National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants; Delegation of Authority to Oklahoma
Federal Register, Volume 80 Issue 36 (Tuesday, February 24, 2015)
Federal Register Volume 80, Number 36 (Tuesday, February 24, 2015)
Rules and Regulations
Pages 9622-9628
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office www.gpo.gov
FR Doc No: 2015-03803
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 61 and 63
EPA-R06-OAR-2008-0063; FRL-9923-22-Region 6
National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants; Delegation of Authority to Oklahoma
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule; delegation of authority.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality (ODEQ) has submitted updated regulations for receiving delegation of Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) authority for implementation and enforcement of National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPs) for all sources (both part 70 and non-part 70 sources). The delegation of authority under this action does not apply to sources located in Indian Country. EPA is taking direct final action to approve the delegation of certain NESHAPs to ODEQ.
DATES: This rule is effective on April 27, 2015 without further notice, unless EPA receives relevant adverse comment by March 26, 2015. If EPA receives such comment, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal Register informing the public that the updated NESHAPs delegation will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R06-
OAR-2008-0063, by one of the following methods:
www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions.
Email: Mr. Rick Barrett at barrett.richard@epa.gov. Please also send a copy by email to the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section below.
Mail or delivery: Mr. Rick Barrett, Air Permits Section (6PD-R), Environmental Protection Agency, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket No. EPA-R06-OAR-2008-
0063. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in the public docket without change and may be made available online at http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information through http://www.regulations.gov or email, if you believe that it is CBI or otherwise protected from disclosure. The http://www.regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an email comment directly to EPA without going through http://www.regulations.gov, your email address will be automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name and other contact information in the body of your comment along with any disk or CD-ROM submitted. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of special characters and any form of encryption and be free of any defects or viruses. For additional information about EPA's public docket, visit the EPA Docket Center homepage at http://www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
Docket: The index to the docket for this action is available electronically at www.regulations.gov and in hard copy
Page 9623
at EPA Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 700, Dallas, Texas. While all documents in the docket are listed in the index, some information may be publicly available only at the hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted material), and some may not be publicly available at either location (e.g., CBI).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Rick Barrett (6PD-R), (214) 665-
7227, barrett.richard@epa.gov. To inspect the hard copy materials, please schedule an appointment with Mr. Barrett or Mr. Bill Deese at (214) 665-7253.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document ``we,'' ``us,'' and ``our'' refers to EPA.
Table of Contents
-
What does this action do?
-
What is the authority for delegation?
-
What criteria must Oklahoma's programs meet to be approved?
-
How did ODEQ meet the approval criteria?
-
What is being delegated?
-
What is not being delegated?
-
How will applicability determinations be made?
-
What authority does EPA have?
-
What information must ODEQ provide to EPA?
-
What is EPA's oversight role?
-
Should sources submit notices to EPA or ODEQ?
-
How will unchanged authorities be delegated to ODEQ in the future?
-
Final Action
-
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
-
What does this action do?
EPA is taking direct final action to approve the delegation of certain NESHAPs to ODEQ. With this delegation, ODEQ has the primary responsibility to implement and enforce the delegated standards.
-
What is the authority for delegation?
Section 112(l) of the CAA, and 40 CFR part 63, subpart E, authorize EPA to delegate authority to any State or local agency which submits adequate regulatory procedures for implementation and enforcement of emission standards for hazardous air pollutants. The hazardous air pollutant standards are codified at 40 CFR parts 61 and 63.
-
What criteria must Oklahoma's program meet to be approved?
Section 112(l)(5) of the CAA enables EPA to approve state air toxics programs or rules to operate in place of the Federal air toxics program or rules. 40 CFR part 63, subpart E governs EPA's approval of State rules or programs under section 112(l).
EPA will approve an air toxics program if we find that:
(1) The State program is ``no less stringent'' than the corresponding Federal program or rule;
(2) The State has adequate authority and resources to implement the program;
(3) The schedule for implementation and compliance is sufficiently expeditious; and
(4) The program otherwise complies with Federal guidance.
