Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Products From the People's Republic of China: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review and Notice of Amended Final Results of Review
| Published date | 17 August 2020 |
| Citation | 85 FR 50006 |
| Record Number | 2020-17942 |
| Section | Notices |
| Court | International Trade Administration |
Federal Register, Volume 85 Issue 159 (Monday, August 17, 2020)
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 159 (Monday, August 17, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 50006-50007]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-17942]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C-570-011]
Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Products From the People's
Republic of China: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With Final
Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review and Notice of
Amended Final Results of Review
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On August 4, 2020, the United States Court of International
Trade (the Court) entered final judgment sustaining the final results
of remand redetermination pursuant to court order by the Department of
Commerce (Commerce) pertaining to the 2014-2015 countervailing duty
(CVD) administrative review of the order on crystalline silicon
photovoltaic products (solar products) from the People's Republic of
China (China). Commerce is notifying the public that the final judgment
in this case is not in harmony with Commerce's final results in the
2014-2015 administrative review of solar products from China, and that
Commerce is amending the final results.
DATES: Applicable August 14, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Caitlin Monks, AD/CVD Operations,
Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-2670.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On September 12, 2017, Commerce published its final results of the
2014-2015 administrative review of solar products.\1\ Commerce reached
affirmative determinations for mandatory respondent Changzhou Trina
Solar Energy Co., Ltd. and its cross-owned affiliates (collectively,
Trina Solar), as well as numerous other producers and exporters not
selected for individual review. On November 30, 2018, the Court
remanded aspects of the Final Results to Commerce for further
consideration.\2\ The Court remanded Commerce's determinations as
regards to the Export Buyer's Credit Program and inclusion of Comtrade
data in calculating the world market price for aluminum extrusions and
solar glass.\3\ In its first remand redetermination, issued in April
2019,\4\ Commerce provided additional explanation and evidence for its
determinations, but the Court continued to find them unsupported by
substantial evidence and remanded them a second time.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Products from the
People's Republic of China: Final Results of Countervailing Duty
Administrative Review, and Partial Rescission of Countervailing Duty
Administrative Review; 2014-2015, 82 FR 42792 (September 12, 2017)
(Final Results), and accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum.
\2\ See Changzhou Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd. et al. v. United
States, Slip Op. 18-167 (November 30, 2018).
\3\ Id. at 16.
\4\ See Changzhou Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd. et al. v. United
States, Court of International Trade Consolidated Court No. 17-
00246, ``Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court
Remand,'' dated April 24, 2019.
\5\ See Changzhou Trina Solar Energy Co. v. United States, Slip
Op. 19-143 (November 18, 2019).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In its second remand redetermination, issued in February 2020,\6\
Commerce explained that, although it continues to believe that it is
not possible to verify whether respondents used the Export Buyer's
Credit Program without the cooperation of the Government of China
(GOC), it found the program not used, under protest, to comply with the
Court's order.\7\ Commerce also solicited additional information for
the solar glass benchmark, and selected data from PV Insights
consistent with Commerce's preference for product-specific monthly
data.\8\ For aluminum extrusions, Commerce used the more product-
specific annual data from IHS exclusively rather than averaging them
with less specific monthly Comtrade data, consistent with the Court's
order.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Changzhou Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd. and SolarWorld
Americas, Inc. v. United States, Consol. Court No. 17-00246; Slip
Op. 19-143 (November 18, 2019), ``Final Results of Redetermination
Pursuant to Court Remand,'' dated February 28, 2020 (Second Remand
Redetermination).
\7\ Id. at 7-8.
\8\ Id. at 9-10.
\9\ Id. at 8-9.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Court sustained Commerce's second remand in full.\10\
Specifically, the Court found that Commerce's determinations regarding
the Export Buyer's Credit Program, as well as the aluminum extrusions
and solar glass benchmarks, complied with the options the Court
provided in its remand opinion.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See Changzhou Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd. and SolarWorld
Americas, Inc. v. United States, Slip Op. 20-109 (August 4, 2020).
\11\ Id. at 3-6 (Export Buyer's Credit Program) and 7-13
(benchmarks for aluminum extrusions and solar glass).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Timken Notice
In its decision in Timken,\12\ as clarified by Diamond
Sawblades,\13\ the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held that,
pursuant to section 516A(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the
Act), Commerce must publish a notice of court decision that is not ``in
harmony'' with a Commerce determination and must suspend liquidation of
entries pending a ``conclusive'' court decision. The Court's August 4,
2020, judgment constitutes a final decision of that court that is not
in harmony with Commerce's Final Results. This notice is published in
fulfillment of the publication requirements of Timken. Accordingly,
Commerce will continue suspension of liquidation of subject merchandise
pending expiration of the period of appeal or, if appealed, pending a
final and conclusive court decision.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ See Timken Co. v. United States, 893 F.2d 337 (Fed. Cir.
1990) (Timken).
\13\ See Diamond Sawblades Mfrs. Coalition v. United States, 626
F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2010).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Amended Final Results
Because there is now a final court decision, Commerce is amending
the 2017 Final Results with respect to Trina Solar and all other
producers and exporters subject to this review. The revised total
subsidy rates for these companies for the period June 10, 2014 through
December 31, 2015 are as follows: \14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ See Second Remand Redetermination at 20-21.
[[Page 50007]]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subsidy rate
Exporter or producer (percent ad
valorem)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Changzhou Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd. and its Cross- 3.72
Owned Affiliates \15\..................................
Chint Solar (Zhejiang) Co., Ltd......................... 3.72
Hefei JA Solar Technology Co., Ltd...................... 3.72
Perlight Solar Co., Ltd................................. 3.72
Risen Energy Co., Ltd................................... 3.72
Shanghai JA Solar Technology Co., Ltd................... 3.72
Shenzhen Sungold Solar Co., Ltd......................... 3.72
Sunny Apex Development Limited.......................... 3.72
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Amended Cash Deposit Rates
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ See Final Results, 82 FR at 42793. Cross-owned affiliates
are: Trina Solar Limited; Trina Solar (Changzhou) Science &
Technology Co., Ltd.; Yancheng Trina Solar Energy Technology Co.,
Ltd.; Changzhou Trina Solar Yabang Energy Co., Ltd.; Hubei Trina
Solar Energy Co., Ltd.; Turpan Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd.; and
Changzhou Trina PV Ribbon Materials Co., Ltd.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commerce will issue revised cash deposit instructions to U.S.
Customs and Border Protection for all firms above that do not have a
superseding cash deposit rate (e.g., from a subsequent administrative
review). For such firms, the revised cash deposit rates will be the
rates indicated above, effective August 14, 2020.
Notification to Interested Parties
This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections
516A(e)(1), 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: August 11, 2020.
Jeffrey I. Kessler,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2020-17942 Filed 8-14-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
