Monsanto Company; Availability of a Draft Plant Pest Risk Assessment and Draft Environmental Assessment for Determination of Nonregulated Status of Cotton Genetically Engineered for Insect Resistance

Published date16 October 2020
Citation85 FR 65789
Record Number2020-22917
SectionNotices
CourtAnimal And Plant Health Inspection Service
Federal Register, Volume 85 Issue 201 (Friday, October 16, 2020)
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 201 (Friday, October 16, 2020)]
                [Notices]
                [Pages 65789-65790]
                From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
                [FR Doc No: 2020-22917]
                -----------------------------------------------------------------------
                DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
                Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
                [Docket No. APHIS-2019-0050]
                Monsanto Company; Availability of a Draft Plant Pest Risk
                Assessment and Draft Environmental Assessment for Determination of
                Nonregulated Status of Cotton Genetically Engineered for Insect
                Resistance
                AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.
                ACTION: Notice.
                -----------------------------------------------------------------------
                SUMMARY: We are advising the public that the Animal and Plant Health
                Inspection Service has prepared a draft plant pest risk assessment and
                draft environmental assessment regarding a request from Monsanto
                Company seeking a determination of nonregulated status for cotton
                designated as MON 88702, which has been genetically engineered for
                resistance to certain insects, primarily Lygus spp. We are making these
                documents available for public review and comment.
                DATES: We will consider all comments that we receive on or before
                November 16, 2020.
                ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by either of the following methods:
                 Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=APHIS-2019-0050.
                 Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery: Send your comment to
                Docket No. APHIS-2019-0050, Regulatory Analysis and Development, PPD,
                APHIS, Station 3A-03.8, 4700 River Road, Unit 118, Riverdale, MD 20737-
                1238.
                 The draft environmental assessment, draft plant pest risk
                assessment, and any comments we receive on this docket may be viewed at
                http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=APHIS-2019-0050 or in our
                reading room, which is located in Room 1620 of the USDA South Building,
                14th Street and Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC. Normal reading
                room hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
                holidays. To be sure someone is there to help you, please call (202)
                7997039 before coming.
                 Supporting documents for this petition are also available on the
                APHIS website at https://www.aphis.usda.gov/aphis/ourfocus/biotechnology/permits-notifications-petitions/petitions/petition-status.
                FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Cindy Eck, Biotechnology
                Regulatory Services, APHIS, 4700 River Road, Unit 147, Riverdale, MD
                20737-1236; (301) 851-3892, email: [email protected].
                SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the authority of the plant pest
                provisions of the Plant Protection Act (7 U.S.C. 7701 et seq.), the
                regulations in 7 CFR part 340, ``Introduction of Organisms and Products
                Altered or Produced Through Genetic Engineering Which Are Plant Pests
                or Which There Is Reason to Believe Are Plant Pests,'' regulate, among
                other things, the introduction (importation, interstate movement, or
                release into the environment) of organisms and products altered or
                produced through genetic engineering that are plant pests or that there
                is reason to believe are plant pests. Such genetically engineered (GE)
                organisms and products are considered ``regulated articles.''
                 Pursuant to the terms set forth in a final rule published in the
                Federal Register on May 17, 2020 (85 FR 29790-29838, Docket No. APHIS-
                2018-0034),\1\ any person may submit a petition to the Animal and Plant
                Health Inspection Service (APHIS) seeking a determination that an
                article should not be regulated under 7 CFR part 340. APHIS received a
                petition (APHIS Petition Number 19-091-01p) from Monsanto Company
                (Monsanto) seeking a determination of nonregulated status of a cotton
                event designated as MON 88702, which has been genetically engineered
                for resistance to certain insects, primarily Lygus spp. The Monsanto
                petition stated that this cotton is unlikely to pose a plant pest risk
                and, therefore, should not be a regulated article under APHIS'
                regulations in 7 CFR part 340.
                ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 \1\ To view the final rule, go to http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=APHIS-2018-0034.
                ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 According to our process \2\ for soliciting public comment when
                considering petitions for determination of nonregulated status of GE
                organisms, APHIS accepts written comments regarding a petition once
                APHIS deems it complete. On Sep 26, 2019, APHIS announced in the
                Federal Register \3\ (84 FR 50818-50819, Docket No. APHIS-2019-0050)
                the availability of the Monsanto petition for public comment. APHIS
                solicited comments on the petition for 60 days ending November 25,
                2019, in order to help identify potential environmental and
                interrelated economic issues and impacts that APHIS may determine
                should be considered in our evaluation of the petition.
                ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 \2\ On March 6, 2012, APHIS published in the Federal Register
                (77 FR 13258-13260, Docket No. APHIS-2011-0129) a notice describing
                our public review process for soliciting public comments and
                information when considering petitions for determinations of
                nonregulated status for GE organisms. To view the notice, go to
                http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=APHIS-2011-0129.
                 \3\ To view the notice, its supporting documents, or the
                comments that we received, go to http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=APHIS-2019-0050.
                ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 Thirty-five comments were received during the comment period.
                Fifteen comments from the agricultural, academic, and private sector
                were in support of Monsanto's petition. Fourteen comments from
                individuals were opposed to approval of Monsanto's petition. Six
                comments provided input on analyses to be considered in the
                environmental assessment (EA), or comments on insect-resistant crops in
                general. Issues raised during the comment period include evaluation of
                potential ecological and economic impacts, and potential impacts on
                non-target organisms. APHIS has evaluated the issues raised during the
                comment period and, where appropriate, has provided a discussion of
                these issues in our EA.
                 After public comments are received on a completed petition, APHIS
                evaluates those comments and then provides a second opportunity for
                public involvement in our decisionmaking process. According to our
                public review process (see footnote 2), the second opportunity for
                public involvement follows one of two approaches, as described below.
                [[Page 65790]]
                 If APHIS decides, based on its review of the petition and its
                evaluation and analysis of comments received during the 60-day public
                comment period on the petition, that the petition involves a GE
                organism that raises no substantive new issues, APHIS will follow
                Approach 1 for public involvement. Under Approach 1, APHIS announces in
                the Federal Register the availability of APHIS' preliminary regulatory
                determination along with its draft EA, preliminary finding of no
                significant impact (FONSI), and its draft plant pest risk assessment
                (PPRA) for a 30-day public review period. APHIS will evaluate any
                information received related to the petition and its supporting
                documents during the 30-day public review period.
                 For this petition, we are following approach 2. Under this
                approach, if APHIS decides, based on its review of the petition and its
                evaluation and analysis of comments received during the 60-day public
                comment period on the petition, that the petition involves a GE
                organism that raises substantive new issues, APHIS first solicits
                written comments from the public on a draft EA and draft PPRA for a 30-
                day comment period through the publication of a Federal Register
                notice. Then, after reviewing and evaluating the comments on the draft
                EA and draft PPRA and other information, APHIS will revise the draft
                PPRA as necessary. It will then prepare a final EA, and based on the
                final EA, a National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) decision document
                (either a FONSI or a notice of intent to prepare an environmental
                impact statement).
                 As part of our decisionmaking process regarding a GE organism's
                regulatory status, APHIS prepares a PPRA to assess the plant pest risk
                of the article. APHIS also prepares the appropriate environmental
                documentation--either an EA or an environmental impact statement--in
                accordance with NEPA. This will provide the Agency and the public with
                a review and analysis of any potential environmental impacts that may
                result if the petition request is approved.
                 APHIS concludes in its draft PPRA that MON 88702 cotton, which as
                stated above has been genetically engineered for resistance to certain
                insects, primarily Lygus spp., is unlikely to pose a plant pest risk.
                In section 403 of the Plant Protection Act, ``plant pest'' is defined
                as any living stage of any of the following that can directly or
                indirectly injure, cause damage to, or cause disease in any plant or
                plant product: A protozoan, a nonhuman animal, a parasitic plant, a
                bacterium, a fungus, a virus or viroid, an infectious agent or other
                pathogen, or any article similar to or allied with any of the
                foregoing.
                 APHIS has also prepared a draft EA in which we present two
                alternatives based on our analysis of data Monsanto submitted, a review
                of other scientific data, field tests conducted under APHIS' oversight,
                and comments received on the petition (see footnote 3). APHIS is
                considering the following alternatives: (1) Take no action, i.e., APHIS
                would not change the regulatory status of MON 88702 cotton, or (2) make
                a determination of nonregulated status for insect-protected MON 88702
                cotton.
                 The draft EA was prepared in accordance with (1) NEPA, as amended
                (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), (2) regulations of the Council on
                Environmental Quality for implementing the procedural provisions of
                NEPA (40 CFR parts 1500-1508), (3) USDA regulations implementing NEPA
                (7 CFR part 1b), and (4) APHIS' NEPA Implementing Procedures (7 CFR
                part 372).
                 Based on APHIS' analysis of field and laboratory data submitted by
                Monsanto, references provided in the petition, peer-reviewed
                publications, information analyzed in the draft EA, the draft PPRA,
                comments provided by the public on the petition, and discussion of
                issues in the draft EA, APHIS has determined that cotton designated as
                event MON 88702 is unlikely to pose a plant pest risk.
                 We are making available for a 30-day review period our draft PPRA
                and draft EA. The draft EA and draft PPRA are available as indicated
                under ADDRESSES and FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT above. Copies of
                these documents may also be obtained from the person listed under FOR
                FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
                 After the 30-day review period closes, APHIS will review and
                evaluate any information received during the 30-day review period.
                APHIS will revise the draft PPRA as necessary and prepare a final EA
                and, based on the final EA, a NEPA decision document (either a FONSI or
                a notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement).
                 Authority: 7 U.S.C. 7701-7772 and 7781-7786; 31 U.S.C. 9701; 7
                CFR 2.22, 2.80, and 371.3.
                 Done in Washington, DC, this 9th day of October 2020.
                Michael Watson,
                Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.
                [FR Doc. 2020-22917 Filed 10-15-20; 8:45 am]
                BILLING CODE 3410-34-P
                

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT