Formaldehyde; Draft Risk Evaluation Peer Review by the Science Advisory Committee on Chemicals (SACC); Request for Comments on Experts Being Considered for Participation as Ad Hoc Peer Reviewers

Published date28 February 2024
Record Number2024-04131
Citation89 FR 14648
CourtEnvironmental Protection Agency
SectionNotices
Federal Register, Volume 89 Issue 40 (Wednesday, February 28, 2024)
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 40 (Wednesday, February 28, 2024)]
                [Notices]
                [Pages 14648-14649]
                From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
                [FR Doc No: 2024-04131]
                -----------------------------------------------------------------------
                ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                [EPA-HQ-OPPT-2023-0613; FRL-11608-02-OCSPP]
                Formaldehyde; Draft Risk Evaluation Peer Review by the Science
                Advisory Committee on Chemicals (SACC); Request for Comments on Experts
                Being Considered for Participation as Ad Hoc Peer Reviewers
                AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
                ACTION: Notice.
                -----------------------------------------------------------------------
                SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is announcing the
                availability of and soliciting public comments on the list of
                candidates under consideration for selection as ad hoc peer reviewers
                assisting the Science Advisory Committee on Chemicals (SACC) with their
                peer review of the Agency's evaluation of the risks from formaldehyde
                being conducted to inform risk management decisions under the Toxic
                Substances Control Act (TSCA). The list of candidates provides the
                names and biographical sketches of all interested and available
                candidates identified from the responses to the call for nominations
                and other sources. Public comments on these candidates will be used to
                assist the Agency in selecting approximately 10-15 ad hoc peer
                reviewers to assist the SACC with the identified peer review.
                DATES: Submit your comments on or before March 14, 2024.
                ADDRESSES: Submit comments, identified by docket identification (ID)
                number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2023-0613, through the Federal eRulemaking Portal at
                https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for
                submitting comments. Do not submit electronically any information you
                consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other
                information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Additional
                instructions on commenting and visiting the docket, along with more
                information about dockets generally, is available at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
                FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Designated Federal Official (DFO)
                is Tamue Gibson, Mission Support Division (7602M), Office of Program
                Support, Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention,
                Environmental Protection Agency; telephone number: (202) 564-7642;
                email address: [email protected]; or call the SACC main office at
                (202) 564-8450.
                SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
                I. General Information
                A. What action is the Agency taking?
                 The Agency is seeking public comments on scientific and technical
                experts that EPA is considering for service as ad hoc peer reviewers
                assisting the SACC with the peer review of the Agency's evaluation of
                the risks from formaldehyde being conducted to inform risk management
                decisions under TSCA. The Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics
                (OPPT) collaborated with the Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP) to
                develop hazard assessments for human and ecological health. EPA expects
                to ask the SACC to consider and review these joint hazard assessments
                in addition to the OPPT exposure and risk characterizations. This SACC
                peer review is in addition to prior external peer reviews by the
                National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM), the
                EPA's Human Studies Review Board (HSRB) and SACC peer reviews of
                related scientific issues. The Agency is leveraging these peer reviews
                to support further development of the risk evaluation of formaldehyde.
                For additional information, please see the Agency's request for
                nominations of ad hoc expert reviewers that appeared in the Federal
                Register of December 26, 2023 (88 FR 88910 (FRL-11608-01-OCSPP)).
                B. What is the Agency's authority for taking this action?
                 EPA established the SACC in 2016 in accordance with TSCA, 15 U.S.C.
                2625(o), to provide independent advice and expert consultation with
                respect to the scientific and technical aspects of issues relating to
                the implementation of TSCA. The SACC operates in accordance with the
                Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), 5 U.S.C. 10, and supports
                activities under TSCA, 15 U.S.C. 2601 et seq., the Pollution Prevention
                Act (PPA), 42 U.S.C. 13101 et seq., and other applicable statutes.
                C. Does this action apply to me?
                 This action is directed to the public in general and may be of
                particular interest to those involved in the manufacture, processing,
                distribution, and disposal of the subject chemical substance, and/or
                those interested in the assessment of risks involving chemical
                substances and mixtures regulated under TSCA.
                [[Page 14649]]
                D. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for EPA?
                 Do not electronically submit any information you consider to be
                Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
                disclosure is restricted by statute. Copyrighted material will not be
                posted without explicit permission of the copyright holder. Members of
                the public should also be aware that personal contact information, if
                included in any written comments, may be posted on the internet at
                https://www.regulations.gov. If your comment contains any information
                that you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected, please contact the
                DFO listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT to obtain special
                instructions before submitting that information.
                E. How can I stay informed about SACC activities?
                 You may subscribe to the following listserv for alerts regarding
                this and other SACC-related activities: https://public.govdelivery.com/accounts/USAEPAOPPT/subscriber/new?topic_id=USAEPAOPPT_101.
                II. Background
                 EPA is planning this SACC peer review of the Agency's evaluation of
                the risks from formaldehyde being conducted to inform risk management
                decisions under TSCA. OPPT collaborated with OPP to develop hazard
                assessments for human and ecological health. EPA expects to ask the
                SACC to consider and review these joint hazard assessments in addition
                to the OPPT exposure and risk characterizations. This SACC peer review
                is in addition to prior external peer reviews by the National Academies
                of Science, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM), the EPA's Human Studies
                Review Board (HSRB) and SACC peer reviews of related scientific issues.
                The Agency is leveraging these peer reviews to support further
                development of the risk evaluation of formaldehyde. The TSCA risk
                evaluation of formaldehyde is expected to comprise several modules
                (i.e., human health hazard, ecological hazard, release and exposure
                assessments) and two risk assessment documents--the ecological risk
                assessment and the human health risk assessment. As part of the TSCA
                risk evaluation for formaldehyde, OPPT is assessing formaldehyde
                conditions of use (COUs; e.g., composite wood products, plastics,
                rubber, toys, and various adhesives and sealants).
                 Recommendations from the formaldehyde SACC review will be
                considered in the development of the TSCA risk evaluation and may
                inform other EPA efforts related to the assessment and regulation of
                formaldehyde. The Agency will be seeking SACC review of its data
                analyses and methodologies relevant to human health hazard and exposure
                analyses that have not been previously peer reviewed. For additional
                information, please see the Federal Register notice of December 26,
                2023 (88 FR 88910).
                III. Request for Comments on the Candidates List
                A. Will ad hoc reviewers be subjected to an ethics review?
                 EPA is currently seeking public comments on all interested and
                available candidates, without prescreening for ethics concerns.
                However, SACC members and ad hoc peer reviewers are subject to the
                provisions of the Standards of Ethical Conduct for Employees of the
                Executive Branch at 5 CFR part 2635, conflict of interest statutes in
                title 18 of the United States Code and related regulations. In
                anticipation of this requirement, prospective candidates for service on
                the SACC will be asked to submit confidential financial information
                which shall fully disclose, among other financial interests, the
                candidate's employment, stocks and bonds, and where applicable, sources
                of research support. EPA will evaluate the candidates' financial
                disclosure forms to assess whether there are financial conflicts of
                interest, appearance of a loss of impartiality, or any prior
                involvement with the development of the documents under consideration
                (including previous scientific peer review) before the candidate is
                considered further for service on the SACC.
                B. How will EPA select the ad hoc reviewers?
                 The selection of scientists to serve as ad hoc peer reviewers for
                the SACC is based on the function of the Committee and the expertise
                needed to address the Agency's charge to the Committee. No interested
                scientists shall be ineligible to serve by reason of their membership
                on any other advisory committee to a federal department or agency or
                their employment by a federal department or agency, except EPA. Other
                factors considered during the selection process include availability of
                the prospective candidate to fully participate in the Committee's
                reviews, absence of any conflicts of interest or appearance of loss of
                impartiality, independence with respect to the matters under review,
                and lack of bias. Although financial conflicts of interest, the
                appearance of loss of impartiality, lack of independence, and bias may
                result in non-selection, the absence of such concerns does not assure
                that a candidate will be selected to serve on the SACC.
                 Numerous qualified candidates are often identified for SACC
                reviews. Therefore, selection decisions involve carefully weighing a
                number of factors including the candidates' areas of expertise and
                professional qualifications, and achieving an overall balance of
                different scientific perspectives across reviewers.
                 Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2625(o); 5 U.S.C 10.
                 Dated: February 23, 2024.
                Michal Freedhoff,
                Assistant Administrator, Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution
                Prevention.
                [FR Doc. 2024-04131 Filed 2-27-24; 8:45 am]
                BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
                

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT