Determinations of Attainment by the Attainment Date, Extensions of the Attainment Date, and Reclassification of Several Areas Classified as Marginal for the 2008 Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards
Federal Register, Volume 80 Issue 166 (Thursday, August 27, 2015)
Federal Register Volume 80, Number 166 (Thursday, August 27, 2015)
Proposed Rules
Pages 51992-52002
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office www.gpo.gov
FR Doc No: 2015-21196
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
EPA-HQ-OAR-2015-0468; FRL-9933-06-OAR
Determinations of Attainment by the Attainment Date, Extensions of the Attainment Date, and Reclassification of Several Areas Classified as Marginal for the 2008 Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing three separate and independent determinations related to the 36 areas that are currently classified as ``Marginal'' for the 2008 ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). First, the EPA is proposing to determine that 17 areas attained the 2008 ozone NAAQS by the applicable attainment date of July 20, 2015, based on complete, quality-assured and certified ozone monitoring data for 2012-2014. Second, the EPA is proposing to grant 1-year attainment date extensions for eight areas on the basis that the requirements for such extensions under the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act) have been met. Third, the EPA is proposing to determine that 11 areas failed to attain the 2008 ozone NAAQS by the applicable attainment date of July 20, 2015, and that they are not eligible for an extension, and to reclassify these areas as ``Moderate'' for the 2008 ozone NAAQS. Once reclassified as Moderate, states must submit State Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions that meet the statutory and regulatory requirements that apply to 2008 ozone NAAQS nonattainment areas classified as Moderate. In this action, the EPA is proposing and taking comment on two options for the deadline by which states would need to submit to the EPA for review and approval the SIP revisions required for Moderate areas once their areas are reclassified.
DATES: Comments. Comments must be received on or before September 28, 2015. Public Hearings. If anyone contacts us requesting a public hearing on or before September 11, 2015, we will hold a public hearing. Please refer to SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for additional information on the comment period and the public hearing.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-OAR-
2015-0468, to the Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or withdrawn. The EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. If you need to include CBI as part of your comment, please visit http://www.epa.gov/dockets/comments.html for instructions. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. For additional submission methods, the full EPA public comment policy, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit http://www.epa.gov/dockets/comments.html.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Cecil (Butch) Stackhouse, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Air Quality Policy Division, Mail Code C539-01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, telephone (919) 541-5208; fax number: (919) 541-5315; email address: stackhouse.butch@epa.gov.
Page 51993
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
-
General Information
-
Does this action apply to me?
Entities potentially affected by this action include states (typically state air pollution control agencies), the District of Columbia and, in some cases, tribal governments. In particular, 26 states \1\ with areas designated nonattainment and classified as ``Marginal'' for the 2008 ozone NAAQS and the District of Columbia are affected by this action. Entities potentially affected indirectly by this proposal include owners and operators of sources of volatile organic compounds (VOC) and nitrogen oxides (NOX) emissions that contribute to ground-level ozone formation within the subject ozone nonattainment areas.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ AR, AZ, CA, CO, CT, DE, GA, IL, IN, KY, LA, MA, MD, MO, MS, NC, NJ, NY, OH, PA, SC, TN, TX, VA, WI and WY.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
What should I consider as I prepare my comments for the EPA?
-
Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to the EPA through http://www.regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark the part or all of the information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or CD-ROM that you mail to the EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD-ROM as CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD-ROM the specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information claimed to be CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket. Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
-
Tips for Preparing Your Comments. When submitting comments, remember to:
Identify the rulemaking by docket number and other identifying information (subject heading, Federal Register date and page number).
Follow directions--The agency may ask you to respond to specific questions or organize comments by referencing a Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part or section number.
Explain why you agree or disagree; suggest alternatives and substitute language for your requested changes.
Describe any assumptions and provide any technical information and/or data that you used.
If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how you arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be reproduced.
Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns, and suggest alternatives.
Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the use of profanity or personal threats.
Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period deadline identified.
-
-
Where can I get a copy of this document and other related information?
In addition to being available in the docket, an electronic copy of this document will be posted at http://www.epa.gov/airquality/ozonepollution/actions.html#impl.
-
What information should I know about a possible public hearing?
