Margin and Capital Requirements for Covered Swap Entities

Citation84 FR 9940
Record Number2019-05012
Published date19 March 2019
SectionRules and Regulations
CourtBoard Of Governors Of The Federal Reserve System,Farm Credit Administration,Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation,Federal Housing Finance Agency,The Comptroller Of The Currency Office
9940
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 53 / Tuesday, March 19, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
§ 929.43 Contributions.
The Committee may accept voluntary
contributions to pay expenses incurred
pursuant to § 929.45, Research and
development. Such contributions may
only be accepted if they are sourced
from domestic contributors and are free
from any encumbrances or restrictions
on their use by the donor. The
Cranberry Marketing Committee shall
retain complete control of their use.
[FR Doc. 2019–05079 Filed 3–18–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Office of the Comptroller of the
Currency
12 CFR Part 45
[Docket No. OCC–2019–0002]
RIN 1557–0061
BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
12 CFR Part 237
[Docket No. R–1654]
RIN 7100–AF42
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE
CORPORATION
12 CFR Part 349
RIN 3064–AF00
FARM CREDIT ADMINISTRATION
12 CFR Part 624
RIN 3052–AD34
FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE
AGENCY
12 CFR Part 1221
RIN 2590–AB02
Margin and Capital Requirements for
Covered Swap Entities
AGENCY
: Office of the Comptroller of the
Currency, Treasury (OCC); Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve
System (Board); Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation (FDIC); Farm
Credit Administration (FCA); and the
Federal Housing Finance Agency
(FHFA).
ACTION
: Interim final rule and request
for comment.
SUMMARY
: The OCC, Board, FDIC, FCA,
and FHFA (each an Agency and,
collectively, the Agencies) are adopting
and invite comment on an interim final
rule amending the Agencies’ regulations
that require swap dealers and security-
based swap dealers under the Agencies’
respective jurisdictions to exchange
margin with their counterparties for
swaps that are not centrally cleared
(Swap Margin Rule). The Swap Margin
Rule takes effect under a phased
compliance schedule stretching from
2016 through 2020, and the dealers
covered by the rule continue to hold
swaps in their portfolios that were
entered into before the effective dates of
the rule. Those swaps are grandfathered
from the Swap Margin Rule’s
requirements until they expire
according to their terms. There are
currently financial services firms
located within the United Kingdom
(U.K.) that conduct swap dealing
activities subject to the Swap Margin
Rule. The U.K. has provided formal
notice of its intention to withdraw from
the European Union (E.U.) on March 29,
2019. If this transpires without a
negotiated agreement between the U.K.
and E.U., these entities located in the
U.K. may not be authorized to provide
full-scope financial services to swap
counterparties located in the E.U. The
Agencies’ policy objective in developing
the interim final rule is to address one
aspect of the scenario likely to ensue,
whereby entities located in the U.K.
might transfer their existing swap
portfolios that face counterparties
located in the E.U. over to an affiliate or
other related establishment located
within the E.U. or the United States
(U.S.). The Agencies seek to address
industry concerns about the status of
grandfathered swaps in this scenario, so
the industry can focus on making
preparations for swap transfers. These
transfers, if carried out in accordance
with the conditions of the interim final
rule, will not trigger the application of
the Swap Margin Rule to grandfathered
swaps that were entered into before the
compliance dates of the Swap Margin
Rule.
DATES
: The interim final rule is effective
March 19, 2019. Comments should be
received on or before April 18, 2019.
ADDRESSES
: Interested parties are
encouraged to submit written comments
jointly to all of the Agencies.
Commenters are encouraged to use the
title ‘‘Margin and Capital Requirements
for Covered Swap Entities’’ to facilitate
the organization and distribution of
comments among the Agencies.
OCC: You may submit comments to
the OCC by any of the methods set forth
below. Commenters are encouraged to
submit comments through the Federal
eRulemaking Portal or email, if possible.
Please use the title ‘‘Margin and Capital
Requirements for Covered Swap
Entities’’ to facilitate the organization
and distribution of the comments. You
may submit comments by any of the
following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal—
‘‘Regulations.gov’’: Go to
www.regulations.gov. Enter ‘‘Docket ID
OCC–2019–0002’’ in the Search Box and
click ‘‘Search.’’ Click on ‘‘Comment
Now’’ to submit public comments. Click
on the ‘‘Help’’ tab on the
Regulations.gov home page to get
information on using Regulations.gov,
including instructions for submitting
public comments.
Email: regs.comments@
occ.treas.gov.
Mail: Legislative and Regulatory
Activities Division, Office of the
Comptroller of the Currency, 400 7th
Street SW, Suite 3E–218, Washington,
DC 20219.
Hand Delivery/Courier: 400 7th
Street SW, Suite 3E–218, Washington,
DC 20219.
Fax: (571) 465–4326.
Instructions: You must include
‘‘OCC’’ as the agency name and ‘‘Docket
ID OCC–2019–0002’’ in your comment.
In general, the OCC will enter all
comments received into the docket and
publish the comments on the
Regulations.gov website without
change, including any business or
personal information that you provide
such as name and address information,
email addresses, or phone numbers.
Comments received, including
attachments and other supporting
materials, are part of the public record
and subject to public disclosure. Do not
include any information in your
comment or supporting materials that
you consider confidential or
inappropriate for public disclosure.
You may review comments and other
related materials that pertain to this
rulemaking action by any of the
following methods:
Viewing Comments Electronically:
Go to www.regulations.gov. Enter
‘‘Docket ID OCC–2019–0002’’ in the
Search box and click ‘‘Search.’’ Click on
‘‘Open Docket Folder’’ on the right side
of the screen. Comments and supporting
materials can be viewed and filtered by
clicking on ‘‘View all documents and
comments in this docket’’ and then
using the filtering tools on the left side
of the screen. Click on the ‘‘Help’’ tab
on the Regulations.gov home page to get
information on using Regulations.gov.
The docket may be viewed after the
close of the comment period in the same
manner as during the comment period.
Viewing Comments Personally: You
may personally inspect comments at the
OCC, 400 7th Street SW, Washington,
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:02 Mar 18, 2019 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\19MRR1.SGM 19MRR1
9941
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 53 / Tuesday, March 19, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
DC 20219. For security reasons, the OCC
requires that visitors make an
appointment to inspect comments. You
may do so by calling (202) 649–6700 or,
for persons who are deaf or hearing
impaired, TTY, (202) 649–5597. Upon
arrival, visitors will be required to
present valid government-issued photo
identification and submit to security
screening in order to inspect comments.
Board: You may submit comments,
identified by [Docket No. R–1654 and
RIN No. 7100–AF42, by any of the
following methods:
Agency website: http://
www.federalreserve.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments at
http://www.federalreserve.gov/
generalinfo/foia/ProposedRegs.cfm.
Email: regs.comments@
federalreserve.gov. Include the docket
number and RIN number in the subject
line of the message.
Fax: (202) 452–3819 or (202) 452–
3102.
Mail: Address to Ann E. Misback,
Secretary, Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System, 20th Street and
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20551.
All public comments are available
from the Board’s website at http://
www.federalreserve.gov/generalinfo/
foia/ProposedRegs.cfm as submitted,
unless modified for technical reasons or
to remove personally identifiable
information at the commenter’s request.
Accordingly, comments will not be
edited to remove any identifying or
contact information. Public comments
may also be viewed electronically or in
paper in Room 146, 1709 New York
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20006
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. on weekdays.
FDIC: You may submit comments,
identified by RIN 3064–AF00, by any of
the following methods:
Agency website: https://
www.FDIC.gov/regulations/laws/federal.
Mail: Robert E. Feldman, Executive
Secretary, Attention: Comments/Legal
ESS, Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation, 550 17th Street, NW,
Washington, DC 20429.
Hand Delivered/Courier: The guard
station at the rear of the 550 17th Street
Building (located on F Street) on
business days between 7:00 a.m. and
5:00 p.m.
Email: Comments@FDIC.gov.
Comments submitted must include
‘‘FDIC’’ and ‘‘RIN 3064–AF00—Brexit
Amendment: Margin and Capital
Requirements for Covered Swap
Entities.’’ Comments received will be
posted without change to https://
www.fdic.gov/regulations/laws/federal,
including any personal information
provided.
FHFA: You may submit your written
comments on the interim final
rulemaking, identified by regulatory
information number: RIN 2590–AB02,
by any of the following methods:
Agency website: www.fhfa.gov/
open-for-comment-or-input.
Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments. If
you submit your comment to the
Federal eRulemaking Portal, please also
send it by email to FHFA at
RegComments@fhfa.gov to ensure
timely receipt by the Agency. Please
include ‘‘RIN 2590–AB02’’ in the
subject line of the message.
Hand Delivery/Courier: The hand
delivery address is: Alfred M. Pollard,
General Counsel, Attention: Comments/
RIN 2590–AB02, Federal Housing
Finance Agency, Constitution Center
(OGC Eighth Floor), 400 7th St. SW,
Washington, DC 20219. Deliver the
package to the Seventh Street entrance
Guard Desk, First Floor, on business
days between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m.
U.S. Mail, United Parcel Service,
Federal Express, or Other Mail Service:
The mailing address for comments is:
Alfred M. Pollard, General Counsel,
Attention: Comments/RIN 2590–AB02,
Federal Housing Finance Agency,
Constitution Center (OGC Eighth Floor),
400 7th St. SW, Washington, DC 20219.
All comments received by the
deadline will be posted for public
inspection without change, including
any personal information you provide,
such as your name, address, email
address and telephone number on the
FHFA website at http://www.fhfa.gov.
Copies of all comments timely received
will be available for public inspection
and copying at the address above on
government-business days between the
hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. To make an
appointment to inspect comments
please call the Office of General Counsel
at (202) 649–3804.
FCA: We offer a variety of methods for
you to submit your comments. For
accuracy and efficiency reasons,
commenters are encouraged to submit
comments by email or through the
FCA’s website. As facsimiles (fax) are
difficult for us to process and achieve
compliance with section 508 of the
Rehabilitation Act, we are no longer
accepting comments submitted by fax.
Regardless of the method you use,
please do not submit your comments
multiple times via different methods.
You may submit comments by any of
the following methods:
Email: Send us an email at reg-
comm@fca.gov.
FCA website: http://www.fca.gov.
Click inside the ‘‘I want to . . .’’ field
near the top of the page; select
‘‘comment on a pending regulation’’
from the dropdown menu; and click
‘‘Go.’’ This takes you to an electronic
public comment form.
Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Barry F. Mardock, Deputy
Director, Office of Regulatory Policy,
Farm Credit Administration, 1501 Farm
Credit Drive, McLean, VA 22102–5090.
You may review copies of all
comments we receive at our office in
McLean, Virginia or on our website at
http://www.fca.gov. Once you are on the
website, click inside the ‘‘I want to
. . .’’ field near the top of the page;
select ‘‘find comments on a pending
regulation’’ from the dropdown menu;
and click ‘‘Go.’’ This will take you to the
Comment Letters page where you can
select the regulation for which you
would like to read the public comments.
We will show your comments as
submitted, including any supporting
data provided, but for technical reasons
we may omit items such as logos and
special characters. Identifying
information that you provide, such as
phone numbers and addresses, will be
publicly available. However, we will
attempt to remove email addresses to
help reduce internet spam.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
:
OCC: Chris McBride, Director for
Market Risk, Treasury and Market Risk
Policy, (202) 649–6402, or Allison
Hester-Haddad, Counsel, Chief
Counsel’s Office, (202) 649–5490, for
persons who are deaf or hearing
impaired, TTY (202) 649–5597, Office of
the Comptroller of the Currency, 400 7th
Street SW, Washington, DC 20219.
Board: Constance Horsley, Deputy
Associate Director, (202) 452–5239,
Peter Clifford, Manager, (202) 785–6057,
Lesley Chao, Lead Financial Institution
Policy Analyst, (202) 974–7063, or John
Feid, Principal Economist, (202) 452–
2385, Division of Supervision and
Regulation; Jason Shafer, Counsel, (202)
728–5811, or Justyna Bolter, Attorney,
(202) 452–2686, Legal Division, Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve
System, 20th and C Streets NW,
Washington, DC 20551.
FDIC: Irina Leonova, Senior Policy
Analyst, ileonova@fdic.gov, Capital
Markets Branch, Division of Risk
Management Supervision, (202) 898–
3843; Thomas F. Hearn, Counsel,
thohearn@fdic.gov, Legal Division,
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation,
550 17th Street NW, Washington, DC
20429.
FCA: Jeremy R. Edelstein, Associate
Director, Finance & Capital Market
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:02 Mar 18, 2019 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\19MRR1.SGM 19MRR1
9942
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 53 / Tuesday, March 19, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
1
Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer
Protection Act, Public Law 111–203, 124 Stat. 1376
(2010).
2
See 7 U.S.C. 6s(e)(3)(A); 15 U.S.C. 78o–
10(e)(3)(A).
3
See 7 U.S.C. 6s; 15 U.S.C. 78o–10. Sections 731
and 764 of the Dodd-Frank Act added a new section
4s to the Commodity Exchange Act of 1936, as
amended, and a new section, section 15F, to the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
respectively, which require registration with the
Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) of
swap dealers and major swap participants and the
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) of
security-based swap dealers and major security-
based swap participants (each a swap entity and,
collectively, swap entities).
4
Section 1a(39) of the Commodity Exchange Act
of 1936, as amended, defines the term ‘‘prudential
regulator’’ for purposes of the margin requirements
applicable to swap dealers, major swap
participants, security-based swap dealers and major
security-based swap participants. The Board is the
prudential regulator for any swap entity that is (i)
a state-chartered bank that is a member of the
Federal Reserve System, (ii) a state-chartered
branch or agency of a foreign bank, (iii) a foreign
bank which does not operate an insured branch, (iv)
an organization operating under section 25A of the
Federal Reserve Act of 1913, as amended, or having
an agreement with the Board under section 25 of
the Federal Reserve Act, or (v) a bank holding
company, a foreign bank that is treated as a bank
holding company under section 8(a) of the
International Banking Act of 1978, as amended, or
a savings and loan holding company (on or after the
transfer date established under section 311 of the
Dodd-Frank Act), or a subsidiary of such a company
or foreign bank (other than a subsidiary for which
the OCC or the FDIC is the prudential regulator or
that is required to be registered with the CFTC or
SEC as a swap dealer or major swap participant or
a security-based swap dealer or major security-
based swap participant, respectively). The OCC is
the prudential regulator for any swap entity that is
(i) a national bank, (ii) a federally chartered branch
or agency of a foreign bank, or (iii) a Federal savings
association. The FDIC is the prudential regulator for
any swap entity that is (i) a State-chartered bank
that is not a member of the Federal Reserve System,
or (ii) a State savings association. The FCA is the
prudential regulator for any swap entity that is an
institution chartered under the Farm Credit Act of
1971, as amended. The FHFA is the prudential
regulator for any swap entity that is a ‘‘regulated
entity’’ under the Federal Housing Enterprises
Financial Safety and Soundness Act of 1992, as
amended (i.e., the Federal National Mortgage
Association and its affiliates, the Federal Home
Loan Mortgage Corporation and its affiliates, and
the Federal Home Loan Banks). See 7 U.S.C. 1a(39).
5
A ‘‘swap’’ is defined in section 721 of the Dodd-
Frank Act to include, among other things, an
interest rate swap, commodity swap, equity swap,
and credit default swap, and a security-based swap
is defined in section 761 of the Dodd-Frank Act to
include a swap based on a single security or loan
or on a narrow-based security index. See 7 U.S.C.
1a(47); 15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(68). For the remainder of
this preamble, the term ‘‘non-cleared swaps’’ refers
to non-cleared swaps and non-cleared security-
based swaps unless the context requires otherwise.
6
80 FR 74840 (November 30, 2015). The Swap
Margin Rule was amended to implement a statutory
exemption for non-cleared swaps entered into for
hedging by commercial end users and small
financial institutions, see 80 FR 74916 (November
30, 2015), and to address treatment of qualified
financial contracts, see 83 FR 50805 (October 10,
2018).
7
See https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/
government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_
data/file/759019/25_November_Agreement_on_the_
withdrawal_of_the_United_Kingdom_of_Great_
Britain_and_Northern_Ireland_from_the_European_
Union_and_the_European_Atomic_Energy_
Community.pdf (visited February 5, 2019).
8
In this
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
, the
Agencies’ references to an establishment of a
financial entity is intended to be flexible as to
whether the relationship of the financial entity to
the business unit in the U.K. or elsewhere is due
to an affiliation between separately-incorporated
entities, branching of a single business entity in
different jurisdictions, or some other form of
business establishment through which an arm of the
financial entity may be legally authorized to
conduct business in that location.
9
The applicable compliance date for a covered
swap entity is based on the average daily aggregate
notional amount of non-cleared swaps, foreign
exchange forwards and foreign exchange swaps of
the covered swap entity and its counterparty
(accounting for their respective affiliates) for each
business day in March, April and May of that year.
The applicable compliance dates for initial margin
requirements, and the corresponding average daily
notional thresholds, are: September 1, 2016, $3
trillion; September 1, 2017, $2.25 trillion;
September 1, 2018, $1.5 trillion; September 1, 2019,
$0.75 trillion; and September 1, 2020, all swap
entities and counterparties. See §__.1(e) of the
Swap Margin Rule.
10
See §__.1(e) of the Swap Margin Rule.
11
80 FR 74850–51. See also, 83 FR 50805
(October 10, 2018) (the Agencies added paragraph
Team, Timothy T. Nerdahl, Senior
Policy Analyst, Office of Regulatory
Policy, (703) 883–4414, TTY (703) 883–
4056, or Richard A. Katz, Senior
Counsel, Office of General Counsel,
(703) 883–4020, TTY (703) 883–4056,
Farm Credit Administration, 1501 Farm
Credit Drive, McLean, VA 22102–5090.
