Airworthiness standards: Diamond Aircraft Industries GmbH; Model DA 40 airplane,
[Federal Register: June 7, 2001 (Volume 66, Number 110)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 30649-30651]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr07jn01-4]
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 23
[Docket No. CE167, Special Condition 23-107-SC]
Special Conditions; Diamond DA 40; Protection of Systems for High Intensity Radiated Fields (HIRF)
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final special conditions; request for comments.
SUMMARY: These special conditions are issued to Diamond Aircraft Industries GmbH, N.A. Otto-Str. 5, A-2700 Wiener Neustadt, Austria, for a Type Certificate for the Model DA 40 airplane. This airplane will have the potential for novel and unusual design features when compared to the state of technology envisaged in the applicable airworthiness standards. The current design does not include novel and unusual design features such as the installation of electronic flight instrument system (EFIS) displays; however, Diamond Aircraft Industries GmbH would like to make the applicable tests necessary for these types of installations for which the applicable regulations do not contain adequate or appropriate airworthiness standards for the protection of these systems from the effects of high intensity radiated fields (HIRF). These special conditions contain the additional safety standards that the Administrator considers necessary to establish a level of safety equivalent to the airworthiness standards applicable to these airplanes.
DATES: The effective date of these special conditions is July 9, 2001. Comments must be received on or before July 9, 2001.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed in duplicate to: Federal Aviation Administration Regional Counsel, ACE-7, Attention: Rules Docket Clerk, Docket No. CE167, Room 506, 901 Locust, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. All comments must be marked: Docket No. CE167. Comments may be inspected in the Rules Docket weekdays, except Federal holidays, between 7:30 a.m. and 4 p.m.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ervin Dvorak, Aerospace Engineer, Standards Office (ACE-110), Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service, Federal Aviation Administration, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri 64106; telephone (816) 329-4123.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA has determined that notice and opportunity for prior public comment hereon are impracticable because these procedures would significantly delay issuance of the approval design and thus delivery of the affected aircraft. In addition, the substance of these special conditions has been subject to the public comment process in several prior instances with no substantive comments received. The FAA, therefore, finds that good cause exists for making these special conditions effective upon issuance.
Comments Invited
Interested persons are invited to submit such written data, views, or arguments as they may desire. Communications should identify the regulatory docket or notice number and be submitted in duplicate to the address specified above. All communications received on or before the closing date for comments will be considered by the Administrator. The special conditions may be changed in light of the comments received. All comments received will be available in the Rules Docket for examination by interested persons, both before and after the closing date for comments. A report summarizing each substantive public contact with FAA personnel concerning this rulemaking will be filedin the docket. Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments submitted in response to this notice must include a self- addressed, stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments to Docket No. CE167.'' The postcard will be date stamped and returned to the commenter.
Background
On May 11, 2000, Diamond Aircraft Industries GmbH, N.A. Otto-Str. 5, A-2700 Wiener Neustadt, Austria, made an application to the FAA for a new Certificate for the Model DA 40 airplane. The current design does not include novel and unusual design features such as the installation of electronic flight instrument system (EFIS) displays; however, Diamond Aircraft Industries GmbH would like to make the applicable tests necessary for these types of installations. The applicable regulations do not contain adequate or appropriate airworthiness standards for the protection of these systems from the effects of high intensity radiated fields (HIRF). These special conditions contain the additional safety standards that the Administrator considers necessary to establish a level of safety equivalent to
[[Page 30650]]
the airworthiness standards applicable to these airplanes.
Type Certification Basis
Under the provisions of 14 CFR 21.17, Diamond Aircraft Industries GmbH, must show that the Model DA 40 aircraft meets the following provisions, or the applicable regulations in effect on the date of application for the Model DA 40: FAR part 23 effective February 9, 1996, through Amendment 23-51. Noise Certification--FAR 36 up to Amendment 10, as applicable. Fuel Venting Emissions--SFAR 27 up to Amendment 3, as applicable; exemptions, if any; and the special conditions adopted by this rulemaking action.
Discussion
If the Administrator finds that the applicable airworthiness standards do not contain adequate or appropriate safety standards because of novel or unusual design features of an airplane, special conditions are prescribed under the provisions of Sec. 21.16.
Special conditions are normally issued in accordance with Sec. 11.19, as required by Sec. 11.38, and become a part of the type certification basis in accordance with Sec. 21.17(a)(2).
Special conditions are initially applicable to the model for which they are issued. Should the applicant apply for a supplemental type certificate to modify any other model already included on the same type certificate to incorporate the same novel or unusual design feature, the special conditions would also apply to the other model under the provisions of Sec. 21.101(a)(1).
Novel or Unusual Design Features
Diamond Aircraft Industries GmbH, plans to test the Model DA 40 such that it could incorporate certain novel and unusual design features into the airplane for which the airworthiness standards do not contain adequate or appropriate safety standards for protection from the effects of HIRF.
Protection of Systems From High Intensity Radiated Fields (HIRF)
Recent advances in technology have given rise to the application in aircraft designs of advanced electrical and electronic systems that perform functions required for continued safe flight and landing. Due to the use of sensitive solid state advanced components in analog and digital electronics circuits, these advanced systems are readily responsive to the transient effects of induced electrical current and voltage caused by the HIRF. The HIRF can degrade electronic systems performance by damaging components or upsetting system functions.
