Motor vehicle safety standards: School bus safety; small business impacts,
[Federal Register: September 13, 2000 (Volume 65, Number 178)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 55212-55214]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr13se00-19]
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
49 CFR Part 571
[Docket No. NHTSA-00-7794]
Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSS); Small Business Impacts of School Bus Safety
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of regulatory review; request for comments.
SUMMARY: The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) seeks comments on the economic impact of its regulations on small entities. As required by Section 610 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, we are attempting to identify rules that may have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. We also request comments on ways to make these regulations easier to read and understand. The focus of this notice is rules that specifically relate to school bus safety.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before September 29, 2000.
ADDRESSES: You should mention the docket number of this document in your comments and submit your comments in writing to: Docket Management System, U.S. Department of Transportation, Room PL-401, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC, 20590. You may call Docket Management at: (202) 366-9324. You may visit the Docket from 10:00am to 5:00pm Monday through Friday.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nita Kavalauskas, Office of Regulatory Analysis and Evaluation, Office of Plans and Policy, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC, 20590. Telephone: (202) 366-2584. Facsimile (fax): (202) 366-2559.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
-
Section 610 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act
-
Background and Purpose
Section 610 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (Pub. L. 96- 354), as amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), requires agencies to conduct periodic reviews of final rules that have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small business entities. The purpose of the reviews is to determine whether such rules should be continued without change, amended, or rescinded, consistent with the objectives of applicable statutes, to minimize any significant economic impact of the rules on a substantial number of such small entities.
-
Review Schedule
The Department of Transportation (DOT) published its Semiannual Regulatory Agenda on November 22, 1999, listing in Appendix D (64 FR
[[Page 55213]]
64684) those regulations that each operating administration will review under section 610 during the next 12 months. Appendix D also contains DOT's 10-year review plan for all of its existing regulations.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA, (``we'') has divided its rules into 10 groups by subject area. Each group will be reviewed once every 10 years, undergoing a two-stage process--an Analysis Year and a Review Year. For purposes of these reviews, a year will coincide with the fall-to-fall publication schedule of the Semiannual Regulatory Agenda. Thus, Year 1 (1998) began in fall of 1998 and ends in the fall of 1999; Year 2 (1999) begins in the fall of 1999 and ends in the fall of 2000; and so on.
During the Analysis Year, we will request public comment on and analyze each of the rules in a given year's group to determine whether any rule has a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities and, thus, requires review in accordance with section 610 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. In each fall's Regulatory Agenda, we will publish the results of the analyses we completed during the previous year. For rules that have subparts, or other discrete sections of rules that do have a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities, we will announce that we will be conducting a formal section 610 review during the following 12 months.
The section 610 review will determine whether a specific rule should be revised or revoked to lessen its impact on small entities. We will consider: (1) The continued need for the rule; (2) the nature of complaints or comments received from the public; (3) the complexity of the rule; (4) the extent to which the rule overlaps, duplicates, or conflicts with other federal rules or with state or local government rules; and (5) the length of time since the rule has been evaluated or the degree to which technology, economic conditions, or other factors have changed in the area affected by the rule. At the end of the Review Year, we will publish the results of our review.
The following table shows the 10-year analysis and review schedule:
NHTSA Section 610 Review Plan
Regulations to be Year
reviewed
Analysis year Review year
-
49 CFR parts 501
1998
1999 through 526 and 571.213. 2......... 49 CFR parts 571.131,
1999
2000 217, 220, 221, and 222. 3......... 49 CFR parts 591
2000
2001 through 594. 4......... 49 CFR parts 571.101
2001
2002 through 571.110 and 571.135. 5......... 49 CFR parts 529
2002
2003 through 579, except part 571. 6......... 49 CFR parts 571.111
2003
2004 through 571.129 and parts 580 through 590. 7......... 49 CFR parts 571.201
2004
2005 through 571.212. 8......... 49 CFR parts 571.214
2005
2006 through 571.219, except 217. 9......... 49 CFR parts 571.223
2006
2007 through 571.304, part 500 and new parts and subparts under 49 CFR. 10........ 23 CFR parts 1200's
2007
2008 and 1300's and new parts and subparts under 23 CFR.
-
-
Regulations Under Analysis
During Year 2 (1999), the Analysis Year, we will conduct a preliminary assessment of the following sections of 49 CFR Part 571.
Section
Title
571.131................................ School bus pedestrian safety devices. 571.217................................ Bus emergency exits and window retention and release. 571.220................................ School bus rollover protection. 571.221................................ School bus body joint strength. 571.222................................ School bus passenger seating and crash protection.