FHFA: Ron Sugarman, Principal
Policy Analyst, Office of Policy Analysis
and Research, (202) 649–3208,
Ron.Sugarman@fhfa.gov, or James P.
Jordan, Associate General Counsel,
Office of General Counsel, (202) 649–
3075, James.Jordan@fhfa.gov, Federal
Housing Finance Agency, Constitution
Center, 400 7th St., SW, Washington, DC
20219. The telephone number for the
Telecommunications Device for the
Hearing Impaired is (800) 877–8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
:
I. Background
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform
and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-
Frank Act)
1
required the Agencies to
adopt rules jointly that establish capital
and margin requirements
2
for swap
entities
3
that are prudentially regulated
by one of the Agencies (covered swap
entities).
4
These capital and margin
requirements apply to swaps that are
not cleared by a registered derivatives
clearing organization or a registered
clearing agency (non-cleared swaps).
Swaps are certain types of financial
derivatives, such as interest rate swaps
and commodity swaps, that the Dodd-
Frank Act generally characterized as
‘‘swaps.’’
5
On November 30, 2015, the
Agencies published the Swap Margin
Rule to establish the minimum margin
and capital requirements for the non-
cleared swap portfolios of covered swap
entities.
6
The Agencies are issuing this interim
final rule in connection with efforts to
assist covered swap entities as they
prepare for the event commonly
described as ‘‘Brexit.’’ In particular, this
interim final rule is intended to address
a covered swap entity’s ability to service
its cross-border clients in the event that
the U.K. withdraws from the E.U.
without a Withdrawal Agreement.
7
Briefly stated, the interim final rule
amends the Swap Margin Rule to make
it clear that in such an event, financial
entities located in the U.K. may transfer
existing non-cleared swap portfolios
over to a sister establishment of the U.K.
financial entity that is located in an E.U.
Member State or the U.S., without
concerns of thereby triggering the
application of the Swap Margin Rule’s
margin requirements to non-cleared
swaps that had been grandfathered at
the financial entity in the U.K.
8
The
Agencies are also requesting public
comment whether additional provisions
or clarifications are needed to achieve
the Agencies’ objectives and provide
greater clarity.
In issuing the Swap Margin Rule in
2015, the Agencies established an
effective date of April 1, 2016, with a
phased in compliance schedule for the
initial and variation margin
requirements.
9
On or after March 1,
2017, all covered swap entities were
required to comply with the variation
margin requirements for transactions
with other swap entities and financial
end user counterparties. By September
1, 2020, all covered swap entities will
be required to comply with the initial
margin requirements for non-cleared
swaps with all financial end users with
a material swaps exposure and with all
swap entities.
The Swap Margin Rule’s requirements
generally apply only to a non-cleared
swap entered into on or after the
applicable compliance date.
10
A non-
cleared swap entered into prior to an
entity’s applicable compliance date is
essentially ‘‘grandfathered’’ by this
regulatory provision, in that the non-
cleared swap is generally not subject to
the margin requirements in the Swap
Margin Rule (legacy swap). However,
the Agencies explained in the preamble
of the Swap Margin Rule that a legacy
swap that is later amended or novated
on or after the applicable compliance
date should be subject to the
requirements of the Swap Margin Rule,
in the interests of preventing evasion of
the rule’s margin requirements.
11
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:02 Mar 18, 2019 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\19MRR1.SGM 19MRR1
9943
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 53 / Tuesday, March 19, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
(7) to §__.1(e), to clarify that a legacy swap would
not lose its legacy status when the covered swap
entity acceded to changes to the non-cleared swap
as necessary to implement the QFC Receivership
Stay regulations of the Board, the FDIC, and the
OCC).
12
See §__.9(a)–(c) of the Swap Margin Rule.
13
See §__.9(a)–(c) of the As discussed later in
this
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
, the Agencies have
designed the interim final rule to recognize the
need for flexibility on the part of financial entities
as they attempt to work through the unanticipated
effects of a U.K. exit from the E.U. absent a
Withdrawal Agreement. For example, while this
discussion illustrates an E.U. establishment of a
covered swap entity taking on the swap portfolios
of the entity’s related covered swap entity in the
U.K., a different financial entity’s current structure
might mean the U.K. portfolio is currently held by
the financial entity’s CFTC-registered non-bank
subsidiary in the U.K., which is subject to the
CFTC’s non-cleared swap margin rule. As a general
matter, the CFTC’s rule and the Agencies’ Swap
Margin Rule impose the same requirements and
feature the same grandfathering. But the portfolio
transfer over to the financial entity’s covered swap
entity in the E.U. will, as a legal matter, subject
them to the Agencies’ swap margin rule once they
are transferred. Or some financial firms that operate
a covered swap entity through an establishment in
the U.S. may make strategic decisions to refrain
from opening a new E.U. establishment post-
withdrawal, and thus need to pull their U.K. non-
cleared swap portfolios back to their U.S. covered
swap entity.
14
See, e.g., Barclays Bank plc Part VII Business
transfer to Barclays Bank Ireland plc (2019) EWHC
129 (Ch), at http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/
Ch/2019/129.pdf (visited January 29, 2019); ‘‘Two
Banks Begin Moving Swaps out of London, Pre-
Brexit,’’ Risk.net (November 30, 2018), at https://
www.risk.net/derivatives/6168671/banks-begin-
moving-swaps-out-of-london-pre-brexit (visited
January 25, 2019); ‘‘UBS Wins Approval for Ö32bn
Brexit Swaps Transfer,’’ Risk.net (February 6, 2019),
at https://www.risk.net/derivatives/6367306/ubs-
wins-approval-for-eu32bn-brexit-swaps-transfer.
15
The three ESAs are the European Banking
Authority (EBA), the European Securities and
Markets Authority (ESMA) and the European
Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority
(EIOPA).
16
ESAs Propose to Amend Bilateral Margin
Requirements to Assist Brexit Preparations for OTC
Derivative Contracts (November 29, 2018), at
https://www.esma.europa.eu/press-news/esma-
news/esas-propose-amend-bilateral-margin-
requirements-assist-brexit-preparations-otc (visited
January 25, 2019).
17
A legacy swap may still be subjected to margin
requirements if the covered swap entity places the
swap into a netting set that includes other non-
cleared swaps that are entered into after the
compliance date applicable to the covered swap
entity. Swap Margin Rule §.__5(a)(3). Covered swap
entities use netting sets to calculate their margin
requirements for multiple swaps with a single
counterparty on a portfolio basis, offsetting asset
and liability exposures in the portfolio to one net
exposure, subject to conditions contained in the
Swap Margin Rule, including an enforceable legal
Continued
The Swap Margin Rule has a broad
territorial reach. It applies to swap
dealers and security-based swap dealers
that are registered with the CFTC or the
SEC, respectively, and for which one of
the Agencies is the prudential regulator,
including, for example, certain foreign
banks and foreign banking
organizations, certain entities
established abroad by U.S. banks, and
certain foreign branches of U.S. banks.
Typically, such firms are registered in
the foreign jurisdiction in which they
are located with the appropriate
financial regulatory authorities, but the
firms may also conduct swap activities
with counterparties that have significant
ties to the U.S. (or the dealer itself may
be a branch of a U.S. bank) under
circumstances that trigger dealer
registration obligations with the CFTC
or SEC. The Agencies included an
exemption from the requirements of the
Swap Margin Rule that applies
whenever a foreign covered swap entity
engages in a foreign non-cleared swap,
but the rule’s margin requirements still
apply when the counterparty has certain
connections to the U.S., such as when
the counterparty is a foreign branch or
office of an entity organized under U.S.
federal or state law.
12
As a result, there are instances in
which a covered swap entity engages in
non-cleared swap activities out of
establishments in the U.K. that are
subject to the requirements of the Swap
Margin Rule. The same is true in certain
instances for a covered swap entity
engaging in those activities out of an
establishment in another E.U. Member
State.
Financial entities, including covered
swap entities, in the U.K. face
uncertainty about the applicable
regulatory framework they will operate
within after a U.K. withdrawal from the
E.U. In many instances, these firms
made a strategic decision decades ago to
use a U.K. establishment as their base of
operations to provide financial services
to customers across the E.U., consistent
with the E.U.’s system of cross-border
authorizations to engage in regulated
financial activities (known as
‘‘passporting’’). These firms have been
mindful that one consequence of a U.K.
exit from the E.U. absent a Withdrawal
Agreement will be an inability of the
firms to continue providing investment
services in the E.U. under the current
passporting regime. As a result, they
might not be in a position to perform
certain operations in relation to
derivatives contracts they presently
have with E.U. clients. In order to
address this situation, these firms could
transfer their derivatives to a related
establishment in an E.U. Member State,
which in turn would benefit from the
passporting regime.
In addition, a covered swap entity
that operates an establishment located
outside the U.K. may be affected if the
U.K. exits the E.U. without a
Withdrawal Agreement. These covered
swap entities may have entered into
non-cleared swaps with financial
entities located in the U.K. These U.K.
counterparties of the covered swap
entity may need to relocate certain
operations, in order to continue
providing financial services to their own
customers in the E.U. Accordingly, a
covered swap entity’s counterparties
with establishments in the U.K. may
seek to transfer their non-cleared swaps
to related establishments of their own in
an E.U. Member State.
13
In recent months, some financial
entities have initiated processes under
which a U.K. court sanctions a bulk
transfer of their business, including
derivatives, from the balance sheets of
their U.K. establishments to a different
location established by the dealer in
another E.U. Member State.
14
For many
months before that, industry
stakeholders urged E.U. regulators to
provide certainty that these kinds of
portfolio transfers of swaps, entered into
before the E.U.’s swap margin rule, will
not become subject to E.U. swap margin
rules by virtue of the legal changes
associated with novations or other legal
transfer methods. The European
Supervisory Authorities (ESAs)
15
published a final report in November to
make a limited exemption in the
Commission Delegated Regulation
under the European Market
Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR) for
bilateral margining requirements. The
exemption would facilitate novations of
these non-cleared swaps by ensuring
that the regulatory characteristics of the
original contracts are preserved.
16
The scheduled date of the U.K.
withdrawal is March 29, 2019. The
Agencies believe it is appropriate to
provide clarity, in order to facilitate the
work of covered swap entities and their
counterparties to transfer non-cleared
swaps in response to a U.K. exit from
the E.U. absent a Withdrawal
Agreement, without thereby converting
their legacy swaps into covered swaps
subject to the Swap Margin Rule. The
conditions of eligibility for the transfers
are described in the next section of this
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
.
II. Description of the Interim Final Rule
As discussed above, legacy swaps are
generally grandfathered from the Swap
Margin Rule’s requirements. More
specifically, § __.1(e) states that covered
swap entities shall comply with the
Swap Margin Rule’s minimum margin
requirements for non-cleared swaps
entered into on or after the compliance
date that the rule establishes for
separate classes of counterparties,
depending on the size of their swaps
portfolios.
17
However, in the preamble
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:02 Mar 18, 2019 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\19MRR1.SGM 19MRR1
9944
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 53 / Tuesday, March 19, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
netting agreement with the counterparty. See §__
.5(a).
18
80 FR 74850–51. The Agencies articulated
concerns about the potential evasion of the Swap
Margin Rule if legacy swaps could be materially
amended and not become subject to the
requirements of the Swap Margin Rule, as well as
the Agencies’ concerns about the difficulty of
administrating a more complex regulatory approach
that attempted to draw distinctions among the
materiality of, or the intended purpose of,
amendments to legacy swaps.
19
The Agencies note that, regardless whether the
covered swap entity is driving the swap relocation,
or the covered swap entity’s counterparty is driving
the move, the covered swap entity will need to
participate in whatever amendments or other legal
steps are used to reflect the transfer of a bilateral
non-cleared swap contract.
20
See §__.1(h)(2)(ii), referring to non-cleared
swaps an entity in the U.K. arranges to amend in
order to transfer it to one of its affiliates, or a branch
or other authorized form of establishment, located
in an E.U. Member State.
21
See §__.1(h)(2)(i), referring to non-cleared
swap originally entered into before the relevant
compliance date under the Swap Margin Rule,
when one party to the swap booked it at, or
otherwise held it at, an entity (including a branch
or other authorized form of establishment) located
in the U.K.
22
See §__.1(h)(2)(ii), requiring the amendments
to be for the sole purpose of transferring the non-
cleared it to one of its affiliates, or a branch or other
authorized form of establishment, located in an E.U.
Member State, in connection with the entity’s
planning for or response to U.K. withdrawal.
to the Swap Margin Rule, in response to
comments, the Agencies declined to
include regulatory language that would
extend legacy swap treatment to a swap
if it is subsequently novated or amended
after the applicable compliance date,
expressing concerns about evasion and
implementation.
18
In the interim final rule, the Agencies
are amending § __.1 to add an additional
provision, paragraph § __.1(h). This new
provision is designed to preserve the
status quo for legacy swaps for a
covered swap entity in the event of a
‘‘no-deal’’ U.K. withdrawal, regardless
of whether that covered swap entity is
the swap counterparty directly involved
in the transfer out of the U.K. or the
counterparty on the other side of the
swap.
A covered swap entity may, for
example, use its establishment in the
E.U. to take on non-cleared swap
portfolios from its swap dealing affiliate
in the U.K. In a different case, the
covered swap entity’s establishments in
the E.U. and the U.K. may both be
branches of the same swap dealing
bank. Alternatively, there may be yet a
different relationship due to the
structure of the specific financial entity
involved.
On the other hand, the covered swap
entity may not move its operations in
any way, but it may have existing
portfolios of non-cleared swaps facing
counterparties who are themselves
relocating out of the U.K., to an affiliate,
or a branch, or some other type of
establishment outside of the U.K.
To be effective, the Agencies believe
this interim final rule must cover the
different scenarios that would trigger
the need for a covered swap entity to
participate in amending a non-cleared
swap in order to ‘‘relocate’’ the swap,
either on account of its own need to
move non-cleared swaps out of the U.K.,
or its counterparty’s need to do so.
19
Accordingly, the text of the interim
final rule is intended to be flexible as to
the nature of the financial entity’s
establishment—covered swap entity or
counterparty—maintained in the U.K.,
be it an entity organized under U.K. law,
or a branch or other authorized office
maintained in the U.K. by a firm that is
legally organized elsewhere. This
flexibility extends to the establishment
to which the non-cleared swaps are
transferred, so long as the transferring
establishment in the U.K. is related to
the receiving establishment outside the
U.K.
20
The interim final rule is also
intended to be flexible as to the manner
in which that establishment in the U.K
held its non-cleared swaps, either
because the financial entity booked the
swap at the U.K. establishment, or as
determined by other business or account
criteria the financial entity consistently
employs in assigning a particular non-
cleared swap to a particular
establishment.
21
To benefit from the treatment of this
new legacy swap provision, the
financial entity located in the U.K. must
arrange to make the amendments to the
non-cleared swap solely for the purpose
of transferring the non-cleared swap to
an affiliate or other related
establishment that is located in an E.U.
Member State (once the U.K. has
withdrawn from the E.U., as further
discussed below). This purpose test also
contains a requirement that the transfer
be made in connection with the U.K.
entity’s planning for the possibility that
the U.K. might exit the E.U. without a
Withdrawal Agreement, or the U.K.
entity’s response to such event.
22
The interim final rule is intended to
be flexible as to whether the
relationship aspect of the purpose test is
due to affiliation between separately-
incorporated entities, branching of a
single business entity in different
jurisdictions, or some other form of
business establishment through which
an arm of the financial entity may be
legally authorized to conduct business
in the E.U. Member State. The Agencies
have similarly included transfers to an
affiliate, or branch or other authorized
form of establishment, that the financial
entity maintains in the U.S. to provide
additional flexibility for financial
entities with U.S. headquarters or other
U.S. establishments.
For compliance purposes, the interim
final rule makes one distinction
between a transfer initiated by the
financial entity standing as the covered
swap entity at the completion of the
transaction, versus a transfer initiated
by the covered swap entity’s
counterparty. For the latter, the
counterparty must make a
representation to the covered swap
entity that the counterparty carried out
the swap in accordance with both
elements of the purpose test.
The interim final rule is designed to
permit such amendments as financial
entities find necessary to relocate non-
cleared swap portfolios out of the U.K.
under the purpose test. These changes
may be carried out using any of the
methods typically employed for
effecting non-cleared swap transfers,
including industry protocols,
contractual amendments, or contractual
tear-up and replacement. To the extent
they would otherwise trigger margin
requirements, judicially-supervised
changes that result in a non-cleared
swap being booked at or held by a
related establishment in the E.U.,
including by means of the court-
sanctioned process available under Part
VII of the U.K.’s Financial Services and
Markets Act of 2000, are similarly
within the scope of the interim final
rule.
However, the Agencies do not believe
the relief being provided for relocation
purposes should be expansively applied
to encompass economic changes to a
legacy swap. Accordingly, the rule text
makes legacy swap status unavailable if
the amendments to a non-cleared swap
modify the payment amount calculation
methods, the maturity date, or the
notional amount of the non-cleared
swap. Thus, for example, if the day
count convention of a non-cleared swap
changes as a consequence of re-locating
a non-cleared interest rate swap several
time zones away from the U.K., the
parties to the swap would not be
changing the payment amount
calculation methods. On the other hand,
a change to one of the payment amount
calculation economic factors (e.g., an
interest rate margin or base rate) would
be a change outside the scope of the
interim final rule and would trigger
application of the margin requirements.
The Agencies also seek to establish a
reasonable period of time for the
necessary work to achieve the transfers
to be performed. The interim final rule
permits transfers for a period of one year
after a U.K. withdrawal. The 1-year
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:02 Mar 18, 2019 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\19MRR1.SGM 19MRR1
9945
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 53 / Tuesday, March 19, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
23
For an overview of the process by which an
E.U. Member State may withdraw from the E.U., see
the European Parliament Briefing, Article 50 TEU:
Withdrawal of a Member State from the E.U.
(February 2016), available at http://www.europarl.
europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2016/577971/
EPRS_BRI(2016)577971_EN.pdf (visited January
25th, 2019).
