Drawbridge operations: New York,
[Federal Register: March 23, 2001 (Volume 66, Number 57)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 16128-16129]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr23mr01-16]
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[CGD01-01-032]
RIN 2115-AE47
Drawbridge Operation Regulations: Newtown Creek, Dutch Kills, English Kills and Their Tributaries, NY
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DOT.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary final rule governing the operation of the Pulaski Bridge, at mile 0.6, across the Newtown Creek between Brooklyn and Queens, New York. This temporary final rule allows the bridge owner to need open only one bascule span for the passage of vessel traffic from April 23, 2001 through August 31, 2001. This action is necessary to facilitate maintenance at the bridge.
DATES: This temporary final rule is effective from April 23, 2001 through August 31, 2001.
ADDRESSES: The public docket and all documents referred to in this notice are available for inspection or copying at the First Coast Guard District, Bridge Branch Office, 408 Atlantic Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts, 02110, 7 a.m. to 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Joseph Schmied, Project Officer, First Coast Guard District, (212) 668-7165.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) was not published for this regulation. Good cause exists for not publishing a NPRM. The Coast Guard mailed letters to all known waterway users advising of the proposed single span operation. No objections or negative comments were received. No vessels known to use the waterway would be precluded from navigation during single span operation. Accordingly, an NPRM was deemed unnecessary. Additionally, conclusive information from the bridge owner confirming the start date for this single span bridge operation was not provided to the Coast Guard until February 26, 2001. As a result, it was impracticable to draft or publish a NPRM or a final rule in advance of the requested start date for this necessary maintenance. Any delay encountered in this regulation's effective date would be contrary to the public interest.
Background
The Pulaski Bridge, at mile 0.6, across Newtown Creek between Brooklyn and Queens has a vertical clearance of 39 feet at mean high water and 43 feet at mean low water. The existing regulations require the draw to open on signal at all times.
The bridge owner, New York City Department of Transportation, requested a single bascule span operation in order to facilitate sandblasting and painting at the bridge. The Coast Guard contacted all known users by letter advising of this proposed single span operation. No objections or negative comments were received.
Regulatory Evaluation
This rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866 and does not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not reviewed it under that Order. It is not ``significant'' under the regulatory policies and procedures of the Department of Transportation (DOT) (44 FR 11040; February 26, 1979). This conclusion is based on the fact that the bridge will continue to open at all times for navigation.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612) we considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. ``Small entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for profit organizations that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. This conclusion is based on the fact that the bridge will continue to open on signal at all times for navigation.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
[[Page 16129]]
Federalism
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13132 and have determined that this rule does not have implications for federalism under that Order.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) governs the issuance of Federal regulations that require unfunded mandates. An unfunded mandate is a regulation that requires a State, local, or tribal government or the private sector to incur direct costs without the Federal Government's having first provided the funds to pay those unfunded mandate costs. This rule will not impose an unfunded mandate.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of private property or otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and does not concern an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may disproportionately affect children.
Environment
The Coast Guard considered the environmental impact of this rule and concluded that under figure 2-1, paragraph (32)(e) of Commandant Instruction M16475.1C, this rule is categorically excluded from further environmental documentation because promulgation of changes to drawbridge regulations have been found to not have a significant effect on the environment. A written ``Categorical Exclusion Determination'' is not required for this rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
Regulations
For the reasons set out in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 CFR part 117 as follows:
PART 117--DRAWBRIDGE OPERATION REGULATIONS
-
The authority citation for part 117 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 49 CFR 1.46; 33 CFR 1.05-1(g); section 117.255 also issued under the authority of Pub. L. 102-587, 106 Stat. 5039.
-
From April 23, 2001 through August 31, 2001, Sec. 117.801 is temporarily amended by adding a new paragraph (a)(3) and a new paragraph (h) to read as follows:
Sec. 117.801 Newtown Creek, Dutch Kills, English Kills and their tributaries.
(a) * * *
(3) Except as provided in paragraphs (b) through (h) of this section, each draw shall open on signal. * * * * *
(h) The Pulaski Bridge, at mile 0.6, across Newtown Creek, need open only one bascule span for the passage of vessel traffic.
Dated: March 16, 2001. G.N. Naccara, Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, First Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 01-7292Filed3-20-01; 3:29 pm]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P
