regulatory organizations; proposed rule changes: National Securities Clearing Corp.,

[Federal Register: June 21, 2001 (Volume 66, Number 120)]

[Notices]

[Page 33280-33281]

From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]

[DOCID:fr21jn01-77]

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-44431; File No. SR-NSCC-2001-04]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; National Securities Clearing Corporation; Order Approving a Proposed Rule Change To Modify and Consolidate Clearing Fund Rules

June 15, 2001.

On April 24, 2001, the National Securities Clearing Corporation (``NSCC'') filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') and on April 30, 2001, amended a proposed rule change (File No. SR-NSCC-2001-04) pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'').\1\ Notice of the proposal was published in the Federal Register on May 15, 2001.\2\ No comment letters were received. For the reasons discussed below, the Commission is approving the proposed rule change.

\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).

\2\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 44276 (May 8, 2001), 66 FR 26895.

1. Description

   Under the proposal, NSCC will consolidate its clearing fund rules and standards of financial responsibility and operational capacity, currently found in various rules and procedures, into Procedure XV \3\ of its Rules and Procedures.

   \3\ NSCC's main clearing fund formulas are found in its Procedure XV.

   Under Addendum O,\4\ NSCC collects additional clearing fund deposits from settling members on surveillance. The additional clearing fund deposits are based on a risk-based margining (``RBM'') methodology that includes, but is not limited to, calculations based on portfolio volatility and, where applicable, market maker domination. The rule change extends these RBM requirements to all NSCC members in

   [[Page 33281]]

   lieu of NSCC's current allocation and liquidation clearing fund requirements.

   \4\ Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 37202 (May 10, 1996), 61 FR 24993 [File No. SR-NSCC-95-17]; 38622 (May 19, 1997), 62 FR 27285 [File No. SR-NSCC-97-04]; 40034 (May 27, 1998), 63 FR 30277

   [File No. SR-NSCC-98-03] ; 41478 (June 4, 1999), 64 FR 31664 [File No. SR-NSCC-99-06]; 42864 (May 30, 2000), 65 FR 36204 [File No. SR- NSCC-99-09] (Commission approval date corrected in Federal Register, 65 FR 42065); and 44277 (May 8, 2001) [File No. NSCC-2001-05].)

   Since the Commission's approval of Addendum O in 1996, NSCC has studied the impact of RBM on member firms. NSCC found that utilization of RBM more accurately reflects NSCC's exposure than the allocation and liquidation formulae being replaced because it enables NSCC to more precisely identify the risks posed by a member's unsettled portfolio and, as a result, more quickly adjust and collect additional clearing fund deposits. NSCC management therefore recommended and the Membership and Risk Management Committee concurred that RBM methodologies should be applied to all NSCC members, not just those on surveillance.

   The rule change modifies NSCC's clearing fund requirements (Procedure XV) as follows:

   With respect to clearing fund requirements for CNS transactions, Procedure XV's allocation [current Section A.I.(a)(i)(a)] and liquidation [current Section A.I.(a)(i)(c)] formulae will be replaced with RBM methodology, specifically volatility [new Section I.(A)(1)(a)] and market maker domination [new Section I.(A)(1)(c)] calculations, currently found in Addendum O. The volatility formula will continue to permit NSCC to utilize any generally accepted portfolio volatility model to calculate volatility.

   In addition, the clearing fund requirements will continue to provide that NSCC may exclude from volatility calculations net unsettled positions in classes of securities whose volatility is (1) less amendable to statistical analysis, such as OTC Bulletin Board or Pink Sheet issues or issues trading below a designated dollar threshold (e.g., five dollars) or (2) amendable to generally accepted statistical analysis only in a complex manner, such as municipal or corporate bonds. The amount of clearing fund required with respect to these net unsettled positions will be determined by multiplying the absolute value of the net unsettled positions by a percentage designated by NSCC. This percentage will not be less than 10% with respect to the positions covered by item (1) above and will not be less than 2% with respect to the positions covered by item (2) above.

   The clearing fund requirements for all when-issued and when-distributed transactions will be consolidated with the calculations for regular way transactions.

   The third prong of the CNS formula, the calculation of the difference between the contract price and the current market price of compared pending positions, will remain the same [current Sections I.(A)(1)(b) and I.(A)(2)(b)]; however, these calculations will now be undertaken on a daily basis instead of on a twenty day rolling basis.

   Members will be required to make within one hour of demand all clearing fund and other required deposits. To the extent a member is meeting its obligation with (1) a deposit of cash, the cash deposit must be made by Federal Funds wire transfer and must be received no later than fifteen minutes prior to the close of the Federal Funds wire or (2) a delivery of eligible securities, the delivery of eligible securities must be received within the deadlines established by a qualified securities depository.\5\ The rule change further provides that, at the discretion of NSCC, these cash deposits may be included as part of the member's daily settlement obligation.

   \5\ Under NSCC rules, currently the only qualified securities depository is DTC.

   Addendum B, among other things, currently specifies thresholds pursuant to which NSCC will require additional clearing fund deposits. Procedure XV [new Section II.(C)] will now provide that additional clearing fund deposits shall not be requested where the amount of the deficiency for a: (1) Member on Class A or B Surveillance is equal to or less than $5,000 and such amount is less than 5% of such member's actual deposit; (2) member on Advisory Surveillance is equal to or less than $20,000 and such amount is less than 5% of such member's actual deposit; or (3) member not on any surveillance is equal to or less than $50,000 and such amount is less than 10% of the member's actual deposit.

   Other changes to Procedure XV result from relabeling and/ or moving the placement of NSCC's clearing fund requirements without altering their substantive nature.

   As described below, NSCC intends to begin implementing the revised clearing fund methodologies on June 15, 2001, and to have all members subject to them by December 31, 2002. Members currently subject to Addendum O will be subject to these clearing fund changes on June 15, 2001. Applicants approved for NSCC membership from and after April 24, 2001, the date of the proposed rule change filing, will also be subject to these rule changes on June 15, 2001. Members who have a position which will subject them to a deposit requirement based on the market maker domination calculations will also be subject to these rule changes on June 15, 2001. NSCC will place every remaining member into deciles and will apply the revised clearing fund methodologies pursuant to a step-by-step, decile-by-decile plan based upon the volatility classification of each such member's unsettled portfolio. Accordingly, members with the most volatile portfolios will be subject to these rule changes first, on or shortly after June 15, 2001, provided, however, that to the extent any such member has significant CNS obligations resulting from options exercises and assignments or is a municipal securities brokers' broker, it will be subject to these rule changes in conjunction with or after all other members but in no event later than December 31, 2002.

2. Discussion

   Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act requires that the rules of a clearing agency be designed to assure the safeguarding of securities and funds which are in the custody or control of the clearing agency or for which it is responsible.\6\ The Commission believes that the approval of NSCC's rule change is consistent with this section because utilization of RBM should enable NSCC to more precisely identify the risks posed by a member's unsettled portfolio and, as a result, more quickly adjust and collect additional clearing fund requirements than the current allocation and liquidation formulae. As a result NSCC is better protected from the possibility of a member's default because the clearing fund deposits it collects more accurately reflect NSCC's exposure.

   \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F).

3. Conclusion

   On the basis of the foregoing, the Commission finds that the proposal is consistent with the requirements of the Act and in particular with the requirements of Section 17A of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder.

   It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act, that the proposed rule change (File No. SR-NSCC-2001-04) be and hereby is approved.

   For the Commission by the Division of Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated authority.\7\

   \7\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).

   Margaret H. McFarland, Deputy Secretary.

   [FR Doc. 01-15623Filed6-20-01; 8:45 am]

   BILLING CODE 8010-01-M