In order to obtain approval of its program to implement and enforce Federal section 112 rules as promulgated without changes (straight delegation), a state must demonstrate that it meets the approval criteria of 40 CFR 63.91(d). 40 CFR 63.91(d)(3) provides that interim or final Title V program approval will satisfy the criteria of 40 CFR 63.91(d) for part 70 sources (sources required to obtain operating permits pursuant to Title V of the Clean Air Act).
-
How did ODEQ meet the NESHAPs program approval criteria?
As to the NESHAPs standards in 40 CFR parts 61 and 63, as part of its Title V submission ODEQ stated that it intended to use the mechanism of incorporation by reference to adopt unchanged Federal section 112 into its regulations. This commitment applied to both existing and future standards as they applied to part 70 sources. EPA's final interim approval of Oklahoma's Title V operating permits program delegated the authority to implement certain NESHAPs on February 5, 1996 (61 FR 4220). On December 5, 2001, EPA granted final full approval of the State's operating permits program (66 FR 63170). These interim and final Title V program approvals satisfy the upfront approval criteria of 40 CFR 63.91(d). Under 40 CFR 63.91(d)(2), once a State has satisfied up-front approval criteria, it needs only to reference the previous demonstration and reaffirm that it still meets the criteria for any subsequent submittals of the section 112 standards. ODEQ has affirmed that it still meets the up-front approval criteria.
-
What is being delegated?
By letter dated January 11, 2008, ODEQ requested EPA to update its existing NESHAP delegation. With certain exceptions noted in section VI below, Oklahoma's request included NESHAPs in 40 CFR part 61 and 40 CFR part 63. ODEQ's request included newly incorporated NESHAPs promulgated by EPA and amendments to existing standards currently delegated, as amended between September 2, 2004 and September 1, 2006. These NESHAPs were adopted by the ODEQ on March 27, 2007, and became effective on June 15, 2007.
-
What is not being delegated?
The following part 61 and 63 authorities listed below are not delegated. All of the inquiries and requests concerning implementation and enforcement of the excluded standards in the State of Oklahoma should be directed to the EPA Region 6 Office.
40 CFR part 61, subpart B (National Emission Standards for Radon Emissions from Underground Uranium Mines);
40 CFR part 61, subpart H (National Emission Standards for Emissions of Radionuclides Other Than Radon From Department of Energy Facilities);
40 CFR part 61, subpart I (National Emission Standards for Radionuclide Emissions from Federal Facilities Other Than Nuclear Regulatory Commission Licensees and Not Covered by Subpart H);
40 CFR part 61, subpart K (National Emission Standards for Radionuclide Emissions from Elemental Phosphorus Plants);
40 CFR part 61, subpart Q (National Emission Standards for Radon Emissions from Department of Energy facilities);
40 CFR part 61, subpart R (National Emission Standards for Radon Emissions from Phosphogypsum Stacks);
40 CFR part 61, subpart T (National Emission Standards for Radon Emissions from the Disposal of Uranium Mill Tailings); and
40 CFR part 61, subpart W (National Emission Standards for Radon Emissions from Operating Mill Tailings).
In addition, EPA cannot delegate to a State any of the Category II Subpart A authorities set forth in 40 CFR 63.91(g) (2). These include the following provisions: Sec. 63.6(g), Approval of Alternative Non-
Opacity Standards; Sec. 63.6(h)(9), Approval of Alternative Opacity Standards; Sec. 63.7(e)(2)(ii) and (f), Approval of Major Alternatives to Test Methods; Sec. 63.8(f), Approval of Major Alternatives to Monitoring; and Sec. 63.10(f), Approval of Major Alternatives to Recordkeeping and Reporting. In addition, some Part 63 standards have certain provisions that cannot be delegated to the States. Therefore, any Part 63 standard that provides that certain authorities cannot be delegated are retained by EPA and not delegated to ODEQ. Furthermore, no authorities are delegated that require rulemaking in the Federal Register to implement, or where Federal overview
Page 9624
is the only way to ensure national consistency in the application of the standards or requirements of CAA section 112. Finally, section 112(r), the accidental release program authority, is not being delegated by this approval.
In addition, this delegation to ODEQ to implement and enforce certain NESHAPs does not extend to sources or activities located in Indian country, as defined in 18 U.S.C. 1151. Under this definition, EPA treats as reservations, trust lands validly set aside for the use of a Tribe even if the trust lands have not been formally designated as a reservation. Consistent with previous federal program approvals or delegations, EPA will continue to implement the NESHAPs in Indian country because ODEQ has not submitted information to demonstrate authority over sources and activities located within the exterior boundaries of Indian reservations and other areas in Indian country.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act of 2005 includes a provision relating to Oklahoma and EPA programs, providing:
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, if the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (referred to in this section as the ``Administrator'') determines that a regulatory program submitted by the State of Oklahoma for approval by the Administrator under a law administered by the Administrator meets applicable requirements of the law, and the Administrator approves the State to administer the State program under the law with respect to areas in the State that are not Indian country, on request of the State, the Administrator shall approve the State to administer the State program in the areas of the State that are in Indian country, without any further demonstration of authority by the State.
H.R. 3, Section 10211(a). Oklahoma has not applied to administer the NESHAPS program in Indian country in accordance with this statute.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
How will applicability determinations under section 112 be made?
In approving this delegation, ODEQ will obtain concurrence from EPA on any matter involving the interpretation of section 112 of the CAA or 40 CFR parts 61 and 63 to the extent that implementation, administration, or enforcement of these sections have not been covered by EPA determinations or guidance.
-
What authority does EPA have?
We retain the right, as provided by CAA section 112(l)(7), to enforce any applicable emission standard or requirement under section 112. EPA also has the authority to make certain decisions under the General Provisions (subpart A) of part 63. We are granting ODEQ some of these authorities, and retaining others, as explained in sections V and VI above. In addition, EPA may review and disapprove of State determinations and subsequently require corrections. (See 40 CFR 63.91(g) and 65 FR 55810, 55823, September 14, 2000, as amended at 70 FR 59887, October 13, 2005; 72 FR 27443, May 16, 2007.)
Furthermore, we retain any authority in an individual emission standard that may not be delegated according to provisions of the standard. Also, listed in the footnotes of the part 63 delegation table at the end of this rule are the authorities that cannot be delegated to any State or local agency which we therefore retain.
-
What information must ODEQ provide to EPA?
ODEQ must provide any additional compliance related information to EPA, Region 6, Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance within 45 days of a request under 40 CFR 63.96(a). In receiving delegation for specific General Provisions authorities, ODEQ must submit to EPA Region 6 on a semi-annual basis, copies of determinations issued under these authorities. For parts 61 and 63 standards, these determinations include: Section 63.1, Applicability Determinations; Section 63.6(e), Operation and Maintenance Requirements--Responsibility for Determining Compliance; Section 63.6(f), Compliance with Non-Opacity Standards--
Responsibility for Determining Compliance; Section 63.6(h), Compliance with Opacity and Visible Emissions Standards--Responsibility for Determining Compliance; Sections 63.7(c)(2)(i) and (d), Approval of Site-Specific Test Plans; Section 63.7(e)(2)(i), Approval of Minor Alternatives to Test Methods; Section 63.7(e)(2)(ii) and (f), Approval of Intermediate Alternatives to Test Methods; Section 63.7(e)(iii), Approval of Shorter Sampling Times and Volumes When Necessitated by Process Variables or Other Factors; Sections 63.7(e)(2)(iv), (h)(2), and (h)(3), Waiver of Performance Testing; Sections 63.8(c)(1) and (e)(1), Approval of Site-Specific Performance Evaluation (Monitoring) Test Plans; Section 63.8(f), Approval of Minor Alternatives to Monitoring; Section 63.8(f), Approval of Intermediate Alternatives to Monitoring; Section 63.9 and 63.10, Approval of Adjustments to Time Periods for Submitting Reports; Section 63.10(f), Approval of Minor Alternatives to Recordkeeping and Reporting; Section 63.7(a)(4), Extension of Performance Test Deadline.
-
What is EPA's oversight role?
EPA must oversee ODEQ's decisions to ensure the delegated authorities are being adequately implemented and enforced. We will integrate oversight of the delegated authorities into the existing mechanisms and resources for oversight currently in place. If, during oversight, we determine that ODEQ made decisions that decreased the stringency of the delegated standards, then ODEQ shall be required to take corrective actions and the source(s) affected by the decisions will be notified, as required by 40 CFR 63.91(g)(1)(ii). We will initiate withdrawal of the program or rule if the corrective actions taken are insufficient.
-
Should sources submit notices to EPA or ODEQ?
All of the information required pursuant to the general provisions and the relevant subpart of the Federal NESHAPs (40 CFR parts 61 and 63) should be submitted by sources located outside of Indian country, directly to the ODEQ at the following address: Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality, 707 North Robinson, P.O. Box 1677, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73101-1677. The ODEQ is the primary point of contact with respect to delegated NESHAPs. Sources do not need to send a copy to EPA. EPA Region 6 waives the requirement that notifications and reports for delegated standards be submitted to EPA in addition to ODEQ in accordance with 40 CFR 63.9(a)(4)(ii) and 63.10(a)(4)(ii). For those standards that are not delegated, sources must continue to submit all appropriate information to EPA.
-
How will unchanged authorities be delegated to ODEQ in the future?
In the future, ODEQ will only need to send a letter of request for approval to EPA, Region 6, for NESHAP regulations that ODEQ has adopted by reference. The letter must reference the previous up-front approval demonstration and reaffirm that it still meets the up-front approval criteria. We will respond in writing to the request stating that the request for delegation is either granted or denied. A Federal Register action will be published to inform the public and affected sources of the delegation, indicate where source notifications and reports should be sent, and to amend the relevant portions of the Code of Federal Regulations showing which NESHAPs standards have been delegated to ODEQ.
-
Final Action
The public was provided the opportunity to comment on the proposed approval of the program and mechanism for delegation of section 112 standards, as they apply to part 70
Page 9625
sources, on March 10, 1995, for the proposed interim approval of ODEQ's operating permits program. (60 FR 13088). In EPA's final full approval of ODEQ's operating permits program on February 5, 1996 (61 FR 4220), EPA discussed that no adverse comments were received from the public on the proposed final delegation of the operating permits program. In today's action, the public is given the opportunity to comment on the approval of ODEQ's request for delegation of authority to implement and enforce certain section 112 standards for all sources (both part 70 and non-part 70 sources) which have been adopted by reference into Oklahoma's state regulations. However, the Agency views the approval of this request as a noncontroversial action and anticipates no adverse comments. Therefore, EPA is publishing this rule without prior proposal. However, in the ``Proposed Rules'' section of today's Federal Register publication, EPA is publishing a separate document that will serve as the proposal to approve the program and delegation of authority described in this action if adverse comments are received. This action will be effective April 27, 2015 without further notice unless the Agency receives relevant adverse comments by March 26, 2015.
If EPA receives relevant adverse comments, we will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal Register informing the public the rule will not take effect. We will address all public comments in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action. Any parties interested in commenting must do so at this time. Please note that if we receive relevant adverse comment on an amendment, paragraph, or section of the rule and if that provision may be severed from the remainder of the rule, we may adopt as final those provisions of the rule that are not the subject of a relevant adverse comment.
-
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and therefore is not subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211, ``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and imposes no additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this rule approves pre-existing requirements under state law and does not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by state law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4).
In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because the delegation is not approved to apply in Indian country located in the State, and the EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law. This action also does not have Federalism implications because it does not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999). This action merely approves a state request to receive delegation of certain Federal standards, and does not alter the relationship or the distribution of power and responsibilities established in the Clean Air Act. This rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045 ``Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not economically significant.
In reviewing delegation submissions, EPA's role is to approve submissions provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. In this context, in the absence of a prior existing requirement for the State to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority to disapprove a delegation submission for failure to use VCS. It would thus be inconsistent with applicable law for EPA to use VCS in place of a delegation submission that otherwise satisfies the provisions of the Clean Air Act. Thus, the requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. This rule does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by April 27, 2015. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects
40 CFR Part 61
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, Air pollution control, Arsenic, Benzene, Beryllium, Hazardous substances, Mercury, Intergovernmental relations, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Vinyl chloride.
40 CFR Part 63
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, Air pollution control, Hazardous substances, Intergovernmental relations, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: February 6, 2015.
Wren Stenger,
Director, Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division, Region 6.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, 40 CFR parts 61 and 63 are amended as follows:
PART 61--NATIONAL EMISSION STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS
0
1. The authority citation for part 61 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Page 9626
Subpart A--General Provisions
0
2. Section 61.04 is amended by revising paragraph (c)(6)(iv) to read as follows:
Sec. 61.04 Address.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(6) * * *
(iv) Oklahoma. The Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality (ODED) has been delegated the following part 61 standards promulgated by EPA, as amended in the Federal Register through September 1, 2006. The (X) symbol is used to indicate each subpart that has been delegated.
Delegation Status for National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants (Part 61 Standards) for Oklahoma
Excluding Indian country
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subpart Source category ODEQ \1\
------------------------------------------------------------------------
A........................ General Provisions.......... X
B........................ Radon Emissions From ...............
Underground Uranium Mines.
C........................ Beryllium................... X
D........................ Beryllium Rocket Motor X
Firing.
E........................ Mercury..................... X
F........................ Vinyl Chloride.............. X
G........................ (Reserved).................. ...............
H........................ Emissions of Radionuclides ...............
Other Than Radon From
Department of Energy
Facilities.
I........................ Radionuclide Emissions From ...............
Federal Facilities Other
Than Nuclear Regulatory
Commission Licensees and
Not Covered by Subpart H.
J........................ Equipment Leaks (Fugitive X
Emission Sources) of
Benzene.
K........................ Radionuclide Emissions From ...............
Elemental Phosphorus Plants.
L........................ Benzene Emissions From Coke X
By-Product Recovery Plants.
M........................ Asbestos.................... X
N........................ Inorganic Arsenic Emissions X
From Glass Manufacturing
Plants.
O........................ Inorganic Arsenic Emissions X
From Primary Copper
Smelters.
P........................ Inorganic Arsenic Emissions X
From Arsenic Trioxide and
Metallic Arsenic Production
Facilities.
Q........................ Radon Emissions From ...............
Department of Energy
Facilities.
R........................ Radon Emissions From ...............
Phosphogypsum Stacks.
S........................ (Reserved).................. ...............
T........................ Radon Emissions From the ...............
Disposal of Uranium Mill
Tailings.
U........................ (Reserved).................. ...............
V........................ Equipment Leaks (Fugitives X
Emission Sources).
W........................ Radon Emissions From ...............
Operating Mill Tailings.
X........................ (Reserved).................. ...............
Y........................ Benzene Emissions From X
Benzene Storage Vessels.
Z-AA..................... (Reserved).................. ...............
BB....................... Benzene Emissions From X
Benzene Transfer Operations.
CC-EE.................... (Reserved).................. ...............
FF....................... Benzene Waste Operations.... X
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Program delegated to Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality
(ODEQ).
* * * * *
PART 63--NATIONAL EMISSION STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS FOR SOURCE CATEGORIES
0
3. The authority citation for part 63 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart E--Approval of State Programs and Delegation of Federal Authorities
0
4. Section 63.99 is amended by revising paragraph (a)(37)(i) to read as follows:
Sec. 63.99 Delegated Federal authorities.
(a) * * *
(37) * * *
(i) The following table lists the specific part 63 standards that have been delegated unchanged to the Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality for all sources. The ``X'' symbol is used to indicate each subpart that has been delegated. The delegations are subject to all of the conditions and limitations set forth in Federal law, regulations, policy, guidance, and determinations. Some authorities cannot be delegated and are retained by EPA. These include certain General Provisions authorities and specific parts of some standards. Any amendments made to these rules after September 1, 2006 are not delegated.
Delegation Status for Part 63 Standards--State of Oklahoma
Excluding Indian country
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subpart Source category ODEQ 1 2
------------------------------------------------------------------------
A........................ General Provisions.......... X
F........................ Hazardous Organic NESHAP X
(HON)--Synthetic Organic
Chemical Manufacturing
Industry (SOCMI).
G........................ HON--SOCMI Process Vents, X
Storage Vessels, Transfer
Operations and Wastewater.
H........................ HON--Equipment Leaks........ X
I........................ HON--Certain Processes X
Negotiated Equipment Leak
Regulation.
J........................ Polyvinyl Chloride and (\3\)
Copolymers Production.
Page 9627
K........................ (Reserved).................. ...............
L........................ Coke Oven Batteries......... X
M........................ Perchloroethylene Dry X
Cleaning.
N........................ Chromium Electroplating and X
Chromium Anodizing Tanks.
O........................ Ethylene Oxide Sterilizers.. X
P........................ (Reserved).................. ...............
Q........................ Industrial Process Cooling X
Towers.
R........................ Gasoline Distribution....... X
S........................ Pulp and Paper Industry..... X
T........................ Halogenated Solvent Cleaning X
U........................ Group I Polymers and Resins. X
V........................ (Reserved).................. ...............
W........................ Epoxy Resins Production and X
Non-Nylon Polyamides
Production.
X........................ Secondary Lead Smelting..... X
Y........................ Marine Tank Vessel Loading.. X
Z........................ (Reserved).................. ...............
AA....................... Phosphoric Acid X
Manufacturing Plants.
BB....................... Phosphate Fertilizers X
Production Plants.
CC....................... Petroleum Refineries........ X
DD....................... Off-Site Waste and Recovery X
Operations.
EE....................... Magnetic Tape Manufacturing. X
FF....................... (Reserved).................. ...............
GG....................... Aerospace Manufacturing and X
Rework Facilities.
HH....................... Oil and Natural Gas X
Production Facilities.
II....................... Shipbuilding and Ship Repair X
Facilities.
JJ....................... Wood Furniture Manufacturing X
Operations.
KK....................... Printing and Publishing X
Industry.
LL....................... Primary Aluminum Reduction X
Plants.
MM....................... Chemical Recovery Combustion X
Sources at Kraft, Soda,
Sulfide, and Stand-Alone
Semichemical Pulp Mills.
NN....................... (Reserved).................. ...............
OO....................... Tanks--Level 1.............. X
PP....................... Containers.................. X
QQ....................... Surface Impoundments........ X
RR....................... Individual Drain Systems.... X
SS....................... Closed Vent Systems, Control X
Devices, Recovery Devices
and Routing to a Fuel Gas
System or a Process.
TT....................... Equipment Leaks--Control X
Level 1.
UU....................... Equipment Leaks--Control X
Level 2 Standards.
VV....................... Oil--Water Separators and X
Organic--Water Separators.
WW....................... Storage Vessels (Tanks)-- X
Control Level 2.
XX....................... Ethylene Manufacturing X
Process Units Heat Exchange
Systems and Waste
Operations.
YY....................... Generic Maximum Achievable X
Control Technology
Standards.
ZZ-BBB................... (Reserved).................. ...............
CCC...................... Steel Pickling--HCI Process X
Facilities and Hydrochloric
Acid Regeneration.
DDD...................... Mineral Wool Production..... X
EEE...................... Hazardous Waste Combustors.. X
FFF...................... (Reserved).................. ...............
GGG...................... Pharmaceuticals Production.. X
HHH...................... Natural Gas Transmission and X
Storage Facilities.
III...................... Flexible Polyurethane Foam X
Production.
JJJ...................... Group IV Polymers and Resins X
KKK...................... (Reserved).................. ...............
LLL...................... Portland Cement X
Manufacturing.
MMM...................... Pesticide Active Ingredient X
Production.
NNN...................... Wool Fiberglass X
Manufacturing.
OOO...................... Amino/Phenolic Resins....... X
PPP...................... Polyether Polyols Production X
QQQ...................... Primary Copper Smelting..... X
RRR...................... Secondary Aluminum X
Production.
SSS...................... (Reserved).................. ...............
TTT...................... Primary Lead Smelting....... X
UUU...................... Petroleum Refineries-- X
Catalytic Cracking Units,
Catalytic Reforming Units
and Sulfur Recovery Plants.
VVV...................... Publicly Owned Treatment X
Works (POTW).
WWW...................... (Reserved).................. ...............
XXX...................... Ferroalloys Production: X
Ferromanganese and
Silicomanganese.
AAAA..................... Municipal Solid Waste X
Landfills.
CCCC..................... Nutritional Yeast X
Manufacturing.
DDDD..................... Plywood and Composite Wood X
Products.
EEEE..................... Organic Liquids Distribution X
FFFF..................... Misc. Organic Chemical X
Production and Processes
(MON).
GGGG..................... Solvent Extraction for X
Vegetable Oil Production.
HHHH..................... Wet Formed Fiberglass Mat X
Production.
Page 9628
IIII..................... Auto & Light Duty Truck X
(Surface Coating).
JJJJ..................... Paper and other Web (Surface X
Coating).
KKKK..................... Metal Can (Surface Coating). X
MMMM..................... Misc. Metal Parts and X
Products (Surface Coating).
NNNN..................... Surface Coating of Large X
Appliances.
OOOO..................... Fabric Printing Coating and X
Dyeing.
PPPP..................... Plastic Parts (Surface X
Coating).
QQQQ..................... Surface Coating of Wood X
Building Products.
RRRR..................... Surface Coating of Metal X
Furniture.
SSSS..................... Surface Coating for Metal X
Coil.
TTTT..................... Leather Finishing Operations X
UUUU..................... Cellulose Production X
Manufacture.
VVVV..................... Boat Manufacturing.......... X
WWWW..................... Reinforced Plastic X
Composites Production.
XXXX..................... Tire Manufacturing.......... X
YYYY..................... Combustion Turbines......... X
ZZZZ..................... Reciprocating Internal X
Combustion Engines (RICE).
AAAAA.................... Lime Manufacturing Plants... X
BBBBB.................... Semiconductor Manufacturing. X
CCCCC.................... Coke Ovens: Pushing, X
Quenching and Battery
Stacks.
DDDDD.................... Industrial/Commercial/ X
Institutional Boilers and
Process Heaters Major
Sources.
EEEEE.................... Iron Foundries.............. X
FFFFF.................... Integrated Iron and Steel... X
GGGGG.................... Site Remediation............ X
HHHHH.................... Miscellaneous Coating X
Manufacturing.
IIIII.................... Mercury Cell Chlor-Alkali X
Plants.
JJJJJ.................... Brick and Structural Clay X
Products Manufacturing.
KKKKK.................... Clay Ceramics Manufacturing. X
LLLLL.................... Asphalt Roofing and X
Processing.
MMMMM.................... Flexible Polyurethane Foam X
Fabrication Operation.
NNNNN.................... Hydrochloric Acid X
Production, Fumed Silica
Production.
OOOOO.................... (Reserved).................. ...............
PPPPP.................... Engine Test Facilities...... X
QQQQQ.................... Friction Products X
Manufacturing.
RRRRR.................... Taconite Iron Ore Processing X
SSSSS.................... Refractory Products X
Manufacture.
TTTTT.................... Primary Magnesium Refining.. X
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Program delegated to Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality
(ODEQ).
\2\ Authorities which may not be delegated include: Sec. 63.6(g),
Approval of Alternative Non-Opacity Emission Standards; Sec.
63.6(h)(9), Approval of Alternative Opacity Standards; Sec.
63.7(e)(2)(ii) and (f), Approval of Major Alternatives to Test
Methods; Sec. 63.8(f), Approval of Major Alternatives to Monitoring;
Sec. 63.10(f), Approval of Major Alternatives to Recordkeeping and
Reporting; and all authorities identified in the subparts (e.g., under
``Delegation of Authority'') that cannot be delegated.
\3\ The ODEQ has adopted this subpart unchanged and applied for
delegation of the standard. The subpart was vacated and remanded to
EPA by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia
Circuit. See, Mossville Environmental Action Network v. EPA, 370 F. 3d
1232 (D.C. Cir. 2004). Because of the D.C. Court's holding, this
subpart is not delegated to ODEQ at this time.
* * * * *
FR Doc. 2015-03803 Filed 2-23-15; 8:45 am
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
