Pecan Research, Promotion, and Information Order

Published date22 September 2020
Citation85 FR 59610
Record Number2020-19031
SectionProposed rules
CourtAgricultural Marketing Service
59610
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 184 / Tuesday, September 22, 2020 / Proposed Rules
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 1223
[Document Number AMS–SC–20–0013; PR–
A1]
Pecan Research, Promotion, and
Information Order
AGENCY
: Agricultural Marketing Service.
ACTION
: Proposed rule.
SUMMARY
: This proposal invites
comments on the establishment of the
Pecan Research, Promotion, and
Information Order (Order). The purpose
of the program would be to strengthen
the position of pecans in the
marketplace, maintain and expand
markets for pecans, and develop new
uses for pecans. The program would be
financed by an assessment on pecan
producers and importers. This proposal
also invites comments on the
procedures for conducting a referendum
to determine whether the continuation
of the proposed Order is favored by
domestic producers and importers of
pecans. In addition, this proposal
announces the Agricultural Marketing
Service’s (AMS) intent to request
approval by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) of new information
collection requirements to implement
the program.
DATES
: Comments must be received by
November 23, 2020. Pursuant to the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA),
comments on the information collection
burden that would result from this
proposal must be received by November
23, 2020.
ADDRESSES
: Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments
concerning this proposed rule. All
comments must be submitted through
the Federal e-rulemaking portal at
http://www.regulations.gov and should
reference the document number, and the
date and page number of this issue of
the Federal Register. All comments
submitted in response to this proposed
rule will be included in the rulemaking
record and will be made available to the
public. Please be advised that the
identity of the individuals or entities
submitting comments will be made
public at http://www.regulations.gov.
Pursuant to the PRA, comments
regarding the accuracy of the burden
estimate, ways to minimize the burden,
including the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology, or any other
aspect of this collection of information,
should be sent to the above address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
:
Andrea Ricci, Marketing Specialist,
Promotion and Economics Division,
Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA,
755 E Nees Avenue #25985, Fresno, CA
93720; telephone: (202) 572–1442; or
electronic mail: Andrea.Ricci@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
: This
proposal is issued pursuant to the
Commodity Promotion, Research, and
Information Act of 1996 (1996 Act) (7
U.S.C. 7411–7425).
Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and
13771
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts and equity).
Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, reducing costs,
harmonizing rules, and promoting
flexibility. This action falls within a
category of regulatory actions that the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) exempted from Executive Order
12866 review. Additionally, because
this rule does not meet the definition of
a significant regulatory action, it does
not trigger the requirements contained
in Executive Order 13771. See OMB’s
Memorandum titled ‘‘Interim Guidance
Implementing Section 2 of the Executive
Order of January 30, 2017, titled
‘Reducing Regulation and Controlling
Regulatory Costs’ ’’ (February 2, 2017).
Executive Order 13175
This action has been reviewed in
accordance with the requirements of
Executive Order 13175, Consultation
and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments. The review reveals that
this regulation would not have
substantial and direct effects on Tribal
governments and would not have
significant Tribal implications.
Executive Order 12988
This proposal has been reviewed
under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. It is not intended to
have retroactive effect. Section 524 of
the 1996 Act (7 U.S.C. 7423) provides
that it shall not affect or preempt any
other Federal or State law authorizing
promotion or research relating to an
agricultural commodity.
Section 519 of the 1996 Act (7 U.S.C.
7418) provides that a person subject to
an order may file a written petition with
the U.S. Department of Agriculture
(USDA) stating that an order, any
provision of an order, or any obligation
imposed in connection with an order, is
not established in accordance with the
law, and request a modification of an
order or an exemption from an order.
Any petition filed challenging an order,
any provision of an order, or any
obligation imposed in connection with
an order, must be filed within two years
after the effective date of an order,
provision, or obligation subject to
challenge in the petition. The petitioner
would have the opportunity for a
hearing on the petition. Thereafter,
USDA will issue a ruling on the
petition. The 1996 Act provides that the
district court of the United States for
any district in which the petitioner
resides or conducts business shall have
the jurisdiction to review a final ruling
on the petition, if the petitioner files a
complaint for that purpose not later
than 20 days after the date of the entry
of USDA’s final ruling.
Background
This proposal invites comments on
the establishment of the Pecan Research,
Promotion, and Information Order
(Order). The program would be financed
by an assessment on producers and
importers and would be administered
by a board of industry members selected
by the Secretary. The initial assessment
rate would be $0.02 per pound of
inshell pecans and $0.04 per pound of
shelled pecans produced within or
imported to the United States. Entities
that produce or import less than 50,000
pounds of inshell pecans (25,000
pounds of shelled pecans) on average
for four fiscal periods (the fiscal period
for which the exemption is claimed and
the previous three fiscal periods) would
be exempt from the payment of
assessments.
The purpose of the program would be
to strengthen the position of pecans in
the marketplace, maintain and expand
markets for pecans, and develop new
uses for pecans. The proposal was
submitted to USDA by the National
Pecan Federation (NPF), an organization
representing pecan growers and shellers
across the United States whose mission
is to promote, protect, and improve
business conditions for the pecan
industry.
This proposal also invites comments
on the procedures for conducting a
referendum to determine whether the
continuation of the proposed Order is
favored by domestic producers and
importers of pecans. A referendum
would be held among eligible domestic
producers and importers no later than
three years after assessments begin to
determine whether they favor
continuation of the program. In
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:29 Sep 21, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\22SEP2.SGM 22SEP2
59611
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 184 / Tuesday, September 22, 2020 / Proposed Rules
addition, this proposal announces the
intent of AMS to request approval by
OMB of new information collection
requirements to implement the program.
Legal Basis for Action
The proposed Order is authorized
under the 1996 Act which authorizes
USDA to establish agricultural
commodity research and promotion
orders which may include a
combination of promotion, research,
industry information, and consumer
information activities funded by
mandatory assessments. These programs
are designed to maintain and expand
markets and uses for agricultural
commodities.
The 1996 Act provides several
optional provisions that allow the
tailoring of orders for different
commodities. Section 516 of the 1996
Act provides permissive terms for
orders, and other sections provide for
alternatives. For example, section 514 of
the 1996 Act provides for orders
applicable to (1) producers, (2) first
handlers and others in the marketing
chain as appropriate, and (3) importers
(if imports are subject to assessments).
Section 516 states that an order may
include an exemption of de minimis
quantities of an agricultural commodity;
different payment and reporting
schedules; coverage of research,
promotion, and information activities to
expand, improve, or make more efficient
the marketing or use of an agricultural
commodity in both domestic and
foreign markets; provision for reserve
funds; provision for credits for generic
and branded activities; and assessment
of imports.
