Airworthiness Directives: Boeing Model 737-100, et al.

Federal Register: October 8, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 196)

Proposed Rules

Page 58906-58908

From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]

DOCID:fr08oc08-27

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 39

Docket No. FAA-2008-1070; Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-087-AD

RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 737-100, -200, -200C, - 300, -400, and -500 Series Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all

Boeing Model 737-100, -200, -200C, -300, -400, and -500 series airplanes. For all airplanes, this proposed AD would require repetitive overhaul of the retract actuator beam of the main landing gear (MLG).

For certain airplanes, this proposed AD would require repetitive inspections for damage of the retract actuator beam, and related investigative and corrective actions if necessary. This proposed AD results from reports of broken retract actuator beams of the MLG and the subsequent failure of the MLG to fully retract. We are proposing this AD to detect and correct broken retract actuator beams of the MLG, which could cause damage to the beam arm, hydraulic tubing, and flight control cables. Damage to the flight control cables could result in loss of control of the airplane.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by November 24, 2008.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:

Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.

Fax: 202-493-2251.

Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket

Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New

Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.

Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket

Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New

Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,

Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

For service information identified in this AD, contact Boeing

Commercial Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207.

Examining the AD Docket

You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http:// www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street address for the Docket Office (telephone 800-647-5527) is in the

ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nancy Marsh, Aerospace Engineer,

Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425) 917-6440; fax (425) 917-6590.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2008-1070;

Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-087-AD'' at the beginning of your comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend this proposed AD because of those comments.

We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http:// www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

We have received reports of broken retract actuator beams of the main landing gear (MLG) and the subsequent failure of the MLG to fully retract. In one incident, hydraulic system A became unserviceable. In another incident, the flightcrew declared an emergency and made an air turn-back. For all the reports of MLG retract actuator beams that broke in service, the MLG fell to the down-and-locked position, and landings were normal. Investigation revealed that proper procedures were not followed during overhaul, resulting in stress corrosion cracking initiating from small corrosion pits that were not entirely removed. In one incident, cracking initiated in an area of heat damage/burning caused by incorrect stylus cadmium plating. Broken retract actuator beams of the MLG, if not corrected, could cause damage to the beam arm, hydraulic tubing, and flight control cables. Damage to the flight control cables could result in loss of control of the airplane.

Relevant Service Information

We have reviewed Boeing Service Bulletin 737-32A1355, Revision 2, dated March 5, 2008. The service bulletin describes the procedures and compliance times specified in the following service information table.

Page 58907

Service Information

Applicability description

Actions

Compliance time

All airplanes.................... An overhaul of the beam is performed

Within 180 days after the date of and improved finishes are applied.

this service bulletin, or within 10

New fittings, bushings and bearings

years from the date of the most are installed. The lubrication

recent overhaul of the beam, passages must be cleared. The related whichever occurs later. Repeat investigative and corrective actions, interval is not to exceed 10 years if necessary, include a special

after the last overhaul. detailed inspection for corrosion pits or damage of the beam, and repair before further flight.

Group 1, Configuration 3

A general visual inspection (GVI) of

Within 2 years after the date of this airplanes with a MLG retract

the beam is performed for damage,

service bulletin. Repeat interval is actuator beam having part number finish degradation, and corrosion.

not to exceed 2 years after the last

(P/N) 65-46108-14 and previous

The related investigative and

inspection. dash numbers that have not

corrective actions, if necessary, incorporated the original issue, include a special detailed inspection

Revision 1, or Revision 2 of the for corrosion pits or damage of the service bulletin.

beam, and repair before further flight.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD

We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all relevant information and determined the unsafe condition described previously is likely to exist or develop in other products of the same type design.

This proposed AD would require accomplishing the actions specified in the service information described previously, except as discussed under

``Differences Between the Proposed AD and Service Information.''

Differences Between the Proposed AD and Service Information

Boeing Service Bulletin 737-32A1355, Revision 2, dated March 5, 2008, does not specify a compliance time for repairing the retract actuator beam if damage, finish degradation, or corrosion is found.

This proposed AD would require that those repairs be done before further flight after accomplishing the applicable inspections.

Boeing Service Bulletin 737-32A1355, Revision 2, dated March 5, 2008, specifies that the actions are for airplanes with new MLG retract actuator beams having P/N 65-46108-15 and subsequent dash numbers that have not been overhauled, and new or overhauled MLG retract actuator beams having P/N 65-46108-14 and previous dash numbers. However, MLG retract actuator beams which are not new or overhauled may also exhibit the identified unsafe condition. For this reason, this proposed AD is not limited to new or overhauled beams; the proposed AD would require that the actions be done on airplanes having any MLG retract actuator beam having one of those P/Ns. This correction will be included in the next revision of the service bulletin.

We have coordinated these differences with the manufacturer.

Costs of Compliance

We estimate that this proposed AD would affect 652 airplanes of

U.S. registry. The following table provides the estimated costs for

U.S. operators to comply with this proposed AD.

Estimated Costs

Number of U.S.-

Action/airplane group

Work hours

Average labor

Parts cost

Cost per product

registered

Fleet cost rate per hour

airplanes

Overhaul for Group 1; Configurations

64

$80 None.................... $5,120, per overhaul

652

$3,338,240 1, 2, and 3.

cycle.

Inspection for Group 1, Configuration

1

80 None.................... $80, per inspection

525

42,000 3.

cycle.

Authority for This Rulemaking

Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation

Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.

We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in

``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.

For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed regulation: 1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866, 2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979), and 3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

You can find our regulatory evaluation and the estimated costs of compliance in the AD Docket.

Page 58908

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the

Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES 1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec. 39.13 [Amended] 2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:

Boeing: Docket No. FAA-2008-1070; Directorate Identifier 2008-NM- 087-AD.

Comments Due Date

(a) We must receive comments by November 24, 2008.

Affected ADs

(b) None.

Applicability

(c) This AD applies to all Boeing Model 737-100, -200, -200C, - 300, -400, and -500 series airplanes, certificated in any category.

Unsafe Condition

(d) This AD results from reports of broken retract actuator beams of the main landing gear (MLG) and the subsequent failure of the MLG to fully retract. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct broken retract actuator beams of the MLG, which could result in damage to the beam arm, hydraulic tubing, and flight control cables. Damage to the flight control cables could result in loss of control of the airplane.

Compliance

(e) Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified, unless already done.

Inspection and Related Investigative and Corrective Actions/Overhaul

(f) Except as provided by paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD: At the applicable times specified in paragraph 1.E. of Boeing Service

Bulletin 737-32A1355, Revision 2, dated March 5, 2008; inspect for damage of the retract actuator beam of the MLG and overhaul the retract actuator beam, as applicable, by doing all the applicable actions specified in the Accomplishment Instructions of the service bulletin. Do all applicable related investigative and corrective actions before further flight. Repeat the applicable inspection or overhaul thereafter at the applicable time specified in paragraph 1.E. of the service bulletin.

Exceptions to Service Information

(g) Where Boeing Service Bulletin 737-32A1355, Revision 2, dated

March 5, 2008, specifies a compliance time after ``* * * the date on this service bulletin,'' this AD requires compliance within the specified compliance time after the effective date of this AD.

(h) Boeing Service Bulletin 737-32A1355, Revision 2, dated March 5, 2008, specifies that the actions are for airplanes with new MLG retract actuator beams that have not been overhauled having P/N 65- 46108-15 and subsequent dash numbers, and new or overhauled MLG retract actuator beams having P/N 65-46108-14 and previous dash numbers; however, this AD is not limited to new or overhauled beams.

This AD requires that the actions required by paragraph (f) of this

AD be done on airplanes with any MLG retract actuator beam having those P/Ns.

Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

(i)(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),

FAA, ATTN: Nancy Marsh, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Branch, ANM- 120S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue,

SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425) 917-6440; fax

(425) 917-6590; has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.

(2) To request a different method of compliance or a different compliance time for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR 39.19.

Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA

Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local

FSDO.

(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be used for any repair required by this AD, if it is approved by an

Authorized Representative for the Boeing Commercial Airplanes

Delegation Option Authorization Organization who has been authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO, to make those findings. For a repair method to be approved the repair must meet the certification basis of the airplane and the approval must specifically refer to this AD.

Issued in Renton, Washington, on September 26, 2008.

Michael Kaszycki,

Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification

Service.

FR Doc. E8-23828 Filed 10-7-08; 8:45 am

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P