Airworthiness standards: 400 airplane,
[Federal Register: March 12, 2002 (Volume 67, Number 48)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 11031-11033]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr12mr02-1]
Rules and Regulations Federal Register
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each week.
[[Page 11031]]
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 23
[Docket No. CE176; Special Condition Number 23-111-SC]
Special Conditions: Extra Flugzeugbau GmbH, Model EA-400 Airplane, Protection of Systems for High Intensity Radiated Fields (HIRF)
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Final special conditions, request for comments.
SUMMARY: These special conditions are issued to Extra Flugzeugbau GmbH, for an amended type certificate for the EA-400 airplane. This airplane will have novel and unusual design features when compared to the state of technology envisaged in the applicable airworthiness standards. These novel and unusual design features include the installation of an electronic attitude direction indicator installed by Extra Flugzeugbau GmbH for which the applicable regulations do not contain adequate or appropriate airworthiness standards for the protection of these systems from the effects of high intensity radiated fields (HIRF). These special conditions contain the additional safety standards that the Administrator considers necessary to establish a level of safety equivalent to the airworthiness standards applicable to these airplanes.
DATES: The effective date of these special conditions is February 27, 2002. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) must receive any comments on or before April 11, 2002.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments to FAA, Central Region, Office of the Regional Counsel, Attention: Rules Docket No. CE176, 901 Locust, Room 506, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. You may view any comments at this location between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ervin E. Dvorak, Aerospace Engineer, Standards Office (ACE-110), Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service, Federal Aviation Administration, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri 64106; telephone 816-329-4123; facsimile 816-329-4090.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA has determined that notice and opportunity for prior public comment hereon are impracticable because these procedures would significantly delay issuance of the approval design and thus delivery of the affected aircraft. In addition, the substance of these special conditions has been subject to the public comment process in several prior instances with no substantive comments received. The FAA, therefore, finds that good cause exists for making these special conditions effective upon issuance.
Comments Invited
Interested persons are invited to submit such written data, views, or arguments, as they may desire. Communications should identify the regulatory docket or notice number and be submitted in duplicate to the address specified above. All communications received on or before the closing date for comments will be considered by the Administrator. The special conditions may be changed in light of the comments received. All comments received will be available in the Rules Docket for examination by interested persons, both before and after the closing date for comments. A report summarizing each substantive public contact with FAA personnel concerning this rulemaking will be filedin the docket. Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments submitted in response to this notice must include a self- addressed, stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments to Docket No. CE176.'' The postcard will be date stamped and returned to the commenter.
Background
On September 5, 2001, Extra Flugzeugbau GmbH, Flugplatz Dinslaken Schwarze Heide, 46569 Hunxe, Federal Republic of Germany, made an application to the FAA for an amended type certificate for the EA-400 airplane. The EA-400 airplane is currently approved under TC No. A43CE. The proposed modification incorporates a novel or unusual design feature, such as an electronic attitude direction indicator that is vulnerable to HIRF external to the airplane.
Type Certification Basis
Under the provisions of 14 CFR part 21, Sec. 21.101, Extra Flugzeugbau GmbH must show that the EA-400 airplane meets the following provisions, or the applicable regulations in effect on the date of application, 14 CFR part 23 at Amendment 23-54.
Discussion
If the Administrator finds that the applicable airworthiness standards do not contain adequate or appropriate safety standards because of novel or unusual design features of an airplane, special conditions are prescribed under the provisions of Sec. 21.16.
Special conditions are normally issued in accordance with Sec. 11.19 as required by and become a part of the type certification basis in accordance with Sec. 21.101(d).
Special conditions are initially applicable to the model for which they are issued. Should the applicant apply for a supplemental type certificate to modify any other model already included on the same type certificate to incorporate the same novel or unusual design feature, the special conditions would also apply to the other model under the provisions of Sec. 21.101(a)(1).
Novel or Unusual Design Features
Extra Flugzeugbau GmbH plans to incorporate certain novel and unusual design features into an airplane for which the airworthiness standards do not contain adequate or appropriate safety standards for protection from the effects of HIRF. These features include an electronic attitude direction indicator, which are susceptible to the HIRF environment, that were not envisaged by the existing regulations for this type of airplane.
Protection of Systems From High Intensity Radiated Fields (HIRF)
Recent advances in technology have given rise to the application in aircraft designs of advanced electrical and electronic systems that perform
[[Page 11032]]
functions required for continued safe flight and landing. Due to the use of sensitive solid state advanced components in analog and digital electronics circuits, these advanced systems are readily responsive to the transient effects of induced electrical current and voltage caused by the HIRF. The HIRF can degrade electronic systems performance by damaging components or upsetting system functions.
Furthermore, the HIRF environment has undergone a transformation that was not foreseen when the current requirements were developed. Higher energy levels are radiated from transmitters that are used for radar, radio, and television. In addition, the number of transmitters has increased significantly. There is also uncertainty concerning the effectiveness of airframe shielding for HIRF. Furthermore, coupling to cockpit-installed equipment through the cockpit window apertures is undefined.
