Airworthiness Directives: McDonnell Douglas Model DC 9 14, DC 9 15, and DC 9 15F Airplanes; and McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9-20, DC-9-30, DC 9 40, and DC 9 50 Series Airplanes
Federal Register: July 30, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 145)
Proposed Rules
Page 37963-37965
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
DOCID:fr30jy09-15
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 39
Docket No. FAA-2009-0658; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-058-AD
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9-14, DC-9- 15, and DC-9-15F Airplanes; and McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9-20, DC-9- 30, DC-9-40, and DC-9-50 Series Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to supersede an existing airworthiness directive (AD) that applies to all McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9-14, DC- 9-15, and DC-9-15F airplanes; and McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9-20, DC- 9-30, DC-9-40, and DC-9-50 series airplanes. The existing AD currently requires repetitive inspections for cracks of the main landing gear
(MLG) shock strut cylinder, and related investigative and corrective actions if necessary. This proposed AD would add more work on airplanes that have main landing gear shock struts with certain identified part numbers. This proposed AD results from two reports of a collapsed MLG and a report of cracks in two MLG cylinders. We are proposing this AD to detect and correct fatigue cracks in the shock strut cylinder of the
MLG, which could result in a collapsed MLG during takeoff or landing, and possible reduced structural integrity of the airplane.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by September 14, 2009.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management, 3855 Lakewood Boulevard, MC D800-0019, Long Beach, California 90846- 0001; telephone 206-544-5000, extension 2; fax 206-766-5683; e-mail dse.boecom@boeing.com; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may review copies of the referenced service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call 425-227-1221 or 425-227-1152.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http:// www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street address for the Docket Office (telephone 800-647-5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Wahib Mina, ANM-120L, FAA, Los Angeles
Aircraft Certification Office, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood,
California 90712-4137; telephone (562) 627-5324; fax (562) 627-5210.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2009-0658;
Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-058-AD'' at the beginning of your comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend this proposed AD because of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http:// www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we receive about this proposed AD.
Discussion
On September 7, 2005, we issued AD 2005-19-08, amendment 39-14273
(70 FR 54616, September 16, 2005), for all McDonnell Douglas Model DC- 9-14, DC-9-15, and DC-9-15F airplanes; and McDonnell Douglas Model DC- 9-20, DC-9-30, DC-9-40, and DC-9-50 series airplanes. That AD requires repetitive inspections for cracks of the main landing gear (MLG) shock strut cylinder, and related investigative and corrective actions if necessary. That AD resulted from two reports of a collapsed MLG and a report of cracks in two MLG cylinders. We issued that AD to detect and correct fatigue cracks in the shock strut cylinder of the MLG, which could result in a collapsed MLG during takeoff or landing, and possible reduced structural integrity of the airplane.
Actions Since Existing AD Was Issued
Since we issued AD 2005-19-08, the manufacturer revised the service information referenced in that AD, i.e., Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
DC9-32A350, Revision 1, dated August 3, 2005, to add more work on airplanes that have shock struts with part numbers 5924400-505 and 5924400-506.
Relevant Service Information
We have reviewed Boeing Alert Service Bulletin DC9-32A350, Revision 2, dated March 20, 2009, which specifies that shock struts having part numbers 5924400-505 and 5924400-506 must be included with those struts that require repetitive non-destructive testing inspections. The remaining actions are otherwise unchanged.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of the Proposed AD
We have evaluated all pertinent information and identified an unsafe
Page 37964
condition that is likely to develop on other airplanes of the same type design. For this reason, we are proposing this AD, which would supersede AD 2005-19-08 and would retain its requirements. This proposed AD would also require accomplishing the actions specified for the additional shock struts.
Costs of Compliance
There are about 644 airplanes of the affected design in the worldwide fleet. The following table provides the estimated costs for
U.S. operators to comply with this proposed AD.
Estimated Costs
Average
Number of labor
U.S.-
Action
Work hours
rate per
Parts
Cost per airplane
registered
Fleet cost hour
airplanes
Inspection......................... 4 to 6................
$80 None................. $320 to $480 per
426 $136,320 to $204,480 inspection cycle.
per inspection cycle.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that the proposed regulation: 1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866; 2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and 3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket. See the
ADDRESSES section for a location to examine the regulatory evaluation.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES 1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended] 2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by removing amendment 39-14273 (70 FR 54616, September 16, 2005) and adding the following new AD:
McDonnell Douglas: Docket No. FAA-2009-0658; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-058-AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) The FAA must receive comments on this AD action by September 14, 2009.
Affected ADs
(b) This AD supersedes AD 2005-19-08.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to all McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9-14, DC- 9-15, and DC-9-15F airplanes; Model DC-9-21 airplanes; Model DC-9- 31, DC-9-32, DC-9-32 (VC-9C), DC-9-32F, DC-9-33F, DC-9-34, DC-9-34F, and DC-9-32F (C-9A, C-9B) airplanes; Model DC-9-41 airplanes; and
Model DC-9-51 airplanes; certificated in any category.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 32: Landing gear.
Unsafe Condition
(e) This AD results from two reports of a collapsed main landing gear (MLG) and a report of cracks in two MLG cylinders. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct fatigue cracks in the shock strut cylinder of the MLG, which could result in a collapsed MLG during takeoff or landing, and possible reduced structural integrity of the airplane.
Compliance
(f) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the actions have already been done.
Restatement of Requirements of AD 2005-19-08 with Revised
Service Information:
Records Review
(g) Except as required by paragraph (m) of this AD, before the applicable compliance time specified in paragraph (h) or Table 1 of this AD, as applicable, do the applicable actions in paragraphs
(g)(1) and (g)(2) of this AD.
