Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Youngs Bay and Lewis and Clark River, Astoria, OR

Published date20 December 2018
Citation83 FR 65326
Record Number2018-27526
SectionProposed rules
CourtCoast Guard,Homeland Security Department
Federal Register, Volume 83 Issue 244 (Thursday, December 20, 2018)
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 244 (Thursday, December 20, 2018)]
                [Proposed Rules]
                [Pages 65326-65328]
                From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
                [FR Doc No: 2018-27526]
                =======================================================================
                -----------------------------------------------------------------------
                DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
                Coast Guard
                33 CFR Part 117
                [Docket No. USCG-2018-0131]
                RIN 1625-AA09
                Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Youngs Bay and Lewis and Clark
                River, Astoria, OR
                AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
                ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
                -----------------------------------------------------------------------
                SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to amend the operating schedule that
                governs three bridges in Astoria, OR: The US101 New Youngs Bay highway
                bridge (New Youngs Bay Bridge), mile 0.7 crossing Youngs Bay; the
                Oregon State Old Youngs Bay highway bridge (Old Youngs Bay Bridge),
                mile 2.4, crossing Youngs Bay; and the Oregon State Lewis and Clark
                River highway bridge (Lewis and Clark River Bridge), mile 1.0, crossing
                the Lewis and Clark River. This NPRM will allow the bridge to open
                during weekend hours after receiving a 2 hour advance notice. The
                proposed modification will remove the draw tender during weekend hours
                due to minimal usage.
                DATES: Comments and related material must reach the Coast Guard on or
                before January 22, 2019.
                ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
                2018-0131 using Federal eRulemaking Portal at http://www.regulations.gov.
                 See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion
                of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for instructions on
                submitting comments.
                FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this proposed
                rule, call or email Steven M. Fischer, Bridge Administrator, Thirteenth
                Coast Guard District Bridge Program Office, telephone 206-220-7282;
                email d13-pf-d13bridges@uscg.mil.
                SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
                I. Table of Abbreviations
                CFR Code of Federal Regulations
                DHS Department of Homeland Security
                FR Federal Register
                NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
                ODOT Oregon Department of Transportation
                Sec. Section
                U.S.C. United States Code
                II. Background, Purpose and Legal Basis
                 The Coast Guard proposes revising the rule that governs three
                bridges at Astoria, OR, the New Youngs Bay Bridge, the Old Youngs Bay
                Bridge and the Lewis and Clark River Bridge. Due to infrequent
                drawbridge opening requests from Friday evenings through Monday early
                mornings, we propose opening the three highway bridges within Youngs
                Bay and Lewis and Clark River with a two-hour advance notice. The New
                Youngs Bay Bridge over five years had the most openings of 77 requests.
                We published a test deviation for six months in the Federal Register
                (83 FR 9430) on March 6, 2018, to collect data and comments for this
                proposed rule titled Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Youngs Bay and
                Lewis and Clark River. Only one comment was received, and that comment
                was not related to the schedule change for the test deviation. We did
                not receive any delay of opening complaints for the three subject
                bridges during the test deviation. The three bridges are operated by
                the Lewis and Clark River Bridge tender of the Oregon Department of
                Transportation (ODOT). Youngs Bay provides no alternate route to pass
                around the three subject bridges. The New Youngs Bay Bridge provides 39
                feet of vertical clearance at mean high water, the Old Youngs Bay
                Bridge provides 24 feet of vertical clearance at mean high water, and
                the Lewis and Clark River Bridge provides 25 feet of vertical clearance
                at mean high water. The three subject bridges operate per 33 CFR
                117.899 to open on signal if at least one half-hour notice is given to
                the draw tender at the Lewis and Clark River Bridge from 7 a.m. to 5
                p.m. Monday through Friday, and from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m. on Saturday and
                Sunday. This proposed rule will allow the three subject bridges to open
                from Friday at 5 p.m. to Monday at 7 a.m. if at least a two-hour notice
                is given by telephone to the draw tender at the Lewis and Clark River
                Bridge. The purpose of this rulemaking is in regards to a request from
                ODOT to remove the bridge operator to reduce operating cost. The Coast
                Guard proposes this rulemaking under authority in 33 U.S.C. 1231.
                III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
                 This proposed rule amends 33 CFR 117.899 to provide specific
                requirements for the operation of the
                [[Page 65327]]
                New Youngs Bay Bridge, the Old Youngs Bay Bridge and the Lewis and
                Clark River Bridge. These specific requirements are in addition to or
                vary from the general requirements that apply to all drawbridges across
                the navigable waters of the United States. This proposed rule
                reasonably accommodates waterway users while reducing ODOT's burden in
                operating the bridges. We have not identified any impacts on marine
                navigation with this proposed rule.
                IV. Regulatory Analyses
                 We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
                and Executive Orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
                analysis based on these statutes and Executive Orders, and we discuss
                First Amendment rights of protestors.
                A. Regulatory Planning and Review
                 Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
                costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
                regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
                net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control
                regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This NPRM has not been
                designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order
                12866. Accordingly, the NPRM has not been reviewed by the Office of
                Management and Budget (OMB), and pursuant to OMB guidance, it is exempt
                from the requirements of Executive Order 13771. This regulatory action
                determination is based on the ability for the bridges to open on signal
                after receiving at least a two hour notice by telephone from Friday at
                5 p.m. to Monday at 7 a.m. This proposed rule also applies to opening
                the three subject bridges for marine vessels needing an opening due to
                an emergency.
                B. Impact on Small Entities
                 The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
                amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
                regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
                entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
                that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
                fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
                50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
                proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a
                substantial number of small entities.
                 While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit
                under the subject bridges may be small entities, for the reasons stated
                in section IV.A above, this proposed rule would not have a significant
                economic impact on any vessel owner or operator. Vessels operating on
                Youngs Bay and the Lewis and Clark River range from small recreational
                vessels, sailboats, tribal fishing boats and small commercial fishing
                vessels. Vessels able to pass through the subject bridges with the draw
                in the closed-to-navigation position may do so at any time.
                 If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
                jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
                a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
                ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
                degree this rule would economically affect it.
                 Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
                Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
                entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect
                your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you
                have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance,
                please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
                CONTACT, above. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
                entities that question or complain about this proposed rule or any
                policy or action of the Coast Guard.
                C. Collection of Information
                 This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information
                under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520.).
                D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Government
                 A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
                Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
                relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
                distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
                government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
                have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
                principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
                13132.
                 Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
                Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
                Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
                one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
                Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
                responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
                you believe this proposed rule has implications for federalism or
                Indian tribes, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
                INFORMATION CONTACT section above.
                E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
                 The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
                requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
                regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
                result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
                the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
                inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule will not
                result in such expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this proposed
                rule elsewhere in this preamble.
                F. Environment
                 We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
                Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction
                M16475.lD, which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National
                Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
                have made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a
                category of actions which do not individually or cumulatively have a
                significant effect on the human environment. This proposed rule simply
                promulgates the operating regulations or procedures for drawbridges.
                Normally such actions are categorically excluded from further review,
                under figure 2-1, paragraph (32) (e), of the Instruction.
                 A preliminary Record of Environmental Consideration and a
                Memorandum for the Record are not required for this proposed rule. We
                seek any comments or information that may lead to the discovery of a
                significant environmental impact from this proposed rule.
                G. Protest Activities
                 The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
                Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
                INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
                your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
                security of people, places or vessels.
                V. Public Participation and Request for Comments
                 We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking,
                and will consider all comments and material
                [[Page 65328]]
                received during the comment period. Your comment can help shape the
                outcome of this rulemaking. If you submit a comment, please include the
                docket number for this rulemaking, indicate the specific section of
                this document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for
                each suggestion or recommendation.
                 We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking
                Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be
                submitted using http://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the
                FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for alternate
                instructions.
                 We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted
                without change to http://www.regulations.gov and will include any
                personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and the
                docket, visit http://www.regulations.gov/privacynotice.
                 Documents mentioned in this NPRM as being available in this docket
                and all public comments, will be in our online docket at http://www.regulations.gov and can be viewed by following that website's
                instructions. Additionally, if you go to the online docket and sign up
                for email alerts, you will be notified when comments are posted or a
                final rule is published.
                List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
                 Bridges.
                 For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
                to amend 33 CFR part 117 as follows:
                PART 117--DRAWBRIDGE OPERATION REGULATIONS
                0
                1. The authority citation for part 117 continues to read as follows:
                 Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05-1; Department of Homeland
                Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
                0
                2. Amend Sec. 117.899 by revising paragraphs (a), (b) and (c) to read
                as follows:
                Sec. 117.899 Youngs Bay and Lewis and Clark River.
                 (a) The draw of the US101 New Youngs Bay highway bridge, mile 0.7,
                across Youngs Bay at Smith Point, shall open on signal for the passage
                of vessels if at least one half-hour notice is given to the draw tender
                at the Lewis and Clark River Bridge by marine radio, telephone, or
                other suitable means from 7 a.m. to 5 p.m. Monday through Friday.
                During all other times, including weekends from 5 p.m. on Friday until
                7 a.m. on Monday, and all Federal holidays but Columbus Day, the draw
                shall open on signal if at least a two-hour notice is given to the draw
                tender by telephone. The opening signal shall be two prolonged blasts
                followed by one short blast.
                 (b) The draw of the Oregon State Old Youngs Bay highway bridge,
                mile 2.4, across Youngs Bay foot of Fifth Street, shall open on signal
                for the passage of vessels if at least one half-hour notice is given to
                the draw tender at the Lewis and Clark River Bridge by marine radio,
                telephone, or other suitable means from 7 a.m. to 5 p.m. Monday through
                Friday. During all other times, including weekends from 5 p.m. on
                Friday until 7 a.m. on Monday and Federal holidays with the exception
                of Columbus Day, the draw shall open on signal if at least a two-hour
                notice is given to the draw tender by telephone. The opening signal
                shall be two prolonged blasts followed by one short blast.
                 (c) The draw of the Oregon State Lewis and Clark River highway
                bridge, mile 1.0, across the Lewis and Clark River, shall open on
                signal for the passage of vessels if at least one half-hour notice is
                given by marine radio, telephone, or other suitable means from 7 a.m.
                to 5 p.m. Monday through Friday. During all other times, including
                weekends from 5 p.m. on Friday until 7 a.m. on Monday and Federal
                holidays but Columbus Day, the draw shall open on signal if at least a
                two-hour notice is given to the draw tender by telephone. The opening
                signal shall be two prolonged blasts followed by one short blast.
                David G. Throop,
                Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Thirteenth Coast Guard
                District.
                [FR Doc. 2018-27526 Filed 12-19-18; 8:45 am]
                 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P
                

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT