Airworthiness directives: PZL-Bielsko,
[Federal Register: April 9, 2004 (Volume 69, Number 69)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 18845-18848]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr09ap04-14]
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
[Docket No. 2003-CE-66-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Przedsiebiorstwo Doswiadczalno- Produkcyjne Szybownictwa ``PZL-Bielsko'' Model SZD-50-3 ``Puchacz'' Sailplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all Przedsiebiorstwo Doswiadczalno-Produkcyjne Szybownictwa ``PZL- Bielsko'' (PZL-Bielsko) Model SZD-50-3 ``Puchacz'' sailplanes. This proposed AD would require you to inspect the
[[Page 18846]]
airbrake torque tube for cracks, distortion, and corrosion (herein referred to as damage). This proposed AD would also require you to replace or repair any damaged airbrake torque tube. This proposed AD is the result of mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) issued by the airworthiness authority for Poland. We are issuing this proposed AD to detect and correct damage on the airbrake torque tube, which could result in failure of the airbrake system. This failure could lead to loss of control of the sailplane.
DATES: We must receive any comments on this proposed AD by May 9, 2004.
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following to submit comments on this proposed AD:
By mail: FAA, Central Region, Office of the Regional Counsel, Attention: Rules Docket No. 2003-CE-66-AD, 901 Locust, Room 506, Kansas City, Missouri 64106.
By fax: (816) 329-3771.
By e-mail: 9-ACE-7-Docket@faa.gov. Comments sent electronically must contain ``Docket No. 2003-CE-66-AD'' in the subject line. If you send comments electronically as attached electronic files, the files must be formatted in Microsoft Word 97 for Windows or ASCII.
You may get the service information identified in this proposed AD from Allstar PZL Glider Sp. z o.o., ul. Cieszy[nacute]ska 325, 43-300 Bielsko-Biala.
You may view the AD docket at FAA, Central Region, Office of the Regional Counsel, Attention: Rules Docket No. 2003-CE-66-AD, 901 Locust, Room 506, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. Office hours are 8 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Greg Davison, Aerospace Engineer, FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri 64106; telephone: (816) 329-4130; facsimile: (816) 329-4090.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
How do I comment on this proposed AD? We invite you to submit any written relevant data, views, or arguments regarding this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed under ADDRESSES. Include ``AD Docket No. 2003-CE-66-AD'' in the subject line of your comments. If you want us to acknowledge receipt of your mailed comments, send us a self- addressed, stamped postcard with the docket number written on it. We will date-stamp your postcard and mail it back to you.
Are there any specific portions of this proposed AD I should pay attention to? We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. If you contact us through a nonwritten communication and that contact relates to a substantive part of this proposed AD, we will summarize the contact and place the summary in the docket. We will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend this proposed AD in light of those comments and contacts.
Discussion
What events have caused this proposed AD? The General Inspectorate of Civil Aviation (GICA), which is the airworthiness authority for Poland, recently notified FAA that an unsafe condition may exist on all PZL-Bielsko Model SZD-50-3 ``Puchacz'' sailplanes. The GICA reports several instances of the airbrake torque tube breaking and separating from the fuselage during flight, which makes it impossible to retract the airbrake.
An investigation revealed damage at the welded joint between the airbrake torque tube and the fuselage. The damage was caused by material fatigue due to frequent striking load that exceeds the recommended allowances and/or corrosion.
What are the consequences if the condition is not corrected? This condition, if not detected and corrected, could cause the airbrake system to fail. Failure of the airbrake system could result in loss of control of the sailplane.
Is there service information that applies to this subject? Allstar PZL Glider Sp. Z o.o. has issued Mandatory Bulletin No. BE-052/SZD-50- 3/2003 ``Puchacz'', dated July 22, 2003.
What are the provisions of this service information? The service bulletin includes procedures for:
--Inspecting the airbrake torque tube for crack, distortion, and corrosion (damage); and --Replacing or repairing any damaged airbrake torque tube.
What action did the GICA take? The GICA classified this service bulletin as mandatory and issued Republic of Poland AD Number SP-0052- 2003-A, dated July 22, 2003, to ensure the continued airworthiness of these sailplanes in Poland.
Did the GICA inform the United States under the bilateral airworthiness agreement? These PZL-Bielsko Model SZD-50-3 ``Puchacz'' sailplanes are manufactured in Poland and are type-certificated for operation in the United States under the provisions of Sec. 21.29 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.29) and the applicable bilateral airworthiness agreement.
Under this bilateral airworthiness agreement, the GICA has kept us informed of the situation described above.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD
What has FAA decided? We have examined the GICA's findings, reviewed all available information, and determined that AD action is necessary for products of this type design that are certificated for operation in the United States.
Since the unsafe condition described previously is likely to exist or develop on other PZL-Bielsko Model SZD-50-3 ``Puchacz'' sailplanes of the same type design that are registered in the United States, we are proposing AD action to detect and correct damage in the airbrake torque tube, which could result in failure of the airbrake system. This failure could lead to loss of control of the sailplane.
What would this proposed AD require? This proposed AD would require you to incorporate the actions in the previously-referenced service bulletin.
How does the revision to 14 CFR part 39 affect this proposed AD? On July 10, 2002, we published a new version of 14 CFR part 39 (67 FR 47997, July 22, 2002), which governs FAA's AD system. This regulation now includes material that relates to altered products, special flight permits, and alternative methods of compliance. This material previously was included in each individual AD. Since this material is included in 14 CFR part 39, we will not include it in future AD actions.
Costs of Compliance
How many sailplanes would this proposed AD impact? We estimate that this proposed AD affects 8 sailplanes in the U.S. registry.
What would be the cost impact of this proposed AD on owners/ operators of the affected sailplanes? We estimate the following costs to accomplish this proposed inspection:
[[Page 18847]]
Total cost per Total cost on Labor cost
Parts cost
sailplane U.S. operators
5 workhours x $65 per hour = $325............. Not applicable..................
$325
$2,600
We estimate the following costs to accomplish any necessary replacements that would be required based on the results of this proposed inspection. We have no way of determining the number of sailplanes that may need this replacement:
Labor cost
Parts cost
Total cost per sailplane
5 workhours x $65 per hour = $325..........
$294 $325 + $294 = $619.
Regulatory Findings
Would this proposed AD impact various entities? We have determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
Would this proposed AD involve a significant rule or regulatory action? For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this proposed AD:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a summary of the costs to comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD Docket. You may get a copy of this summary by sending a request to us at the address listed under ADDRESSES. Include ``AD Docket No. 2003-CE-66-AD'' in your request.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness directive (AD):
/Przedsiebiorstwo Doswiadczalno-Produkcyjne Szybownictwa ``PZL- Bielsko'': Docket No. 2003-CE-66-AD
When Is the Last Date I Can Submit Comments on This Proposed AD?
(a) We must receive comments on this proposed airworthiness directive (AD) by May 9, 2004.
What Other ADs Are Affected by This Action?
(b) None.
What Sailplanes Are Affected by This AD?
(c) This AD affects Model SZD-50-3 ``Puchacz'' sailplanes, all serial numbers, that are certificated in any category.
What Is the Unsafe Condition Presented in This AD?
(d) This AD is the result of mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) issued by the airworthiness authority for Poland. We are issuing this proposed AD to detect and correct cracks in the airbrake torque tube, which could result in failure of the airbrake system. This failure could lead to loss of control of the sailplane.
What Must I Do To Address This Problem?
(e) To address this problem, you must do the following:
Actions
Compliance
Procedures
(1) Using a fluorescent dye- Within the next 25 Follow Allstar PZL penetrant or dye-check
hours time-in-
Glider Sp. Z o.o. method, inspect the
service (TIS) after Mandatory Bulletin airbrake torque tube for the effective date No. BE-052/SZD-50-3/ cracks and corrosion pits. of this AD.
2003 ``Puchacz'', Visually inspect for
Repetitively
dated July 22, permanent distortions and inspect thereafter 2003. surface corrosion (damage). at intervals not to exceed 12 calendar months or 100 hours TIS, whichever occurs later. (2) Based on the results of Prior to further Follow Allstar PZL the inspection:
flight after the Glider Sp. Z o.o. (a) Repair the airbrake
inspection in which Mandatory Bulletin torque tube if slight,
the damage is
No. BE-052/SZD-50-3/ uniform corrosive deposits found. Continue 2003 ``Puchacz'', are found during the
with the repetitive dated July 22, inspection required in
inspections
2003. paragraph (e)(1) of this AD required in by removing the corrosive paragraph (e)(1) of deposits with a fine
this AD after each abrasive paper; and.
repair or (b) Replace the airbrake replacement is made. torque tube if any other damage is found during the inspection required in paragraph (e)(1) of this AD..
May I Request an Alternative Method of Compliance?
(f) You may request a different method of compliance or a different compliance time for this AD by following the procedures in 14 CFR 39.19. Unless FAA authorizes otherwise, send your request to your principal inspector. The principal inspector may add comments and will send your request to the Manager, Standards Office, Small Airplane Directorate, FAA. For information on any already approved alternative methods of compliance, contact Greg Davison, Aerospace Engineer, FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri 64106; telephone: (816) 329-4130; facsimile: (816) 329-4090.
[[Page 18848]]
May I Get Copies of the Documents Referenced in This AD?
(g) You may get copies of the documents referenced in this AD from Allstar PZL Glider Sp. z o.o., ul. Cieszynska, 43-300 Bielsko- Biala. You may view these documents at FAA, Central Region, Office of the Regional Counsel, 901 Locust, Room 506, Kansas City, Missouri 64106.
Is There Other Information That Relates to This Subject?
(h) Republic of Poland AD Number SP-0052-2003-A, dated July 22, 2003.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on April 2, 2004. Dorenda D. Baker, Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 04-8055 Filed 4-8-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
