Technical Amendments to List of User Fee Airports: Additions Of Capital City Airport, Lansing, MI, and Kelly Field Annex, San Antonio, TX

Federal Register: June 23, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 121)

Rules and Regulations

Page 35339-35340

From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]

DOCID:fr23jn08-2

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Bureau of Customs and Border Protection 19 CFR Part 122

CBP Dec. 08-23

List of User Fee Airports: Additions of Capital City Airport,

Lansing, MI and Kelly Field Annex, San Antonio, TX

AGENCY: Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security.

ACTION: Final rule; technical amendments.

SUMMARY: This document amends the Customs and Border Protection (CBP)

Regulations by revising the list of user fee airports to reflect the recent user fee airport designations for Capital City Airport in

Lansing, Michigan, and Kelly Field Annex in San Antonio, Texas. User fee airports are those airports which, while not qualifying for designation as international or landing rights airports, have been approved by the Commissioner of CBP to receive, for a fee, the services of CBP officers for the processing of aircraft entering the United

States, and the passengers and cargo of those aircraft.

DATES: Effective Date: June 23, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Captain, Office of Field

Operations, 703-261-8516.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

Title 19, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), sets forth at Part 122 regulations relating to the entry and clearance of aircraft in international commerce and the transportation of persons and cargo by aircraft in international commerce.

Generally, a civil aircraft arriving from a place outside of the

United States is required to land at an airport designated as an international airport. Alternatively, the pilot of a civil aircraft may request permission to land at a specific airport, and, if landing rights are granted, the civil aircraft may land at that landing rights airport.

Section 236 of Public Law 98-573 (the Trade and Tariff Act of 1984), codified at 19 U.S.C. 58b, created an option for civil aircraft desiring to land at an airport other than an international airport or a landing rights airport. A civil aircraft arriving from a place outside of the United States may ask for permission to land at an airport designated by the Secretary of Homeland Security \1\ as a user fee airport.

\1\ Sections 403(1) and 411 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002

(``the Act,'' Pub. L. 107-296) transferred the United States Customs

Service and its functions from the Department of the Treasury to the

Department of Homeland Security; pursuant to section 1502 of the

Act, the President renamed the ``Customs Service'' as the ``Bureau of Customs and Border Protection.'' Effective on March 31, 2007, DHS changed the name of ``Bureau of Customs and Border Protection'' to

``U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP)'' (See 72 FR 20131, April 23, 2007).

Pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 58b, an airport may be designated as a user fee airport if the Commissioner of CBP as delegated by the Secretary of

Homeland Security determines that the volume of business at the airport is insufficient to justify customs services at the airport and the governor of the state in which the airport is located approves the designation. Generally, the type of airport that would seek designation as a user fee airport would be one at which a company, such as an air courier service, has a specialized interest in regularly landing.

As the volume of business anticipated at this type of airport is insufficient to justify its designation as an international or landing rights airport, the availability of customs services is not paid for out of appropriations from the general treasury of the United States.

Instead, customs services are provided on a fully reimbursable basis to be paid for by the user fee airport on behalf of the recipients of the services.

The fees which are to be charged at user fee airports, according to the statute, shall be paid by each person using the customs services at the airport and shall be in the amount equal to the expenses incurred by the Commissioner of CBP in providing customs services which are rendered to such person at such airport, including the salary and expenses of those employed by the Commissioner of CBP to provide the customs services. To implement this provision, generally, the airport seeking the designation as a user fee airport or that airport's authority agrees to pay a flat fee for which the users of the airport are to reimburse the airport/airport authority. The airport/airport authority agrees to set and periodically review the charges to ensure that they are in accord with the airport's expenses.

The Commissioner of CBP designates airports as user fee airports pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 58b. See 19 CFR 122.15. If the Commissioner decides that the conditions for designation as a user fee airport are satisfied, a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) is executed between the

Commissioner of CBP and the local responsible official signing on behalf of the state, city or municipality in which the airport is located. In this manner, user fee airports are designated on a case-by- case basis. Section 19 CFR 122.15 sets forth the grounds for withdrawal of a user fee designation and sets forth the list of designated user fee airports. Periodically, CBP updates the list of user fee airports at 19 CFR 122.15(b) to reflect those that have been currently designated by the Commissioner. This document updates that list of user fee airports by adding Capital City Airport, in Lansing, Michigan, and

Kelly Field Annex, in San Antonio, Texas, to the list. On January 22, 2008, and February 8, 2008, respectively, the Commissioner signed MOA's approving the designation of user fee status for Capital City Airport and Kelly Field Annex.

Inapplicability of Public Notice and Delayed Effective Date

Requirements

Because these amendments merely update the list of user fee airports to include airports already designated by the Commissioner of

CBP in accordance with 19 U.S.C. 58b and neither impose additional burdens on, nor take away any existing rights or privileges from, the public, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), notice and public procedure are unnecessary, and for the same reasons, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), a delayed effective date is not required.

The Regulatory Flexibility Act and Executive Order 12866

Because no notice of proposed rulemaking is required, the provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) do not apply. These amendments do not meet the criteria for a

``significant regulatory action'' as specified in Executive Order 12866.

Signing Authority

This document is limited to technical corrections of CBP regulations. Accordingly, it is being signed under the authority of 19

CFR 0.1(b).

List of Subjects in 19 CFR Part 122

Air carriers, Aircraft, Airports, Customs duties and inspection,

Freight.

Amendments to Regulations 0

Part 122, Code of Federal Regulations (19 CFR part 122) is amended as set forth below:

Page 35340

PART 122--AIR COMMERCE REGULATIONS 0 1. The authority citation for part 122 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 19 U.S.C. 58b, 66, 1431, 1433, 1436, 1448, 1459, 1590, 1594, 1623, 1624, 1644, 1644a, 2071 note.

Sec. 122.15 [Amended] 0 2. The listing of user fee airports in Sec. 122.15(b) is amended as follows: by adding, in alphabetical order, in the ``Location'' column

``Lansing, Michigan'' and by adding on the same line, in the ``Name'' column, ``Capital City Airport''; by adding, in alphabetical order, in the ``Location'' column ``San Antonio, Texas'' and by adding on the same line, in the ``Name'' column ``Kelly Field Annex.''

Dated: June 18, 2008.

Jayson P. Ahern,

Acting Commissioner, U.S. Customs and Border Protection.

FR Doc. E8-14125 Filed 6-20-08; 8:45 am

BILLING CODE 9111-14-P