In addition, section 518 of the 1996
Act provides for referenda to ascertain
approval of an order to be conducted
either prior to its going into effect or
within three years after assessments first
begin under the order. Pursuant to
section 518 of the Act, an order may
also provide for its approval in a
referendum based upon different voting
patterns. Section 515 provides for
establishment of a board from among
producers, first handlers and others in
the marketing chain as appropriate, and
importers, if imports are subject to
assessment.
USDA currently oversees a marketing
order for pecans grown in Alabama,
Arkansas, Arizona, California, Florida,
Georgia, Kansas, Louisiana, Missouri,
Mississippi, North Carolina, New
Mexico, Oklahoma, South Carolina, and
Texas, which is authorized under the
Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act
of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601–674).
The purpose of marketing orders, in
general, is to stabilize market
conditions, allowing industries to work
together to solve marketing problems,
and to improve profitability. The pecan
marketing order authorizes collection of
industry data; research and promotion
activities; regulations on grade, size,
quality, pack and container; and is
financed by assessments paid by
handlers of pecans grown in the
production area.
The purpose of research and
promotion programs, in general, is to
provide a framework for agricultural
industries to pool their resources and
combine efforts to develop new markets,
strengthen existing markets and conduct
important research and promotion
activities. The proposed pecan research
and promotion program would be
national in scope, financed by an
assessment on pecan producers and
importers, and authorize research and
promotion activities. The purpose of the
proposed Order would be to strengthen
the position of pecans in the
marketplace, maintain and expand
markets for pecans, and develop new
uses for pecans. USDA has not
identified any relevant Federal rules
that duplicate, overlap, or conflict with
this proposed rule.
Industry Background
The pecan industry is comprised of
producers, shellers, accumulators,
wholesalers, and importers that
produce, process, and supply pecans for
market. Pecans include any and all
varieties or sub varieties, inshell or
shelled of the Genus, species: Carya
illinoinensis. Pecans are grown
primarily in Alabama, Arkansas,
Arizona, California, Florida, Georgia,
Kansas, Louisiana, Missouri,
Mississippi, North Carolina, New
Mexico, Oklahoma, South Carolina, and
Texas. According to the most recent
Census of Agriculture (2017), there are
15,608 operations with bearing acreage
of pecans. Bearing acreage is greatest in
Georgia with about 30 percent of the
nationwide total, followed by Texas at
27 percent, Oklahoma at 22 percent,
New Mexico at 11 percent, and Arizona
at 4 percent. These five states generally
account for about 95 percent of U.S.
pecan production.
U.S. Supply and Consumption
Pecans are an alternate bearing crop,
causing variability in production from
year to year. Based on data from the
National Agricultural Statistics Service
(NASS), the 2014 to 2019 six-year
average of total U.S. pecan production
was almost 265 million pounds on an
inshell basis, as shown in Table 1.
Together, Georgia and New Mexico
produced more than half of pecan
production nationwide.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:29 Sep 21, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\22SEP2.SGM 22SEP2
59612
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 184 / Tuesday, September 22, 2020 / Proposed Rules
From 2013 through 2016, pecan
production averaged about 263 million
pounds per year, and reached a peak in
2017 at nearly 305 million pounds. The
following year, however, domestic
production dropped 21 percent due to
the destruction of the Georgia pecan
crop by Hurricane Michael. The trend of
U.S. pecan production is depicted in
Chart 1.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:29 Sep 21, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4725 E:\FR\FM\22SEP2.SGM 22SEP2
EP22SE20.023</GPH> EP22SE20.024</GPH>
Table
1.
State
Pecan
Production
1,000
Lbs.
State
Inshell
basis
Georgia
88,000
New
Mexico
80,150
Texas
42,517
Arizona
26,717
Oklahoma
13,533
Louisiana
7,406
California
4,686
Arkansas
2,850
Alabama
1,850
Mississippi
1,150
Missouri
1,090
South
Carolina
350
Florida
145
Total
U.S.
1
264,765
Source:
NASS,
2014-2019
average.
Note:
1Sum
may
not
equal
Total
U.S.
due
to
rounding.
Chart
1.
U.S.
Pecan
Production
(Inshell
basis)
310,000
300,000
290,000
Ul
280,000
..Q
,-:i
0
270,000
0
0
~
,-I
260,000
250,000
240,000
230,000
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017 2018
2019
Source:
NASS.
59613
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 184 / Tuesday, September 22, 2020 / Proposed Rules
In 2018, Hurricane Michael swept
across the southern half of Georgia as a
Category 3 storm. According to the
University of Georgia Pecan Extension,
this storm resulted in a loss of nearly
half the expected 2018 crop and a loss
of 17 percent of the state’s pecan
acreage. The effects of Hurricane
Michael remain present as the 2019
Georgia crop was down nearly 30
percent from the average production of
the six years prior to the storm. Prior to
Hurricane Michael, Georgia was the top
pecan-producing state in the U.S.
Considering this, along with the state’s
recovery efforts, the University of
Georgia Pecan Extension expects
Georgia pecan production to rebound in
the coming years. Pecan production
nationwide began to increase in 2019,
climbing six percent from 2018.
Table 2 shows U.S. pecan supply and
utilization. Domestic production
generally accounts for about 40 percent
of the domestic supply, while imports
account for nearly one-third, with
beginning stocks just under 30 percent.
Almost all pecans imported into the
U.S. are from Mexico. Of these, 70
percent are shelled, and 30 percent are
inshell.
Nearly half of the U.S. supply of
pecans is consumed domestically each
year. Per capita consumption has
trended upward for the last four years,
reaching a high of 1.20 inshell pounds
in 2019. Compared to 2018 and to the
2013 to 2018 six-year average, 2019 per
capita consumption is up 23 percent
and 33 percent, respectively.
Exports
The U.S. exports about 24 percent of
its pecan supply on average each year.
Shelled pecans make up 60 percent of
U.S. pecan exports, while inshell are 40
percent. Europe and Canada are the
primary markets for shelled pecans
with, on average, 49 percent and 24
percent, respectively, of total shelled
exports. In Europe, the largest
consumers of U.S. shelled pecans are
the Netherlands, the United Kingdom,
and Germany with 39 percent, 24
percent, and 15 percent, respectively, of
total shelled exports to Europe. On
average, about 94 percent of U.S. inshell
exports go to Asia. Together, Hong Kong
and China make up 72 percent of the
Asian market for inshell pecan exports
from the United States.
Competition
The pecan industry competes with
other tree nut industries such as
almonds, pistachios and walnuts. As
Table 3 illustrates, sales by volume of
pecans are 95 percent lower than sales
of almonds, 74 percent lower than sales
of walnuts, but 40 percent higher than
sales of pistachios.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:29 Sep 21, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\22SEP2.SGM 22SEP2
EP22SE20.025</GPH>
Table
2.
U.S.
Supply
and
Utilization
of
Pecans
(1,000
Lbs.,
Inshell
basis)
Per
Capita
Year
1
Beginning
Ending
5
Consumption
Production
1 1
Utilization
Stocks
Stocks
(Lbs.
I 6
2013
266,330
183,840 143,285
593,455
166,909 156,450
270,095
0.85
2014
264,150
166,909 186,619
617,678
174,874
167,701
275,103
0.86
2015
254,290
174,874
170,574
599,738
181,390
157,208
261,140
0.81
2016
268,770
181,390
220,069
670,229
204,288
160,469
305,471
0.95
2017
304,850
204,288
176,122
685,260
183,984
188,116
313,160
0.
96
2018
240,930
183,984
230,899
655,813
203,341
135,256
317,216
0.97
2019
255,600 203,341
265,287
724,228
180,055 151,370
392,803
1.
20
2014-2019
6-yr
avg
264,765
185,798
208,262
658,824
187,989 160,020
310,815
0.
96
Pct
of
supply
40%
28% 32% 2
9%
24%
47%
2019
V
2018
6%
11% 15% 10%
-11%
12% 24% 23%
2019
V
2013-2018
6-yr
avg
-4% 11%
41%
14%
-3% -6%
35% 33%
Sources:
1
NASS;
2
Customs
and
Border
Protection;
4
Agricultural
Service.
Notes:
3
Production
+
Beginning
Stocks
+
Imports;
-
(Ending
Stocks
+
Exports);
6
Utilization
I
U.S.
Population.
59614
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 184 / Tuesday, September 22, 2020 / Proposed Rules
Prices received by growers, as shown
in Table 4, are 25 percent lower for
pecans than for almonds. Compared to
other nuts, grower-received prices for
pecans are 18 percent lower than those for pistachios, but double those for
walnuts.
Price Trends
Chart 2 shows the trend of prices for
pecans from 2013 to 2019. In recent
years, pecan prices were at their highest
in 2016 before dropping in the following
two years. Prices increased slightly
between 2018 and 2019 but are still
down about 12 percent compared to the
average of the previous six years.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:29 Sep 21, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\22SEP2.SGM 22SEP2
EP22SE20.026</GPH> EP22SE20.027</GPH>
Table
3.
Shelled
Nut
Sales
(1,000
Lbs.)
Year
Pecans
Almonds
1
Pistachios
Walnuts
2013
106,569
2,010,000
45,400
306,000
2014
101,858
1,870,000
50,800
374,000
2015
87,225
1,900,000
33,100
400,000
2016
116,930
2,140,000
114,400
438,000
2017
126,396
2,270,000
52,807
390,000
2018
88,373
2,280,000
121,000
450,000
2019
115,937
2,550,000
82,000
412,000
2014-2019
6-yr
avg
106,120
2,168,333
75,685
410,667
Pecan
comparison
-95%
40
-74
Source:
NASS.
Note:
1
Almonds
is
shelled
utilized
production.
Table
4.
Grower-Received
Prices
($/Lb.)
Year
Pecans
Almonds
Pistachios
Walnuts
2013
$
1.
73
$
3.21
$
3.48
$
1.
86
2014
$
1.
96
$
4.00
$
3.57
$
1.
67
2015
$
2.20
$
3.13
$
3.29
$
0.84
2016
$
2.59
$
2.39
$
1.
68 $
0.93
2017
$
2.33
$
2.53
$
1.
69
$
1.
25
2018
$
1.
75
$
2.50
$
2.65
$
0.68
2019
$
1.
84 $
2.43
$
2.62
$
0.99
2014-2019
6-yr
avg
$
2.11
$
2.83
$
2.58
$
1.
06
Pecan
comparison
-25%
-18%
100
Source:
NASS.
59615
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 184 / Tuesday, September 22, 2020 / Proposed Rules
1
Based on historic compound annual growth
rates (CAGR’s) in global pecan supply and demand
for 10 years from 2008 to 2018; resultant CAGR’s
of 6 percent for global supply and demand applied
to 2018 estimates to forecast 2028 figures.
Need for a Program
According to the NPF, the greatest
challenge the pecan industry is facing is
supply surpassing demand. Data from
the International Nut and Dried Fruit
Council and from the research compiled
by the Boston Consulting Group,
contracted by the NPF, show that the
supply of pecans may exceed demand
by 19 percent in 2028.
1
The NPF
believes the establishment of a national
research and promotion program for
pecans would help the industry address
this challenge. NPF concluded that
without a program funded by
assessments from both domestically
produced and imported pecans, the
industry would not be able to meet the
challenge of the approaching supply
and demand imbalance.
In 2016, the U.S. pecan industry
favored the establishment of a marketing
order for pecans grown in Alabama,
Arkansas, Arizona, California, Florida,
Georgia, Kansas, Louisiana, Missouri,
Mississippi, North Carolina, New
Mexico, Oklahoma, South Carolina, and
Texas. The program authorizes
collection of industry data; research and
promotion activities; regulation of
grade, size, quality, pack and container;
and is financed by assessments paid by
handlers of pecans grown in the
production area. Over the past several
years the marketing order program has
launched marketing campaigns to
increase demand for pecans.
According to the NPF, the proposed
research and promotion program will
benefit domestic producers and
importers of pecans, thereby justifying
the collection of assessments on both
domestic production and imports.
The NPF proposal indicates that
imported product accounts for
approximately 39 percent of pecans
being supplied to the U.S., with
domestic production accounting for the
other 61 percent. With mandatory
assessments being collected only on
domestic production, this has created a
gap in the dollars available to fund
marketing campaigns focused on
creating increased demand for pecans in
the U.S. and globally. As domestic
production and imports increase, the
need for a robust promotion campaign is
apparent, which would only be
accomplished with both domestic
producers and importers contributing
financially. The NPF concluded that the
marketing order would continue to have
an important role within the industry
and the intent is that the two programs
would work together to benefit the
entire pecan industry.