24
See Final Report on EMIR RTS on the novation
of bilateral contracts not subject to bilateral
margins, ESAs 2018 25 (November 27, 2018), at
https://eiopa.europa.eu/Publications/Reports/
ESAs%202018%2025%20-%20Final
%20Report%20-%20Bilateral%20margining%20
%28novation%29.pdf (visited January 25, 2019).
25
5 U.S.C. 553.
26
5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B).
period commences at the point at which
the law of the European Union ceases to
apply in the U.K. pursuant to Article
50(3) of the Treaty on European Union,
without conclusion of a Withdrawal
Agreement between the U.K. and E.U.
pursuant to Article 50(2).
23
If the
present withdrawal date is extended,
and withdrawal later occurs at the end
of that extension without a Withdrawal
Agreement, the interim final rule’s 1-
year period would begin at that time.
The Agencies contemplate that, if the
withdrawal date is extended, financial
entities may negotiate and document
their desired transfers during the
intervening period, under terms that
delay consummation of any transfer
until withdrawal takes place without an
agreement and the interim final rule’s
substantive provisions are thereby
triggered.
The Agencies believe that a provision
enabling entities to transfer non-cleared
swaps while retaining legacy status
would be most effective if the timeframe
allowed takes into account the
timeframe under corresponding E.U.
legislation. As noted above, the ESAs
have submitted novation amendments
for their margin rules in proposed form
to the European Commission, but the
relief that would be afforded thereby has
not yet been finalized under the E.U.
process.
24
The ESAs’ draft Regulatory
Technical Standards provides relief for
one year after the amendments are
finalized by official publication, after
parliamentary approval. If the E.U.
amendments are not yet finalized at the
time of a U.K. withdrawal, affected
financial entities may delay
consummation of their non-cleared
swap transfers until the ESAs’ proposed
amendments apply. The Agencies
anticipate some transferring financial
entities will operate under both sets of
regulations and will accordingly seek to
coordinate their transfer operations for
compliance purposes under both sets of
amendments. To facilitate this, the
Agencies’ interim final rule has a
‘‘tacking’’ provision that will extend the
Agencies’ 1-year period by the amount
of any additional time available under
the ESAs’ 1-year period.
The interim final rule differs from the
ESAs’ proposed amendments to the
extent that the legacy status protection
afforded under the ESAs’ approach is
unavailable to derivatives entered into
after the official, final publication of the
amendments (which establishes the
legal effective date of the rule). The
Agencies have provided legacy status
protection to any swap entered into
before the applicable compliance date—
of which there are two still upcoming,
on September 1, 2019 and September 1,
2020—with no cutoff for swaps
executed before those dates but after
issuance of this interim final rule. The
Agencies believe the marginal volume of
additional legacy swaps that will be
protected by the Agencies’ approach is
not likely to be substantial, and the
additional time granted could facilitate
a more organized transition for the
affected counterparties.
III. Request for Comments
The Agencies request comment on all
aspects of the interim final rule as well
as on the following specific questions.
(1) The interim final rule permits
amendments to non-cleared swaps in
order to transfer swaps in response to
the scenario in which the U.K. exits the
E.U. in the absence of a Withdrawal
Agreement. As explained above, the
Agencies seek to encompass changes
through a variety of methods, including
industry protocols, contractual
amendments, transfers permitted by
judicial proceedings, and contractual
tear-up and replacement. What, if any,
additional clarification in the rule as to
types of permissible amendments
should the Agencies provide? What
specifically should be added or
clarified, and why is it necessary in
order to achieve the Agencies’ policy
objectives in the context of a U.K.
withdrawal from the E.U.?
(2) The relief provided by the interim
final rule applies to the transfer of
swaps from a financial entity’s
establishment in the U.K. to an
establishment in the E.U. or the U.S.
What, if any, other types of relief should
be considered for swaps that are
transferred from the E.U. to the U.K.?
Please provide a description of the
circumstances creating this need,
including the frequency of its
occurrence.
(3) The transfers that are
accommodated by the interim final rule
are available only between affiliates or
other related establishments. The
Agencies do not intend the relief
provided by the interim final rule to
provide an opportunity for financial
entities to seek out a new dealer
relationship and retain legacy swap
treatment. However, the Agencies
request comment on whether there may
be financial entities that are unable to
arrange a transfer of legacy swaps unless
the transfer is to an unrelated entity
outside the U.K. and are thus not
covered under the terms of the interim
final rule. Commenters should provide
descriptions of the factual
circumstances, including the frequency
of its occurrence.
IV. Administrative Law Matters
A. Administrative Procedure Act
The Agencies are issuing the interim
final rule without prior notice and the
opportunity for public comment and
without the 30-day delayed effective
date ordinarily prescribed by the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA).
25
Pursuant to section 553(b)(B) of the
APA, general notice and the opportunity
for public comment are not required
with respect to a rulemaking when an
‘‘agency for good cause finds (and
incorporates the finding and a brief
statement of reasons therefor in the
rules issued) that notice and public
procedure thereon are impracticable,
unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.’’
26
As discussed above, the interim final
rule addresses a potential impact of the
scenario in which the U.K. exits from
the E.U. in the absence of a Withdrawal
Agreement. The U.K.’s exit is expected
to occur on March 29, 2019. The interim
final rule facilitates the ability of a
financial entity with non-cleared swaps
located in the U.K. to relocate existing
swap portfolios over to affiliates or other
related entities located within the E.U.
or U.S., without the ‘‘grandfathered’’
legacy swaps in the portfolios becoming
subject to the Swap Margin Rule. As
such, the interim final rule benefits
covered swap entities subject to the
Swap Margin Rule by removing an
impediment to the transfers and
maintaining the status quo of a legacy
swap. The interim final rule does not
impose any requirements or mandatory
burden on any covered swap entity.
The Agencies believe that the public
interest is best served by making the
interim final rule effective as soon as
possible as a result of the expected
timing of events in the U.K. The
Agencies believe that issuing the
interim final rule will provide the
certainty necessary to facilitate the
industry’s efforts to begin arranging
their transfers immediately upon the
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:02 Mar 18, 2019 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\19MRR1.SGM 19MRR1
9946
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 53 / Tuesday, March 19, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
27
5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B); 553(d)(3).
28
5 U.S.C. 553(d).
29
The agencies may be required to request new
control numbers.
30
The purpose test requires that the financial
entity located in the U.K. arrange to make the
amendments to the non-cleared swap solely for the
purpose of transferring the non-cleared swap to an
affiliate or other related establishment that is
located in an E.U. Member State. This purpose test
also contains a requirement that the transfer be
made in connection with the U.K. entity’s planning
for the possibility that the U.K. might exit the E.U.
without a Withdrawal Agreement, or the U.K.
entity’s response to such an event.
31
The FDIC’s estimates zero entities, but is
estimating one here as a placeholder.
U.K.’s withdrawal. In addition, the
Agencies believe that providing a notice
and comment period prior to issuance of
the interim final rule is impracticable
given the need for relief to begin on
March 29, 2019. For these reasons, the
Agencies find there is good cause
consistent with the public interest to
issue the interim final rule without
advance notice and comment.
27
The APA also requires a 30-day
delayed effective date, except for (1)
substantive rules which grant or
recognize an exemption or relieve a
restriction; (2) interpretative rules and
statements of policy; or (3) as otherwise
provided by the agency for good
cause.
28
The Agencies find good cause
to publish the interim final rule with an
immediate effective date for the same
reasons set forth above under the
discussion of section 553(b)(B) of the
APA.
While the Agencies believe there is
good cause to issue the interim final
rule without advance notice and
comment and with an immediate
effective date, the Agencies are
requesting comment on all aspects of
the interim final rule.
B. Solicitation of Comments on Use of
Plain Language
Section 722 of the Gramm-Leach-
Bliley Act, Public Law 106–102, sec.
722, 113 Stat. 1338, 1471 (Nov. 12,
1999), requires the OCC, Board and
FDIC to use plain language in all
proposed and final rules published after
January 1, 2000. The OCC, Board and
FDIC invite your comments on how to
make this proposal easier to understand.
For example:
Have we organized the material to
suit your needs? If not, how could this
material be better organized?
Are the requirements in the
regulation clearly stated? If not, how
could the regulation be more clearly
stated?
Does the regulation contain
language or jargon that is not clear? If
so, which language requires
clarification?
Would a different format (grouping
and order of sections, use of headings,
paragraphing) make the regulation
easier to understand? If so, what
changes to the format would make the
regulation easier to understand?
What else could we do to make the
regulation easier to understand?
C. Paperwork Reduction Act Analysis
In accordance with the requirements
of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501–3521, the
Agencies may not conduct or sponsor,
and a respondent is not required to
respond to, an information collection
unless it displays a currently-valid
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) control number. The OCC,
Board, and FDIC have reviewed this
interim final rule and determined that it
introduces a new collection of
information pursuant to the PRA and
the OCC and FDIC have submitted it to
OMB for review under section 3507(d)
of the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3507(d)) and
section 1320.11 of the OMB’s
implementing regulations (5 CFR 1320).
