Navigation, COLREGS compliance exemptions: USS ROOSEVELT,

[Federal Register: October 23, 2001 (Volume 66, Number 205)]

[Rules and Regulations]

[Page 53529-53530]

From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]

[DOCID:fr23oc01-10]

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Navy

32 CFR Part 706

Certifications and Exemptions Under the International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea, 1972

AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DOD.

ACTION: Final Rule.

SUMMARY: The Department of the Navy is amending its certifications and exemptions under the International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea, 1972 (72 COLREGS), to reflect that the Deputy Assistant Judge Advocate General of the Navy (Admiralty and Maritime Law) has determined that USS ROOSEVELT (DDG 80) is a vessel of the Navy which, due to its special construction and purpose, cannot fully comply with certain provisions of the 72 COLREGS without interfering with its special function as a naval ship. The intended effect of this rule is to warn mariners in waters where 72 COLREGS apply.

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 30, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Commander Gregg A. Cervi, JAGC, U.S. Navy, Deputy Assistant Judge Advocate General (Admiralty and Maritime Law), Office of the Judge Advocate General, 1322 Patterson Avenue, Suite 3000, Washington Navy Yard, Washington, DC 20374-5066, Telephone number: (202) 685-5040.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to the authority granted in 33 U.S.C. 1605, the Department of the Navy amends 32 CFR Part 706. This amendment provides notice that the Deputy Assistant Judge Advocate General of the Navy (Admiralty and Maritime Law), under authority delegated by the Secretary of the Navy, has certified that USS ROOSEVELT (DDG 80) is a vessel of the Navy which, due to its special construction and purpose, cannot fully comply with the following

[[Page 53530]]

specific provision of the 72 COLREGS without interfering with its special function as a naval ship: Annex I paragraph 3(a) pertaining the horizontal distance between the forward and after masthead lights. The Deputy Assistant Judge Advocate General of the Navy (Admiralty and Maritime Law) has also certified that the lights involved are located in closest possible compliance with the applicable 72 COLREGS requirements.

Moreover, it has been determined, in accordance with 32 CFR Parts 296 and 701, that publication of this amendment for public comment prior to adoption is impracticable, unnecessary, and contrary to public interest since it is based on technical findings that the placement of lights on this vessel in a manner differently from that prescribed herein will adversely affect the vessel's ability to perform its military functions.

List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 706

Marine safety, Navigation (water), and Vessels.

Accordingly, 32 CFR Part 706 is amended as follows:

PART 706--[AMENDED]

  1. The authority citation for 32 CFR Part 706 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1605.

  2. Table Four, Paragraph 16 of Sec. 706.2 is amended by revising, in numerical order, the following entry for U.S.S. ROOSEVELT:

    Sec. 706.2 Certifications of the Secretary of the Navy under Executive Order 11964 and 33 U.S.C. 1605.

    * * * * *

    Obstruction angle relative Vessel

    Number

    ship's headings

    *

    *

    *

    * *

    *

    * USS ROOSEVELT............... DDG 80

    109.34 thru 112.50 deg..

    *

    *

    *

    * *

    *

    *

  3. Table Five of Sec. 706.2 is amended by revising, in numerical order, the following entry for U.S.S. ROOSEVELT:

    Sec. 706.2 Certifications of the Secretary of the Navy under Executive Order 11964 and 33 U.S.C. 1605.

    * * * * *

    Table Five

    After masthead light Masthead lights not Forward masthead less than \1/2\ Percentage over all other light not in forward ship's length aft of horizontal Vessel

    Number

    lights and

    quarter of ship. forward masthead separation obstructions. annex annex I, sec. 3(a) light. annex I, sec. attained I, sec. 2(f)

    3(a)

    *

    *

    *

    *

    *

    *

    * USS ROOSEVELT............................. DDG 80

    X

    X

    X

    14.6

    *

    *

    *

    *

    *

    *

    *

    Dated: May 30, 2001. G.A. Cervi, Commander, JAGC, U.S. Navy, Deputy Assistant Judge Advocate General (Admiralty and Maritime Law).

    [FR Doc. 01-26644Filed10-22-01; 8:45 am]

    BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT