Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway, Stuart, FL
| Published date | 31 October 2019 |
| Record Number | 2019-23885 |
| Section | Rules and Regulations |
| Court | Coast Guard |
Federal Register, Volume 84 Issue 211 (Thursday, October 31, 2019)
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 211 (Thursday, October 31, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 58322-58324]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-23885]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[Docket No. USCG-2019-0561]
RIN 1625-AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway,
Stuart, FL
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is removing the existing drawbridge operation
regulation for the Jensen Beach (SR707a) Bridge across the Atlantic
Intracoastal Waterway, mile 981.4, at Stuart, FL. The drawbridge was
converted to a fixed bridge in 2005. The operating regulation is no
longer applicable or necessary.
DATES: This rule is effective October 31, 2019.
ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov. Type USCG-
2019-0561 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rulemaking.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email Ms. Jennifer Zercher, Bridge Administration Branch,
United States Coast Guard District Seven; telephone 305-415-6740, email
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
OMB Office of Management and Budget
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (Advance, Supplemental)
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and Regulatory History
The Coast Guard is issuing this final rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because Jensen Beach (SR707a) Bridge was
converted to a fixed bridge in 2005 and no longer requires the draw
operations in 33 CFR 117.261(o). Therefore, the regulation is no longer
applicable and shall be removed from publication. It is unnecessary to
publish an NPRM because this regulatory action does not purport to
place any restrictions on mariners but rather removes a restriction
that has no further use or value.
We are issuing this rule under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3). The Coast Guard
finds that good cause exists for making this rule effective in less
than 30 days after publication in the Federal Register. The bridge was
removed from the waterway 14 years ago and this rule merely requires an
administrative change to the Federal Register in order to omit a
regulatory requirement that is no longer applicable or necessary. The
modification has already taken place and the removal of the regulation
will not affect mariners currently operating on this waterway.
Therefore, a delayed effective date is unnecessary.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority of The Bridge
Act of 1894, 33 U.S.C. 499.
The Jensen Beach (SR707a) Bridge was converted to a fixed bridge in
2005. The regulation for the previously existing drawbridge was not
removed subsequent to the bridge's conversion to a fixed bridge. The
conversion of this bridge necessitates the removal of the drawbridge
operation regulation, 33 CFR 117.261(o), because this drawbridge
regulation governs a bridge that is no longer able to be opened.
IV. Discussion of Final Rule
The Coast Guard is changing the regulation in 33 CFR 117.261 by
removing restrictions and the regulatory burden related to draw
operations for a
[[Page 58323]]
bridge, which is no longer a drawbridge. The change removes 33 CFR
117.261(o) of the regulation governing the Jensen Beach (SR707a) Bridge
since the bridge has been converted to a fixed bridge. This Final Rule
seeks to update the Code of Federal Regulations by removing language
that governs the operation of the Jensen Beach (SR707a) Bridge, which
is no longer a drawbridge. This change does not affect waterway or land
traffic. This change does not affect or alter the operating schedules
in 33 CFR 117.261 that govern the remaining active drawbridges on the
Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway from St. Marys River to Key Largo.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
Executive Orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and Executive Orders, and we
discuss First Amendment rights of protesters.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control
regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This rule has not been
designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order
12866. Accordingly, it has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive Order 13771.
This regulatory action determination is based on the fact that the
bridge was removed from the waterway and the replacement structure is a
fixed bridge. The removal of the operating schedule from 33 CFR 117
subpart B will have no effect on the movement of waterway or land
traffic.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
For the reasons stated in section V.A above this final rule will
not have a significant economic impact on any vessel owner or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT,
above.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Government
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01, U.S. Coast Guard Environmental Planning
Policy COMDTINST 5090.1 (series) and U.S. Coast Guard Environmental
Planning Implementation Procedures (series) which guide the Coast Guard
in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f). We have made a determination that this
action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This
rule promulgates the operating regulations or procedures for
drawbridges. This action is categorically excluded from further review,
under paragraph L49, of Chapter 3, Table 3-1 of the U.S. Coast Guard
Environmental Planning Implementation Procedures.
A Record of Environmental Consideration nor a Memorandum for the
Record are required for this rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 117 as follows:
PART 117--DRAWBRIDGE OPERATION REGULATIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 117 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05-1; Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
[[Page 58324]]Sec. 117.261 [Amended]
0
2. Amend Sec. 117.261 by removing and reserving paragraph (o).
Dated: October 22, 2019.
Eric C. Jones,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Seventh Coast Guard
District.
[FR Doc. 2019-23885 Filed 10-30-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P