The combined effect of the technological advances in airplane design and the changing environment has resulted in an increased level of vulnerability of electrical and electronic systems required for the continued safe flight and landing of the airplane. Effective measures against the effects of exposure to HIRF must be provided by the design and installation of these systems. The accepted maximum energy levels in which civilian airplane system installations must be capable of operating safely are based on surveys and analysis of existing radio frequency emitters. These special conditions require that the airplane be evaluated under these energy levels for the protection of the electronic system and its associated wiring harness. These external threat levels, which are lower than previous required values, are believed to represent the worst case to which an airplane would be exposed in the operating environment.
These special conditions require qualification of systems that perform critical functions, as installed in aircraft, to the defined HIRF environment in paragraph 1 or, as an option to a fixed value using laboratory tests, in paragraph 2, as follows: The applicant may demonstrate that the operation and operational capability of the installed electrical and electronic systems that perform critical functions are not adversely affected when the aircraft is exposed to the HIRF environment defined below:
Field strength (volts per meter) Frequency
--------------------- Peak Average
10 kHz-100 kHz....................................
50
50 100 kHz-500 kHz...................................
50
50 500 kHz-2 MHz.....................................
50
50 2 MHz-30 MHz......................................
100
100 30 MHz-70 MHz.....................................
50
50 70 MHz-100 MHz....................................
50
50 100 MHz-200 MHz...................................
100
100 200 MHz-400 MHz...................................
100
100 400 MHz&-700 MHz..................................
700
50 700 MHz-1 GHz.....................................
700
100 1 GHz-2 GHz....................................... 2000
200 2 GHz-4 GHz....................................... 3000
200 4 GHz-6 GHz....................................... 3000
200 6 GHz-8 GHz....................................... 1000
200 8 GHz-12 GHz...................................... 3000
300 12 GHz-18 GHz..................................... 2000
200 18 GHz-40 GHz.....................................
600 200
The field strengths are expressed in terms of peak root-mean-square (rms) values, over the complete modulation period.
or,
(2) The applicant may demonstrate by a system test and analysis that the electrical and electronic systems that perform critical functions can withstand a minimum threat of 100 volts rms per meter, electrical field strength, from 10 kHz to 18 GHz. When using this test to show compliance with the HIRF requirements, no credit is given for signal attenuation due to installation.
A preliminary hazard analysis must be performed by the applicant, for approval by the FAA, to identify either electrical or electronic systems that perform critical functions. The term ``critical'' means those functions whose failure would contribute to, or cause, a failure condition that would prevent the continued safe flight and landing of the airplane. The systems identified by the hazard analysis that perform critical functions are candidates for the application of HIRF requirements. A system may perform both critical and non-critical functions. Primary electronic flight display systems, and their associated components, perform critical functions such as attitude, altitude, and airspeed indication. The HIRF requirements apply only to critical functions.
Compliance with HIRF requirements may be demonstrated by tests, analysis, models, similarity with existing systems, or any combination of these. Service experience alone is not acceptable since normal flight operations may not include an exposure to the HIRF environment. Reliance on a system with similar design features for redundancy as a means of protection against the effects of external HIRF is generally insufficient since all elements of a redundant system are likely to be exposed to the fields concurrently.
Applicability
As discussed above, these special conditions are applicable to the EA-400 airplane. Should Extra Flugzeugbau GmbH apply at a later date for a design approval to modify any other model on the same type certificate to incorporate the same novel or unusual design feature, the special conditions would apply to that model as well under the provisions of Sec. 21.101(a)(1).
Conclusion
This action affects only certain novel or unusual design features on the specified airplane model(s). It is not a rule of general applicability and affects only the applicant who applied to the FAA for approval of these features on the airplane.
The substance of these special conditions has been subjected to the notice and comment period in several prior instances and has been derived without substantive change from those previously issued. It is unlikely that prior public comment would result in a significant change from the substance contained herein. For this reason, and because a delay would significantly affect the certification of the airplane, which is imminent, the FAA has determined that prior public notice and comment are unnecessary and impracticable, and good cause exists for adopting these special conditions upon issuance. The FAA is requesting comments to allow interested persons to submit views that may not have been submitted in response to the prior opportunities for comment described above.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 23
Aircraft, Aviation safety, Signs and symbols.
Citation
The authority citation for these special conditions is as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113 and 44701; 14 CFR part 21, Secs. 21.16 and 21.101; and 14 CFR part 11, 11.19.
The Special Conditions
Accordingly, by the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the following special conditions are issued as part of the type certification basis for the EA-400 airplane modified by Extra Flugzeugbau GmbH to add an electronic attitude direction indicator.
-
Protection of Electrical and Electronic Systems from High Intensity Radiated Fields (HIRF). Each system that performs critical functions must be
[[Page 11033]]
designed and installed to ensure that the operations, and operational capabilities of these systems to perform critical functions, are not adversely affected when the airplane is exposed to high intensity radiated electromagnetic fields external to the airplane.
-
For the purpose of these special conditions, the following definition applies: Critical Functions: Functions whose failure would contribute to, or cause, a failure condition that would prevent the continued safe flight and landing of the airplane.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on February 27, 2002. James E. Jackson, Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 02-5810Filed3-11-02; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