Provisions of Proposed Program
Definitions
Pursuant to section 513 of the 1996
Act, §§ 1223.1 through 1223.24 of
proposed 7 CFR part 1223 (referred to as
the proposed Order) define certain
terms that would be used throughout
final 7 CFR part 1223 (referred to as the
Order). Several of the terms are common
to all research and promotion programs
authorized under the 1996 Act, while
other terms are specific to the proposed
Order.
Section 1223.1 would define the term
‘‘Act’’ to mean the Commodity
Promotion, Research, and Information
Act of 1996 (7 U.S.C. 7411–7425), and
any amendments thereto.
Section 1223.2 would define the term
‘‘American Pecan Council’’ or ‘‘APC’’ to
mean that governing body of the Federal
Marketing Order established pursuant to
7 CFR part 986, unless otherwise noted.
As specified in proposed § 1223.41, the
APC would conduct the initial
nominations for producers of the
American Pecan Promotion Board and
submit them to the Secretary.
Section 1223.3 would define the term
‘‘American Pecan Promotion Board’’ or
‘‘Board’’ to mean the administrative
body established pursuant to § 1223.40.
Section 1223.5 would define
‘‘Customs’’ or ‘‘CBP’’ to mean the
Customs and Border Protection, an
agency of the United Sates Department
of Homeland Security.
Section 1223.7 would define ‘‘first
handler’’ to mean any person who
receives, shells, cracks, accumulates,
warehouses, roasts, packs, sells,
consigns, transports, exports, or ships
(except as a common or contract carrier
of pecans owned by another person), or
in any other way puts inshell or shelled
pecans in the stream of commerce. The
term first handler includes a producer
who handles or markets pecans of the
producer’s own production.
Section 1223.8 would define the term
‘‘fiscal period’’ to mean the period from
October 1 to September 30, or such
other period as recommended by the
Board and approved by the Secretary.
Section 1223.10 would define the
term ’’information’’ to mean information
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:29 Sep 21, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\22SEP2.SGM 22SEP2
EP22SE20.028</GPH>
..Q
$2.70
$2.50
$2.30
~
$2
.10
{f}-
$1.
90
$1.70
$1.50
2013
Source:
NASS.
Chart
2.
Pecan
Prices
2014
2015
2016
2017 2018
2019
59616
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 184 / Tuesday, September 22, 2020 / Proposed Rules
and programs that are designed to
increase efficiency in processing and to
develop new markets, marketing
strategies, increase market efficiency,
and activities that are designed to
enhance the image of pecans on a
national or international basis. This
includes consumer information, which
means any action taken to provide
information to, and broaden the
understanding of, the general public
regarding the consumption, use,
nutritional attributes, and care of
pecans. This would also include
industry information, which means
information and programs that would
lead to the development of new markets,
new marketing strategies, or increased
efficiency for the pecan industry, and
activities to enhance the image of the
pecan industry.
Section 1223.11 would define the
term ‘‘inshell pecans’’ to mean nuts
whose kernel is maintained inside the
shell.
Section 1223.12 would define the
terms ‘‘market’’ or ‘‘marketing.’’ The
term ‘‘marketing’’ would mean the sale
or other disposition of pecans in any
channel of commerce. The term
‘‘market’’ would mean to sell or
otherwise dispose of pecans in
interstate, foreign, or intrastate
commerce.
Section 1223.14 would define the
terms ‘‘part’’ and ‘‘subpart.’’ The term
‘‘part’’ would mean all rules,
regulations, and supplemental orders
issued pursuant to the Act and the
Order. The Pecan Promotion, Research,
and Information Order would be a
‘‘subpart’’ (specifically subpart A) of
such part.
Section 1223.15 would define the
term ‘‘pecans’’ to mean and includes
any and all varieties or subvarieties,
inshell or shelled, of the Genus, species:
Carya illinoinensis grown or imported
into the United States.
Section 1223.17 would define the
term ‘‘producer’’ to mean synonymous
with grower and any person engaged in
the production and sale of pecans in the
United States who owns, or who shares
in the ownership and risk of loss of such
pecans.
Section 1223.18 would define the
terms programs, plans, and projects to
mean research, promotion and
information programs, plans, or projects
established under the Order.
Section 1223.19 would define the
term ‘‘promotion’’ to mean any action
taken to present a favorable image of
pecans to the general public and the
food industry for the purpose of
improving the competitive position of
pecans both in the United States and
abroad and stimulating the sale of
pecans. This includes paid advertising
and public relations.
Section 1223.20 would define the
term ‘‘research’’ to mean any type of
test, study, or analysis designed to
advance the image, desirability, use,
marketability, production, product
development, or quality of pecans,
including research relating to
nutritional value, cost of production,
new product development, varietal
development, nutritional value, health
research, and marketing of pecans.
Section 1223.22 would define the
term ‘‘shelled pecans’’ to mean pecans
whose shells have been removed leaving
only edible kernels, kernel pieces or
pecan meal. One pound of shelled
pecans is the equivalent of two pounds
inshell pecans.
Sections 1223.4, 1223.6, 1223.9,
1223.13, 1223.16, 1223.21, 1223.23,
1223.24, and 1223.25 would define the
terms ‘‘conflict of interest,’’
‘‘Department or USDA,’’ ‘‘importer,’’
‘‘Order,’’ ‘‘person,’’ ‘‘Secretary,’’
‘‘suspend,’’ ‘‘terminate,’’ and ‘‘United
States,’’ respectively. The definitions are
the same as or are based on the
definitions specified in section 513 of
the Act.
Establishment of the Board
Pursuant to section 515 of the 1996
Act, §§ 1223.40 through 1223.47 of the
proposed Order would detail the
establishment and membership of the
proposed American Pecan Promotion
Board (Board), nominations and
appointments, term of office, removal
and vacancies, procedure, compensation
and reimbursement, powers and duties,
and prohibited activities.
Section 1223.40 would specify the
Board establishment and membership.
The 1996 Act requires the composition
of a board to reflect the geographical
distribution of production of the
commodity in the U.S. as well as the
quantity or value of the commodity
imported into the United States. In
accordance with this requirement, the
NPF recommended the Board would
consist of 17 members: 10 domestic
producers and 7 importers.
To determine whether the NPF’s
proposed board representation is
reflective of the appropriate
geographical distribution, USDA used
the following resources: The NASS for
U.S. production data; the 2007, 2012,
and 2017 Census of Agriculture
(published by NASS) for bearing acreage
data by state; Customs import data for
shelled and inshell pecans (HTS Codes
0802901500 and 0802901000,
respectively); and the Global
Agricultural Trade System (GATS) of
the Foreign Agricultural Service (FAS)
for data on U.S. exports of inshell
pecans to Mexico. All data presented in
this document is based on a calendar
year for consistency in timeframe. Due
to the alternate-bearing nature of the
crop, USDA concluded that the most
appropriate way to illustrate production
and import volume is a six-year average
of years 2014 through 2019.
U.S. Production
Every five years, following the Census
of Agriculture, NASS reviews
production for each commodity and
evaluates the inclusion of states in its
annual estimating program. Given
limited available resources, NASS has
reduced the number of states included
in its annual estimation of pecan
production to five states as of 2019,
down from 12 states in 2014 after the
2012 Census of Agriculture. NASS had
reported annual estimates of pecan
production for 15 states as early as 2007.
Using bearing acreage data from the
2007, 2012, and 2017 Census of
Agriculture, USDA estimated 2017
production in the seven states for which
no data was issued by NASS. USDA
calculated an average yield per acre for
each of these seven states using bearing
acreage data from the 2007 and 2012
Census of Agriculture and NASS
production data for the corresponding
years. Next, USDA applied these
calculations of yield to bearing acreage
data from the 2017 Census of
Agriculture to estimate 2017
production. Table 5 shows the result.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:29 Sep 21, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\22SEP2.SGM 22SEP2
59617
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 184 / Tuesday, September 22, 2020 / Proposed Rules
In 2018, Hurricane Michael swept
across the southern half of Georgia as a
Category 3 storm. According to the
University of Georgia Pecan Extension,
this storm resulted in a loss of nearly
half the expected 2018 crop and a loss
of 17 percent of the state’s pecan
acreage. The effects of Hurricane
Michael remain present as the 2019
Georgia crop was down nearly 30
percent from the average production of
the six years prior to the storm. To more
accurately represent the geographical
distribution of U.S. pecan production,
USDA adjusted the six-year average of
production for Georgia by applying
weights to each year’s production
figures. Equal weights of 20 percent
were applied to years 2014 through
2017, and weights of 10 percent each
were applied to years 2018 and 2019.
The result, as shown in Table 5, is a six-
year weighted average of 90.9 million
pounds, inshell, of Georgia production.
Prior to Hurricane Michael, Georgia was
the top pecan producer in the United
States. Considering this, along with the
state’s recovery efforts, the University of
Georgia Pecan Extension expects
Georgia pecan production to rebound in
the coming years.
According to the proposal, domestic
board representation would be split into
three regions: Eastern, Central, and
Western. The Eastern Region includes
Alabama, Florida, Georgia, North
Carolina, South Carolina, and any other
U.S. states the majority of whose land
mass is in the Eastern Time Zone, plus
any U.S. territories in the Atlantic
Ocean. The Central Region includes
Arkansas, Kansas, Louisiana,
Mississippi, Missouri, Oklahoma, Texas,
and any other U.S. states the majority of
whose land mass is in the Central Time
Zone. Finally, the Western Region
includes Arizona, California, New
Mexico, and any other U.S. states the
majority of whose land mass is in the
Mountain or Pacific Time Zones, plus
Alaska, Hawaii, and any U.S. territories
in the Pacific Ocean.
Table 6 lists the three regions
including their states and territories,
along with regional six-year average
production, and portion of total U.S.
production. The Eastern and Central
Regions, with 34 percent and 25 percent
of total U.S. production, respectively,
would each have three seats on the
Board as recommended by the NPF. The
Western Region, with 41 percent of total
U.S. production would have four seats
on the Board as recommended by the
NPF, for a total of 10 seats representing
domestic U.S. production.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:29 Sep 21, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\22SEP2.SGM 22SEP2
EP22SE20.029</GPH>
Table
5.
Pecan
Production
Volume
by
State
2014-2019
Six-Year
Average
States
Lbs.
(Inshell
basis)
Alabama
Arizona
Arkansas
1
California
Florida
1
G . 2
eorgia
Kansas
1
Louisiana
Mississippi
1
Missouri
1
New
Mexico
North
Carolina
1
Oklahoma
South
Carolina
1
Texas
U.S.
Total
Source:
NASS.
1,850,000
26,783,333
3,102,365
4,686,000
1,958,448
90,900,000
676,226
7,406,000
1,217,850
1,415,427
81,950,000
216,949
13,300,000
714,239
43,366,667
279,543,504
Notes:
1
2017
production
estimated
by
USDA;
2
Georgia
production
estimated
using
a
weighted
average
with
lower
weights
applied
to
production
in
years
2018
and
2019
to
discount
anomalous
effects
of
2018
Hurricane
Michael.
59618
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 184 / Tuesday, September 22, 2020 / Proposed Rules
Imports
Regarding import volume, USDA
estimated about 208 million pounds,
inshell, using a six-year average for
years 2014 through 2019. To arrive at
this estimate, USDA considered the
routine industry practice of domestic
inshell pecans being exported to Mexico
for shelling, and then reentering the
United States as shelled kernels. These
shelled kernels may be documented as
imported product, but they were
actually produced in the United States.
To account for this scenario, USDA
deducted from total imports U.S.
exports of inshell pecans to Mexico.
This calculation assumes that all U.S.
inshell pecan exports to Mexico
ultimately return to the United States as
shelled kernels. According to the NPF,
this is a reasonable assumption. The
result of this calculation is shown in
Table 7.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:29 Sep 21, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4725 E:\FR\FM\22SEP2.SGM 22SEP2
EP22SE20.030</GPH> EP22SE20.031</GPH>
Table
6.
Pecan
Production
Volume
by
Region
2014-2019
Six-Year
Average
States
Lbs.
(Inshell
basis)
9c
0
of
u
.s.
Alabama
~
Florida
H
~
Georgia
(].J
0
-J...J
-rl
North
Carolina
95,639,636
34%
CTI
(/)
(].J
(U
p::;
South
Carolina
µ:J
Eastern
Time
Zone
States
Atlantic
Territories
Arkansas
Kansas
rl
~
Louisiana
(U 0
H
Mississippi
-J...J
-rl
70,484,535
25%
CTI
~
(].J
Missouri
(].J
p::;
u
Oklahoma
Texas
Central
Time
Zone
States
Arizona
California
~ ~
New
Mexico
H 0
(].J
-rl
Mountain
Time
Zone
States
-J...J
CTI
113,419,333
41%
(/)
(].J
Pacific
Time
Zone
States
(].J
p::;
:s
Alaska
Hawaii
Pacific
Territories
Total
u.
s.
Production
279,543,504
Source:
NASS.
Table
7.
Revised
Pecan
Import
Calculation
2014-2019
Six-Year
Average,
Lbs.
(Inshell
basis)
Total
Imports
1
Exports
2
Revised
Imports
3
244,539,780
36,278,137
208,261,643
Sources:
1
Customs
and
Border
Protection;
2
Foreign
Agricultural
Service.
Notes:
2u.
s.
inshell
exports
to
Mexico;
3
Total
Imports
-
Exports.
59619
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 184 / Tuesday, September 22, 2020 / Proposed Rules
In Table 8, revised imports are added
to domestic production to estimate the
total U.S. supply of pecans. With 279.5
million pounds, on an inshell basis,
U.S. production accounts for 57 percent
of the total domestic supply; and, with
just over 208 million pounds, on an
inshell basis, imports account for 43
percent of the total U.S. supply. In its
proposal, the NPF recommended 17
total board members, including ten
domestic producers and seven
importers.
The NPF proposed to have no
alternate Board members. It wants to
ensure that industry members who seek
representation and serve on the Board
are committed to their service and
participate in all Board meetings.
At least once every five years, the
Board must review the geographical
distribution of United States production
of pecans and the quantity or value of
imports. The review would be
conducted through an audit of state crop
production, Customs data, and Board
assessment records. If warranted, the
Board would recommend to the
Secretary of Agriculture that the Board
membership be reapportioned
appropriately to reflect such changes.
The distribution of production between
regions also shall be considered. Any
changes in Board composition would be
implemented by the Secretary through
rulemaking.
Section 1223.41 of the proposed
Order would specify Board nominations
and appointments. The initial
nominations for producers would be
submitted to the Secretary by the
American Pecan Council (APC). The
APC would publicize the nomination
process, using trade press or other
means it deems appropriate. The APC
would use regional caucuses, mail or
other methods to solicit potential
nominees and would work with USDA
to help ensure that all interested
persons are apprised of the nomination
process. The APC would submit the
nominations and recommend two
nominees for each Board position for
the Secretary’s consideration.
USDA would conduct initial importer
nominations. This includes publicizing
the nomination process, using trade
press or other means it deems
appropriate, and conducting outreach to
all importers. USDA would receive the
nominations and submit two nominees
for each Board position for the
Secretary’s consideration.
Regarding subsequent nominations,
the Board would solicit nominations as
described in the following paragraph.
Nominees must produce more than
50,000 pounds of inshell pecans (25,000
pounds of shelled pecans) on average
for four fiscal periods (the fiscal period
for which the nominations are being
conducted and the previous three fiscal
periods).
The Board would seek nominations
for each vacant seat from producers who
paid their assessments to the Board in
the most recent fiscal period. Producers
that produce in more than one region
could seek nomination in only the
region in which they produce the
majority of their pecans. Interested
producers could also submit a
background statement outlining their
qualifications to serve on the Board. The
names of producer nominees would be
placed on a ballot by region. The ballots,
along with any background statements,
would be mailed to producers in each
respective region for a vote. Producers
who produce pecans in more than one
region could only vote in the region in
which they produce the majority of their
pecans. The votes would be tabulated
for each region with the nominee
receiving the highest number of votes at
the top of the list in descending order
by vote. Two candidates for each
position would be submitted to the
Secretary for consideration.
The Board would also solicit
candidates for importer nominees. All
qualified national organizations
representing importers would have the
opportunity to nominate members to
serve on the Board. To be certified by
the Secretary as a qualified national
organization, an organization would
have to have been established for more
than a year; be comprised primarily of
importers of pecans; receive a portion of
its operating funds from importers; and
demonstrate it would be willing and
able to further the Act and Order’s
purposes. Interested importers could
also submit a background statement
outlining their qualifications to serve on
the Board. The names of importer
nominees would then be placed on a
ballot. The ballots, along with any
background statements, would be
mailed to importers for a vote. The votes
would be tabulated with the nominee
receiving the highest number of votes at
the top of the list in descending order
by vote. Two candidates for each
position would then be submitted to the
Secretary for consideration.
The Board would submit nominations
to the Secretary at least six months
before the new Board term begins.
The NPF also recommended that no
two Board members be employed by a
single corporation, company,
partnership, or any other legal entity.
The NPF stated this is to help ensure
that no one entity has control on the
Board.
In order to provide the Board
flexibility, the Board could recommend
to the Secretary modifications to its
nomination procedures. Any such
modifications would be implemented
through rulemaking by the Secretary.
Section 1223.42 of the proposed
Order would specify the term of office.
Except for the initial Board, each Board
member would serve a three-year term
or until the Secretary selected his or her
successor. Each term of office would
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:29 Sep 21, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\22SEP2.SGM 22SEP2
EP22SE20.032</GPH>
Table
8.
Board
Representation
2014-2019
Six-Year
Average,
Lbs.
(Inshell
basis)
u.
s.
Production
1
Imports
2
Total
U.S.
Supply
3
279,543,504
208,261,643
487,805,148
57%
43%
100%
Sources:
1NASS; 2
Customs
and
Border
Protection,
Foreign
Agricultural
Service.
Notes:
2
Revised
Imports
calculated
in
Table
7
(Total
Imports
-
Exports);
3U.
s.
Production
+
Imports.
59620
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 184 / Tuesday, September 22, 2020 / Proposed Rules
begin on October 1 and end on
September 30. No member could serve
more than two consecutive terms,
excluding any term of office less than
three years. For the initial Board, the
members’ terms would be staggered for
two, three, and four years and would be
determined at random. The initial
members would be able to serve one
successive three-year term.
Section 1223.43 of the proposed
Order would specify criteria for the
removal of members and for filling
vacancies. If a Board member ceased to
work for or be affiliated with the
category of members from which the
member was appointed or in the region
he or she represented, such position
would become vacant. The Board could
recommend to the Secretary that a
member be removed from office if the
member consistently refused to perform
his or her duties or engaged in dishonest
acts or willful misconduct. Further,
without recommendation of the Board,
a member may be removed by the
Secretary upon showing of adequate
cause, including the continued failure
by a member to submit reports or remit
assessments required under this part, if
the Secretary determines that such
member’s continued service would be
detrimental to the achievement of the
purposes of the Act. If a position
became vacant, nominations to fill the
vacancy would be conducted using the
nomination process as proposed in
§ 1223.41 of the Order. A vacancy
would not be required to be filled if the
unexpired term is less than six months.