Furthermore, the HIRF environment has undergone a transformation that was not foreseen when the current requirements were developed. Higher energy levels are radiated from transmitters that are used for radar, radio, and television. Also, the number of transmitters has increased significantly. There is also uncertainty concerning the effectiveness of airframe shielding for HIFR. Furthermore, coupling to cockpit-installed equipment through the cockpit window apertures is undefined.
The combined effect of the technological advances in airplane design and the changing environment has resulted in an increased level of vulnerability of electrical and electronic systems required for the continued safe flight and landing of the airplane. Effective measures against the effects of exposure to HIRF must be provided by the design and installation of these systems. The accepted maximum energy levels in which civilian airplane system installations must be capable of operating safely are based on surveys and analysis of existing radio frequency emitters. These special conditions require that the airplane be evaluated under these energy levels for the protection of the electronic system and its associated wiring harness. These external threat levels, which are lower than previous required values, are believed to represent the worst case to which an airplane would be exposed in the operating environment.
These special conditions require qualification of systems that perform critical functions, as installed in aircraft, to the defined HIRF environment in paragraph 1 or, as an option to a fixed value using laboratory tests, in paragraph 2, as follows:
(1) The applicant may demonstrate that the operation and operational capability of the installed electrical and electronic systems that perform critical functions are not adversely affected when the aircraft is exposed to the HIRF environment defined below:
Field strength (volts per meter) Frequency
------------------- Peak Average
10 kHz-100 kHz......................................
50
50 100 kHz-500 kHz.....................................
50
50 500 kHz-2 MHz.......................................
50
50 2 MHz-30 MHz........................................ 100 100 30 MHz-70 MHz.......................................
50
50 70 MHz-100 MHz......................................
50
50 100 MHz-200 MHz..................................... 100 100 200 MHz-400 MHz..................................... 100 100 400 MHz-700 MHz..................................... 700
50 700 MHz-1 GHz....................................... 700 100 1 GHz-2 GHz......................................... 2000 200 2 GHz-4 GHz......................................... 3000 200 4 GHz-6 GHz......................................... 3000 200 6 GHz-8 GHz......................................... 1000 200 8 GHz-12 GHz........................................ 3000 300 12 GHz-18 GHz....................................... 2000 200 18 GHz-40 GHz....................................... 600 200
The field strengths are expressed in terms of peak root-mean-square (rms) values.
or,
(2) The applicant may demonstrate by a system test and analysis that the electrical and electronic systems that perform critical functions can withstand a minimum threat of 100 volts per meter, peak electrical field strength, from 10 kHz to 18 GHz. When using this test to show compliance with the HIRF requirements, no credit is given for signal attenuation due to installation.
A preliminary hazard analysis must be performed by the applicant, for approval by the FAA, to identify either electrical or electronic systems that perform critical functions. The term ``critical'' means those functions whose failure would contribute to, or cause, a failure condition that would prevent the continued safe flight and landing of the airplane. The systems identified by the hazard analysis that perform critical functions are candidates for the application of HIRF requirements. A system may perform both critical and not-critical functions. Primary electronic flight display systems, and their associated components, perform critical functions such as attitude, altitude, and airspeed indication. The HIRF requirements apply only to critical functions.
Compliance with HIRF requirements may be demonstrated by tests, analysis, models, similarity with existing systems, or any combination of these. Service experience alone is not acceptable since normal flight operations may not include an exposure to the HIRF environment. Reliance on a system with similar design features for redundancy as a means of protection against he effects of external HIRF is generally insufficient since all elements of a redundant system are likely to be exposed to the fields concurrently.
Applicability
As discussed above, these special conditions are applicable to Diamond Aircraft Industries GmbH, Model DA 40 airplane. Should Diamond Aircraft Industries GmbH, apply at a later date
[[Page 30651]]
for an amended type certificate to modify the Model DA 40 that incorporates novel or unusual design feature, the special conditions would apply under the provisions of Sec. 21.101(a)(1).
Conclusion
This action affects only certain novel or unusual design features on one model of airplane. It is not a rule of general applicability and affects only the applicant who applied to the FAA for approval of these features on the airplane.
The substance of these special conditions has been subjected to the notice and comment period in several prior instances and has been derived without substantive change from those previously issued. It is unlikely that prior public comment would result in a significant change from the substance contained herein. For this reason, and because a delay would significantly affect the certification of the airplane, which is imminent, the FAA has determined that prior public notice and comment are unnecessary and impracticable, and good cause exists for adopting these special conditions upon issuance. The FAA is requesting comments to allow interested persons to submit views that may not have been submitted in response to the prior opportunities for comment described above.
List of Subjects in CFR Part 23
Aircraft, Aviation safety, Signs and symbols.
Citation
The authority citation for these special conditions is as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113 and 44701; 14 CFR 21.16 and 21.17; and 14 CFR 11.19 and 11.38.
The Special Conditions
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the following special conditions are issued as part of the type certification basis for Diamond Model DA 40 airplane.
-
Protection of Electrical and Electronic Systems from High Intensity Radiated Fields (HIRF). Each system that performs critical functions must be designed and installed to ensure that the operations, and operational capabilities of these systems to perform critical functions, are not adversely affected when the airplane is exposed to high intensity radiated electromagnetic fields external to the airplane.
-
For the purpose of these special conditions, the following definition applies: Critical Functions: Functions whose failure would contribute to, or cause, a failure condition that would prevent the continued safe flight and landing of the airplane.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on May 23, 2001. Michael Gallagher, Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 01-14233Filed6-6-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