To request a public hearing or information pertaining to a public hearing on this document, contact Ms. Pamela Long at (919) 541-0641 before 5 p.m. on September 11, 2015. If requested, further details concerning a public hearing for this proposed rule will be published in a separate Federal Register document. For updates and additional information on a public hearing, please check the EPA's Web site for this rulemaking at http://www.epa.gov/airquality/ozonepollution/actions.html#impl.
-
How is this preamble organized?
The information presented in this preamble is organized as follows.
-
-
General Information
-
Does this action apply to me?
-
What should I consider as I prepare my comments for EPA?
-
Where can I get a copy of this document and other related information?
-
What information should I know about a possible public hearing?
-
How is this preamble organized?
-
-
Overview and Basis of Proposal
-
Overview of Proposal
-
What is the background for the proposed actions?
-
What is the statutory authority for the proposed actions?
-
How does the EPA determine whether an area has attained the 2008 ozone standard?
-
-
What is the EPA proposing and what is the rationale?
-
Determination of Attainment
-
Extension of Marginal Area Attainment Dates
-
Determinations of Failure To Attain and Reclassification
-
Moderate Area SIP Revision Submission Deadline
-
Summary of Proposed Actions
-
-
Environmental Justice Considerations
-
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
-
Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and Executive Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review
-
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
-
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
-
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)
-
Executive Order 13132: Federalism
-
Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments
-
Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental Health and Safety Risks
-
Executive Order 13211: Actions That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use
-
-
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA)
-
Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations
-
-
Overview and Basis of Proposal
-
Overview of Proposal
CAA section 181(b)(2) requires the EPA Administrator to determine, based on an area's design value (which represents air quality in the area for the most recent 3 year period) \2\ as of an area's attainment deadline, whether an ozone nonattainment area attained the ozone standard by that date. The statute provides a mechanism by which states that meet certain criteria may request and be granted by the EPA Administrator a 1-year extension of an area's attainment deadline. The CAA also requires that areas that have not attained the standard by their attainment deadlines be reclassified to either the next ``highest'' classification (e.g., Marginal to Moderate, Moderate to Serious, etc.) or to the classifications applicable to the areas' design values in Table 1 of 40 CFR 51.1103. In this document, the EPA proposes to find that 17 Marginal areas attained the 2008 NAAQS by the applicable deadline of July 20, 2015, based on complete, quality-
assured and certified ozone monitoring data for 2012-2014.\3\ The EPA also proposes to find that 8 Marginal areas meet the criteria, as provided in CAA section 181(a)(5) and interpreted by regulation at 40 CFR 51.1107, to qualify for a 1-year attainment date extension for the 2008 ozone NAAQS. Finally, the EPA proposes to find that 11 Marginal areas
Page 51994
failed to attain the 2008 ozone NAAQS by the applicable Marginal attainment deadline of July 20, 2015, and do not qualify for a 1-year extension. Accordingly, as required by CAA section 181(b)(2)(A), if the EPA finalizes the determinations that these areas failed to attain, the EPA must reclassify those 11 Marginal areas to Moderate. The reclassified areas must attain the 2008 ozone NAAQS as expeditiously as practicable, but no later than July 20, 2018. Table 1 provides a summary of the EPA's proposed actions that would apply to these 36 Marginal areas.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ An area's design value for the 8-hour ozone NAAQS is the highest 3-year average of the annual fourth highest daily maximum 8-
hour average ozone concentration of all monitors in the area. See 40 CFR part 50, appendix P.
\3\ These proposed determinations of attainment do not constitute a redesignation to attainment. Redesignations require states to meet a number of additional criteria, including EPA approval of a state plan to maintain the air quality standard for 10 years after redesignation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The EPA is proposing in this document to apply the discretion granted to the Administrator in the statute to adjust the statutory deadlines for submitting required SIP revisions for reclassified Moderate ozone nonattainment areas in order to align the SIP due dates with the regulatory deadline for implementing reasonably available control measures (RACM), including reasonably available control technology (RACT), in such areas as necessary to attain the 2008 ozone standard by the Moderate area attainment deadline of July 20, 2018.
