Airworthiness directives: Boeing,
[Federal Register: January 13, 1999 (Volume 64, Number 8)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 2161-2164]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr13ja99-17]
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 98-NM-383-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 737 Series Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
SUMMARY: This document proposes the adoption of a new airworthiness directive (AD) that is applicable to all Boeing Model 737 series airplanes. This proposal would require repetitive displacement tests of the secondary slide in the dual concentric servo valve of the power control unit (PCU) for the rudder, and replacement of the valve assembly with a modified valve assembly, if necessary. This proposal is prompted by reports of cracking found in PCU secondary servo valve slides. The actions specified by the proposed AD are intended to prevent failure of the secondary slide and consequent rudder hardover and reduced controllability of the airplane.
DATES: Comments must be received by February 12, 1999.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments in triplicate to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, ANM-114, Attention: Rules Docket No. 98-NM-383-AD, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98055-4056. Comments may be inspected at this location between 9:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
The service information referenced in the proposed rule may be obtained from Boeing Commercial Airplane Group, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207. This information may be examined at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: R.C. Jones, Aerospace Engineer, Systems and Equipment Branch, ANM-130S, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98055-4056; telephone (425) 227-1118; fax (425) 227-1181.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
Interested persons are invited to participate in the making of the proposed rule by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as they may desire. Communications shall identify the Rules Docket number and be submitted in triplicate to the address specified above. All communications received on or before the closing date for comments, specified above, will be considered before taking action on the proposed rule. The proposals contained in this notice may be changed in light of the comments received.
Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory, economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed rule. All comments submitted will be available, both before and after the closing date for comments, in the Rules Docket for examination by interested persons. A report summarizing each FAA-public contact concerned with the substance of this proposal will be filedin the Rules Docket.
[[Page 2162]]
Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments submitted in response to this notice must submit a self-addressed, stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments to Docket Number 98-NM-383-AD.'' The postcard will be date stamped and returned to the commenter.
Availability of NPRMs
Any person may obtain a copy of this NPRM by submitting a request to the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, ANM-114, Attention: Rules Docket No. 98-NM-383-AD, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98055-4056.
Discussion
The FAA has received reports of cracking found on Boeing Model 737 series airplanes on one of the two legs of the clevis of the secondary slide, which is a component of the dual servo valve in the power control unit (PCU) of the rudder. Most of the cracks were found during the manufacturing process by the PCU supplier. However, some of the cracks were found on servo valve assemblies by operators; those assemblies had not yet been installed in PCU's. Test results have indicated that a crack in one leg of the secondary slide is not in itself an unsafe condition. However, a crack in the other leg of that same slide could cause the slide to break apart and allow a loose part to jam both the primary and secondary slides within the valve assembly. This condition, if not corrected, could result in rudder hardover and reduced controllability of the airplane.
Other Relevant Rulemaking
Related AD 97-14-04, amendment 39-10061 (62 FR 35068, June 30, 1997), applicable to all Boeing Model 737-100, -200, -300, -400, and - 500 series airplanes, requires the following actions:
‹bullet› Tests of the main rudder PCU to detect excessive internal leakage of hydraulic fluid, stalling, or reversal, and to verify proper operation of the PCU;
‹bullet› Replacement of the PCU with a unit having a different part number, if necessary (the new PCU incorporates a redesigned valve assembly);
‹bullet› Replacement of the PCU and the vernier control rod bolts with newly designed units; and
‹bullet› Leak tests of the PCU, and replacement of the PCU with a serviceable or newly designed unit, if necessary.
Explanation of Relevant Service Information
The FAA has reviewed and approved a draft of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-27A1221, dated January 14, 1999 (for Boeing Model 737-100, -200, -300, -400, and -500 series airplanes); and a draft of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-27A1222, dated January 14, 1999 (for Boeing Model 737-600, -700, and -800 series airplanes). [Although these alert service bulletins will not be published until after this proposed AD has been issued, they are not expected to be substantively different from the drafts that have been approved. Copies of these drafts have been placed in the rulemaking docket.] These draft alert service bulletins describe procedures for a displacement test of the secondary slide in the dual concentric servo valve of the rudder PCU, criteria for passing the test, and procedures for replacement of any discrepant valve assembly with one having a slide that passes the displacement test. Accomplishment of the actions specified in the draft alert service bulletins is intended to adequately address the identified unsafe condition.
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-27A1222 refers to Parker Service Bulletin 381500-27-01, dated December 22, 1998, as an additional source of service information for accomplishment of the displacement test for Model 737-600, -700, -800, and -900 series airplanes.
Explanation of Requirements of Proposed Rule
Since an unsafe condition has been identified that is likely to exist or develop on other products of this same type design, the proposed AD would require accomplishment of the actions specified in the draft alert service bulletins described previously, except as discussed in the ``Differences Between Proposed Rule and Draft Alert Service Bulletins'' section of this proposed AD. The proposed AD also would require that operators report results of inspection findings to the FAA and submit failed valve assemblies to Parker Hannifin Corporation (the PCU manufacturer).
Interim Action
This is considered to be interim action until final action is identified, at which time the FAA may consider further rulemaking.
Differences Between Proposed Rule and Draft Alert Service Bulletins
Operators should note that, while the draft alert service bulletins do not recommend that the displacement test be repeated, the FAA has determined that the proposed AD should be considered interim action until the root cause of the cracking can be determined or a final action identified. As a result, the proposed AD would require accomplishment of the displacement test at regular intervals.
In addition, while this proposed AD is applicable to all Boeing Model 737 series airplanes, the effectivity of the alert service bulletins is limited to airplanes with certain line numbers. Because this proposed AD is interim action and a final action has not yet been identified to adequately address the identified unsafe condition, it will be necessary to repeat the displacement test on all Model 737 series airplanes, including airplanes that are produced subsequent to those with line numbers specified in the draft alert service bulletins.
Further, although draft Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-27A1221 specifies that the manufacturer may be contacted for disposition of certain corrective actions, this proposal would require those corrective actions to be accomplished in accordance with a method approved by the FAA.
Cost Impact
There are approximately 3,059 airplanes of the affected design in the worldwide fleet. The FAA estimates that 1,334 airplanes of U.S. registry would be affected by this proposed AD, that it would take approximately 1 work hour per airplane to accomplish the proposed displacement test, and that the average labor rate is $60 per work hour. Based on these figures, the cost impact of the proposed AD on U.S. operators is estimated to be $80,040, or $60 per airplane, per test cycle.
The cost impact figure discussed above is based on assumptions that no operator has yet accomplished any of the proposed requirements of this AD action, and that no operator would accomplish those actions in the future if this AD were not adopted.
The proposed test requires that the PCU be removed from the airplane. It would take approximately 9 work hours to remove and reinstall or replace the PCU. For Model 737-100, -200, -300, -400, and -500 series airplanes, concurrent accomplishment of this proposed AD and AD 97-14-04 would preclude the necessity to accomplish this replacement action twice, thereby offsetting the cost impact on operators.
Regulatory Impact
The regulations proposed herein would not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship
[[Page 2163]]
between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.Therefore, in accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this proposal would not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this proposed regulation (1) is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) if promulgated, will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. A copy of the draft regulatory evaluation prepared for this action is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained by contacting the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration proposes to amend part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
-
The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
-
Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new airworthiness directive:
Boeing: Docket 98-NM-383-AD.
Applicability: All Model 737 series airplanes, certificated in any category.
Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified, altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (e) of this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to address it.
Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished previously.
To prevent failure of the secondary servo valve slide in the rudder power control unit (PCU) due to cracking of the slide, and consequent rudder hardover and reduced controllability of the airplane, accomplish the following:
(a) Perform a displacement test of the secondary slide in the dual servo valve in the rudder PCU, in accordance with Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-27A1221, dated January 14, 1999 (for Model 737- 100, -200, -300, -400, and -500 series airplanes); or 737-27A1222, dated January 14, 1999 (for Model 737-600, -700, -800, and -900 series airplanes); at the applicable time specified by paragraph (a)(1), (a)(2), (a)(3), (a)(4), or (a)(5) of this AD. Repeat the displacement test on that PCU thereafter at intervals not to exceed 12,000 flight hours.
(1) For Model 737-100, -200, -300, -400, and -500 series airplanes on which the PCU replacement required by paragraph (d)(1) of AD 97-14-04, amendment 39-10061 (62 FR 35068, June 30, 1997), has been accomplished prior to the effective date of this AD: Conduct the displacement test within 4 months after the effective date of this AD.
(2) For Model 737-100, -200, -300, -400, and -500 series airplanes on which the PCU installation required by paragraph (d)(1) of AD 97-14-04 has not been accomplished prior to the effective date of this AD: Prior to installing the PCU required by AD 97-14-04, conduct the displacement test on that PCU as required by this paragraph of this AD.
(3) For airplanes equipped with a PCU having part number 65- 44861-12 and having serial number (S/N) 3509A or lower: Conduct the displacement test within 4 months after the effective date of this AD.
(4) For Model 737-600, -700, and -800 series airplanes having line numbers 1 through 222 inclusive: Conduct the displacement test within 4 months after the effective date of this AD.
(5) For all other airplanes: Conduct the displacement test prior to the accumulation of 12,000 flight hours on the PCU, or within 30 days after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later.
(b) If the results of the displacement test required by paragraph (a) of this AD are outside the limits specified by Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-27A1221, dated January 14, 1999 (for Model 737-100, -200, -300, -400, and -500 series airplanes), or 737- 27A1222, dated January 14, 1999 (for Model 737-600, -700, -800, and -900 series airplanes): Prior to further flight, accomplish the actions specified in paragraphs (b)(1) and (b)(2) of this AD.
(1) Replace the valve assembly, in accordance with the applicable alert service bulletin, with a serviceable valve assembly. And
(2) Following installation of the replacement valve assembly in accordance with paragraph (b)(1) of this AD, perform the displacement test required by paragraph (a) of this AD on that assembly, in accordance with the applicable alert service bulletin. If the test results are outside the limits specified by the applicable alert service bulletin, prior to further flight, perform corrective action in accordance with a method approved by the Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate.
Note 2: Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-27A1222 refers to Parker Service Bulletin 381500-27-01, dated December 22, 1998, as an additional source of service information for accomplishment of the displacement test for Model 737-600, -700, -800, and -900 series airplanes.
(c) As of the effective date of this AD, no person shall install on any airplane a main rudder PCU having serial number (S/N) 3509A or lower (for Model 737-100, -200, -300, -400, and -500 series airplanes) or S/N 0299 or lower (for Model 737-600, -700, -800, and -900 series airplanes) unless that PCU's nameplate has been vibro- engraved with the letter ``C'' following the serial number.
(d)(1) Within 10 days after accomplishing the displacement test required by paragraph (a) of this AD: Submit a report of inspection findings to the Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98055-4056; fax (425) 227-1181. The report must include the inspection results (both positive and negative findings), test data for any failed actuators, a description of any discrepancies found, the part number and serial number of each actuator tested, and the airplane serial number.
(2) Within 10 days after accomplishing the displacement test required by paragraph (a) of this AD: Submit failed valve assemblies for analysis to Parker Hannifin Corporation, Chief Engineer, Customer Support Operations, 16666 Von Karman Avenue, Irvine, California 92606.
(3) Information collection requirements contained in this regulation have been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) and have been assigned OMB Control Number 2120-0056.
(e) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be used if approved by the Manager, Seattle ACO. Operators shall submit their requests through an appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the Manager, Seattle ACO.
Note 3: Information concerning the existence of approved alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be obtained from the Seattle ACO.
(f) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
[[Page 2164]]
Issued in Renton, Washington, on January 6, 1999. John J. Hickey, Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 99-682Filed1-12-99; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