We are seeking comments on whether any requirements in Parts 571.131, 571.217, and 571.220 through 571.222 have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. ``Small entities'' include small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations under 50,000. Business entities are generally defined as small businesses by Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) code, for the purposes of receiving Small Business Administration (SBA) assistance. Size standards established by SBA in 13 CFR 121.201 are expressed either in number of employees or annual receipts in millions of dollars, unless otherwise specified. The number of employees or annual receipts indicates the maximum allowed for a concern and its affiliates to be considered small. If your business or organization is a small entity and if any of the requirements in Parts 571.131, 571.217, and 571.220 through 571.222 have a significant economic impact on your business or organization, please submit a comment to explain how and to what degree these rules affect you, the extent of the economic impact on your business or organization, and why you believe the economic impact is significant.
If the agency determines that there is a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities, it will ask for comment in a subsequent notice during the Review Year on how these impacts could be reduced without reducing safety.
-
-
Plain Language
-
Background and Purpose
Executive Order 12866 and the President's memorandum of June 1, 1998, require each agency to write all rules in plain language. Application of the principles of plain language includes consideration of the following questions:
Have we organized the material to suit the public's needs?
Are the requirements in the rule clearly stated?
Does the rule contain technical language or jargon that is not clear?
Would a different format (grouping and order of sections, use of headings,
[[Page 55214]]
paragraphing) make the rule easier to understand?
Would more (but shorter) sections be better?
Could we improve clarity by adding tables, lists, or diagrams?
What else could we do to make the rule easier to understand?
If you have any responses to these questions, please include them in your comments on this document.
-
Review Schedule
In conjunction with our section 610 reviews, we will be performing plain language reviews over a ten-year period on a schedule consistent with the section 610 review schedule. We will review Parts 571.131, 571.217, and 571.220 through 571.222 to determine if these regulations can be reorganized and/or rewritten to make them easier to read, understand, and use. We encourage interested persons to submit draft regulatory language that clearly and simply communicates regulatory requirements, and other recommendations, such as for putting information in tables, that may make the regulations easier to use.
Comments
How do I prepare and submit comments?
Your comments must be written and in English. To ensure that your comments are correctly filedin the Docket, please include the docket number of this document in your comments.
Your comments must not be more than 15 pages long. (49 CFR 553.21.) We established this limit to encourage you to write your primary comments in a concise fashion. However, you may attach necessary additional documents to your comments. There is no limit on the length of the attachments.
Please submit two copies of your comments, including the attachments, to Docket Management at the address given above under ADDRESSES.
Comments may also be submitted to the docket electronically by logging onto the Docket Management System website at http:// dms.dot.gov. Click on ``Help & Information'' or ``Help/Info'' to obtain instructions for filing your comments electronically.
How can I be sure that my comments were received?
If you wish Docket Management to notify you upon its receipt of your comments, enclose a self-addressed, stamped postcard in the envelope containing your comments. Upon receiving your comments, Docket Management will return the postcard by mail.
How do I submit confidential business information?
If you wish to submit any information under a claim of confidentiality, you should submit three copies of your complete submission, including the information you claim to be confidential business information, to the Chief Counsel, NHTSA, at the address given above under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. In addition, you should submit two copies, from which you have deleted the claimed confidential business information, to Docket Management at the address given above under ADDRESSES. When you send a comment containing information claimed to be confidential business information, you should include a cover letter setting forth the information specified in our confidential business information regulation. (49 CFR Part 512.)
Will the agency consider late comments?
We will consider all comments that Docket Management receives before the close of business on the comment closing date indicated above under DATES. To the extent possible, we will also consider comments that Docket Management receives after that date.
How can I read the comments submitted by other people?
You may read the comments received by Docket Management at the address given above under ADDRESSES. The hours of the Docket are indicated above in the same location.
You may also see the comments on the Internet. To read the comments on the Internet, take the following steps:
(1) Go to the Docket Management System (DMS) Web page of the Department of Transportation (http://dms.dot.gov/).
(2) On that page, click on ``search.''
(3) On the next page (http://dms.dot.gov/search/), type in the four-digit docket number shown at the beginning of this document. Example: If the docket number were ``NHTSA-1998-1234,'' you would type ``1234.'' After typing the docket number, click on ``search.''
(4) On the next page, which contains docket summary information for the docket you selected, click on the desired comments. You may download the comments. However, since the comments are imaged documents, instead of word processing documents, the ``pdf'' versions of the documents are word searchable.
Please note that even after the comment closing date, we will continue to file relevant information in the Docket as it becomes available. Further, some people may submit late comments. Accordingly, we recommend that you periodically check the Docket for new material.
William H. Walsh, Associate Administrator for Plans and Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-23520Filed9-12-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P
-
