Notice of Funding Opportunity for Consolidated Rail Infrastructure and Safety Improvements

Published date31 August 2021
Citation86 FR 48798
Record Number2021-18737
SectionNotices
CourtFederal Railroad Administration,Transportation Department
48798
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 166 / Tuesday, August 31, 2021 / Notices
1
These criteria may be found in Appendix A to
Part 391—Medical Advisory Criteria, section H.
Epilepsy: §391.41(b)(8), paragraphs 3, 4, and 5,
which is available on the internet at https://
www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2015-title49-vol5/pdf/
CFR-2015-title49-vol5-part391-appA.pdf.
SUMMARY
: FMCSA announces its
decision to renew exemptions for 13
individuals from the requirement in the
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Regulations (FMCSRs) that interstate
commercial motor vehicle (CMV)
drivers have ‘‘no established medical
history or clinical diagnosis of epilepsy
or any other condition which is likely
to cause loss of consciousness or any
loss of ability to control a CMV.’’ The
exemptions enable these individuals
who have had one or more seizures and
are taking anti-seizure medication to
continue to operate CMVs in interstate
commerce.
DATES
: The exemptions were applicable
on July 12, 2021. The exemptions expire
on July 12, 2023.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
: Ms.
Christine A. Hydock, Chief, Medical
Programs Division, (202) 366–4001,
fmcsamedical@dot.gov, FMCSA, DOT,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Room
W64–224, Washington, DC 20590–0001.
Office hours are from 8:30 a.m. to 5
p.m., ET, Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. If you have
questions regarding viewing or
submitting material to the docket,
contact Dockets Operations, (202) 366–
9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
:
I. Public Participation
A. Viewing Comments
To view comments go to
www.regulations.gov. Insert the docket
number, FMCSA–2008–0355, FMCSA–
2011–0089, FMCSA–2014–0381,
FMCSA–2014–0382, FMCSA–2017–
0253, FMCSA–2018–0057, FMCSA–
2019–0028, or FMCSA–2019–0029 in
the keyword box, and click ‘‘Search.’’
Next, sort the results by ‘‘Posted
(Newer-Older),’’ choose the first notice
listed, and click ‘‘Browse Comments.’’ If
you do not have access to the internet,
you may view the docket online by
visiting Dockets Operations in Room
W12–140 on the ground floor of the
DOT West Building, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590–
0001, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., ET,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. To be sure someone is there to
help you, please call (202) 366–9317 or
(202) 366–9826 before visiting Dockets
Operations.
B. Privacy Act
In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(c),
DOT solicits comments from the public
to better inform its regulatory process.
DOT posts these comments, without
edit, including any personal information
the commenter provides, to
www.regulations.gov, as described in
the system of records notice (DOT/ALL–
14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at
www.transportation.gov/privacy.
II. Background
On July 15, 2021, FMCSA published
a notice announcing its decision to
renew exemptions for 13 individuals
from the epilepsy and seizure disorders
prohibition in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(8) to
operate a CMV in interstate commerce
and requested comments from the
public (86 FR 37397). The public
comment period ended on August 16,
2021, and no comments were received.
FMCSA has evaluated the eligibility
of these applicants and determined that
renewing these exemptions would
achieve a level of safety equivalent to,
or greater than, the level that would be
achieved by complying with
§ 391.41(b)(8).
The physical qualification standard
for drivers regarding epilepsy found in
§ 391.41(b)(8) states that a person is
physically qualified to drive a CMV if
that person has no established medical
history or clinical diagnosis of epilepsy
or any other condition which is likely
to cause the loss of consciousness or any
loss of ability to control a CMV.
In addition to the regulations, FMCSA
has published advisory criteria
1
to
assist medical examiners in determining
whether drivers with certain medical
conditions are qualified to operate a
CMV in interstate commerce.
III. Discussion of Comments
FMCSA received no comments in this
preceding.
IV. Conclusion
Based on its evaluation of the 13
renewal exemption applications,
FMCSA announces its decision to
exempt the following drivers from the
epilepsy and seizure disorders
prohibition in § 391.41(b)(8).
As of July 12, 2021, and in accordance
with 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315(b),
the following 13 individuals have
satisfied the renewal conditions for
obtaining an exemption from the
epilepsy and seizure disorders
prohibition in the FMCSRs for interstate
CMV drivers (86 FR 37397):
Prince Austin, Jr. (OH)
Darcy Baker (OH)
Gary Bartels (SD)
Frank Cekovic (PA)
Monte DeRocini (PA)
Teddy Dixon (GA)
Jaime Dougherty (MN)
Martin Ford (WI)
David Johnston (HI)
Brent Mapes (IL)
Enrico Mucci (PA)
Charles Skelton (AL)
Kevin Wiggins (KY)
The drivers were included in docket
number FMCSA–2008–0355,
FMCSA–2011–0089, FMCSA–2014–
0381, FMCSA–2014–0382, FMCSA–
2017–0253, FMCSA–2018–0057,
FMCSA–2019–0028, or FMCSA–2019–
0029. Their exemptions were applicable
as of July 12, 2021 and will expire on
July 12, 2023.
In accordance with 49 U.S.C.
31315(b), each exemption will be valid
for 2 years from the effective date unless
revoked earlier by FMCSA. The
exemption will be revoked if the
following occurs: (1) The person fails to
comply with the terms and conditions
of the exemption; (2) the exemption has
resulted in a lower level of safety than
was maintained prior to being granted;
or (3) continuation of the exemption
would not be consistent with the goals
and objectives of 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and
31315(b).
Larry W. Minor,
Associate Administrator for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021–18780 Filed 8–30–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
Notice of Funding Opportunity for
Consolidated Rail Infrastructure and
Safety Improvements
AGENCY
: Federal Railroad
Administration (FRA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION
: Notice of Funding Opportunity
(NOFO or notice).
SUMMARY
: This notice details the
application requirements and
procedures to obtain grant funding for
eligible projects under the Consolidated
Rail Infrastructure and Safety
Improvements (CRISI) Program, and
related Trespass Prevention projects.
The opportunities described in this
notice are made available under
Assistance Listings Number 20.325,
‘‘Consolidated Rail Infrastructure and
Safety Improvements.’’
DATES
: Applications for funding under
this solicitation are due no later than
5:00 p.m. ET, November 29, 2021.
Applications that are incomplete or
received after 5:00 p.m. ET on
November 29, 2021 will not be
considered for funding. See Section D of
VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:08 Aug 30, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00140 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\31AUN1.SGM 31AUN1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
48799
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 166 / Tuesday, August 31, 2021 / Notices
this notice for additional information on
the application process.
ADDRESSES
: Applications must be
submitted via www.Grants.gov. Only
applicants who comply with all
submission requirements described in
this notice and submit applications
through www.Grants.gov will be eligible
for award. For any supporting
application materials that an applicant
is unable to submit via www.Grants.gov
(such as oversized engineering
drawings), an applicant may submit an
original and two (2) copies to Mr.
Douglas Gascon, Office of Policy and
Planning, Federal Railroad
Administration, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Room W38–212,
Washington, DC 20590. However, due to
delays caused by enhanced screening of
mail delivered via the U.S. Postal
Service, applicants are advised to use
other means of conveyance (such as
courier service) to assure timely receipt
of materials before the application
deadline.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
: For
further project or program-related
information in this notice, please
contact Mr. Douglas Gascon, Office of
Policy and Planning, Federal Railroad
Administration, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Room W38–212,
Washington, DC 20590; email:
douglas.gascon@dot.gov; phone: 202–
493–0239.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
:
Notice to applicants: FRA
recommends that applicants read this
notice in its entirety prior to preparing
application materials. Definitions of key
terms used throughout the NOFO are
provided in Section A(3) below. These
key terms are capitalized throughout the
NOFO. There are several administrative
prerequisites and specific eligibility
requirements described herein with
which applicants must comply.
Additionally, applicants should note
that the required Project Narrative
component of the application package
may not exceed 25 pages in length.
Table of Contents
A. Program Description
B. Federal Award Information
C. Eligibility Information
D. Application and Submission Information
E. Application Review Information
F. Federal Award Administration
Information
G. Federal Awarding Agency Contacts
H. Other Information
A. Program Description
(A) Overview
Our nation’s rail network is a critical
component of the U.S. transportation
system and economy. Prior to the
coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID–19)
pandemic, rail carried over 32.5 million
passengers on Amtrak services and
approximately 1.6 billion tons of freight
valued at over $600 billion each year.
The CRISI program will enhance rail
safety, help to undo inequities caused
by transportation and land use policies
and create new opportunities for
underserved communities, provide
energy efficient transportation options
to confront the effects of climate change,
invest in projects that spur economic
growth, and ensure our world-class
freight network can meet the mobility
demands of a growing population.
Congress authorized the CRISI grant
program for the Secretary to invest in a
wide range of projects within the United
States to improve railroad safety,
efficiency, and reliability; mitigate
congestion at both intercity passenger
and freight rail chokepoints; enhance
multi-modal connections; and lead to
new or substantially improved Intercity
Passenger Rail Transportation corridors.
Rail safety projects include, but are not
limited to, grade crossing
enhancements, rail line Relocations and
Improvements, and deployment of
railroad safety technology. Eligible
activities also include regional rail and
corridor Planning, environmental
analyses, research, workforce
development, and training. The purpose
of this notice is to solicit applications
for the competitive CRISI Program
provided in Consolidated
Appropriations Act, 2021, Div. L, Tit I,
Public Law 116–260 (2021
Appropriation) and related funding
provided in the Consolidated
Appropriations Act, 2019, Div. G, Tit I,
Public Law 116–6 (2019 Appropriation).
The CRISI Program is authorized
under Section 11301 of the Fixing
America’s Surface Transportation
(FAST) Act, Public Law 114–94 (2015);
49 U.S.C. 22907. Grant funding to help
implement FRA’s National Strategy to
Prevent Trespassing for law
enforcement agencies and for railroad
trespass suicide prevention programs
(Non-CRISI Funding), as provided in the
2021 Appropriation and the 2019
Appropriation, is authorized pursuant
to 49 U.S.C. 103(i) and 49 U.S.C.
20151(b). Unless otherwise stated
herein, to the extent practicable,
applications for the Non-CRISI Funding
will be evaluated consistent with the
selection criteria for a CRISI safety
program under 49 U.S.C. 22907(c)(10).
Consistent with Biden-Harris
Administration priorities, the
Department seeks to fund projects that
address climate change impacts and
environmental justice. Projects should
include components that reduce
emissions, promote energy efficiency,
increase resiliency, and recycle or
redevelop existing infrastructure. This
objective is consistent with Executive
Order 14008, Tackling the Climate
Crisis at Home and Abroad (86 FR
7619). As part of the Department’s
implementation of that Executive Order,
the Department encourages the
submission of applications that would
direct resources and benefits towards
low-income communities,
disadvantaged communities, or
communities underserved by affordable
transportation.
The Department also seeks to
encourage racial equity by investing in
projects that proactively address racial
equity and barriers to opportunity.
Projects should include components
that improve or expand transportation
options, and mitigate the safety risks
and detrimental quality of life effects
that rail lines can have on communities,
particularly low-income areas and
communities of color. This objective
supports the Department’s strategic goal
related to infrastructure, with the
potential for significantly enhancing
environmental stewardship and
community partnerships, and reflects
Executive Order 13985, Advancing
Racial Equity and Support for
Underserved Communities Through the
Federal Government (86 FR 7009).
Section E describes the climate change,
environmental justice, and racial equity
considerations that an applicant can
undertake to address these criteria.
Consistent with the Rural
Opportunities to Use Transportation for
Economic Success (R.O.U.T.E.S.)
initiative, the Department seeks rural
projects that address deteriorating
conditions and disproportionately high
fatality rates on rural transportation
infrastructure. Please visit https://
www.transportation.gov/rural to learn
more about DOT’s efforts to address
disparities in rural infrastructure.
(B) Changes From FY 2020 CRISI NOFO
This notice updates the FY 2020
CRISI NOFO to reflect the Biden-Harris
Administration’s priorities for creating
good-paying jobs, improving safety,
applying transformative technology, and
explicitly addressing climate change
and racial equity as discussed in Section
E(1)(c). This NOFO also incorporates
Non-CRISI Funding.
There are three legislative set-asides
for the CRISI funding under this notice:
(1) Rural Set-Aside—for projects
located in Rural Areas,
(2) Intercity Passenger Rail Set-
Aside—for certain intercity passenger
rail development projects, and
VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:08 Aug 30, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00141 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\31AUN1.SGM 31AUN1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
48800
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 166 / Tuesday, August 31, 2021 / Notices
1
For any project that includes purchasing
Intercity Passenger Rail rolling stock, applicants are
encouraged to use a standardized approach to the
procurement of passenger rail equipment, such as
the specifications developed by the Next Generation
Corridor Equipment Pool Committee or a similar
uniform process.
(3) Capital Improvements for Trespass
Prevention Set-Aside—for trespass
prevention capital projects.
Additionally, FRA is making Non-
CRISI funding available funding for:
(A) Railroad Trespassing
Enforcement—for projects for law
enforcement strategies for reducing
trespassing, and
(B) Railroad Trespassing Suicide
Prevention—for the implementation of
railroad trespassing suicide prevention
programs.
Applicants should state in their
applications whether their project falls
within one or more of the above set-
asides, each as further described in
Section B.1.
Definitions of Key Terms
Terms defined in this section are
capitalized throughout this NOFO.
a. ‘‘Benefit-Cost Analysis’’ (or ‘‘Cost-
Benefit Analysis’’) is a systematic, data
driven, and transparent analysis
comparing monetized project benefits
and costs, using a no-build baseline and
properly discounted present values,
including concise documentation of the
assumptions and methodology used to
produce the analysis; a description of
the baseline, data sources used to
project outcomes, and values of key
input parameters; basis of modeling
including spreadsheets, technical
memos, etc.; and presentation of the
calculations in sufficient detail and
transparency to allow the analysis to be
reproduced and for sensitivity of results
evaluated by FRA. Please refer to the
Benefit-Cost Analysis Guidance for
Discretionary Grant Programs prior to
preparing a BCA at https://
www.transportation.gov/office-policy/
transportation-policy/benefit-cost-
analysis-guidance. In addition, please
also refer to the BCA FAQs on FRA’s
website for rail specific examples of
how to apply the BCA Guidance for
Discretionary Grant Programs to CRISI
applications.
b. ‘‘Capital Project’’ means a project
for acquiring, constructing, improving,
or inspecting rail equipment, track and
track structures, or a rail facility;
expenses incidental to the acquisition or
Construction including pre-construction
activities (such as designing,
engineering, location surveying,
mapping, acquiring rights-of-way) and
related relocation costs, environmental
studies, and all work necessary for FRA
to approve the project under the
National Environmental Policy Act;
highway-rail grade crossing
improvements; communication and
signalization improvements; and
rehabilitating, remanufacturing or
overhauling rail rolling stock and rail
facilities.
1
c. ‘‘Construction’’ means the
production of fixed works and
structures or substantial alterations to
such structures or land and associated
costs.
d. ‘‘Enforcement Activities’’ means
investigating compliance with, and
enforcing, rail trespass-related laws.
e. ‘‘Final Design (FD)’’ means design
activities following Preliminary
Engineering, and at a minimum,
includes the preparation of final
Construction plans, detailed
specifications, and estimates sufficiently
detailed to inform project stakeholders
(designers, reviewers, contractors,
suppliers, etc.) of the actions required to
advance the project from design through
completion of Construction.
f. ‘‘Hot Spot’’ means a location along
the railroad right-of-way where the risk
of trespassing or collision as a result of
trespassing is high.
g. ‘‘Improvement’’ means repair or
enhancement to existing rail
infrastructure, or construction of new
rail infrastructure, that results in
efficiency of the rail system and the
safety of those affected by the system.
h. ‘‘Intercity Rail Passenger
Transportation’’ means rail passenger
transportation, except commuter rail
passenger transportation. See 49 U.S.C.
22901(3). In this notice, ‘‘Intercity
Passenger Rail Service’’ and ‘‘Intercity
Passenger Rail Transportation’’ are
equivalent terms to ‘‘Intercity Rail
Passenger Transportation.’’
i. ‘‘National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA)’’ is a Federal law that requires
Federal agencies to analyze and
document the environmental impacts of
a proposed action in consultation with
appropriate Federal, state, and local
authorities, and with the public. NEPA
classes of action include an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS),
Environmental Analysis (EA) or
Categorical Exclusion (CE). The NEPA
class of action depends on the nature of
the proposed action, its complexity, and
the potential impacts. For purposes of
this NOFO, NEPA also includes all
related Federal laws and regulations
including the Clean Air Act, Section 4(f)
of the Department of Transportation
Act, Section 7 of the Endangered
Species Act, and Section 106 of the
National Historic Preservation Act.
Additional information regarding FRA’s
environmental processes and
requirements are located at https://
www.fra.dot.gov/environment.
j. ‘‘Outreach Campaign’’ means any
coordinated effort to reach a specific
population, in the case of railroad
trespassing suicide prevention
programs, those who are experiencing or
who may experience suicidal thoughts,
with the goal of providing assistance.
The assistance provided through the
Outreach Campaign may take many
forms, including but not limited to,
advertising of services, identifying and
approaching individuals in need, or
other methods to recognize the signs of
an individual in crisis to prevent
suicide.
k. ‘‘Planning’’ means activities that
support the development of a state or
regional rail plan or a corridor service
development plan. Project-specific (e.g.,
rail station or port improvements)
planning is not eligible.
l. ‘‘Positive Train Control (PTC)
system’’ is defined by 49 CFR 270.5 to
mean a system designed to prevent
train-to-train collisions, overspeed
derailments, incursions into established
work zone limits, and the movement of
a train through a switch left in the
wrong position, as described in 49 CFR
part 236, subpart I.
m. ‘‘Preliminary Engineering (PE)’’
means engineering design to: (1) Define
a project, including identification of all
environmental impacts, design of all
critical project elements at a level
sufficient to assure reliable cost
estimates and schedules, (2) complete
project management and financial plans,
and (3) identify procurement
requirements and strategies. The PE
development process starts with specific
project design alternatives that allow for
the assessment of a range of rail
improvements, specific alignments, and
project designs. PE generally occurs
concurrently with NEPA and related
analyses, and prior to FD and
Construction.
n. ‘‘Relocation’’ is defined to mean
moving a rail line vertically or laterally
to a new location. Vertical Relocation
refers to raising above the current
ground level or sinking below the
current ground level of a rail line.
Lateral Relocation refers to moving a rail
line horizontally to a new location.
o. ‘‘Rural Project’’ means a project in
which all or the majority of the project
(determined by the geographic location
or locations where the majority of the
project funds will be spent) is located in
a Rural Area.
p. ‘‘Rural Area’’ is defined in 49
U.S.C. 22907(g)(2) to mean any area not
in an urbanized area as defined by the
Census Bureau. The Census Bureau
VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:08 Aug 30, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00142 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\31AUN1.SGM 31AUN1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
48801
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 166 / Tuesday, August 31, 2021 / Notices
2
See 74 FR 53030, 53043 (August 24, 2011)
available at https://www2.census.gov/geo/pdfs/
reference/fedreg/fedregv76n164.pdf.
3
Of the $375,000,000 in CRISI funding made
available in the 2021 Appropriation, $11,512,500
will be separately made available for Special
Transportation Circumstances and $3,750,000 will
be set aside for award and program oversight.
4
FRA made Safety and Operations Account
funding available in FY 2019 and FY 2020 under
separate NOFOs for the Railroad Trespassing
Enforcement Grant Program and the Railroad
Trespassing Suicide Prevention Grant Program, as
part of its National Trespass Prevention Strategy.
FRA is combining Non-CRISI funds for those
trespass prevention programs into the CRISI NOFO
to leverage Federal funding to comprehensively
address trespassing safety issues through awards for
infrastructure investment combined with safety
programs including enforcement and outreach
activities. If funding is not requested under B.1(d)
or (e), FRA may award such funds for other eligible
trespass prevention purposes.
5
Interstate Compacts are ineligible for Non-CRISI
funding.
6
See Section D(2)(a)(iv) for supporting
documentation required to demonstrate eligibility
under this eligibility category.
7
See Section D(2)(a)(iv) for supporting
documentation required to demonstrate eligibility
under this eligibility category.
8
See Section D(2)(a)(iv) for supporting
information required to demonstrate eligibility
under this eligibility category.
defines Urbanized Area (UA) as an area
with a population of 50,000 or more
people.
2
Updated lists of UAs as defined
by the Census Bureau are available on
the Census Bureau website at http://
www2.census.gov/geo/maps/dc10map/
UAUC_RefMap/ua/.
B. Federal Award Information
1. Available Award Amount
The total funding available for awards
under this NOFO is $361,978,796.
Should additional funds become
available after the release of this NOFO,
FRA may elect to award such additional
funds to applications received under
this NOFO.
3
Further, certain funding amounts are
set-aside for the following purposes
under this NOFO:
a. Rural Set-Aside—At least 25
percent of the CRISI funding, or
$93,750,000 will be made available for
Rural Projects as required by 49 U.S.C.
22907(g);
b. Intercity Passenger Rail Set-Aside—
Not less than $75 million of the CRISI
funding will be made available for
projects eligible under 49 U.S.C.
22907(c)(2) that support the
development of new intercity passenger
rail service routes including alignments
for existing routes; and
c. Capital Improvements for Trespass
Prevention—Not less than $25 million
of the CRISI funding will be made
available for Capital Projects and
engineering solutions targeting
trespassing.
d. Railroad Trespassing Enforcement
Activities—$2,034,296 in Non-CRISI
Funding will be made available for
grants supporting Enforcement
Activities at Hot Spots within their
respective jurisdictions or at areas that
demonstrate a rail trespassing problem
in their community on FRA-regulated
track. This grant funding is limited to
hourly wages for law enforcement
officials.
e. Railroad Trespassing Suicide
Prevention—$207,000 in Non-CRISI
Funding will be made available for
grants to help implement FRA’s
Trespasser Prevention Strategy through
grants funding the implementation or
expansion of targeted Outreach
Campaigns to reduce the number of
railroad-related suicides that involve
railroad trespassing on FRA-regulated
track.
4
2. Award Size
There are no predetermined minimum
or maximum dollar thresholds for CRISI
awards. For Non-CRISI funding, the
maximum award for railroad trespass
law enforcement grants will be capped
at $120,000, and the maximum award
for railroad trespass suicide prevention
grants will be capped at $100,000. FRA
anticipates making multiple awards
with the available funding. FRA may
not be able to award grants to all eligible
applications even if they meet or exceed
the stated evaluation criteria (see
Section E, Application Review
Information). Projects may require more
funding than is available. FRA
encourages applicants to propose
projects or components of projects that
have operational independence and that
can be completed and implemented
with funding under this NOFO as a part
of the total project cost together with
other, non-Federal sources.
3. Award Type
FRA will make awards for projects
selected under this notice through grant
agreements and/or cooperative
agreements. Grant agreements are used
when FRA does not expect to have
substantial Federal involvement in
carrying out the funded activity.
Cooperative agreements allow for
substantial Federal involvement in
carrying out the agreed upon
investment, including technical
assistance, review of interim work
products, and increased program
oversight. The funding provided under
this NOFO will be made available to
grantees on a reimbursable basis.
Applicants must certify that their
expenditures are allowable, allocable,
reasonable, and necessary to the
approved project before seeking
reimbursement from FRA. Additionally,
the grantee is expected to expend
matching funds at the required
percentage concurrent with Federal
funds throughout the life of the project.
See an example of standard terms and
conditions for FRA grant awards at:
https://www.fra.dot.gov/eLib/Details/
L19057. This template is subject to
revision.
4. Concurrent Applications
DOT and FRA may be concurrently
soliciting applications for transportation
infrastructure projects for several
financial assistance programs.
Applicants may submit applications
requesting funding for a particular
project to one or more of these
programs. In the application for funding
under this NOFO, applicants must
indicate the other programs and, if
applicable, the other CRISI or trespass
prevention NOFOs to which they
submitted or plan to submit an
application for funding the entire
project or certain project components, as
well as highlight new or revised
information in the application
responsive to this NOFO that differs
from the previously submitted
application(s).
C. Eligibility Information
This section of the notice explains
applicant eligibility, cost sharing and
matching requirements, project
eligibility, and project component
operational independence. Applications
that do not meet the requirements in
this section will be ineligible for
funding. Instructions for submitting
eligibility information to FRA are
detailed in Section D of this NOFO.
1. Eligible Applicants
The following entities are eligible
applicants under this notice:
a. A State;
b. A group of States;
c. An Interstate Compact;
5
d. A public agency or publicly chartered
authority established by one or more States;
6
e. A political subdivision of a State;
f. Amtrak or another rail carrier that
provides Intercity Rail Passenger
Transportation (as defined in 49 U.S.C.
24102);
g. A Class II railroad or Class III railroad
(as those terms are defined in 49 U.S.C.
20102) or a holding company of a Class II or
III railroad;
7
h. Any rail carrier or rail equipment
manufacturer in partnership with at least one
of the entities described in paragraph (a)
through (e);
8
VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:08 Aug 30, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00143 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\31AUN1.SGM 31AUN1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
48802
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 166 / Tuesday, August 31, 2021 / Notices
9
See Section D(2)(a)(iii) for supporting
information required to demonstrate eligibility of
Federal funds for use as match.
10
Pursuant to the 2021 Appropriation, 49 U.S.C.
22905(f) shall not apply to projects for the
implementation of positive train control systems,
otherwise eligible under 49 U.S.C. 22907(c)(1).
‘‘Maintenance and operations costs incurred after a
PTC system is placed in revenue service are not
eligible for CRISI funding. . . .’’ 166 Cong. Rec.
H8820 (2020) (explanatory statement accompanying
the 2021 Appropriation).
11
Only costs for FD and Construction project
stages and forward are eligible within this project
eligibility category.
i. The Transportation Research Board
together with any entity with which it
contracts in the development of rail-related
research, including cooperative research
programs;
j. A University transportation center
engaged in rail-related research; or
k. A non-profit labor organization
representing a class or craft of employees of
rail carriers or rail carrier contractors.
Applications must identify an eligible
applicant as the lead applicant. The lead
applicant serves as the primary point of
contact for the application, and if
selected, as the grantee. Eligible
applicants may reference entities that
are not eligible applicants in an
application as a project partner.
2. Cost Sharing or Matching
The Federal share of total costs for
CRISI projects funded under this notice
will not exceed 80 percent, though FRA
will provide selection preference to
applications where the proposed
Federal share of total project costs is 50
percent or less. For Non-CRISI funding,
the Federal share of total project costs
can be up to 100 percent. The estimated
total cost of a project must be based on
the best available information, including
engineering studies, studies of economic
feasibility, environmental analyses, and
information on the expected use of
equipment and/or facilities.
Additionally, and to the extent
practicable, in preparing estimates of
total project costs, applicants may refer
to FRA’s cost estimate guidance
documentation, ‘‘Capital Cost
Estimating: Guidance for Project
Sponsors,’’ which is available at:
https://www.fra.dot.gov/Page/P0926.
The minimum 20 percent non-Federal
match for CRISI-funded projects may be
composed of public sector (e.g., state or
local) and/or private sector funding.
FRA will not consider any Federal
financial assistance
9
nor any non-
Federal funds already expended (or
otherwise encumbered) toward the
matching requirement, unless compliant
with 2 CFR part 200. In-kind
contributions, including the donation of
services, materials, and equipment, may
be credited as a project cost, in a
uniform manner consistent with 2 CFR
200.306.
Amtrak or another rail carrier may use
ticket and other non-Federal revenues
generated from its operations and other
sources as matching funds. Applicants
must identify the source(s) of its
matching and other funds, and must
clearly and distinctly reflect these funds
as part of the total project cost.
Before applying, applicants should
carefully review the principles for cost
sharing or matching in 2 CFR 200.306.
See Section D(2)(a)(iii) for required
application information on non-Federal
match and Section E for further
discussion of FRA’s consideration of
matching funds in the review and
selection process. FRA will approve pre-
award costs consistent with 2 CFR
200.458, as applicable. See Section D(6).
Cost sharing or matching may be used
only for authorized Federal award
purposes.
3. Other
a. Project Eligibility
The following rail projects within the
United States that improve the safety,
efficiency, and/or reliability of
passenger and/or freight rail
transportation systems are eligible for
funding under 49 U.S.C. 22907 and this
NOFO.
i. Deployment of railroad safety
technology, including positive train
control and rail integrity inspection
systems.
10
PTC examples include: Back
office systems; wayside,
communications and onboard hardware
equipment; software; equipment
installation; spectrum; any component,
testing and training for the
implementation of PTC systems; and
interoperability. Maintenance and
operating expenses incurred after a PTC
system is placed in revenue service are
ineligible. Railroad safety technology
and rail integrity inspection system
examples include broken rail detection
and warning systems; track intrusion
systems; and hot box detectors, wheel
impact load detectors, and other safety
improvements.
11
ii. A capital project as defined in 49
U.S.C. 22901(2) relating to Intercity
Passenger Rail Service, except that such
projects are not required to be in a State
rail plan under the CRISI Program.
Examples include acquisition,
improvement, or rehabilitation of
railroad equipment (locomotives and
rolling stock); railroad infrastructure
(grade crossings, catenary, and signals);
and rail facilities (yards, passenger
stations, or maintenance and repair
shops).
iii. A Capital Project necessary to
address congestion challenges affecting
rail service. Examples include projects
addressing congestion that increase rail
capacity; add or upgrade the condition,
clearances, and capacity of rail
mainlines; enhance capacity and service
with less conflict between freight and
Intercity Passenger Rail; reduce delays
and risks associated with highway-rail
grade crossings; and provide more
effective rail equipment.
iv. A Capital Project necessary to
reduce congestion and facilitate
ridership growth in Intercity Passenger
Rail Transportation along heavily
traveled rail corridors. Examples
include projects addressing congestion
that improve stations; increase rail
capacity; reduce conflict between freight
and Intercity Passenger Rail; reduce
delays and risks associated with
highway-rail grade crossings; and
provide more effective rail equipment.
v. A highway-rail grade crossing
improvement project, including
installation, repair, or improvement of
grade separations, railroad crossing
signals, gates, and related technologies;
highway traffic signalization; highway
lighting and crossing approach signage;
roadway improvements such as medians
or other barriers; railroad crossing
panels and surfaces; and safety
engineering improvements to reduce
risk in quiet zones or potential quiet
zones.
vi. A rail line Relocation and
Improvement project. Examples include
projects that: Improve the route or
structure of a rail line by replacing
degraded track; enhance/relocate
railroad switching operations; add or
lengthen passing tracks to increase
capacity; improve interlockings; and
relocate rail lines to alleviate
congestion, and eliminate frequent rail
service interruptions.
vii. A Capital Project to improve
short-line or regional railroad
infrastructure. Examples include
projects for normalized capital
replacement, increasing capacity, as
well as replacing aging locomotive fleets
with newer, more energy efficient
technologies that produce less harmful
emissions.
viii. The preparation of regional rail
and corridor service development plans
and corresponding environmental
analyses. (See the examples under Track
1 and 2 below in Subsections C(3)(b)(i)–
(ii) as they apply to regional and
corridor rail Planning).
ix. A project necessary to enhance
multimodal connections or facilitate
service integration between rail service
and other modes, including between
Intercity Rail Passenger Transportation
VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:08 Aug 30, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00144 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\31AUN1.SGM 31AUN1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
48803
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 166 / Tuesday, August 31, 2021 / Notices
12
Enforcement Activities may include
investigating incidents or reports of trespassing, as
well as providing warnings and citations to the
trespassers for violating rail-related trespass laws.
The hourly rate for law enforcement officers
performing Enforcement Activities should be
limited to the officer’s regular and overtime wage
rate (e.g., 1.5 times the base rate). Administrative
costs are capped at 1% of the award. Projects must
be completed within the twelve-month period of
performance under the grant.
Court costs and equipment are not eligible. Only
new scope (e.g., hourly wages incurred during the
project performance period for a grant awarded
under this NOFO) is eligible for funding under this
NOFO.
13
The implementation or expansion of an
Outreach Campaign for reducing suicides that
involve railroad trespassing may involve training
staff to identify individuals at risk and intervene,
raising awareness of services via signage or public
awareness campaigns, or implementing other
strategies. Projects must be specifically tailored to
directly reduce railroad suicide incidents. While an
Outreach Campaign may have applicability outside
of the rail domain, projects must be intended to
directly reduce railroad suicide incidents. At least
1 mile of FRA-regulated railroad track must be
within the boundaries of the planned outreach
activities.
14
The scope, schedule, and budget necessary to
implement a project, as well as the definition of the
project’s potential benefits, are typically informed
by the work conducted in prior phases of project
development (e.g., the specific elements of an FD/
Construction project and their cost estimates are
developed and refined through PE). The evaluation
criteria for the CRISI program (see Section E of this
NOFO) considers the level of detail contained in the
applicant’s proposed scope of work and readiness
for the project to be implemented.
and intercity bus service or commercial
air service. Examples include
intermodal transportation facilities
projects that encourage joint scheduling,
ticketing, and/or baggage handling;
freight rail intermodal connections; and
rail projects improving access to ports.
x. The development and
implementation of a safety program or
institute designed to improve rail safety.
Examples include employee training;
payment of applicable law enforcement
wages to undertake trespass
Enforcement Activities;
12
Outreach
Campaigns for reducing suicides that
involve railroad trespassing;
13
and
public safety outreach and education.
xi. Any research that the Secretary
considers necessary to advance any
particular aspect of rail related capital,
operations, or safety improvements.
xii. Workforce development and
training activities, coordinated to the
extent practicable with the existing local
training programs supported by the
Department of Transportation, the
Department of Labor, and the
Department of Education.
Applicants that intend to charge
indirect costs through the use of a
negotiated indirect cost rate must have
a current, signed, Federally-approved
indirect cost rate agreement. Applicants
that do not have a current Federally-
approved indirect cost rate may elect to
charge a de minimis rate of 10 percent
of modified total direct costs. This
includes state and local governments
that have never negotiated an indirect
cost rate with the federal government
and receive less than $35 million in
direct federal funding per year.
Organizations that wish to negotiate an
indirect cost rate should contact FRA’s
Office of the Chief Financial Officer at
FRA.CFO@dot.gov. Sub-recipients may
charge indirect costs using their
federally-approved indirect cost rate, a
negotiated indirect cost rate between the
pass-through entity and the sub-
recipient, or a de minimis rate of 10
percent.
As a condition to making a grant with
CRISI Funding under this NOFO, FRA
requires that a written agreement exist
between the applicant and the railroad
regarding use and ownership consistent
with 49 U.S.C. 22905(c)(1) for projects
using rights-of-way owned by a railroad
that is not the applicant.
b. Project Tracks for Eligible Projects
Applicants are not limited in the
number of projects for which they seek
funding. FRA will not limit eligible
projects from consideration for funding
for planning, environmental,
engineering, design, and construction
elements of the same project in the same
application. Applicants are allowed to
include multiple phases of a project in
the same application. However,
depending on the project, applications
for multiple phases of project
development may not contain sufficient
detail with regards to scope, schedule,
or budget for all phases of the
application to compete well in the
application review process.
14
An applicant must identify one or
more of the following four tracks for an
eligible project: Track 1—Planning;
Track 2—PE/NEPA; Track 3—FD/
Construction; or Track 4—Research,
Safety Programs and Institutes.
i. Track 1—Planning
Track 1 consists of eligible rail
Planning projects. Examples include the
technical analyses and associated
environmental analyses that support the
development of state rail plans, regional
rail plans, and corridor service
development plans, including:
Identification of alternatives, rail
network Planning, market analysis,
travel demand forecasting, revenue
forecasting, railroad system design,
railroad operations analysis and
simulation, equipment fleet Planning,
station and access analysis, conceptual
engineering and capital programming,
operating and maintenance cost
forecasting, capital replacement and
renewal analysis, and economic
analysis. Project-specific (e.g., rail
station or port improvements) planning
is not an eligible Track 1 project.
ii. Track 2—PE/NEPA
Track 2 consists of eligible PE/NEPA
projects. PE examples include: PE
drawings and specifications (scale
drawings at the 30 percent design level,
including track geometry as
appropriate); design criteria, schematics
and/or track charts that support the
development of PE; and work that can
be funded in conjunction with
developing PE, such as operations
modeling, surveying, project work/
management plans, preliminary cost
estimates, and preliminary project
schedules. PE/NEPA projects funded
under this NOFO must be sufficiently
developed to support FD or
Construction activities.
iii. Track 3—FD/Construction
Track 3 consists of eligible projects for
FD, Construction, and project
implementation and deployment
activities. Applicants must complete all
necessary Planning, PE and NEPA
requirements for FD/Construction
projects. FD funded under this track
must resolve remaining uncertainties or
risks associated with changes to design
scope; address procurement processes;
and update and refine plans for
financing the project or program to
reflect accurately the expected year-of-
expenditure costs and cash flow
projections. Applicants selected for
funding for FD/Construction must
demonstrate the following to FRA’s
satisfaction:
(A) PE is completed for the proposed
project, resulting in project designs that
are reasonably expected to conform to
all regulatory, safety, security, and other
design requirements, including those
under the Americans with Disabilities
Act (ADA);
(B) NEPA is completed for the
proposed project;
(C) Signed agreements with key
project partners, including
infrastructure-owning entities; and
(D) A project management plan is in-
place for managing the implementation
of the proposed project, including the
management and mitigation of project
risks.
FD examples include drawings at the
100 percent Design Level, interim
design drawings that support
development (e.g., drawings at the 60
percent Design Level), project work/
project management plan, cost
estimates, project schedules, and right-
VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:08 Aug 30, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00145 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\31AUN1.SGM 31AUN1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
48804
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 166 / Tuesday, August 31, 2021 / Notices
of-way acquisition and relocation plans.
Construction examples include
additions, improvements, replacements,
renovations and/or repairs to track,
bridge, station, rail yard, signal, and
communication system infrastructure,
or other railroad safety technology.
iv. Track 4—Research, Safety Programs
and Institutes (Non-Railroad
Infrastructure)
Track 4 consists of projects not falling
within Tracks 1–3 including workforce
development activities, research, safety
programs or institutes designed to
improve rail safety that clearly
demonstrate the expected positive
impact on rail safety. Sufficient detail
must be provided on what the project
will accomplish, as well as the
applicant’s capability to achieve the
proposed outcomes. Examples include
initiatives for improving rail safety,
training, payment of applicable law
enforcement wages to undertake
trespass Enforcement Activities,
Outreach Campaigns for reducing
suicides that involve railroad
trespassing, and education.
c. Project Component Operational
Independence
If an applicant requests funding for a
project that is a component or set of
components of a larger project, the
project component(s) must be attainable
with the award amount, together with
other funds as necessary, obtain
operational independence, and must
comply with all eligibility requirements
described in Section C.
In addition, the component(s) must be
capable of being independently
analyzed, as determined by FRA, under
NEPA (i.e., have independent utility,
connect logical termini, if applicable,
and not restrict the consideration of
alternatives for other reasonably
foreseeable rail projects).
d. Rural Project
FRA will consider a project to be in
a Rural Area if all or the majority of the
project (determined by geographic
location(s) where the majority of the
project funds will be spent) is located in
a Rural Area. However, in the event
FRA elects to fund a component of the
project, then FRA will reexamine
whether the project is in a Rural Area.
D. Application and Submission
Information
Required documents for the
application are outlined in the following
paragraphs. Applicants must complete
and submit all components of the
application. See Section D(2) for the
application checklist. FRA welcomes
the submission of additional relevant
supporting documentation, such as
planning, engineering and design
documentation, and letters of support
from partnering organizations, all of
which will not count against the Project
Narrative 25-page limit.
1. Address To Request Application
Package
Applicants may access the application
through www.grants.gov. Applicants
must submit all application materials in
their entirety through www.Grants.gov
no later than 5:00 p.m. ET, on November
29, 2021. FRA reserves the right to
modify this deadline. General
information for submitting applications
through Grants.gov can be found at:
https://www.fra.dot.gov/Page/P0270.
FRA is committed to ensuring that
information is available in appropriate
alternative formats to meet the
requirements of persons who have a
disability. If you require an alternative
version of files provided, please contact
Lou Lorello, Office of the Chief
Financial Officer, Federal Railroad
Administration, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Room W36–111,
Washington, DC 20590; email:
lou.lorello@dot.gov; phone: 202–493–
8026.
2. Content and Form of Application
Submission
FRA strongly advises applicants to
read this section carefully. Applicants
must submit all required information
and components of the application
package to be considered for funding.
Required documents for an
application package are outlined in the
checklist below.
i. Project Narrative (see D.2.a)
ii. Statement of Work (see D.2.b.i)
iii. Benefit-Cost Analysis (see D.2. b.ii)
iv. SF424—Application for Federal
Assistance
v. Either: SF 424A—Budget Information for
Non-Construction projects (required for
Tracks 1, 2 and 4) or SF 424C—Budget
Information for Construction (required
for any application that includes Track
3)
vi. Either: SF 424B—Assurances for Non-
Construction projects (required for
Tracks 1, 2 and 4) or SF 424D—
Assurances for Construction (required
for any application that includes Track
3)
vii. FRA’s Additional Assurances and
Certifications
viii. SF LLL—Disclosure of Lobbying
Activities
a. Project Narrative
This section describes the minimum
content required in the Project Narrative
of the grant application. The Project
Narrative must follow the basic outline
below to address the program
requirements and assist evaluators in
locating relevant information.
I. Cover Page ..................... See D.2.a.i
II. Project Summary .......... See D.2.a.ii
III. Project Funding ........... See D.2.a.iii
IV. Applicant Eligibility ... See D.2.a.iv
V. Project Eligibility ......... See D.2.a.v
VI. Detailed Project De-
scription. See D.2.a.vi
VII. Project Location ......... See D.2.a.vii
VIII. Evaluation and Se-
lection Criteria. See D.2.a.viii
IX. Project Implementa-
tion and Management. See D.2.a.ix
X. Planning Readiness ...... See D.2.a.x
XI. Environmental Readi-
ness. See D.2.a.xi
The above content must be provided
in a narrative statement submitted by
the applicant. The Project Narrative may
not exceed 25 pages in length
(excluding cover pages, table of
contents, and supporting
documentation). FRA will not review or
consider Project Narratives beyond the
25-page limitation. If possible,
applicants should submit supporting
documents via website links rather than
hard copies. If supporting documents
are submitted, applicants must clearly
identify the page number(s) of the
relevant portion in the Project Narrative
supporting documentation. The Project
Narrative must adhere to the following
outline.
i. Cover Page: Include a cover page
that lists the following elements in a
table:
Project Title
Applicant
Project Track ...................................................................................................................................................... 1, 2, 3, and/or 4.
Was a Federal grant application previously submitted for this project? ........................................................... Yes/No.
If yes, state the name of the Federal grant program and title of the project in the previous application. Federal Grant Program:
Project Title:
Is this a Rural Project? What percentage of the project cost is based in a Rural Area? Yes/No.
Percentage of total project cost:
VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:08 Aug 30, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00146 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\31AUN1.SGM 31AUN1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
48805
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 166 / Tuesday, August 31, 2021 / Notices
Is this a project eligible under 49 U.S.C. 22907(c)(2) that supports the development of new intercity pas-
senger rail service routes including alignments for existing routes? Yes/No.
Is this for a Capital Project or engineering solution targeting trespassing? Yes/No.
Is this for a safety program to reduce trespassing through targeted law Enforcement Activities? Yes/No.
Is this for a safety program to implement or expand an Outreach Campaign for reducing railroad tres-
passing suicide? Yes/No.
City(ies), State(s) where the project is located ..................................................................................................
Urbanized Area where the project is located ....................................................................................................
Population of Urbanized Area ............................................................................................................................
Is the project currently programmed in the: .......................................................................................................
State rail plan, State Freight Plan, TIP, STIP, MPO Long Range Transportation Plan, State Long Range
Transportation Plan?
Yes/No (If yes, please specify in
which plans the project is cur-
rently programmed).
ii. Project Summary: Provide a brief
4–6 sentence summary of the proposed
project and what the project will entail.
Include challenges the proposed project
aims to address, and summarize the
intended outcomes and anticipated
benefits that will result from the
proposed project.
iii. Project Funding: Indicate in table
format the amount of Federal funding
requested, the proposed non-Federal
match, identifying contributions from
the private sector if applicable, and total
project cost. Describe the non-Federal
funding arrangement, including
multiple sources of non-Federal funding
if applicable. Include funding
commitment letters outlining funding
agreements, as attachments or in an
appendix. If Federal funding is
proposed as match, provide the
applicant’s determination of eligibility
for such use and the legal basis for that
determination. Identify any specific
project components that the applicant
proposes for partial project funding. If
all or a majority of a project is located
in a Rural Area, identify the Rural
Area(s) and estimated percentage of
project costs that will be spent in the
Rural Area. Identify any previously
incurred costs, as well as other sources
of Federal funds committed to the
project and any pending Federal
requests. Also, note if the requested
Federal funding under this NOFO or
other programs must be obligated or
spent by a certain date due to
dependencies or relationships with
other Federal or non-Federal funding
sources, related projects, law, or other
factors. If applicable, provide the
description and estimated value of any
proposed in-kind contributions, and
demonstrate how the in-kind
contributions meet the requirements in
2 CFR 200.306.
Example Project Funding Table:
Task # Task name/project component Cost Percentage of total cost
1
2
Total Project Cost
Federal Funds Received from Previous Grant
Federal Funding Under this NOFO Request
Non-Federal Funding/Match Cash:
In-Kind:
Portion of Non-Federal Funding from the Private Sector
Portion of Total Project Costs Spent in a Rural Area
Pending Federal Funding Requests
iv. Applicant Eligibility: Explain how
the applicant meets the applicant
eligibility criteria outlined in Section C
of this notice. For public agencies and
publicly chartered authorities
established by one or more states, the
explanation must include citations to
the applicable enabling legislation.
If the applicant is eligible under 49
U.S.C. 22907(b)(8) as a rail carrier or rail
equipment manufacturer in partnership
with at least one of the other eligible
entities, the applicant should explain
the partnership and each entity’s
contribution to the partnership. For a
holding company of a class II or Class
III railroad, the applicant must
demonstrate its status as a holding
company and percentage of ownership
of an operating Class II or III railroad
with supporting documentation.
v. Project Eligibility: Identify which
project eligibility category the project is
eligible under in Section C(3) of this
notice, and explain how the project
meets the project eligibility criteria.
vi. Detailed Project Description:
Include a detailed project description
that expands upon the brief project
summary. This detailed description
should provide, at a minimum,
background on the challenges the
project aims to address; the expected
users and beneficiaries of the project,
including all railroad operators; the
specific components and elements of
the project; and any other information
the applicant deems necessary to justify
the proposed project. If applicable,
explain how the project will benefit
communities in Rural Areas. An
applicant should specify whether it is
seeking funding for a project that has
already received Federal financial
assistance, and if applicable, explain
how the new scope proposed to be
funded under this NOFO relates to the
previous scope.
For all projects, applicants must
provide information about proposed
performance measures, as discussed in
Section F(3)(c) and required in 2 CFR
200.301 and 49 U.S.C. 22907(f).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 22:38 Aug 30, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00147 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\31AUN1.SGM 31AUN1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
48806
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 166 / Tuesday, August 31, 2021 / Notices
(A) Grade crossing information, if
applicable: For any project that includes
grade crossing components, cite specific
DOT National Grade Crossing Inventory
information, including the railroad that
owns the infrastructure (or the crossing
owner, if different from the railroad),
the primary railroad operator, the DOT
crossing inventory number, and the
roadway at the crossing. Applicants can
search for data to meet this requirement
at the following link: http://
safetydata.fra.dot.gov/OfficeofSafety/
default.aspx. In addition, if applicable,
applicants must cite the page number in
the grade crossing action plan where the
grade crossing is referenced.
(B) Heavily traveled rail corridor
information, if applicable: For any
project eligible under the eligibility
category in Subsection C(3)(a)(iv), that
reduces congestion and facilitates
ridership growth in Intercity Passenger
Rail Transportation, describe how the
project is located on a heavily traveled
rail corridor.
(C) PTC information, if applicable: For
any project that includes deploying PTC
systems, applicants must:
1. Document submission of a Positive
Train Control Implementation Plan
(PTCIP) to FRA pursuant to either 49
U.S.C. 20157(a) or 49 CFR part 236,
subpart I (FRA’s PTC regulations);
2. Document that it is a tenant on one
or more host railroads that submitted a
PTCIP to FRA; or
3. Document how the proposed
project will assist in the deployment
(i.e., installation and/or full
implementation) of a PTC system.
(D) Workforce development and
training information, if applicable: For
any project that includes workforce
development, applicants must
document to the extent practicable
similar existing local training programs
supported by the Department of
Transportation, the Department of
Labor, and/or the Department of
Education.
(E) Pedestrian trespasser casualty
information, if applicable: Provide
documentation indicating whether the
projects are located in counties with the
most pedestrian trespasser casualties as
identified in FRA’s National Strategy to
Prevent Trespassing on Railroad
Property.
(F) Railroad trespassing law
enforcement strategies, if applicable: For
law enforcement agencies seeking
funding to pay law enforcement wages
to undertake trespass Enforcement
Activities, applicants must provide a
detailed description of the proposed
Enforcement Activities, including (but
not limited to) data on trespass
incidents and casualties, strategies to
target Hot Spots identified by geospatial
data, and expected reductions in
trespass incidents stemming from the
Enforcement Activities.
(G) Railroad trespassing suicide
prevention outreach campaign, if
applicable: For any project seeking to
implement an Outreach Campaign to
reduce suicide by railroad, applicants
must provide a detailed description of
the proposed outreach campaign,
including (but not limited to) relevant
data on rail-related suicides in the
project location, the manner and extent
to which trespass suicide is expected to
be reduced, and examples of prior
efforts to address rail-related suicide.
vii. Project Location: Include
geospatial data for the project, as well as
a map of the project’s location. On the
map, include the Congressional districts
and Rural Area boundaries, if
applicable, in which the project will
take place. For projects (other than those
projects for the implementation of
positive train control systems otherwise
eligible under 49 U.S.C. 22907(c)(1))
that are on a shared corridor.
viii. Evaluation and Selection Criteria:
Include a thorough discussion of how
the proposed project meets all the
evaluation criteria and selection criteria,
as outlined in Section E of this notice.
If an application does not sufficiently
address the evaluation and selection
criteria, it is unlikely to be a competitive
application. For projects (other than
those projects for the implementation of
positive train control systems otherwise
eligible under 49 U.S.C. 22907(c)(1))
that are on a shared corridor with
commuter railroad passenger
transportation, demonstrate how
funding the proposed project would be
a reasonable investment in Intercity
Passenger Rail Transportation and/or
freight rail transportation.
ix. Project Implementation and
Management: Describe proposed project
implementation and project
management arrangements. Include
descriptions of the expected
arrangements for project contracting,
contract oversight and control, change-
order management, risk management,
and conformance to Federal
requirements for project progress
reporting (see https://www.fra.dot.gov/
Page/P0274). Describe past experience
in managing and overseeing similar
projects.
x. Planning Readiness for Tracks 2
and 3 (PE/NEPA and FD/Construction
Projects: Provide information about the
planning process that analyzed the
investment needs and service objectives
of the project. If applicable, cite sources
of this information from a service
development plan, State or regional rail
plan, or similar planning document
where the project has been identified for
solving a specific existing transportation
problem, and makes the case for
investing in the proposed solution.
xi. Environmental Readiness for Track
3 FD/Construction Projects: If the NEPA
process is complete, an applicant
should indicate the date of completion,
and provide a website link or other
reference to the documents
demonstrating compliance with NEPA,
which might include a final CE, Finding
of No Significant Impact, or Record of
Decision. If the NEPA process is not yet
underway, the application should state
this. If the process is underway, but is
not complete, the application should
detail the type of NEPA review
underway, where the project is in the
process, and indicate the anticipated
date of completion of all NEPA and
related milestones.
If the last agency action with respect
to NEPA documents occurred more than
three years before the application date,
the applicant should describe why the
project has been delayed and include a
proposed approach for verifying, and if
necessary, updating this information in
accordance with applicable NEPA
requirements.
b. Additional Application Elements
Applicants must submit:
i. A Statement of Work (SOW)
addressing the scope, schedule, and
budget for the proposed project if it
were selected for award. The SOW must
contain sufficient detail so FRA, and the
applicant, can understand the expected
outcomes of the proposed work to be
performed and monitor progress toward
completing project tasks and
deliverables during a prospective grant’s
period of performance. Applicants must
use FRA’s standard SOW, schedule, and
budget templates to be considered for
award. The templates are located at
https://www.fra.dot.gov/Page/P0325.
When preparing the budget, the total
cost of a project must be based on the
best available information as indicated
in cited references that include
engineering studies, studies of economic
feasibility, environmental analyses, and
information on the expected use of
equipment or facilities.
ii. A Benefit-Cost Analysis (BCA), as
an appendix to the Project Narrative for
each project submitted by an applicant.
The BCA must demonstrate in economic
terms the merits of investing in the
proposed project. The BCA for Track
2—PE/NEPA projects should be for the
underlying project, not the PE/NEPA
work itself. The project narrative should
summarize the project’s benefits.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:08 Aug 30, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00148 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\31AUN1.SGM 31AUN1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
48807
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 166 / Tuesday, August 31, 2021 / Notices
Benefits may apply to existing and
new rail users, as well as users of other
modes of transportation. In some cases,
benefits may be applied to populations
in the general vicinity of the project
area. Improvements to multimodal
connections and shared-use rail
corridors may benefit all users involved.
Benefits may be quantified for savings
in safety costs, reduced costs from
disruption of service, maintenance
costs, reduced travel time, emissions
reductions, and increases in capacity or
ability to offer new types of freight or
passenger services. Applicants may also
describe other categories of benefits that
are difficult to quantify such as noise
reduction, environmental impact
mitigation, improved quality of life, or
reliability of travel times. All benefits
claimed for the project must be clearly
tied to the expected outcomes of the
project. Please refer to the Benefit-Cost
Analysis Guidance for Discretionary
Grant Programs prior to preparing a
BCA at https://www.transportation.gov/
office-policy/transportation-policy/
benefit-cost-analysis-guidance. In
addition, please also refer to the BCA
FAQs on FRA’s website for some rail
specific examples of how to apply the
BCA Guidance for Discretionary Grant
Programs to CRISI funding.
For Tracks 1 and 4—Applicants are
required to document project benefits.
Any subjective estimates of benefits and
costs should be quantified whenever
possible, and applicants should provide
appropriate evidence to support their
subjective estimates. Estimates of
benefits should be presented in
monetary terms whenever possible; if a
monetary estimate is not possible, then
a quantitative estimate (in physical,
non-monetary terms, such as crash or
employee casualty rates, ridership
estimates, emissions levels, energy
efficiency improvements, etc.) should be
provided. At a minimum, qualitatively
describe the project benefits.
iii. Environmental compliance
documentation, as applicable, if a
website link is not cited in the Project
Narrative.
iv. SF 424—Application for Federal
Assistance;
v. SF 424A—Budget Information for
Non-Construction or SF 424C—Budget
Information for Construction;
vi. SF 424B—Assurances for Non-
Construction or SF 424D—Assurances
for Construction;
vii. FRA’s Additional Assurances and
Certifications; and
viii. SF LLL—Disclosure of Lobbying
Activities.
ix. A statement that the lead applicant
has a system for procuring property and
services under a Federal award under
this NOFO that supports the provisions
in 2 CFR 200 Subpart D-Procurement
Standards at 2 CFR 200.317–326 and 2
CFR 1201.317.
x. A statement indicating whether the
applicant or any of its principals:
a. is presently suspended, debarred,
voluntarily excluded, or disqualified;
b. has been convicted within the
preceding three years of any of the
offenses listed in 2 CFR 180.800(a); or
had a civil judgment rendered against
the organization or the individual for
one of those offenses within that time
period;
c. is presently indicted for, or
otherwise criminally or civilly charged
by a governmental entity (Federal, state
or local) with, commission of any of the
offenses listed in 2 CFR 180.800(a); or,
d. has had one or more public
transactions (Federal, state, or local)
terminated within the preceding three
years for cause or default (including
material failure to comply).
xi. FRA F 251, Applicant Financial
Capability Questionnaire.
Forms needed for the electronic
application process are at
www.Grants.gov.
c. Post-Selection Requirements
See subsection F(2) of this notice for
post-selection requirements.
3. Unique Entity Identifier, and System
for Award Management (SAM)
To apply for funding through
Grants.gov, applicants must be properly
registered in SAM before submitting an
application, provide a valid unique
entity identifier, and continue to
maintain an active SAM registration all
as described in detail below. Complete
instructions on how to register and
submit an application can be found at
www.Grants.gov. Registering with
Grants.gov is a one-time process;
however, it can take up to several weeks
for first-time registrants to receive
confirmation and a user password. FRA
recommends that applicants start the
registration process as early as possible
to prevent delays that may preclude
submitting an application package by
the application deadline. Applications
will not be accepted after the due date.
Delayed registration is not an acceptable
justification for an application
extension.
FRA may not make a grant award to
an applicant until the applicant has
complied with all applicable Data
Universal Numbering System (DUNS)
and SAM requirements, and if an
applicant has not fully complied with
the requirements by the time the FRA is
ready to make a Federal award, FRA
may determine that the applicant is not
qualified to receive a Federal award and
use that determination as a basis for
making a Federal award to another
applicant. (Please note that if a Dun &
Bradstreet DUNS number must be
obtained or renewed, this may take a
significant amount of time to complete).
Late applications that are the result of
a failure to register or comply with
Grants.gov applicant requirements in a
timely manner will not be considered. If
an applicant has not fully complied
with the requirements by the
submission deadline, the application
will not be considered. To submit an
application through Grants.gov,
applicants must:
a. Obtain a DUNS Number
A DUNS number is required for
Grants.gov registration. The Office of
Management and Budget requires that
all businesses and nonprofit applicants
for Federal funds include a DUNS
number in their applications for a new
award or renewal of an existing award.
A DUNS number is a unique nine-digit
sequence recognized as the universal
standard for the government in
identifying and keeping track of entities
receiving Federal funds. The identifier
is used for tracking purposes and to
validate address and point of contact
information for Federal assistance
applicants, recipients, and
subrecipients. The DUNS number will
be used throughout the grant life cycle.
Obtaining a DUNS number is a free,
one-time activity. Applicants may
obtain a DUNS number by calling 1–
866–705–5711 or by applying online at
http://www.dnb.com/us.
b. Register With the SAM at
www.SAM.gov
All applicants for Federal financial
assistance must maintain current
registrations in the SAM database. An
applicant must be registered in SAM to
successfully register in Grants.gov. The
SAM database is the repository for
standard information about Federal
financial assistance applicants,
recipients, and subrecipients.
Organizations that have previously
submitted applications via Grants.gov
are already registered with SAM, as it is
a requirement for Grants.gov
registration. Please note, however, that
applicants must update or renew their
SAM registration at least once per year
to maintain an active status. Therefore,
it is critical to check registration status
well in advance of the application
deadline. If an applicant is selected for
an award, the applicant must maintain
an active SAM registration with current
information throughout the period of
the award, including information on a
VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:08 Aug 30, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00149 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\31AUN1.SGM 31AUN1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
48808
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 166 / Tuesday, August 31, 2021 / Notices
recipient’s immediate and highest level
owner and subsidiaries, as well as on all
predecessors that have been awarded a
Federal contract or grant within the last
three years, if applicable. Information
about SAM registration procedures is
available at www.sam.gov.
c. Create a Grants.gov Username and
Password
Applicants must complete an
Authorized Organization Representative
(AOR) profile on www.Grants.gov and
create a username and password.
Applicants must use the organization’s
DUNS number to complete this step.
Additional information about the
registration process is available at:
https://www.grants.gov/web/grants/
applicants/organization-
registration.html.
d. Acquire Authorization for Your AOR
From the E-Business Point of Contact (E-
Biz POC)
The E-Biz POC at the applicant’s
organization must respond to the
registration email from Grants.gov and
login at www.Grants.gov to authorize the
applicant as the AOR. Please note there
can be more than one AOR for an
organization.
e. Submit an Application Addressing
All Requirements Outlined in This
NOFO
If an applicant experiences difficulties
at any point during this process, please
call the Grants.gov Customer Center
Hotline at 1–800–518–4726, 24 hours a
day, 7 days a week (closed on Federal
holidays). For information and
instructions on each of these processes,
please see instructions at: http://
www.grants.gov/web/grants/applicants/
apply-for-grants.html.
4. Submission Dates and Times
Applicants must submit complete
applications to www.Grants.gov no later
than 5:00 p.m.. ET, November 29, 2021.
FRA reviews www.Grants.gov
information on the dates and times of
applications submitted to determine
timeliness of submissions. Late
applications will be neither reviewed
nor considered. Delayed registration is
not an acceptable reason for late
submission. In order to apply for
funding under this announcement, all
applicants are expected to be registered
as an organization with Grants.gov.
Applicants are strongly encouraged to
apply early to ensure all materials are
received before this deadline.
To ensure a fair competition of
limited discretionary funds, the
following conditions are not valid
reasons to permit late submissions: (1)
Failure to complete the Grants.gov
registration process before the deadline;
(2) failure to follow Grants.gov
instructions on how to register and
apply as posted on its website; (3)
failure to follow all instructions in this
NOFO; and (4) technical issues
experienced with the applicant’s
computer or information technology
environment.
5. Intergovernmental Review
Intergovernmental Review is required
for this program. Applicants must
contact their State Single Point of
Contact to comply with their State’s
process under Executive Order 12372.
The names and addresses of the Single
State Points of Contact are listed in the
Office of Management and Budget’s
website.
6. Funding Restrictions
FRA is prohibited under 49 U.S.C.
22905(f) from providing CRISI grants for
commuter rail passenger transportation
(as defined in 49 U.S.C. 24102(3)).
FRA’s interpretation of this restriction is
informed by the language in 49 U.S.C.
22907. FRA’s primary intent in funding
passenger rail projects is to make
reasonable investments in Intercity
Passenger Rail Transportation. Such
projects may be located on shared
corridors where commuter rail
passenger transportation and/or freight
rail also benefit from the project. The
2021 Appropriation makes an exception
to this funding restriction for commuter
rail passenger transportation projects for
the implementation of positive train
control systems that are otherwise
eligible under 49 U.S.C. 22907(c)(1).
Consistent with 2 CFR 200.458, as
applicable, FRA will only approve pre-
award costs if such costs are incurred
pursuant to the negotiation and in
anticipation of the grant agreement and
if such costs are necessary for efficient
and timely performance of the scope of
work. Under 2 CFR 200.458, grantees
must seek written approval from the
administering agency for pre-award
activities to be eligible for
reimbursement under the grant.
Activities initiated prior to the
execution of a grant or without written
approval may be ineligible for
reimbursement or matching
contribution. Cost sharing or matching
may be used only for authorized Federal
award purposes.
7. Other Submission Requirements
For any supporting application
materials that an applicant cannot
submit via Grants.gov, such as oversized
engineering drawings, an applicant may
submit an original and two (2) copies to
Mr. Douglas Gascon, Office of Policy
and Planning, Federal Railroad
Administration, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Room W38–212,
Washington, DC 20590. Due to delays
caused by enhanced screening of mail
delivered via the U.S. Postal Service,
FRA advises applicants to use other
means of conveyance (such as courier
service) to assure timely receipt of
materials before the application
deadline. Additionally, if documents
can be obtained online, providing
instructions to FRA on how to access
files on a referenced website may also
be sufficient.
Note: Please use generally accepted
formats such as .pdf, .doc, .docx, .xls,
.xlsx and .ppt, when uploading
attachments. While applicants may
embed picture files, such as .jpg, .gif,
and .bmp, in document files, applicants
should not submit attachments in these
formats. Additionally, the following
formats will not be accepted: .com, .bat,
.exe, .vbs, .cfg, .dat, .db, .dbf, .dll, .ini,
.log, .ora, .sys, and .zip.
If an applicant experiences difficulties
at any point during this process, please
call the Grants.gov Customer Center
Hotline at 1–800–518–4726, 24 hours a
day, 7 days a week (closed on Federal
holidays). For information and
instructions on each of these processes,
please see instructions at: http://
www.grants.gov/web/grants/applicants/
apply-for-grants.html.
E. Application Review Information
1. Criteria
a. Eligibility, Completeness and
Applicant Risk Review
FRA will first screen each application
for applicant and project eligibility
(eligibility requirements are outlined in
Section C of this notice), completeness
(application documentation and
submission requirements are outlined in
Section D of this notice), applicant risk
and the minimum match.
FRA will then consider applicant risk,
including the applicant’s past
performance in developing and
delivering similar projects and previous
financial contributions, and if
applicable, previous competitive grant
technical evaluation ratings that the
proposed project received under
previous competitive grant programs
administered by DOT.
b. Evaluation Criteria
FRA will evaluate all eligible and
complete applications using the
evaluation criteria outlined in this
section to determine project benefits
and technical merit.
i. Project Benefits:
VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:08 Aug 30, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00150 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\31AUN1.SGM 31AUN1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
48809
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 166 / Tuesday, August 31, 2021 / Notices
FRA will evaluate the Benefit-Cost
Analysis and project benefits of the
proposed project for the anticipated
private and public benefits relative to
the costs of the proposed project and the
summary of benefits provided in
response to subsection D(2)(b)(ii)
including—
(A) Effects on system and service
performance;
(B) Effects on safety, competitiveness,
reliability, trip or transit time, and
resilience;
(C) Efficiencies from improved
integration with other modes; and
(D) Ability to meet existing or
anticipated demand.
ii. Technical Merit:
FRA will evaluate application
information for the degree to which—
(A) The tasks and subtasks outlined in
the SOW are appropriate to achieve the
expected outcomes of the proposed
project.
(B) Applications indicate strong
project readiness and meet requirements
under the project track(s) designated by
the applicant.
(C) The technical qualifications and
experience of key personnel proposed to
lead and perform the technical efforts,
and the qualifications of the primary
and supporting organizations to fully
and successfully execute the proposed
project within the proposed timeframe
and budget are demonstrated.
(D) The proposed project’s business
plan considers potential private sector
participation in the financing,
construction, or operation of the
proposed project.
(E) The applicant has, or will have the
legal, financial, and technical capacity
to carry out the proposed project;
satisfactory continuing control over the
use of the equipment or facilities; and
the capability and willingness to
maintain the equipment or facilities.
(F) The degree to which the applicant
and project deploy innovative
technology, encourage innovative
approaches to project delivery, and
incentivize the use of innovative
financing.
(G) The proposed project is consistent
with planning guidance and documents
set forth by DOT, including those
required by law or State rail plans
developed under Title 49, United State
Code, Chapter 227.
c. Selection Criteria
In addition to the eligibility and
completeness review and the evaluation
criteria outlined in this subsection, the
FRA will apply the following selection
criteria:
i. The FRA will give preference to the
following:
(A) Projects for which the proposed
Federal share of total project costs is 50
percent or less;
(B) Projects for which the net benefits
of the grant funds will be maximized
considering the Benefit-Cost Analysis,
including anticipated private and public
benefits relative to the costs of the
proposed project, and factoring in the
other considerations in 49 U.S.C. 22907
(e);
(C) Projects for pre-construction
elements including preliminary
engineering and final design of projects
eligible under 49 U.S.C. 22907(c)(2) that
support the development of new
intercity passenger rail service routes
including alignments for existing routes;
(D) Projects for capital and
engineering solutions targeting
trespassing that are located in counties
with the most pedestrian casualties as
identified in FRA’s National Strategy to
Prevent Trespassing on Railroad
Property as may be updated or amended
from time to time; and
(E) Projects for trespass Enforcement
Activities in one of the 10 states with
the highest incidence of rail trespass
related casualties (as reported in the
Rail Incident Accident Reporting
System at https://railroads.dot.gov/
accident-and-incident-reporting/
casualty-reporting/casualties-and-other-
incidents), which are California, Texas,
Illinois, Florida, New York,
Pennsylvania, Ohio, Indiana, North
Carolina, and Georgia.
ii. After applying the above
preferences, the FRA will take into
account the following key DOT
objectives:
(A) Safety
DOT will assess the project’s ability to
foster a safe transportation system for
the movement of goods and people,
consistent with the Department’s
strategic goal to reduce transportation-
related fatalities and serious injuries
across the transportation system. Such
considerations will include, but are not
limited to, the extent to which the
project improves safety at highway-rail
grade crossings, reduces incidences of
rail-related trespassing, and upgrades
infrastructure to achieve a higher level
of safety.
(B) Equitable Economic Strength and
Improving Core Assets
DOT will assess the project’s ability to
contribute to economic progress
stemming from infrastructure
investment and associated creation of
good jobs with fair wages, labor
protections, and the opportunity to join
a union. Such considerations will
include, but are not limited to, the
extent to which the project invests in
vital infrastructure assets, addresses
capital needs to connect farms, factories,
and shippers to the rail network, and
provides opportunities for families to
achieve economic security through rail
industry employment.
(C) Ensuring Investments Meet Racial
Equity and Economic Inclusion Goals
DOT will assess the project’s ability to
encourage racial equity by investing in
projects that proactively address racial
equity and barriers to opportunities.
Such considerations will include, but
are not limited to, the extent to which
the project improves or expands
transportation options, mitigates the
safety risks and detrimental quality of
life effects that rail lines can have on
communities, and expands workforce
development and training opportunities
to foster a more diverse rail industry.
(D) Resilience and Addressing Climate
Change
DOT will assess the project’s ability to
reduce the harmful effects of climate
change and anticipate necessary
improvements for preparedness. Such
considerations will include, but are not
limited to, the extent to which the
project reduces emissions, promotes
energy efficiency, increases resiliency,
and recycles or redevelops existing
infrastructure.
(E) Transformation of Our Nation’s
Transportation Infrastructure
DOT will assess the project’s ability to
expand and improve the nation’s rail
network, which needs to balance new
infrastructure for increased capacity
with proper maintenance of aging
assets. Such considerations will
include, but are not limited to, the
extent to which the project adds
capacity to congested corridors, builds
new connections, and ensures assets
will be improved to a state of good
repair.
iii. In determining the allocation of
program funds, FRA may also consider
geographic diversity, diversity in the
size of the systems receiving funding,
and the applicant’s receipt of other
competitive awards.
2. Review and Selection Process
FRA will conduct a four-part
application review process, as follows:
a. Screen applications for
completeness, applicant risk and
eligibility and consider applicable past
performance and previous financial
contributions and technical evaluation
ratings;
VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:08 Aug 30, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00151 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\31AUN1.SGM 31AUN1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
48810
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 166 / Tuesday, August 31, 2021 / Notices
b. Evaluate eligible applications
(completed by technical panels applying
the evaluation criteria);
c. Review, apply selection criteria and
recommend initial selection of projects
for the FRA Administrator’s review
(completed by a non-career Senior
Review Team, which includes senior
leadership from the Office of the
Secretary and FRA); and,
d. Selection of awards for the
Secretary’s review and approval
(completed by the FRA Administrator).
3. Reporting Matters Related to Integrity
and Performance
Before making a Federal award with
a total amount of Federal share greater
than the simplified acquisition
threshold of $250,000 (see 2 CFR 200.88
Simplified Acquisition Threshold), FRA
will review and consider any
information about the applicant that is
in the designated integrity and
performance system accessible through
SAM (currently the Federal Awardee
Performance and Integrity Information
System (FAPIIS)). See 41 U.S.C. 2313.
An applicant, at its option, may
review information in the designated
integrity and performance systems
accessible through SAM and comment
on any information about itself that a
Federal awarding agency previously
entered and is currently in the
designated integrity and performance
system accessible through SAM.
FRA will consider any comments by
the applicant, in addition to the other
information in the designated integrity
and performance system, in making a
judgment about the applicant’s integrity,
business ethics, and record of
performance under Federal awards
when completing the review of risk
posed by applicants as described in 2
CFR 200.205.
F. Federal Award Administration
Information
1. Federal Award Notice
FRA will announce applications
selected for funding in a press release
and on the FRA website after the
application review period. This
announcement is FRA’s notification to
successful and unsuccessful applicants
alike. FRA will contact applicants with
successful applications after
announcement with information and
instructions about the award process.
This notification is not an authorization
to begin proposed project activities.
FRA requires satisfaction of applicable
requirements by the applicant and a
formal agreement signed by both the
grantee and the FRA, including an
approved scope, schedule, and budget,
before obligating the grant.
For Track 2 PE/NEPA projects, these
requirements may include
transportation planning. For Track 3
FD/Construction projects, these
requirements may include
transportation planning, PE and
environmental reviews.
2. Administrative and National Policy
Requirements
In connection with any program or
activity conducted with or benefiting
from funds awarded under this notice,
grantees must comply with all
applicable requirements of Federal law,
including, without limitation, the
Constitution of the United States; the
conditions of performance,
nondiscrimination requirements, and
other assurances made applicable to the
award of funds in accordance with
regulations of the Department of
Transportation; and applicable Federal
financial assistance and contracting
principles promulgated by the Office of
Management and Budget. In complying
with these requirements, grantees, in
particular, must ensure that no
concession agreements are denied, or
other contracting decisions made on the
basis of speech or other activities
protected by the First Amendment. If
the Department determines that a
grantee has failed to comply with
applicable Federal requirements, the
Department may terminate the award of
funds and disallow previously incurred
costs, requiring the grantee to reimburse
any expended award funds.
Examples of administrative and
national policy requirements include: 2
CFR part 200; procurement standards at
2 CFR part 200 Subpart D—Procurement
Standards, 2 CFR 1207.317 and 2 CFR
200.401; compliance with Federal civil
rights laws and regulations;
requirements for disadvantaged
business enterprises, debarment and
suspension requirements, and drug-free
workplace requirements; FRA’s and
OMB’s Assurances and Certifications;
Americans with Disabilities Act; safety
requirements; NEPA; environmental
justice requirements; performance
measures under 49 U.S.C. 22907(f); for
CRISI Funding, grant conditions under
49 U.S.C. 22905 including the Buy
America requirements, applicable labor
requirements, the provision deeming
operators rail carriers for certain
purposes and grantee agreements with
railroad right-of-way owners for projects
using railroad right-of way. Unless
otherwise stated in statutory or
legislative authority, or appropriations
language, all financial assistance awards
follow the Uniform Administrative
Requirements, Cost Principles and
Audit Requirements for Federal Awards
at 2 CFR part 200 and 2 CFR part 1201.
Grantees must comply with
applicable appropriations act
requirements and all relevant
requirements of 2 CFR part 200. Rights
to intangible property under grants
awarded under this NOFO are governed
in accordance with 2 CFR 200.315. See
an example of standard terms and
conditions for FRA grant awards at
https://www.fra.dot.gov/eLib/Details/
L19057 and clauses specific to CRISI
funding at https://www.fra.dot.gov/eLib/
Details/L20078. These templates are
subject to revision.
Projects selected under this NOFO for
commuter rail passenger transportation
for positive train control projects may be
transferred to the Federal Transit
Administration for grant administration
at the Secretary’s discretion. If such a
project is transferred to the Federal
Transit Administration, applicants will
be required to comply with chapter 53
of Title 49 of the United States Code.
3. Reporting
a. Progress Reporting on Grant Activity
Each applicant selected for a grant
will be required to comply with all
standard FRA reporting requirements,
including quarterly progress reports,
quarterly Federal financial reports, and
interim and final performance reports,
as well as all applicable auditing,
monitoring and close out requirements.
Reports may be submitted
electronically. Pursuant to 2 CFR
170.210, non-Federal entities applying
under this NOFO must have the
necessary processes and systems in
place to comply with the reporting
requirements should they receive
Federal funding.
b. Additional Reporting
Applicants selected for funding are
required to comply with all reporting
requirements in the standard terms and
conditions for FRA grant awards
including 2 CFR 180.335 and 2 CFR
180.350.
If the Federal share of any Federal
award under this NOFO may include
more than $500,000 over the period of
performance, applicants are informed of
the post award reporting requirements
reflected in 2 CFR part 200, Appendix
XII—Award Term and Condition for
Recipient Integrity and Performance
Matters.
c. Performance Reporting
Each applicant selected for funding
must collect information and report on
the project’s performance using
measures mutually agreed upon by FRA
VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:08 Aug 30, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00152 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\31AUN1.SGM 31AUN1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
48811
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 166 / Tuesday, August 31, 2021 / Notices
and the grantee to assess progress in
achieving strategic goals and objectives.
Applicants requesting Non-CRISI
funding for trespass Enforcement
Activities must include the following
information: Date, time, number of
officers, location and description of
Enforcement Activity; Justification or
reason for selected Enforcement
Activity; Number of contacts
(encounters with trespassers); Number
of warnings and/or citations issued; and
the deterrence effect of such activities
and method for measuring such
deterrence (including explanation of
how they determine deterrence effect).
Applicants requesting Non-CRISI
funding for an Outreach Campaign must
include indicators of success (e.g.
anticipated reach of messaging efforts or
contacts made by personnel with
individuals at risk or reduced suicide
incidents). FRA maintains the right to
re-publish and use information under
this grant for the advancement of safety.
Examples of some rail performance
measures for CRISI Funding are listed in
the table below. The applicable
measure(s) will depend upon the type of
project. Applicants requesting funding
for the acquisition of rolling stock must
integrate at least one equipment/rolling
stock performance measure, consistent
with the application materials and
program goals.
Rail measures Unit
measured Temporal Primary strategic
goal Secondary strategic
goal Description
Slow Order Miles ..... Miles ............ Annual ......... State of Good Repair Safety ...................... The number of miles per year within the
project area that have temporary speed
restrictions (‘‘slow orders’’) imposed due
to track condition. This is an indicator of
the overall condition of track. This
measure can be used for projects to re-
habilitate sections of a rail line since the
rehabilitation should eliminate, or at
least reduce the slow orders upon
project completion.
Gross Ton ................ Gross Tons Annual ......... Economic Competi-
tiveness. State of Good Repair The annual gross tonnage of freight
shipped in the project area. Gross tons
include freight cargo minus tare weight
of the rail cars. This measures the vol-
ume of freight a railroad ships in a year.
This measure can be useful for projects
that are anticipated to increase freight
shipments.
Rail Track Grade
Separation. Count ........... Annual ......... Economic Competi-
tiveness. Safety ...................... The number of annual automobile cross-
ings that are eliminated at an at-grade
crossing as a result of a new grade
separation.
Passenger Counts ... Count ........... Annual ......... Economic Competi-
tiveness. State of Good Repair Count of the annual passenger boardings
and alightings at stations within the
project area.
Travel Time .............. Time/Trip ..... Annual ......... Economic Competi-
tiveness. Quality of Life .......... Point-to-point travel times between pre-
determined station stops within the
project area. This measure dem-
onstrates how track improvements and
other upgrades improve operations on a
rail line. It also helps make sure the rail-
road is maintaining the line after project
completion.
Track Weight Capac-
ity. Yes/No ........ One Time .... State of Good Repair Economic Competi-
tiveness. If a project is upgrading a line to accom-
modate heavier rail cars (typically an in-
crease from 263,000 lb. rail cars to
286,000 lb. rail cars.)
Track Miles ............... Miles ............ One Time .... State of Good Repair Economic Competi-
tiveness. The number of track miles that exist within
the project area. This measure can be
beneficial for projects building sidings or
sections of additional main line track on
a railroad.
H. Federal Awarding Agency Contacts
For further information regarding this
notice and the grants program, please
contact Mr. Douglas Gascon, Office of
Policy and Planning, Federal Railroad
Administration, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Room W38–212,
Washington, DC 20590; email:
douglas.gascon@dot.gov; phone: 202–
493–0239.
I. Other Information
All information submitted as part of
or in support of any application shall
use publicly available data or data that
can be made public and methodologies
that are accepted by industry practice
and standards, to the extent possible.
If the application includes
information the applicant considers to
be a trade secret or confidential
commercial or financial information, the
applicant should do the following: (1)
Note on the front cover that the
submission ‘‘Contains Confidential
Business Information (CBI)’’; (2) mark
each affected page ‘‘CBI’’; and (3)
highlight or otherwise denote the CBI
portions.
The DOT regulations implementing
the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)
are found at 49 CFR part 7 Subpart C—
Availability of Reasonably Described
Records under the Freedom of
Information Act which sets forth rules
VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:08 Aug 30, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00153 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\31AUN1.SGM 31AUN1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
48812
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 166 / Tuesday, August 31, 2021 / Notices
for FRA to make requested materials,
information and, records publicly
available under FOIA. Unless prohibited
by law and to the extent permitted
under the FOIA, contents of application
and proposals submitted by successful
applicants may be released in response
to FOIA requests.
Issued in Washington, DC.
Amitabha Bose,
Deputy Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2021–18737 Filed 8–30–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA–2016–0117; Notice 2]
General Motors, LLC, Denial of Petition
for Decision of Inconsequential
Noncompliance
AGENCY
: National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION
: Denial of petition.
SUMMARY
: General Motors, LLC (GM) has
determined that certain model year
(MY) 2016–2017 Cadillac CT6 motor
vehicles do not fully comply with
Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard
(FMVSS) No. 108, Lamps, Reflective
Devices, and Associated Equipment. GM
filed a noncompliance report dated
October 26, 2016. GM also petitioned
NHTSA on November 18, 2016, for a
decision that the subject noncompliance
is inconsequential as it relates to motor
vehicle safety.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
:
Leroy Angeles, Office of Vehicle Safety
Compliance, NHTSA, telephone (202)
366–5304, facsimile (202) 366–5930.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
:
I. Overview: GM has determined that
certain MY 2016–2017 Cadillac CT6
motor vehicles do not fully comply with
paragraph S7.8.13 of FMVSS No. 108,
Lamps, Reflective Devices, and
Associated Equipment (49 CFR
571.108). GM filed a noncompliance
report dated October 26, 2016, pursuant
to 49 CFR part 573, Defect and
Noncompliance Responsibility and
Reports. GM subsequently petitioned
NHTSA on November 18, 2016,
pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and
30120(h) and 49 CFR part 556, for an
exemption from the notification and
remedy requirements of 49 U.S.C.
Chapter 301 on the basis that this
noncompliance is inconsequential as it
relates to motor vehicle safety.
Notice of receipt of the petition was
published on April 11, 2017, in the
Federal Register (82 FR 17518), with a
30-day public comment period. One
comment was received. To view the
petition, all supporting documents, and
any comments, log onto the Federal
Docket Management System (FDMS)
website at: https://www.regulations.gov/.
Then follow the online search
instructions to locate docket number
‘‘NHTSA–2016–0117.’’
II. Vehicles Involved: Approximately
12,475 MY 2016–2017 Cadillac CT6
motor vehicles manufactured between
September 4, 2015 and October 18, 2016
(the subject vehicles) are potentially
involved.
III. Noncompliance: GM explains that
the noncompliance is that the software
in the subject vehicles’ parking lamp’s
electronic control unit (ECU) was
programmed incorrectly, causing the
ECU to misinterpret the signals from the
vehicle’s body control module (BCM).
This results in a higher than expected
light output that may exceed the
maximum values permitted in
paragraph S7.8.13 of FMVSS No. 108.
Specifically, the nine failed test points
exceeded the maximum allowed value
by 2.3% to 74.8%. Eight of the nine
failed test points exceeded the
maximum allowed value by 25% or
more.
IV. Rule Requirements: Paragraph
S7.8.13 of FMVSS No. 108, titled
‘‘Photometry’’ includes the
requirements relevant to this petition:
Each parking lamp must be designed to
conform to the photometry requirements
of Table XIV of paragraph S7.8.13, when
tested according to the procedure of
paragraph S14.2.1. Table XIV specifies
various minimum and maximum
photometric intensity requirements for
parking lamps at specified test points.
V. Summary of GM’s Petition:
GM describes the subject
noncompliance and contends that the
noncompliance is inconsequential as it
relates to motor vehicle safety.
In support of its petition, GM offers
the following reasoning:
(a) The subject vehicles’ parking
lamp-headlamp combination does not
exceed the maximum permitted glare
values for headlamps specified in
FMVSS No. 108:
GM states that NHTSA’s August 2014
denial of Mercedes-Benz USA’s petition
for parking lamps that exceeded
maximum photometric values, focused
on a concern that the parking lamps
could cause glare to oncoming drivers
(79 FR 50733).
The subject vehicles will expose
oncoming drivers to the combined
photometric output of the parking lamps
and headlamps. GM claims that, when
considering glare in real-world
application, the critical issue is not the
photometric output value of the parking
lamp alone, but the performance of the
parking lamp in conjunction with the
headlamps. GM asserts that most
appropriate way to assess this combined
effect is to measure the parking lamp-
headlamp combination at the traditional
headlamp glare points (points above the
horizon in the photometric beam pattern
that limit light output in the path of
oncoming drivers).
GM states that when two samples of
the subject vehicles’ parking lamp-
headlamp combinations were evaluated
in the laboratory against recognized
glare points, the output fell below, or
within, the acceptable value of
headlamp glare points specified in
FMVSS No. 108.
According to GM, it is possible for a
vehicle to incorporate parking lamps
and headlamps whose outputs are near,
or at the maximum allowed values
while remaining compliant. For
headlamps, that output would be at or
near the maximum specified
photometric values, and for parking
lamps that output would be at or near
125 candela (cd) at all test points above
the horizon. According to GM, a parking
lamp with this output value in close
proximity to the headlamp at or near
maximum output could create
combined output with a glare value
exceeding the maximum allowable
headlamp photometric glare values by
125 cd. GM asserts that the combination
would still be compliant, because the
headlamp’s glare measurement falls
within the permitted values for the
headlamp alone, and the parking lamp
values correspond to the permitted
values for parking lamps.
However, GM states that the parking
lamp-headlamp combination in the
subject vehicles are below the
prescribed glare values for a compliant
headlamp and well below the value of
the theoretical combined parking lamp-
headlamp output.
GM argues that the photometric
output of the subject vehicles’ parking
lamps will not cause a glare that
presents an unreasonable risk to the
safety of oncoming drivers.
(b) GM’s claim that the
noncompliance has no impact on turn
signal performance: GM recognizes
previous statements by NHTSA that a
parking lamp that exceeds the
maximum permitted photometric values
could mask the turn signal and thereby
impair the turn signal performance (See
79 FR 50733). GM argues that because
the parking lamps in the subject
vehicles are optically combined with
VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:08 Aug 30, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00154 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\31AUN1.SGM 31AUN1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT