Airworthiness Directives: Bombardier Model CL-600-2B19 (Regional Jet Series 100 & 440) Airplanes

Federal Register: June 10, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 110)

Proposed Rules

Page 27474-27476

From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]

DOCID:fr10jn09-20

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 39

Docket No. FAA-2009-0525; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-027-AD

RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier Model CL-600-2B19 (Regional

Jet Series 100 & 440) Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the products listed above that would supersede an existing AD. This proposed AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information

(MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The

MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:

AD CF-2002-12 [which corresponds to FAA AD 2003-04-21, amendment 39-13070] mandated installation of revised overwing emergency exit placards showing that the exit door should be opened and disposed from a seated position. However, it was later discovered that the new placards illustrated an incorrect hand position for removal of the exit upper handle cover. These incorrect instructions could cause difficulty or delay when opening the overwing emergency exit.

As a result, the timely and safe evacuation of passenger and crew may be impeded. The proposed AD would require actions that are intended to address the unsafe condition described in the MCAI.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by July 10, 2009.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:

Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.

Fax: (202) 493-2251.

Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket

Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New

Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.

Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket

Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New

Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact

Bombardier, Inc., 400 C[ocirc]te-Vertu Road West, Dorval, Qu[eacute]bec

H4S 1Y9, Canada; telephone 514-855-5000; fax 514-855-7401; e-mail thd.crj@aero.bombardier.com; Internet http://www.bombardier.com. You may review copies of the referenced service information at the FAA,

Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,

Washington. For information on the availability of this material at the

FAA, call 425-227-1221 or 425-227-1152.

Examining the AD Docket

You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http:// www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street address for the Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher Alfano, Aerospace

Engineer, Airframe and Mechanical Systems Branch, ANE-171, FAA, New

York Aircraft Certification Office, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410,

Westbury, New York 11590; telephone (516) 228-7340; fax (516) 794-5531.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2009-0525;

Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-027-AD'' at the beginning of your comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend this proposed AD based on those comments.

We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http:// www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

On February 19, 2003, we issued AD 2003-04-21, Amendment 39-13070

(68 FR 9509, February 28, 2003). A correction of that AD was published in the Federal Register on March 25, 2003 (68 FR 14309). That AD required actions intended to address an unsafe condition on the products listed above.

Since we issued AD 2003-04-21, it was discovered that the new placards illustrated an incorrect hand position for removal of the exit upper handle cover. Transport Canada Civil Aviation, which is the aviation authority for Canada, has issued Canadian Airworthiness

Directive CF-2009-02, dated January 19, 2009 (referred to after this as

``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for the specified products. The MCAI states:

AD CF-2002-12 [which corresponds to FAA AD 2003-04-21] mandated installation of revised overwing emergency exit placards showing that the exit door should be opened and disposed from a seated position. However, it was later discovered that the new placards illustrated an incorrect hand position for removal of the exit upper handle cover. These incorrect instructions could cause difficulty or delay when opening the overwing emergency exit.

As a result, the timely and safe evacuation of passenger and crew may be impeded. The required actions include replacing the incorrect placards with revised placards. You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD docket.

This NPRM adds certain airplanes to the applicability; we have determined that these additional airplanes are affected by the identified unsafe condition. These airplanes were added as they also have the same interior configuration. This NPRM also removes certain airplanes from the applicability; airplanes with serial numbers 7075, 7099, 7136, 7140, 7152, 7176, and 7351 have been removed because they have different placards installed.

Page 27475

Relevant Service Information

Bombardier has issued Service Bulletin 601R-11-088, Revision `A,' dated March 24, 2009. The actions described in this service information are intended to correct the unsafe condition identified in the MCAI.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD

This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same type design.

Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information

We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the

AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information provided in the MCAI and related service information.

We might also have proposed different actions in this AD from those in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are highlighted in a note within the proposed AD.

Costs of Compliance

Based on the service information, we estimate that this proposed AD would affect about 664 products of U.S. registry.

We estimate that it would take about 1 work-hour per product to comply with the new basic requirements of this proposed AD. The average labor rate is $80 per work-hour. Required parts would cost about $128 per product. Where the service information lists required parts costs that are covered under warranty, we have assumed that there will be no charge for these costs. As we do not control warranty coverage for affected parties, some parties may incur costs higher than estimated here. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of the proposed AD on U.S. operators to be $138,112, or $208 per product.

Authority for This Rulemaking

Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation

Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.

We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in

``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.

For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed regulation: 1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866; 2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and 3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the

Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES 1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec. 39.13 [Amended] 2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by removing Amendment 39-13070 (68 FR 9509, February 28, 2003), corrected at 68 FR 14309, March 25, 2003, and adding the following new AD:

Bombardier, Inc. (Formerly Canadair): Docket No. FAA-2009-0525;

Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-027-AD.

Comments Due Date

(a) We must receive comments by July 10, 2009.

Affected ADs

(b) The proposed AD supersedes AD 2003-04-21 R1, Amendment 39- 13070.

Applicability

(c) This AD applies to Bombardier Model CL-600-2B19 (Regional

Jet Series 100 & 400) airplanes, serial numbers 7003 through 7074 inclusive, 7076 through 7098 inclusive, 7100 through 7135 inclusive, 7137 through 7139 inclusive, 7141 through 7151 inclusive, 7153 through 7175 inclusive, 7177 through 7350 inclusive, 7352 through 7583 inclusive, 7585 through 7638 inclusive, 7640 through 7716 inclusive, 7718 through 7845 inclusive, 7847 through 8042 inclusive, 8044 through 8047 inclusive, 8050, 8058, 8059, 8061, 8062, and 8064; certificated in any category.

Subject

(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 11: Placards and markings.

Reason

(e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) states:

AD CF-2002-12 [which corresponds to FAA AD 2003-04-21] mandated installation of revised overwing emergency exit placards showing that the exit door should be opened and disposed from a seated position. However, it was later discovered that the new placards illustrated an incorrect hand position for removal of the exit upper handle cover. These incorrect instructions could cause difficulty or delay when opening the overwing emergency exit.

As a result, the timely and safe evacuation of passenger and crew may be impeded. The required action includes replacing the incorrect placards with revised placards.

Actions and Compliance

(f) Unless already done, within 24 months after the effective date of this AD, replace the existing overwing emergency exit placards with new placards, in accordance with the Accomplishment

Instructions of Bombardier Service Bulletin 601R-11-088, Revision

`A,' dated March 24, 2009.

(g) Replacement of the overwing emergency exit placards with new placards accomplished before the effective date of this AD in accordance with Bombardier Service Bulletin 601R-11-088, dated June 25, 2008, is considered acceptable for compliance with the corresponding action specified in this AD.

Page 27476

FAA AD Differences

NOTE 1: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information as follows: No differences.

Other FAA AD Provisions

(h) The following provisions also apply to this AD:

(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, New

York Aircraft Certification Office, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN: Christopher Alfano,

Aerospace Engineer, Airframe and Mechanical Systems Branch, ANE-171,

FAA, New York Aircraft Certification Office, 1600 Stewart Avenue,

Suite 410, Westbury, New York 11590; telephone (516) 228-7340; fax

(516) 794-5531. Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify your principal maintenance inspector

(PMI) or principal avionics inspector (PAI), as appropriate, or lacking a principal inspector, your local Flight Standards District

Office.

(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered

FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority

(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product is airworthy before it is returned to service.

(3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, the

Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has approved the information collection requirements and has assigned OMB Control Number 2120- 0056.

Related Information

(i) Refer to MCAI Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF-2009-02, dated January 19, 2009; and Bombardier Service Bulletin 601R-11-088,

Revision `A,' dated March 24, 2009; for related information.

Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 2, 2009.

Stephen P. Boyd,

Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification

Service.

FR Doc. E9-13506 Filed 6-9-09; 8:45 am

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P