Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by October 17, 2008. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See, section 307(b)(2).)

   List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

   Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,

   Catalytic converter, Heavy-duty motor vehicles, Incorporation by reference, Motor vehicle inspection fee, Ozone.

   Dated: July 30, 2008.

   Russell L. Wright, Jr.,

   Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4. 0 40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:

   PART 52--[AMENDED] 0 1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

   Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

   Subpart (RR)--(Tennessee) 0 2. Section 52.2220(c) Table 5 is amended by revising the entry for

   ``Regulation No. 8'' to read as follows:

   Sec. 52.2220 Identification of plan.

   * * * * *

   (c) * * *

   Table 5--EPA Approved Nashville-Davidson, Regulations

   State

   State citation

   Title/subject

   effective date EPA approval date

   Explanation

   * * * * * * *

   Regulation No. 8............... Regulation of Emissions

   10/10/2007 8/18/08 [Insert

   .................. from Light-Duty Motor

   citation of

   Vehicles Through

   publication].

   Mandatory Vehicle

   Inspection and

   Maintenance Program.

   * * * * * * *

   Page 48130

   * * * * *

   FR Doc. E8-18968 Filed 8-15-08; 8:45 am

   BILLING CODE 6560-50-P