The Board has reviewed the information
collection under its delegated authority.
The OMB Control Numbers are: 1557–
0251 (OCC), 3064–0204 (FDIC), and
7100–0364 (Board).
29
The FCA has
determined the rule will not introduce
any collection of information for Farm
Credit System institutions because Farm
Credit System institutions are Federally
chartered instrumentalities of the
United States and instrumentalities of
the United States are specifically
excepted from the definition of
‘‘collection of information’’ contained in
44 U.S.C. 3502(3). The FHFA has
determined that the interim final rule
does not contain any collection of
information for which the agency must
obtain clearance under the PRA.
Section __.1(h) specifies that transfers
of legacy swaps initiated by a covered
swap entity’s counterparty require a
representation to the covered swap
entity that the counterparty carried out
the swap in accordance with both
elements of the purpose test
30
in order
to remain outside the scope of the rule.
The agencies estimate that the burden
for this representation is de minimis.
Therefore, they are estimating minimal
burden for this requirement.
OCC:
Estimated Number of Respondents:
10.
Estimated Burden per Response: 1
hour.
Total Estimated Burden: 10 hour.
FRB:
Estimated Number of Respondents:
41.
Estimated Burden per Response: 1
hour.
Total Estimated Burden: 41 hours.
FDIC:
Estimated Number of Respondents:
1.
31
Estimated Burden per Response: 1
hour.
Total Estimated Burden: 1 hour.
Comments are invited on:
a. Whether the collections of
information are necessary for the proper
performance of the agencies’ functions,
including whether the information has
practical utility;
b. The accuracy or the estimate of the
burden of the information collections,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
c. Ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected;
d. Ways to minimize the burden of the
information collections on respondents,
including through the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology; and
e. Estimates of capital or startup costs
and costs of operation, maintenance,
and purchase of services to provide
information.
All comments will become a matter of
public record. Comments on aspects of
this notice that may affect reporting,
recordkeeping, or disclosure
requirements and burden estimates
should be sent to the addresses listed in
the
ADDRESSES
section of this document.
A copy of the comments may also be
submitted to the OMB desk officer by
mail to U.S. Office of Management and
Budget, 725 17th Street NW, #10235,
Washington, DC 20503; facsimile to
(202) 395–6974; or email to oira_
submission@omb.eop.gov, Attention,
Federal Banking Agency Desk Officer.
D. Regulatory Flexibility Act Analysis
OCC: The Regulatory Flexibility Act
(RFA) does not apply to a rulemaking
when a general notice of proposed
rulemaking is not required. 5 U.S.C. 603
and 604. As noted previously, the
Agencies have determined for good
cause that it is impracticable and
contrary to the public interest to publish
a general notice of proposed rulemaking
for this joint final rule. Accordingly, the
RFA’s requirements relating to an initial
and final regulatory flexibility analysis
do not apply.
Board: The Regulatory Flexibility Act
(RFA) requires an agency to consider
whether the rules it proposes will have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The RFA applies only to rules for which
an agency publishes a general notice of
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:02 Mar 18, 2019 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\19MRR1.SGM 19MRR1
9947
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 53 / Tuesday, March 19, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
32
5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.
33
The SBA defines a small banking organization
as having $550 million or less in assets, where ‘‘a
financial institution’s assets are determined by
averaging the assets reported on its four quarterly
financial statements for the preceding year.’’ 13 CFR
121.201 n.8 (2018). ‘‘SBA counts the receipts,
employees, or other measure of size of the concern
whose size is at issue and all of its domestic and
foreign affiliates. . . .’’ 13 CFR 121.103(a)(6)
(2018). Following these regulations, the FDIC uses
a covered entity’s affiliated and acquired assets,
averaged over the preceding four quarters, to
determine whether the covered entity is ‘‘small’’ for
the purposes of RFA.
34
FDIC-supervised institutions are set forth in 12
U.S.C. 1813(q)(2).
35
FDIC Call Report, September 30, 2018.
36
In identifying the 104 entities referred to in the
text, the Agencies used the list of swap dealers set
forth, on February 12, 2019 (providing data as of
February 12, 2019) at https://www.cftc.gov/
LawRegulation/DoddFrankAct/
registerswapdealer.html. While the CFTC has
adopted a registration requirement for entities that
meet the definition of major swap participants, as
of February 12, 2019, the CFTC’s website does not
indicate that any entities are currently registered as
major swap participants. Major swap participants
are required to apply for registration through a
filing with the National Futures Association.
Accordingly, the Agencies reviewed the National
Futures Association https://www.nfa.futures.org/
members/sd/index.html to determine whether there
were registered major swap participants. As of
February 11, 2019, there were no Major Swaps
Participants listed on this link. The SEC has not yet
imposed a registration requirement for security-
based swap dealers or major security-based swap
participants.
37
12 U.S.C. 4802.
proposed rulemaking pursuant to 5
U.S.C. 553(b). As discussed previously,
consistent with section 553(b)(B) of the
APA, the Board has determined for good
cause that general notice and
opportunity for public comment is
impracticable and contrary to the
public’s interest, and therefore the
Board is not issuing a notice of
proposed rulemaking. Accordingly, the
Board has concluded that the RFA’s
requirements relating to initial and final
regulatory flexibility analysis do not
apply. Further, the Board notes that no
small entities, as defined by the Small
Business Administration’s rules
implementing the RFA, will be affected
by the interim final rule.
FDIC: The Regulatory Flexibility Act
(RFA)
32
requires an agency to consider
whether the rules it proposes will have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
33
The RFA applies only to rules for which
an agency publishes a general notice of
proposed rulemaking pursuant to 5
U.S.C. 553(b). As discussed in the joint
interim final rule, consistent with
section 553(b)(B) of the APA, the FDIC
determined for good cause that general
notice and opportunity for public
comment was unnecessary, and
therefore the FDIC did not issue a notice
of proposed rulemaking. Accordingly,
the FDIC has concluded that the RFA’s
requirements relating to initial and final
regulatory flexibility analysis do not
apply. Further, the FDIC supervises
3,533 depository institutions,
34
of
which 2,726 are defined as small
banking entities by the terms of the
RFA.
35
This interim final rule directly
applies to covered swap entities (which
includes persons registered with the
CFTC as swap dealers or major swap
participants pursuant to the Commodity
Exchange Act of 1936 and persons
registered with the SEC as security-
based swap dealers and major security-
based swap participants under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934) that
are subject to the requirements of the
Swap Margin Rule. The FDIC has
identified 104 swap dealers that, as of
February 12, 2019, have registered as
swap entities.
36
None of these
institutions are supervised by the FDIC.
Therefore, no small FDIC-supervised
entities, as defined by the Small
Business Administration’s rules
implementing the RFA, will be affected
by the interim final rule.
FCA: Pursuant to section 605(b) of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601
et seq.), the FCA hereby certifies that the
interim final rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Each of the banks in the Farm Credit
System, considered together with its
affiliated associations, has assets and
annual income more than the amounts
that would qualify them as small
entities. Nor does the Federal
Agricultural Mortgage Corporation meet
the definition of a ‘‘small entity.’’
Therefore, Farm Credit System
institutions are not ‘‘small entities’’ as
defined in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act.
FHFA: The RFA applies only to rules
for which an agency is required to
publish a general notice of proposed
rulemaking pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(b).
As discussed in the joint interim final
rule, consistent with section 553(b)(B) of
the APA, FHFA determined for good
cause that general notice and
opportunity for public comment was
impracticable and contrary to the public
interest, and therefore FHFA did not
issue a notice of proposed rulemaking.
Accordingly, FHFA has concluded that
the RFA’s requirements relating to
initial and final regulatory flexibility
analysis do not apply. This interim final
rule directly applies to covered swap
entities (which includes persons
registered with the CFTC as swap
dealers or major swap participants
pursuant to the Commodity Exchange
Act of 1936 and persons registered with
the SEC as security-based swap dealers
and major security-based swap
participants under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934) that are subject
to the requirements of the Swap Margin
Rule. No FHFA-regulated entity is a
covered swap entity, nor is any FHFA-
regulated entity a small entity, as
defined by the Small Business
Administration’s rules implementing
the RFA. Therefore, no small FHFA-
regulated entity will be affected by the
interim final rule.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995
Section 202 of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(Unfunded Mandates Act), 2 U.S.C.
1532, requires the OCC to prepare a
budgetary impact statement before
promulgating any final rule for which a
general notice of proposed rulemaking
was published. As discussed above, the
OCC has determined for good cause that
the publication of a general notice of
proposed rulemaking is impracticable
and contrary to the public interest.
Accordingly, this joint final rule is not
subject to section 202 of the Unfunded
Mandates Act.
F. Riegle Community Development and
Regulatory Improvement Act of 1994
The Riegle Community Development
and Regulatory Improvement Act of
1994 (RCDRIA) requires that each
Federal banking agency, in determining
the effective date and administrative
compliance requirements for new
regulations that impose additional
reporting, disclosure, or other
requirements on insured depository
institutions, consider, consistent with
principles of safety and soundness and
the public interest, any administrative
burdens that such regulations would
place on depository institutions,
including small depository institutions,
and customers of depository
institutions, as well as the benefits of
such regulations. In addition, new
regulations and amendments to
regulations that impose additional
reporting, disclosures, or other new
requirements on insured depository
institutions generally must take effect
on the first day of a calendar quarter
that begins on or after the date on which
the regulations are published in final
form.
