Customs drawback centers; consolidation,
[Federal Register: August 21, 2002 (Volume 67, Number 162)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 54137-54138]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr21au02-18]
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Customs Service
19 CFR Part 101
Consolidation of Customs Drawback Centers
AGENCY: Customs Service, Department of the Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
SUMMARY: This document proposes to amend the Customs Regulations to reflect a planned closure of the Customs Drawback Centers located at the ports of Boston, Massachusetts; Miami, Florida; and New Orleans, Louisiana. Because of a sustained decrease in the number of drawback claims and the amount of drawback payments, Customs is proposing a consolidation of the Drawback Program. The closing of the three Drawback Centers is part of the planned consolidation and is intended to promote operational efficiency in the processing of drawback claims.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before September 20, 2002.
ADDRESSES: Written comments (preferably in triplicate) may be submitted to the U.S. Customs Service, Office of Regulations & Rulings, Attention: Regulations Branch, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20229. Submitted comments may be inspected at the U.S. Customs Service, 799 9th Street, NW., Washington, DC, during regular business hours. Arrangements to inspect submitted comments should be made in advance by calling Mr. Joseph Clark at (202) 572-8768.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sherri Hoffman, U.S. Customs Service, Entry and Drawback Management, (202) 927-0300.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Consolidation of Drawback Centers
Since 1996, Customs has recognized a decrease in both the number of drawback claims and the amount of drawback payments. To verify these trends, and to determine how to most efficiently operate the Drawback Program, Customs conducted an internal evaluation of the program. Customs also retained the services of an independent contractor to review the Drawback Program to ensure that the agency's findings were valid.
The findings of both the agency-led review and the independent contractor's assessment indicated the benefits of consolidating the processing of drawback claims by reducing the number of Drawback Centers.
In a Notice to Congress on March 12, 2001, filedin accordance with 19 U.S.C. 2075, Customs proposed the closure of four Drawback Centers. The Senate Finance and House Ways and Means Committees concurred with the proposal for consolidation, but with the recommendation that only three Drawback Centers be eliminated and the San Francisco Drawback Center remain operational. The Commissioner of Customs concurred with this recommendation and it was proposed to phase-in the closure of the Drawback Centers located at the ports of Boston, MA; Miami, FL; and New Orleans, LA. The remaining five Drawback Centers, located at the ports of New York, NY/Newark, NJ; Houston, TX; Chicago, IL; Los Angeles, CA; and San Francisco, CA would remain operational.
Closing of Drawback Centers To Be Phased-In
To assist the remaining five Drawback Centers in accommodating an increased number of drawback claims, it is proposed to phase-in the closing of the three Drawback Centers. If, after further consideration and review of any comments submitted in response to the solicitation of comments set forth in this document, Customs decides to adopt as a final rule these proposed changes, it is proposed to phase-in the closing of the Drawback Centers as follows:
(1) The first Drawback Centers to close would be the centers at the ports of Boston, Massachusetts and New Orleans, Louisiana. These two centers would close 30 days from the date a final rule adopting these proposed changes is published in the Federal Register. At that time, drawback claims would no longer be accepted at the Boston or New Orleans Drawback Centers, and claims would be required to be filedat one of the five remaining Drawback Centers. Drawback claims submitted to the Boston or New Orleans Drawback Centers after this date would be rejected. Once rejected, it would be the responsibility of the claimant to ensure timely filing of the drawback claim at one of the five remaining Drawback Centers. Customs personnel at the ports of Boston and New Orleans would continue to process drawback claims that were submitted prior to commencement of this first phase-in period, for a period of 12-months. After this time, all remaining claims filedat the Boston Drawback Center prior to commencement of this first phase-in period, that have not been liquidated and require Customs review, would be forwarded to the New York/Newark Drawback Center for final processing. All remaining claims that were filedat the New Orleans Drawback Center prior to commencement of this first phase-in period, that have not been liquidated and require Customs review, would be forwarded to the Houston Drawback Center for final processing.
(2) The third Drawback Center to close would be the one located at the port of Miami, Florida. This center would close 180 days from the date a final rule adopting these proposed changes is published in the Federal Register. At that time, drawback claims would no longer be accepted at the Miami Drawback Center, and claims would be required to be filedat one of the five remaining Drawback Centers. Drawback claims submitted to the Miami Drawback Center after this date would be rejected. Once rejected, it would be the responsibility of the claimant to ensure timely filing of the drawback claim at one of the five remaining Drawback Centers. Customs personnel at the port of Miami would continue to process drawback claims that were submitted prior to commencement of this second phase-in period, for a period of 12-months. After this time, all remaining claims filedat the Miami Drawback Center prior to commencement of this second phase-in period, that have not been liquidated and require Customs review, would be forwarded to the Chicago Drawback Center for final processing.
Claimant Requirements To File in Designated Alternate Drawback Centers
In order to file a drawback claim at one of the five remaining Drawback Centers, a claimant would be required to possess either a district permit for the location at which the claim will be filedor a national permit. Claimants are reminded that a national permit requires use of the Automated Broker Interface of Customs Automated Commercial System when filing drawback claims. Claimants must ensure that all permit, license and bond requirements are met in accordance with the regulations. See parts 111 and 113 of the Customs Regulations.
[[Page 54138]]
Maintenance of Drawback Information
Throughout the staged consolidation period, claimants would be required to provide Customs with advance notification of any changes in the information provided regarding a drawback claim. This notification must be provided in accordance with part 191 of the Customs Regulations (19 CFR part 191).
Explanation of Amendments
Section 101.3(b)(1) of the Customs Regulations lists the Customs ports of entry. Eight ports are denoted with an asterisk that designates their status as a ``Drawback unit/office.'' This document proposes to amend Sec. 101.3(b)(1) to delete the asterisks in Sec. 101.3(b)(1) next to the port listings for Boston, Miami and New Orleans.
Comments
Before adopting this proposal as a final rule, consideration will be given to any written comments timely submitted to Customs, including comments on the clarity of this proposed rule and how it may be made easier to understand. Comments submitted will be available for public inspection in accordance with the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552), Sec. 1.4 of the Treasury Department Regulations (31 CFR 1.4), and Sec. 103.11(b) of the Customs Regulations (19 CFR 103.11(b)), on regular business days between the hours of 9 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. at the Regulations Branch, Office of Regulations and Rulings, U.S. Customs Service, 799 9th Street, NW., Washington, DC.
The Regulatory Flexibility Act and Executive Order 12866
Although this document is being issued with notice for public comment, because it relates to agency management and organization, it is not subject to the notice and public procedure requirements of 5 U.S.C. 553. Accordingly, this document is not subject to the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
Agency organization matters, such as this proposed closing of three Customs Drawback Centers, are not subject to Executive Order 12866.
Drafting Information
The principal author of this document was Ms. Suzanne Kingsbury, Office of Regulations and Rulings, U.S. Customs Service. However, personnel from other offices participated in its development.
List of Subjects in 19 CFR Part 101
Customs duties and inspection, Customs ports of entry.
Proposed Amendments to the Regulations
For the reasons stated above, it is proposed to amend part 101 of the Customs Regulations (19 CFR part 101) as follows:
PART 101--GENERAL PROVISIONS
-
The general authority citation for part 101 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 19 U.S.C. 2, 66, 1202 (General Note 23, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States), 1623, 1624, 1646a.
Section 101.3 and 101.4 also issued under 19 U.S.C. 1 and 58b; * * * * *
-
In Sec. 101.3, the table in paragraph (b)(1) is amended by removing the plus sign in the ``Ports of entry'' column before the column listings for ``Miami'' under the state of Florida, ``New Orleans'' under the state of Louisiana, and ``Boston'' under the state of Massachusetts.
Robert C. Bonner, Commissioner of Customs.
Approved: August 15, 2002. Timothy E. Skud, Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Treasury.
[FR Doc. 02-21111Filed8-20-02; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4820-02-P