(1) For all airplane groups: Review the airplane maintenance records of the MLG to determine its service history and the number of landings on the MLG shock strut cylinder.
(2) For Group 3 airplanes identified in the service bulletin:
Review the maintenance records to determine if the MLG cylinder on each Group 3 airplane has always been on a Group 3 airplane, and do the actions in paragraph (k) of this AD.
Inspection
(h) Inspect the MLG shock strut cylinders for cracks using the
Option 1 or Option 2 non-destructive testing inspection described in
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin DC9-32A350, Revision 1, dated August 3, 2005; or Revision 2, dated March 20, 2009, except as required by paragraph (m) of this AD. Inspect in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin DC9- 32A350, Revision 1, dated August 3, 2005; or Revision 2, dated March 20, 2009; except as required by paragraph (m) of this AD. After the effective date of this AD, use only Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
DC9-32A350, Revision 2, dated March 20, 2009. Do the detailed inspection before the accumulation of 60,000 total landings on the
MLG, or at the applicable grace period specified in Table 1 of this
AD, whichever occurs later, except as required by paragraph (m) of this AD, and except as provided by paragraph (k) of this AD. If the review of maintenance records is not sufficient to conclusively determine the service history
Page 37965
and number of landings on the MLG shock strut cylinder, perform the initial inspection at the applicable grace period specified in Table 1 of this AD.
Table 1--Threshold and Repetitive Interval
Airplanes identified in the service bulletin as group
Threshold
Repetitive interval
-
Within 18 months or Intervals not to 650 landings after exceed 650
October 21, 2005
landings.
(the effective date of AD 2005-19-08), whichever occurs first. 2........................... Within 18 months or Intervals not to 500 landings after exceed 500
October 21, 2005,
landings. whichever occurs first. 3, except as provided by
Within 18 months or Intervals not to paragraph (k) of this AD.
2,500 landings
exceed 2,500 after October 21,
landings. 2005, whichever occurs first. 4........................... Within 18 months or Intervals not to 2,100 landings
exceed 2,100 after October 21,
landings. 2005, whichever occurs first.
No Indication of Cracking Is Found
(i) If no indication of cracking is found during the inspection required by paragraph (h) of this AD, repeat the inspection in accordance with Boeing Alert Service Bulletin DC9-32A350, Revision 1, dated August 3, 2005; or Boeing Alert Service Bulletin DC9- 32A350, Revision 2, dated March 20, 2009; at the applicable interval specified in Table 1 of this AD, except as required by paragraph (m) of this AD. After the effective date of this AD, use only Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin DC9-32A350, Revision 2, dated March 20, 2009, of the service bulletin.
Related Investigative and Corrective Actions
(j) If any indication of cracking is found during any inspection required by paragraph (h) or (i) of this AD: Before further flight, confirm the indication of cracking by doing all applicable related investigative actions and doing the applicable corrective actions in accordance with Boeing Alert Service Bulletin DC9-32A350, Revision 1, dated August 3, 2005; or Revision 2, dated March 20, 2009; except as required by paragraph (m) of this AD. After the effective date of this AD, use only Boeing Alert Service Bulletin DC9-32A350, Revision 2, dated March 20, 2009, of the service bulletin. Repeat the inspection at the applicable threshold and interval specified in paragraph (h) of this AD.
MLG Cylinder Previously Installed on Group 4 Airplanes
(k) For MLG cylinders on Group 3 airplanes as identified in
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin DC9-32A350, Revision 1, dated August 3, 2005; or Revision 2, dated March 20, 2009: If the MLG cylinder was previously installed on a Group 4 airplane, as identified in
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin DC9-32A350, Revision 1, dated August 3, 2005; or Revision 2, dated March 20, 2009; or if the service history and number of landings cannot be determined, the MLG cylinder must be inspected at the grace period and repetitive interval that applies to Group 4 airplanes, as specified in Table 1 of this AD, except as required by paragraph (m) of this AD.
Actions Accomplished in Accordance With Original Issue of Service
Bulletin
(l) For airplanes with shock struts that have part numbers other than 5924400-505 and 5924400-506: Actions done before the effective date of this AD in accordance with Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
DC9-32A350, dated December 3, 2004, are acceptable for compliance with the corresponding actions required paragraphs (h), (i), (j), and (k) of this by this AD.
New Requirements of This AD
(m) For airplanes with shock struts that have part numbers 5924400-505 and 5924400-506: Do the actions required by paragraphs
(g), (h), (i), (j), and (k), as applicable, in accordance with
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin DC9-32A350, Revision 2, dated March 20, 2009. Do the actions at the time specified in those paragraphs, except where Table 1 of this AD specifies a compliance time after
October 21, 2005, the compliance time for these airplanes is within the specified compliance time after the effective date of this AD.
Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(n)(1) The Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office,
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to
ATTN: Wahib Mina, ANM-120L, FAA, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification
Office, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, California 90712-4137; telephone (562) 627-5324; fax (562) 627-5210.
(2) To request a different method of compliance or a different compliance time for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR 39.19.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify your principal maintenance inspector (PMI) or principal avionics inspector (PAI), as appropriate, or lacking a principal inspector, your local Flight Standards District Office.
The AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this AD.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be used for any repair required by this AD, if it is approved by an
Authorized Representative for the Boeing Commercial Airplanes
Delegation Option Authorization Organization who has been authorized by the Manager, Los Angeles ACO, to make those findings. For a repair method to be approved, the repair must meet the certification basis of the airplane, and the approval must specifically refer to this AD.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 22, 2009.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
FR Doc. E9-18157 Filed 7-29-09; 8:45 am
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