37
Each Federal banking agency
has determined that the final rule would
not impose additional reporting,
disclosure, or other requirements;
therefore the requirements of the
RCDRIA do not apply.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:02 Mar 18, 2019 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\19MRR1.SGM 19MRR1
9948
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 53 / Tuesday, March 19, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
List of Subjects
12 CFR Part 45
Administrative practice and
procedure, Capital, Margin
requirements, National banks, Federal
savings associations, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Risk.
12 CFR Part 237
Administrative practice and
procedure, Banks, Banking, Foreign
banking, Holding companies, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements,
Swaps.
12 CFR Part 349
Administrative practice and
procedure, Banks, Banking, Holding
companies, Capital, Margin
Requirements, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Savings
associations, Risk, Swaps.
12 CFR Part 624
Accounting, Agriculture, Banks,
Banking, Capital, Cooperatives, Credit,
Margin requirements, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Risk, Rural
areas, Swaps.
12 CFR Part 1221
Government-sponsored enterprises,
Mortgages, Securities.
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Office of the Comptroller of the
Currency
12 CFR Chapter I
Authority and Issuance
For the reasons set forth in the
common preamble and under the
authority of 12 U.S.C. 93a and
5412(b)(2)(B), the Office of the
Comptroller of the Currency amends
chapter I of Title 12, Code of Federal
Regulations, as follows:
PART 45—MARGIN AND CAPITAL
REQUIREMENTS FOR COVERED
SWAP ENTITIES
1. The authority citation for part 45
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 6s(e), 12 U.S.C. 1 et
seq., 12 U.S.C. 93a, 161, 481, 1818, 3907,
3909, 5412(b)(2)(B), and 15 U.S.C. 78o–10(e).
2. Section 45.1 is amended by adding
paragraph (h) to read as follows:
§ 45.1 Authority, purpose, scope,
exemptions and compliance dates.
* * * * *
(h) Legacy swaps. Covered swaps
entities are required to comply with the
requirements of this part for non-cleared
swaps and non-cleared security-based
swaps entered into on or after the
relevant compliance dates for variation
margin and for initial margin
established in paragraph (e) of this
section. Any non-cleared swap or non-
cleared security-based swap entered
into before such relevant date shall
remain outside the scope of this part if
changes are made to it as follows:
(1) [Reserved]
(2) The non-cleared swap or non-
cleared security based swap was
amended under the following
conditions:
(i) The swap was originally entered
into before the relevant compliance date
established in paragraph (e) of this
section and one party to the swap
booked it at, or otherwise held it at, an
entity (including a branch or other
authorized form of establishment)
located in the United Kingdom;
(ii) The entity in the United Kingdom
subsequently arranged to amend the
swap, solely for the purpose of
transferring it to an affiliate, or a branch
or other authorized form of
establishment, located in any European
Union member state or the United
States, in connection with the entity’s
planning for or response to the event
described in paragraph (h)(2)(iii) of this
section, and the transferee is:
(A) A covered swap entity, or
(B) A covered swap entity’s
counterparty to the swap, and the
counterparty represents to the covered
swap entity that the counterparty
performed the transfer in compliance
with the requirements of paragraphs
(h)(2)(i) and (ii) of this section;
(iii) The law of the European Union
ceases to apply to the United Kingdom
pursuant to Article 50(3) of the Treaty
on European Union, without conclusion
of a Withdrawal Agreement between the
United Kingdom and the European
Union pursuant to Article 50(2);
(iv) The amendments do not modify
any of the following: The payment
amount calculation methods, the
maturity date, or the notional amount of
the swap;
(v) The amendments cause the
transfer to take effect on or after the date
of the event described in paragraph
(h)(2)(iii) of this section transpires; and
(iv) The amendments cause the
transfer to take effect by the later of:
(A) The date that is one year after the
date of the event described in paragraph
(h)(2)(iii); or
(B) Such other date permitted by
transitional provisions under Article 35
of Commission Delegated Regulation
(E.U.) No. 2016/2251, as amended.
BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
12 CFR Chapter II
Authority and Issuance
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System amends 12 CFR
part 237 to read as follows:
PART 237—SWAPS MARGIN AND
SWAPS PUSH-OUT
3. The authority citation for part 237
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 6s(e), 15 U.S.C. 78o–
10(e), 15 U.S.C. 8305, 12 U.S.C. 221 et seq.,
12 U.S.C. 343–350, 12 U.S.C. 1818, 12 U.S.C.
1841 et seq., 12 U.S.C. 3101 et seq., and 12
U.S.C. 1461 et seq.
Subpart A—Margin and Capital
Requirements for Covered Swap
Entities (Regulation KK)
4. Section 237.1 is amended by adding
paragraph (h) to read as follows:
§ 237.1 Authority, purpose, scope,
exemptions and compliance dates.
* * * * *
(h) Legacy swaps. Covered swaps
entities are required to comply with the
requirements of this subpart for non-
cleared swaps and non-cleared security-
based swaps entered into on or after the
relevant compliance dates for variation
margin and for initial margin
established in paragraph (e) of this
section. Any non-cleared swap or non-
cleared security-based swap entered
into before such relevant date shall
remain outside the scope of this subpart
if changes are made to it as follows:
(1) [Reserved]
(2) The non-cleared swap or non-
cleared security based swap was
amended under the following
conditions:
(i) The swap was originally entered
into before the relevant compliance date
established in paragraph (e) of this
section and one party to the swap
booked it at, or otherwise held it at, an
entity (including a branch or other
authorized form of establishment)
located in the United Kingdom;
(ii) The entity in the United Kingdom
subsequently arranged to amend the
swap, solely for the purpose of
transferring it to an affiliate, or a branch
or other authorized form of
establishment, located in any European
Union member state or the United
States, in connection with the entity’s
planning for or response to the event
described in paragraph (h)(2)(iii) of this
section, and the transferee is:
(A) A covered swap entity, or
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:02 Mar 18, 2019 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\19MRR1.SGM 19MRR1
9949
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 53 / Tuesday, March 19, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
(B) A covered swap entity’s
counterparty to the swap, and the
counterparty represents to the covered
swap entity that the counterparty
performed the transfer in compliance
with the requirements of paragraphs
(h)(2)(i) and (ii) of this section;
(iii) The law of the European Union
ceases to apply to the United Kingdom
pursuant to Article 50(3) of the Treaty
on European Union, without conclusion
of a Withdrawal Agreement between the
United Kingdom and the European
Union pursuant to Article 50(2);
(iv) The amendments do not modify
any of the following: The payment
amount calculation methods, the
maturity date, or the notional amount of
the swap;
(v) The amendments cause the
transfer to take effect on or after the date
of the event described in paragraph
(h)(2)(iii) of this section transpires; and
(vi) The amendments cause the
transfer to take effect by the later of:
(A) The date that is one year after the
date of the event described in paragraph
(h)(2)(iii) of this section; or
(B) Such other date permitted by
transitional provisions under Article 35
of Commission Delegated Regulation
(E.U.) No. 2016/2251, as amended.
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE
CORPORATION
12 CFR Chapter III
Authority and Issuance
For the reasons set forth in the
Supplementary Information section, the
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
amends 12 CFR chapter III as follows:
PART 349—DERIVATIVES
5. The authority citation for subpart A
of part 349 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 6s(e), 15 U.S.C. 78o–
10(e), and 12 U.S.C. 1818 and 12 U.S.C.
1819(a)(Tenth), 12 U.S.C. 1813(q), 1818,
1819, and 3108.
6. Section 349.1 is amended by adding
paragraph (h) to read as follows:
§ 349.1 Authority, purpose, scope,
exemptions and compliance dates.
* * * * *
(h) Legacy swaps. Covered swaps
entities are required to comply with the
requirements of this part for non-cleared
swaps and non-cleared security-based
swaps entered into on or after the
relevant compliance dates for variation
margin and for initial margin
established in paragraph (e) of this
section. Any non-cleared swap or non-
cleared security-based swap entered
into before such relevant date shall
remain outside the scope of this part if
changes are made to the non-cleared
swap or non-cleared security-based
swap it as follows:
(1) [Reserved]
(2) The non-cleared swap or non-
cleared security based swap was
amended under the following
conditions:
(i) The swap was originally entered
into, booked at, or otherwise held at, an
entity located in the United Kingdom
before the relevant compliance date
established in paragraph (e) of this
section and one party to the swap
booked it at, or otherwise held it at, an
entity (including a branch or other
authorized form of establishment)
located in the United Kingdom;
(ii) The entity in the United Kingdom
subsequently arranged to amend the
swap, solely for the purpose of
transferring it to an affiliate, or a branch
or other authorized form of
establishment, located in any European
Union member state or the United
States, in connection with the entity’s
planning for or response to the event
described in paragraph (h)(2)(iii) of this
section, and the transferee is:
(A) A covered swap entity, or
(B) A covered swap entity’s
counterparty to the swap, and the
counterparty represents to the covered
swap entity that the counterparty
performed the transfer in compliance
with the requirements of paragraphs
(h)(2)(i) and (ii) of this section; subject
to the following conditions:
(iii) The law of the European Union
ceases to apply [to] the United Kingdom
pursuant to Article 50(3) of the Treaty
on European Union, without conclusion
of a Withdrawal Agreement between the
United Kingdom and the European
Union pursuant to Article 50(2);
(iv) The amendments do not modify
any of the following: The payment
amount calculation methods, the
maturity date, or the notional amount of
the swap or non-cleared swap;
(v) The amendments cause the
transfer to take effect on or after the date
of the event described in paragraph
(h)(2)(iii) of this section transpires; and
(vi) The amendments cause the
transfer to take effect by the later of:
(A) The date that is one year after the
date of the event described in paragraph
(h)(2)(iii) of this section; or
(B) Such other date permitted by
transitional provisions under Article 35
of Commission Delegated Regulation
(E.U.) No. 2016/2251, as amended.
FARM CREDIT ADMINISTRATION
Authority and Issuance
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, the Farm Credit
Administration amends chapter VI of
title 12, Code of Federal Regulations, as
follows:
PART 624—MARGIN AND CAPITAL
REQUIREMENTS FOR COVERED
SWAP ENTITIES
1. The authority citation for part 624
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 6s(e), 15 U.S.C. 78o–
10(e), 12 U.S.C. 2154, 12 U.S.C. 2243, 12
U.S.C. 2252, 12 U.S.C. 2279bb–1.
2. Section 624.1 is amended by adding
paragraph (h) to read as follows:
§ 624.1 Authority, purpose, scope,
exemptions and compliance dates.
* * * * *
(h) Legacy swaps. Covered swaps
entities are required to comply with the
requirements of this part for non-cleared
swaps and non-cleared security-based
swaps entered into on or after the
relevant compliance dates for variation
margin and for initial margin
established in paragraph (e) of this
section. Any non-cleared swap or non-
cleared security-based swap entered
into before such relevant date shall
remain outside the scope of this part if
changes are made to it as follows:
(1) [Reserved]
(2) The non-cleared swap or non-
cleared security-based swap was
amended under the following
conditions:
(i) The swap was originally entered
into before the relevant compliance date
established in paragraph (e) of this
section and one party to the swap
booked it at, or otherwise held it at, an
entity (including a branch or other
authorized form of establishment)
located in the United Kingdom;
(ii) The entity in the United Kingdom
subsequently arranged to amend the
swap, solely for the purpose of
transferring it to an affiliate, or a branch
or other authorized form of
establishment, located in any European
Union member state or the United
States, in connection with the entity’s
planning for or response to the event
described in paragraph (h)(2)(iii) of this
section, and the transferee is:
(A) A covered swap entity, or
(B) A covered swap entity’s
counterparty to the swap, and the
counterparty represents to the covered
swap entity that the counterparty
performed the transfer in compliance
with the requirements of paragraphs
(h)(2)(i) and (ii) of this section;
(iii) The law of the European Union
ceases to apply to the United Kingdom
pursuant to Article 50(3) of the Treaty
on European Union, without conclusion
of a Withdrawal Agreement between the
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:02 Mar 18, 2019 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\19MRR1.SGM 19MRR1
9950
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 53 / Tuesday, March 19, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
United Kingdom and the European
Union pursuant to Article 50(2);
(iv) The amendments do not modify
any of the following: The payment
amount calculation methods, the
maturity date, or the notional amount of
the swap;
(v) The amendments cause the
transfer to take effect on or after the date
of the event described in paragraph
(h)(2)(iii) of this section transpires; and
(iv) The amendments cause the
transfer to take effect by the later of:
(A) The date that is one year after the
date of the event described in paragraph
(h)(2)(iii) of this section; or
(B) Such other date permitted by
transitional provisions under Article 35
of Commission Delegated Regulation
(E.U.) No. 2016/2251, as amended.
FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE
AGENCY
Authority and Issuance
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, the Federal Housing Finance
Agency amends chapter XII of title 12,
Code of Federal Regulations, as follows:
PART 1221—MARGIN AND CAPITAL
REQUIREMENTS FOR COVERED
SWAP ENTITIES
1. The authority citation for part 1221
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 6s(e), 15 U.S.C. 78o–
10(e), 12 U.S.C. 4513, and 12 U.S.C. 4526(a).
2. Section 1221.1 is amended by
adding paragraph (h) to read as follows:
§ 1221.1 Authority, purpose, scope,
exemptions, and compliance dates.
* * * * *
(h) Legacy swaps. Covered swaps
entities are required to comply with the
requirements of this part for non-cleared
swaps and non-cleared security-based
swaps entered into on or after the
relevant compliance dates for variation
margin and for initial margin
established in paragraph (e) of this
section. Any non-cleared swap or non-
cleared security-based swap entered
into before such relevant date shall
remain outside the scope of this part if
changes are made to it as follows:
(1) [Reserved]
(2) The non-cleared swap or non-
cleared security based swap was
amended under the following
conditions:
(i) The swap was originally entered
into before the relevant compliance date
established in paragraph (e) of this
section and one party to the swap
booked it at, or otherwise held it at, an
entity (including a branch or other
authorized form of establishment)
located in the United Kingdom;
(ii) The entity in the United Kingdom
subsequently arranged to amend the
swap, solely for the purpose of
transferring it to an affiliate, or a branch
or other authorized form of
establishment, located in any European
Union member state or the United
States, in connection with the entity’s
planning for or response to the event
described in paragraph (h)(2)(iii) of this
section, and the transferee is:
(A) A covered swap entity, or
(B) A covered swap entity’s
counterparty to the swap, and the
counterparty represents to the covered
swap entity that the counterparty
performed the transfer in compliance
with the requirements of paragraphs
(h)(2)(i) and (ii) of this section;
(iii) The law of the European Union
ceases to apply to the United Kingdom
pursuant to Article 50(3) of the Treaty
on European Union, without conclusion
of a Withdrawal Agreement between the
United Kingdom and the European
Union pursuant to Article 50(2);
(iv) The amendments do not modify
any of the following: The payment
amount calculation methods, the
maturity date, or the notional amount of
the swap;
(v) The amendments cause the
transfer to take effect on or after the date
of the event described in paragraph
(h)(2)(iii) of this section transpires; and
(vi) The amendments cause the
transfer to take effect by the later of:
(A) The date that is one year after the
date of the event described in paragraph
(h)(2)(iii) of this section; or
(B) Such other date permitted by
transitional provisions under Article 35
of Commission Delegated Regulation
(E.U.) No. 2016/2251, as amended.
Dated: March 7, 2019.
Joseph M. Otting,
Comptroller of the Currency.
By order of the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System, March 12, 2019.
Margaret McCloskey Shanks,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
Dated at Washington, DC, on March 8,
2019.
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Valerie J. Best,
Assistant Executive Secretary.
By order of the Board of the Farm Credit
Administration.
Dated at McLean, VA, this 5th day of
March 2019.
Dale L. Aultman,
Secretary.
Dated: March 7, 2019.
Joseph M. Otting,
Acting Director, Federal Housing Finance
Agency.
[FR Doc. 2019–05012 Filed 3–18–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810–33–P; 6210–01–P, 6714–01–P,
8070–01–P, 6705–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 91
[Docket No.: FAA–2011–0246; Amdt. No.
91–321D]
RIN 2120–AL40
Amendment of the Prohibition Against
Certain Flights in the Tripoli Flight
Information Region (FIR) (HLLL)
AGENCY
: Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION
: Final rule.
SUMMARY
: This action extends, with
modifications to reflect changed
conditions in Libya, the Special Federal
Aviation Regulation (SFAR) prohibiting
certain flight operations in the Tripoli
Flight Information Region (FIR) (HLLL)
by all: United States (U.S.) air carriers;
U.S. commercial operators; persons
exercising the privileges of an airman
certificate issued by the FAA, except
when such persons are operating U.S.-
registered aircraft for a foreign air
carrier; and operators of U.S.-registered
civil aircraft, except where the operator
of such aircraft is a foreign air carrier.
This action extends the prohibition of
U.S. civil flight operations in the Tripoli
FIR (HLLL) at altitudes below Flight
Level (FL) 300 to safeguard against
continuing hazards to U.S. civil
aviation. However, this action also
reduces the scope of the prohibition,
permitting U.S. civil aviation overflights
of the Tripoli FIR (HLLL) at altitudes at
and above FL300 to resume, due to the
reduced risk to U.S. civil aviation
operations at those altitudes. The FAA
also republishes, with minor revisions,
the approval process and exemption
information for this SFAR, consistent
with other recently published flight
prohibition SFARs; makes a minor
editorial change to the title of the rule;
and makes other minor revisions for
consistency with other recently
published flight prohibition SFARs.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:02 Mar 18, 2019 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\19MRR1.SGM 19MRR1

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT