Petitions for Decision that Nonconforming Vehicles Are Eligible for Importation:
Federal Register: February 8, 2011 (Volume 76, Number 26)
Notices
Page 6841-6842
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
DOCID:fr08fe11-119
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
Docket No. NHTSA-2010-0170; Notice 1
Notice of Receipt of Petition for Decision That Nonconforming 2006 and 2007 Aston Martin Vantage Passenger Cars Are Eligible for
Importation
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Notice of receipt of petition for decision that nonconforming 2006 and 2007 Aston Martin Vantage passenger cars are eligible for importation.
SUMMARY: This document announces receipt by the National Highway
Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) of a petition for a decision that 2006 and 2007 Aston Martin Vantage passenger cars that were not originally manufactured to comply with all applicable Federal Motor
Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSS) are eligible for importation into the
United States because they are substantially similar to vehicles that were originally manufactured for importation into and sale in the
United States and that were certified by their manufacturer as complying with the safety standards (the U.S.-certified version of the 2006 and 2007 Aston Martin Vantage passenger cars,) and they are capable of being readily altered to conform to the standards.
DATES: The closing date for comments on the petition is March 10, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Comments should refer to the docket and notice numbers above and be submitted by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Docket Management Facility: U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
Hand Delivery or Courier: West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. ET,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Instructions: Comments must be written in the English language, and be no greater than 15 pages in length, although there is no limit to the length of necessary attachments to the comments. If comments are submitted in hard copy form, please ensure that two copies are provided. If you wish to receive confirmation that your comments were received, please enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard with the comments. Note that all comments received will be posted without change to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided. Please see the Privacy Act heading below.
Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all comments received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on
April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78).
How to Read Comments submitted to the Docket: You may read the comments received by Docket Management at the address and times given above. You may also view the documents from the Internet at http:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for accessing the dockets. The docket ID number and title of this notice are shown at the heading of this document notice. Please note that even after the comment closing date, we will continue to file relevant information in the Docket as it becomes available. Further, some people may submit late comments. Accordingly, we recommend that you periodically search the Docket for new material.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Coleman Sachs, Office of Vehicle
Safety Compliance, NHTSA (202-366-3151).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Under 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(A), a motor vehicle that was not originally manufactured to conform to all applicable FMVSS shall be refused admission into the United States unless NHTSA has decided that the motor vehicle is substantially similar to a
Page 6842
motor vehicle originally manufactured for importation into and sale in the United States, certified under 49 U.S.C. 30115, and of the same model year as the model of the motor vehicle to be compared, and is capable of being readily altered to conform to all applicable FMVSS.
Petitions for eligibility decisions may be submitted by either manufacturers or importers who have registered with NHTSA pursuant to 49 CFR Part 592. As specified in 49 CFR 593.7, NHTSA publishes notice in the Federal Register of each petition that it receives, and affords interested persons an opportunity to comment on the petition. At the close of the comment period, NHTSA decides, on the basis of the petition and any comments that it has received, whether the vehicle is eligible for importation. The agency then publishes this decision in the Federal Register.
J.K. Technologies, LLC (``JK''), of Baltimore, Maryland (Registered
Importer 90-006) has petitioned NHTSA to decide whether nonconforming 2006 and 2007 Aston Martin Vantage passenger cars are eligible for importation into the United States. The vehicles which JK believes are substantially similar are 2006 and 2007 Aston Martin Vantage passenger cars that were manufactured for sale in the United States and certified by their manufacturer as conforming to all applicable FMVSS.
The petitioner states that it compared non-U.S. certified 2006 and 2007 Aston Martin Vantage passenger cars to their U.S.-certified counterparts, and found the vehicles to be substantially similar with respect to compliance with most FMVSS.
JK submitted information with its petition intended to demonstrate that non-U.S. certified 2006 and 2007 Aston Martin Vantage passenger cars, as originally manufactured, conform to many FMVSS in the same manner as their U.S. certified counterparts, or are capable of being readily altered to conform to those standards.
Specifically, the petitioner claims that non-U.S. certified 2006 and 2007 Aston Martin Vantage passenger cars are identical to their
U.S. certified counterparts with respect to compliance with Standard
Nos. 102 Transmission Shift Lever Sequence, Starter Interlock, and
Transmission Braking Effect, 103 Windshield Defrosting and Defogging
Systems, 104 Windshield Wiping and Washing Systems, 106 Brake Hoses, 109 New Pneumatic Tires, 113 Hood Latch System, 116 Motor Vehicle Brake
Fluids, 124 Accelerator Control Systems, 135 Light Vehicle Brake
Systems, 201 Occupant Protection in Interior Impact, 202 Head
Restraints, 204 Steering Control Rearward Displacement, 205 Glazing
Materials, 206 Door Locks and Door Retention Components, 207 Seating
Systems, 209 Seat Belt Assemblies, 210 Seat Belt Assembly Anchorages, 212 Windshield Mounting, 214 Side Impact Protection, 216 Roof Crush
Resistance, 219 Windshield Zone Intrusion, 225 Child Restraint
Anchorage Systems, 302 Flammability of Interior Materials, and 401
Interior Trunk Release.
The petitioner also contends that the vehicles are capable of being readily altered to meet the following standards, in the manner indicated:
Standard No. 101 Controls and Displays: Replacement of the instrument cluster with a conforming U.S.-model component.
Standard No. 108 Lamps, Reflective Devices and Associated
Equipment: Installation of the following conforming U.S.-model components on vehicles not already so equipped: (a) Front and rear side marker lamps and reflex reflectors; (b) headlamps; (c) tail lamps; and
(d) a high mounted stop lamp.
Standard No. 110 Tire Selection and Rims: Installation of a tire information placard.
Standard No. 111 Rearview Mirrors: Installation of a conforming
U.S.-model passenger side rearview mirror, or inscription of the required warning statement on the face of that mirror.
Standard No. 114 Theft Protection: Installation of a supplemental key warning buzzer to ensure that the theft protection system meets the requirements of this standard.
Standard No. 118 Power-Operated Window, Partition, and Roof Panel
Systems: Installation of U.S.-model software to ensure that the power- operated window system meets the requirements of this standard.
Standard No. 208 Occupant Crash Protection: Installation of: (a) A seat belt warning buzzer and associated software; (b) airbag warning labels; (c) a replacement front passenger's seat frame base incorporating four occupant classification system (OCS) sensors and associated electronic control module (The connection for the OCS already exists in the vehicle wiring system.); (d) a child restraint tether anchorage on the front passenger's seat; (e) revised software in the restraint control module (RCM) so that the OCS connection and redundant Passenger Airbag Cut Off Switch (PACOS) is recognized; and
(f) revised software in the central electronic module (CEM) for system compatibility and to reconfigure the vehicle settings to ensure that the occupant restraint systems meet the requirements of this standard.
In addition, the petitioner states that the passenger airbag cut off switch (PACOS) must be deactivated.
The petitioner included a parts list in its petition that it obtained from the original manufacturer of the vehicle listing the components that must be installed in the nonconforming vehicle.
The petitioner also states that the occupant restraint systems used in vehicle includes conforming combination lap and shoulder belts at the outboard front seating positions as well as the rear outboard seating positions that are self-tensioning and released by means of a single red pushbutton.
Standard No. 301 Fuel System Integrity: Installation of U.S.-model software to ensure that the system meets the requirements of this standard.
The petitioner additionally states that a vehicle identification plate must be affixed to the vehicles near the left windshield post to meet the requirements of 49 CFR Part 565.
All comments received before the close of business on the closing date indicated above will be considered, and will be available for examination in the docket at the above addresses both before and after that date. To the extent possible, comments filed after the closing date will also be considered. Notice of final action on the petition will be published in the Federal Register pursuant to the authority indicated below.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(A) and (b)(1); 49 CFR 593.8; delegations of authority at 49 CFR 1.50 and 501.8.
Issued on: February 2, 2011.
Claude H. Harris,
Acting Associate Administrator for Enforcement.
FR Doc. 2011-2660 Filed 2-7-11; 8:45 am
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P