Table 1--2008 Ozone NAAQS Marginal Nonattainment Area Evaluation Summary
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Areas not attaining
2008 NAAQS eligible
2012-2014 Meets 2008 NAAQS by 2014 4th for attainment date
2008 NAAQS Nonattainment area Design value marginal attainment Highest daily extensions based on
(ppm) date maximum 8-hr 2014 4th highest
average (ppm) daily maximum 8-hr
average X emissions in the area (CAA sections 172(c)(2) and 182(b)(1) and 40 CFR 51.1110); (4) contingency measures to be implemented in the event of failure to meet a milestone or to attain the standard (CAA section 172(c)(9)); (5) a vehicle inspection and maintenance program, if applicable (CAA section 181(b)(4) and 40 CFR 51.350); and, (6) NOX and VOC emission offsets at a ratio of 1.15 to 1 for major source permits (CAA section 182(b)(5) and 40 CFR 51.165(a)). See also the requirements for Moderate ozone nonattainment areas set forth in CAA section 182(b) and the general nonattainment plan provisions required under CAA section 172(c).\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ All 11 of the areas reclassified to Moderate except Denver-
Boulder-Greeley-Fort Collins-Loveland, CO have been classified Moderate or higher classification for a prior ozone NAAQS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As noted elsewhere in this preamble, when an area is reclassified under CAA section 181(b)(2), CAA section 182(i) directs that the state shall meet the new requirements according to the schedules prescribed in those requirements. It provides, however, ``that the Administrator may adjust any applicable deadlines (other than attainment dates) to the extent such adjustment is necessary or appropriate to assure consistency among the required submissions.'' CAA section 182(b), as interpreted by 40 CFR 51.1100 et seq., describes the required SIP revisions and associated deadlines for a nonattainment area classified as Moderate at the time of the initial designations. However, these SIP submission deadlines (e.g., 3 years after the effective date of designation for submission of an attainment plan and attainment demonstration) have already passed. Accordingly, the EPA is proposing to exercise its discretion under CAA section 182(i) to adjust the SIP submittal deadlines for these 11 new Moderate nonattainment areas.
In determining an appropriate deadline for the Moderate area SIP revisions for these 11 areas, the EPA notes that pursuant to 40 CFR 51.1108(d), for each nonattainment area, the state must provide for implementation of all control measures needed for attainment no later than the beginning of the attainment year ozone season. The attainment year ozone season is the ozone season immediately preceding a nonattainment area's attainment date. In the case of nonattainment areas classified as Moderate for the 2008 ozone NAAQS, the attainment year ozone season is the 2017 ozone season (40 CFR 51.1100(g)). The ozone season is the ozone monitoring season as defined in 40 CFR part 58, appendix D, section 4.1, Table D-3 (October 17, 2006, 71 FR 61236). We note that the EPA has proposed changes to the ozone monitoring season in its most recent proposal to revise the ozone NAAQS (79 FR 75234, December 17, 2014). For the purposes of reclassification for the 11 Marginal nonattainment areas identified in this proposal, Table 5 provides the starting month of the ozone monitoring season for each state with one of the 11 Marginal areas as currently codified in the EPA's regulations. Table 5 also includes the December 17, 2014, proposed changes, if any, to the beginning of the ozone monitoring season in such states. If the proposed changes to the beginning of the ozone
Page 51999
monitoring seasons are included in the final ozone NAAQS revision (expected by October 1, 2015), and that rulemaking is finalized before the EPA finalizes this action, the revised ozone season dates would also apply to our adjusted deadlines for the Moderate area SIP revisions for the areas we propose to reclassify in this document. We also note that we believe it is reasonable to provide states with a period of at least approximately 1 year after the reclassification is finalized to develop and submit the Moderate area SIP revisions. This provides time necessary for states and local air districts to finish their review of available control measures, adopt necessary attainment strategies, address other SIP requirements, and complete the public notice process necessary to adopt and submit SIP revisions.
Therefore, the EPA is proposing and taking comment on two options for setting the date by which states with jurisdiction for these 11 reclassified nonattainment areas would be required to submit for EPA review and approval SIP revisions to address Moderate area requirements. The first option, which is reflected in Table 5 below, would require that states submit the required SIP revisions as expeditiously as practicable, but no later than the beginning of the ozone season in 2017 for each state. This proposed option would align the SIP submittal deadline with the deadline for implementing applicable controls, which, as noted above, is also no later than the beginning of the ozone season in 2017 for each area. This option would give 9 states additional time that may be needed to accomplish planning, administrative and SIP revision processes. This option would treat states consistently in that they would need to have submitted SIP revisions by the beginning of their respective ozone seasons, but it would result in SIP submittal dates that vary among the states. In addition, as noted above, if the EPA finalizes the proposed changes to the start dates of the ozone season in a number of states, the proposed deadlines for SIP revisions in this rulemaking would also change accordingly. Under this first option, in multi-state nonattainment areas, such as the Chicago-Naperville area, where the three affected states do not have the same ozone season start date, the deadline for the entire nonattainment area would be the earliest ozone season start date for any of the states (e.g., April 1, 2017, for the Chicago area).
Table 5--Beginning of Ozone Season for States With Areas Identified for Reclassification to Moderate for the
2008 Ozone NAAQS
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current month or Proposed deadline Proposed month or
2008 Moderate ozone areas State date ozone season for moderate area date ozone season
begins \a\ SIP submittal begins \b\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Atlanta, GA..................... Georgia........... March............. 1-Mar-17.......... No change.
Chicago-Naperville, IL-IN-WI.... Illinois.......... April............. 1-Apr-17.......... March.
Chicago-Naperville, IL-IN-WI.... Indiana........... April............. 1-Apr-17.......... March.
Chicago-Naperville, IL-IN-WI.... Wisconsin......... 15-Apr............ 15-Apr-17......... 15-Mar.
Denver-Boulder-Greeley-Fort Colorado.......... March............. 1-Mar-17.......... January.
Collins-Loveland, CO.
Greater Connecticut, CT......... Connecticut....... April............. 1-Apr-17.......... March.
Imperial County, CA............. California........ January........... 1-Jan-17.......... No change.
Kern County (Eastern Kern), CA.. California........ January........... 1-Jan-17.......... No change.
Mariposa County, CA............. California........ January........... 1-Jan-17.......... No change.
Nevada County (Western part), CA California........ January........... 1-Jan-17.......... No change.
New York-N. New Jersey-Long New Jersey........ April............. 1-Apr-17.......... March.
Island, NY-NJ-CT.
New York-N. New Jersey-Long New York.......... April............. 1-Apr-17.......... March.
Island, NY-NJ-CT.
New York-N. New Jersey-Long Connecticut....... April............. 1-Apr-17.......... March.
Island, NY-NJ-CT.
Phoenix-Mesa, AZ................ Arizona........... January........... 1-Jan-17.......... No change.
San Diego County, CA............ California........ January........... 1-Jan-17.......... No change.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\a\ Table D-3 of Appendix D to Part 58--Ozone Monitoring Season by State. First day of beginning month except
for WI.
\b\ Beginning of ozone season proposed in the ozone NAAQS revision proposal (79 FR 75234, December 17, 2014).
Under the second option, the EPA proposes that the deadline for the required SIP revisions for areas that would be reclassified under this rulemaking would be as expeditiously as practicable, but no later than January 1, 2017. By establishing a single specific submittal date, this option would establish a consistent deadline for all 11 areas, similar to the single uniform SIP submission deadline that would have applied to all areas if they had been initially classified as Moderate. A uniform deadline of January 1, 2017, is reasonable because it would provide all states with approximately 1 year after these reclassifications are finalized to develop complete SIP submissions, and it is the latest SIP submittal date that would be compatible with ensuring controls are in place no later than the start of the attainment year ozone season for all of the 11 reclassified areas.
The EPA solicits comments on both of these proposed options for deadlines to submit the required SIP revisions that would apply to states after any current Marginal nonattainment area for the 2008 ozone NAAQS is reclassified to Moderate.
With regard to the New York-N. New Jersey-Long Island (NY-NJ-CT) nonattainment area, the EPA notes that in addition to the actions related to the 2008 ozone standard addressed in this
Page 52000
proposed rulemaking, on May 15, 2014, the agency proposed to rescind the clean data determination (CDD) for that nonattainment area under the 1997 8-hour ozone standard because the EPA determined that the area was no longer attaining the 1997 ozone NAAQS (79 FR 27830, ``May 2014 proposal document''). The CDD, issued by the EPA in June 2012, suspended the three states' obligations to meet attainment-related planning requirements for that standard, including submitting attainment demonstrations, RACM, RFP plans, and contingency measures. In the May 2014 proposal document, the EPA proposed to find that the New Jersey, New York, and Connecticut's SIPs were substantially inadequate to demonstrate attainment of the 1997 ozone NAAQS, and the agency proposed to issue a SIP Call under the authority of CAA section 110(k)(5) requiring the states to submit revised SIPs within 18 months to demonstrate how the New York-N. New Jersey-Long Island nonattainment area would re-attain the 1997 standard as expeditiously as practicable.
One option proposed by the EPA in the May 2014 proposal document would permit the relevant states to respond to the final SIP Call by requesting to be reclassified to Moderate for the 2008 ozone standard (see CAA section 181(b)(3)), which would consequently require that the states submit SIPs demonstrating how they would attain the more stringent 2008 standard as expeditiously as practicable. We proposed that this alternative response of submitting an attainment plan for the 2008 ozone standard would satisfy a final SIP Call on the 1997 ozone standard because an approvable plan would demonstrate compliance with a more stringent NAAQS.
The public comment period for the May 2014 proposal document closed on June 16, 2014, and the EPA is reviewing comments received on the proposal. However, given that this action proposes to find that the New York-N. New Jersey-Long Island nonattainment area has failed to attain the 2008 ozone standard by its Marginal attainment date of July 20, 2015, and must be reclassified to Moderate by operation of law in accordance with CAA section 181(b)(2)(A), this proposed action would effectively eliminate the need for the three affected states to request reclassification for the area under the option described in the May 2014 proposal document. Although we are not taking final action in this document on the proposed CDD rescission and SIP Call (79 FR 27830), the actions which may occur pursuant to this proposal (i.e., a final finding of failure to attain the 2008 standard by the applicable attainment date, reclassification of the area as Moderate, and a state submittal of a Moderate area attainment demonstration) would, thus, also serve to satisfy a final SIP Call under CAA section 110(k)(5). We also note that either of the 2008 ozone attainment plan due dates proposed in this document would meet the statutory timeframe for the SIP revision due subsequent to a SIP Call for the 1997 ozone NAAQS for the area.
-
Summary of Proposed Actions
The actions proposed in this document affect the 36 nonattainment areas for the 2008 ozone NAAQS that were initially designated and classified Marginal effective July 20, 2012, based on their individual design values. The design value of an area is represented by the annual fourth-highest daily maximum 8-hour average ozone concentration measured at each monitor in the area, averaged over a consecutive 3-
year period. According to CAA section 181(a)(1), as interpreted by EPA regulations at 40 CFR 51.1103, nonattainment Marginal areas are required to attain the standard ``as expeditiously as practicable'' but no later than 3 years after the designation effective date of July 20, 2012 (i.e., no later than July 20, 2015). CAA section 181(b)(2)(A) requires that within six months of the attainment date, which, in the case of the Marginal areas that are the subject of this document, was July 20, 2015, the EPA must determine, based on the ozone nonattainment area's design value as of the attainment date, whether the area attained the ozone standard by that date. A Marginal nonattainment area has attained the 2008 ozone NAAQS by the attainment date if its design value is equal to or less than 0.075 ppm based on data from the period 2012-2014. If the EPA determines that an area has failed to attain by its attainment date, CAA section 181(b)(2) requires that those areas be reclassified to the higher of (i) the next highest classification, or (ii) the classification that corresponds with the area's design value as of the time that the EPA publishes the document identifying the areas that have failed to attain by their attainment date. Accordingly, the EPA is proposing that the following 11 Marginal nonattainment areas failed to attain the 2008 ozone NAAQS by July 20, 2015, and must be reclassified as Moderate: Atlanta, GA; Chicago-Naperville, IL-IN-WI; Denver-Boulder-Greeley-Fort Collins-Loveland, CO; Greater Connecticut, CT; Imperial County, CA; Kern County (Eastern Kern), CA; Mariposa County, CA; Nevada County (Western part), CA; New York-N. New Jersey-
Long Island, NY-NJ-CT; Phoenix-Mesa, AZ; and, San Diego County, CA. For these 11 areas, the EPA is further proposing that the responsible states must submit SIP revisions to fulfill the CAA's Moderate area requirements by one of the following two alternative deadlines: Option 1--as expeditiously as practicable but not later than the start of each nonattainment area's 2017 ozone season; Option 2--as expeditiously as practicable but not later than January 1, 2017. The EPA is taking comment on the determinations of failure to attain and subsequent reclassifications of each of these 11 nonattainment areas from Marginal to Moderate, and on an appropriate deadline for responsible states to submit SIP revisions to fulfill Moderate area requirements for these areas.
Upon application by any state, the Administrator may extend the 2008 ozone attainment date by 1 year, in accordance with CAA section 181(a)(5) and 40 CFR 51.1107, provided that the state has complied with all requirements and commitments pertaining to the area in the applicable implementation plan, and the area's fourth highest daily maximum 8-hour average value for the last full year of air quality data prior to the July 20, 2015, attainment date (i.e., 2014) is at or below 0.075 ppm. Based on state requests and a review of 2014 ozone air quality data, the EPA is proposing to grant 1-year extensions of the attainment date to July 20, 2016 (from July 20, 2015) for the following eight Marginal nonattainment areas: Cleveland-Akron-Lorain, OH; Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX; Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-MD-DE; Pittsburgh-Beaver Valley, PA; San Luis Obispo County (Eastern part), CA; Sheboygan, WI; St. Louis-St. Charles-Farmington, MO-IL; and, Washington, DC-MD-VA. The EPA is taking comment on the 1-
year attainment date extensions for each of these eight areas.
For the 17 remaining 2008 ozone NAAQS nonattainment areas currently classified as Marginal, the EPA is proposing to determine that each area has ozone design values for the 2012-14 period at or below 0.075 ppm, and, thus, each area has attained the NAAQS by the attainment date of July 20, 2015. The 17 areas are: Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, PA; Baton Rouge, LA; Calaveras County, CA; Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC; Chico (Butte County), CA; Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN; Columbus, OH; Dukes County, MA; Jamestown, NY; Knoxville, TN; Lancaster, PA; Memphis, TN-MS-AR; Reading, PA; San Francisco
Page 52001
Bay Area, CA; Seaford, DE; Tuscan Buttes, CA; and, Upper Green River Basin, WY. The EPA is taking comment on the determinations of attainment by the applicable attainment date for these 17 areas.
-
-
Environmental Justice Considerations
The CAA requires that states with areas designated as nonattainment submit to the Administrator the appropriate SIP revisions and implement specified control measures by certain dates applicable to the area's classification. By requiring additional planning and implementation requirements for the 11 nonattainment areas proposed to be reclassified from Marginal to Moderate, the part of this action reclassifying the areas from Marginal to Moderate will protect all those residing, working, attending school, or otherwise present in those areas regardless of minority or economic status.
-
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
-
Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and Executive Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review
This action is not a significant regulatory action and was, therefore, not submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review.
-
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
The information collection activities associated with this proposed rule were submitted for approval to the OMB under the PRA as part of the information collection assessment for the 2008 ozone NAAQS SIP Requirements Rule. The Information Collection Request (ICR) document prepared by the EPA has been assigned the EPA ICR number 2347.01. You can find a copy of the ICR in the docket for the 2008 ozone NAAQS SIP Requirements Rule \15\ (EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0885), and in the docket for this rule (EPA-HQ-OAR-2015-0468). The ICR is briefly summarized here.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ 80 FR 12264, March 6, 2015.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The EPA issued the 2008 ozone NAAQS SIP Requirements Rule to provide states with assistance in interpreting how CAA requirements apply to their nonattainment areas when the states develop their SIPs for attaining and maintaining the 2008 ozone NAAQS. The intended effect of the SIP Requirements Rule--in conjunction with other rules that address additional aspects of implementation, such as this proposed action--is to provide assistance to states regarding their planning obligations such that states may begin SIP development. In preparing its analysis of the estimated paperwork burden associated with the SIP Requirements Rule and additional rules providing clarity on implementation of the 2008 ozone NAAQS, the EPA calculated that burden for the 46 areas designated non-attainment under that standard.16 17 The estimate in the ICR included the assumption that 10 nonattainment areas originally classified as Marginal would require reclassification to Moderate after the July 20, 2015, attainment date for Marginal nonattainment areas. If this proposed action is finalized, 11 nonattainment areas originally classified as Marginal would be reclassified to Moderate. Therefore, we believe that the original estimate in the ICR has fairly quantified the information collection activities that will be associated with the 11 areas we proposed to reclassify in this action. Upon finalization of the reclassification to Moderate, the states with jurisdiction over the 11 areas will be required to prepare an attainment demonstration as well as submit SIP revisions for purposes of meeting RFP requirements and RACT. The attainment demonstration requirement is codified at 40 CFR 51.908, which implements CAA subsections 172(c)(1), 182(b)(1)(A) and 182(c)(2)(B). The RFP SIP submission requirement is codified at 40 CFR 51.910, which implements CAA subsections 172(c)(2) and 182(b)(1)(A), and the RACT SIP submission requirement is codified at 40 CFR 51.912, which implements CAA subsections 172(c)(1) 182(b)(2),(c),(d) and (e).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ 77 FR 30088, May 21, 2012.
\17\ 77 FR 34227, June 11, 2012.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
States should already have information from emission sources, as facilities should have provided this information to meet 1-hour and 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS SIP requirements, operating permits and/or emissions reporting requirements. Such information does not generally reveal the details of production processes. But, to the extent it may, CBI for the affected facilities is protected. Specifically, submissions of emissions and control efficiency information that is confidential, proprietary and trade secret is protected from disclosure under the requirements of subsections 503(e) and 114(c) of the CAA.
The annual burden for the information collection associated with all 46 nonattainment areas, averaged over the first 3 years of the ICR, was estimated to be a total of 120,000 labor hours per year at an annual labor cost of $2.4 million (present value) over the 3-year period, or approximately $91,000 per state for the 25 state respondents and the District of Columbia. The average annual reporting burden is 690 hours per response, with approximately two responses per state for 58 state responses.\18\ There are no capital or operating and maintenance costs associated with the SIP Requirements Rule's or this proposed rule's requirements. Burden is defined at 5 CFR 1320.3(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ State responses are the number of SIP revisions required from the respective states to satisfy their 2008 ozone nonattainment requirements. Due to an oversight in the original submitted ICR, the estimated number of state responses (58) does not include the one required SIP revision for the Mississippi portion of the multi-state Memphis nonattainment area.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for the EPA's regulations in 40 CFR are listed in 40 CFR part 9.
The comment period on the agency's need for this information ran from June 6, 2013, to August 5, 2013.\19\ No comments were received on the accuracy of the provided burden estimates and any suggested methods for minimizing respondent burden. The EPA public docket for this rule includes the ICR approved in conjunction with the 2008 ozone NAAQS SIP Requirements Rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ 78 FR 34178, June 6, 2013.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
I certify that this action will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the RFA. This action will not impose any requirements on small entities. The proposed determinations of attainment and failure to attain the 2008 ozone NAAQS (and resulting reclassifications), and the proposed determination to grant 1-year attainment date extensions do not in and of themselves create any new requirements beyond what is mandated by the CAA. Instead, this rulemaking only makes factual determinations, and does not directly regulate any entities.
-
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)
This action does not contain any unfunded mandate as described in UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531-1538, and does not significantly or uniquely affect small governments. This action imposes no enforceable duty on any state, local or tribal governments or the private sector.
Page 52002
-
Executive Order 13132: Federalism
This action does not have federalism implications. It will not have substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship between the national government and the states, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
-
Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments
This action has tribal implications. However, it will neither impose substantial direct compliance costs on federally recognized tribal governments, nor preempt tribal law. The EPA has identified a number of tribal areas implicated in the 36 areas covered by the EPA's proposed determinations of attainment and failure to attain the 2008 ozone NAAQS (and resulting reclassifications), and the proposed determination to grant 1-year attainment date extensions. We intend to communicate with potentially affected tribes located within the boundaries of the nonattainment areas for the 2008 ozone NAAQS as we move forward in developing a final rule.
-
Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental Health and Safety Risks
The EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 as applying only to those regulatory actions that concern environmental health or safety risks that the EPA has reason to believe may disproportionately affect children, per the definition of ``covered regulatory action'' in section 2-202 of the Executive Order. This action is not subject to Executive Order 13045 because it does not concern an environmental health risk or safety risk.
-
Executive Order 13211: Actions That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use
This action is not subject to Executive Order 13211, because it is not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866.
-
-
National Technology Transfer Advancement Act (NTTAA)
This rulemaking does not involve technical standards.
-
Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations
The EPA believes the human health or environmental risk addressed by this action will not have potential disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects on minority, low-income or indigenous populations. The results of this evaluation are contained in the section of the preamble titled ``Environmental Justice Considerations.''
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen oxides, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: August 19, 2015.
Janet G. McCabe,
Acting Assistant Administrator.
FR Doc. 2015-21196 Filed 8-26-15; 8:45 am
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
-