Section 1223.44 of the proposed
Order would specify procedures of the
Board. A majority of the Board members
(9) would constitute a quorum. A
motion would carry if supported by one
vote more than 50 percent of the total
votes represented by the Board members
present. Proxy voting would not be
permitted.
The proposed Order would also
provide for the Board to take action by
mail, telephone, electronic mail,
facsimile, or any other electronic means
when the chairperson believes it is
necessary. Actions taken under these
procedures would be valid only if all
members and the Secretary were
notified of the meeting and all members
were provided the opportunity to vote
and at least nine Board members voted
in favor of the action. Additionally, all
votes would have to be confirmed in
writing and recorded in Board minutes.
The proposed Order would specify
that Board members would serve
without compensation. However, Board
members would be reimbursed for
reasonable travel expenses, as approved
by the Board, incurred when performing
Board business.
Section 1223.46 of the proposed
Order would specify powers and duties
of the Board. These are similar in
promotion programs authorized under
the 1996 Act. They include, among
other things, to administer the Order
and collect assessments; to develop
bylaws and recommend regulations
necessary to administer the Order; to
select a chairperson and other Board
officers; to create committees and
subcommittees as necessary; to hire staff
or contractors; to develop programs and
enter into contracts to implement
programs; to prepare and submit a
budget for approval by USDA in
accordance with the Order; to invest
Board funds appropriately; have its
books audited by an outside certified
public accountant at the end of each
fiscal period and at other times as
requested by the Secretary; to provide
appropriate notice of meetings to the
industry and USDA and keep minutes of
such meetings; to report its activities to
producers and importers; to make
public an accounting of funds received
and expended; to receive, investigate
and report to the Secretary complaints
of violations of the Order; and to
recommend amendments to the Order as
appropriate.
Section 1223.47 of the proposed
Order would specify prohibited
activities that are common to all
promotion programs authorized under
the 1996 Act. In summary, the Board
nor its employees and agents could
engage in actions that would be a
conflict of interest; use Board funds to
lobby (influencing legislation or
governmental action or policy, by local,
state, national, and foreign governments
or subdivision thereof, other than
recommending to the Secretary
amendments to the Order); or engage in
any advertising or activities that may be
false, misleading or disparaging to
another agricultural commodity.
Expenses and Assessments
Pursuant to sections 516 and 517 of
the 1996 Act, §§ 1223.50 through
1223.53 of the proposed Order detail
requirements regarding the Board’s
budget and expenses, financial
statements, assessments, and exemption
from assessments. At least 60 calendar
days before the start of the fiscal period,
and as necessary during the year, the
Board would submit a budget to USDA
covering its projected expenses. The
budget must include a summary of
anticipated revenue and expenses for
each program along with a breakdown
of staff and administrative expenses.
Except for the initial budget, the Board’s
budgets should include comparative
data for at least one preceding fiscal
period.
Each budget must provide for
adequate funds to cover the Board’s
anticipated expenses. Any amendment
or addition to an approved budget must
be approved by USDA, including
shifting of funds from one program, plan
or project to another. Shifts of funds that
do not result in an increase in the
Board’s approved budget would not
need prior approval from USDA. For
example, if the Board’s approved budget
provided for $1 million in consumer
advertising and $500,000 in research
projects, a shift of $50,000 from
consumer advertising to research would
require USDA approval. However, a
shift within the $1 million consumer
advertising line item would not require
prior USDA approval.
The Board would be authorized to
incur reasonable expenses for its
maintenance and functioning. During its
first year of operation, the Board could
borrow funds for startup costs and
capital outlay. Any borrowed funds
would be subject to the same fiscal,
budget and audit controls as other funds
of the Board.
The Board could also accept
voluntary contributions and seek other
funding sources to carry out activities
authorized under the Order. Any
contributions received by the Board
would be free from encumbrances by
the donor and the Board would retain
control over use of the funds. However,
the Board could receive funds from
outside sources targeted for specific
authorized projects. For example, the
Board could receive Federal grant funds,
subject to approval by the Secretary, for
a specific research project. The Board
would also be required to reimburse
USDA for costs incurred by USDA in
overseeing the Order’s operations,
including all costs associated with
referenda.
The Board would be limited to
spending no more than 15 percent of its
assessment and other income received
for administration, maintenance, and
the functioning of the Board for that
fiscal period. This limitation would be
applicable for fiscal periods beginning
three or more years after the
establishment of the Board.
Reimbursements to USDA would not be
considered administrative costs. As an
example, if the Board received $9
million in assessments during fiscal
period five, and $1 million in Federal
grant funding, the Board’s assessment
and other income would be $10 million
for that fiscal period. In this scenario,
the Board would be limited to spending
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:29 Sep 21, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\22SEP2.SGM 22SEP2
59621
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 184 / Tuesday, September 22, 2020 / Proposed Rules
no more than $1.5 million (.15 × $10
million) on administrative costs.
The Board could also maintain a
monetary reserve and carry over excess
funds from one fiscal period to the next.
However, such reserve funds could not
exceed two fiscal period’s budgeted
expenses. For example, if the Board’s
budgeted expenses for a fiscal period
were $8 million, it could carry over no
more than $16 million in reserve. With
approval of the Secretary, reserve funds
could be used to pay expenses.
The Board could invest its revenue
collected under the Order in the
following: (1) Obligations of the United
States or any agency of the United
States; (2) General obligations of any
State or any political subdivision of a
State; (3) Interest bearing accounts or
certificates of deposit of financial
institutions that are members of the
Federal Reserve; and 4) Obligations
fully guaranteed as to principal interest
by the United States.
The Board would be required to
submit to USDA financial statements on
a monthly or quarterly basis, or at any
other time as requested by the Secretary.
Financial statements should include, at
a minimum, a balance sheet, statement
of activities (budget versus actual), an
income statement, and an expense
budget.
Assessments
The Board’s programs and expenses
would be funded through assessments
on producers and importers, other
income, and other funds available to the
Board. The Order would provide for an
initial assessment rate of $0.02 per
pound of all inshell pecans and $0.04
per pound on all shelled pecans. Each
producer would pay on the amount of
pecans produced in the United States.
The importer of record would pay
assessments based on the amount of
pecans imported to the United States.
The Order provides that it is the
responsibility of the first handler, as
defined in § 1223.7, to collect and remit
assessments owed to the Board. First
handlers would collect assessments
from each producer based on pounds of
pecans received. The first handler
would remit those assessments, along
with the required reports, to the Board.
As an example, first handler A receives
100,000 pounds inshell pecans from
producer X, 250,000 pounds shelled
pecans from producer Y, and 750,000
inshell pecans from producer Z. First
handler A would collect $2,000
(100,000 pounds × $0.02 per pound
inshell pecans) from producer X,
$10,000 (250,000 pounds × $0.04 per
pound shelled pecans) from producer Y,
and $15,000 (750,000 pounds × $0.02
per pound inshell pecan) from producer
Z. First handler A would remit the
assessment collected totaling $27,000
($2,000 + $10,000 + $15,000) to the
Board. If a producer is acting as its own
first handler, the producer would be
required to remit its individual
assessments. Assessments owed would
be due to the Board by the 10th calendar
day of the month following the end of
the previous month. As an example,
assessments for pecans received in June
would be due to the Board by July 10th.
Importer assessments would be
collected through Customs. If Customs
did not collect the assessment from an
importer, the importer would be
responsible for paying the assessment
directly to the Board by the 10th
calendar day of the month following the
end of the previous month after the
pecans were imported into the United
States.
Domestic inshell pecans are routinely
exported to Mexico, shelled, and
imported into the United States as
shelled pecans. The intent of the Order
is not to double assess such pecans. For
pecans produced in the United States,
shipped to locations outside the United
States for shelling, and imported back
into the United States, assessments
would be owed on the pecans produced
in the United States and would be
remitted by the first handler. If
assessments are being collected through
Customs, the importer would need to
request a refund from the Board and
provide proof that assessments had been
previously remitted by the first handler.
For importers who remit assessments
directly to the Board, the importers
would have to provide documentation
that assessments had been paid by the
first handler. As an example, if producer
A, acting as its own first handler,
exports 100,000 pounds of inshell
pecans to Mexico to be shelled, that
individual would be required to remit to
the Board assessments owed on the
100,000 pounds of inshell pecans. When
Importer B imports the 50,000 pounds
of shelled pecans, the importer would
need to provide documentation that
substantiates that assessments were
remitted by the producer A.
Section 1223.52(e)(2) of the Order
would prescribe the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule (HTS) of the United States
categories covered under the program.
Imported commodities are assigned
codes via the HTS with the first
numbers denoting the heading, which is
a broad description of the commodity,
and the subsequent numbers denoting
the subheadings, which specify the
commodity in greater detail. In the
event an HTS number subject to
assessment changed and the change is
merely a replacement of a previous
number and has no impact on the
description of the pecans involved,
assessments would continue to be
collected based on the new number.
Section 1223.520 of the Order would
provide authority for the Board to
impose a late payment charge and
interest for assessments not received
within 30 calendar days of the date
assessments were due. There would be
a one-time late payment charge of five
percent of the assessments due. In
addition, there would be a one percent
per month interest charge on the
outstanding balance, including any late
payment and accrued interest. Interest
would accrue monthly until the
outstanding balance would be paid to
the Board.
De Minimis
The proposed Order would provide
an exemption to assessment of
producers whose production volume
was less than 50,000 pounds of inshell
pecans (25,000 pounds of shelled
pecans) on average for four fiscal
periods (the fiscal period for which the
exemption is claimed and the previous
three fiscal periods). The exemption
would also apply to importers whose
import volume was less than 50,000
pounds of inshell pecans (25,000
pounds of shelled pecans) on average
for four fiscal periods (the fiscal period
for which the exemption is claimed and
the previous three fiscal periods). The
Federal Marketing Order (FMO)
regulating the handling of pecans
defines a producer or grower as one who
produces ‘‘a minimum of 50,000 pounds
of inshell pecans’’ or who owns ‘‘a
minimum of 30 pecan acres’’. Record
evidence in the 2015 FMO promulgation
hearings—including witness testimonies
and a study entitled ‘‘Economic
Analysis of the Implementation of a
Federal Marketing Order for Pecans’’—
verified that 50,000 pounds of inshell
pecans or 30 pecan acres was an
acceptable threshold for distinguishing
a commercial pecan producer from a
hobby farmer.
This proposal prescribes an average of
four fiscal periods of production or
imports to determine whether an entity
is subject to assessment. For quantifying
the number of domestic producers of
pecans, data from the 2017 Census of
Agriculture, representing a single year,
is the best resource available to USDA.
Regarding importers, USDA used a six-
year average instead of a four-year
average to maintain consistency across
analyses in this proposal. Finally, all
data used in this analysis is reflective of
a calendar year, not a fiscal year. NASS,
who publishes the Census of
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:29 Sep 21, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\22SEP2.SGM 22SEP2
59622
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 184 / Tuesday, September 22, 2020 / Proposed Rules
Agriculture, reports data on a calendar
year basis. USDA analyzed Customs
data by calendar year for consistency
with NASS. In 2017, NASS estimated
pecan production for 12 states. Every
five years, following the Census of
Agriculture, NASS reviews production
for each commodity and evaluates the
inclusion of states in its annual
estimating program.
To determine the number of domestic
producers that would be assessed or
exempt from assessment, USDA first
estimated the minimum number of acres
required to produce 50,000 pounds,
inshell, of pecans for 12 states. To
accomplish this, USDA divided the de
minimis threshold of 50,000 pounds,
inshell, by the 2017 yield estimates for
each of the 12 states. These yield
estimates, along with the resulting
minimum number of acres to produce
50,000 pounds, inshell, of pecans are
shown in Table 9. Next, USDA used
each state’s minimum number of acres
to find the number of operations that
had pecan bearing acreage that would
enable them to produce at least 50,000
pounds, inshell, of pecans, based on
data from the 2017 Census of
Agriculture.
Table 10 depicts the number of
producers and importers that would be
assessed and exempt from assessment
under the de minimis threshold of
50,000 pounds, inshell, of pecans.
According to the 2017 Census of
Agriculture, there were 15,608
operations with bearing acreage of
pecans in the U.S. in 2017. Based on
data from Customs and Border
Protection (Customs), there were 190
entities that imported shelled or inshell
pecans between 2014 and 2019. USDA
estimates that of the total 15,798
producers and importers of pecans,
1,061, or seven percent, would be
assessed and 14,737, or 93 percent,
would be exempt from assessment.
USDA seeks comment on whether this
de minimis provides a good
representation of the industry for
assessments collected and board
representation.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:29 Sep 21, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4725 E:\FR\FM\22SEP2.SGM 22SEP2
EP22SE20.033</GPH> EP22SE20.034</GPH>
Table
9.
2017
State
Yield
and
Minimum
Acreage
for
Assessment
Min.
Acres
for
State
Yield
50,000
Lbs.
(Inshell)
Alabama
220
227
Arizona
1,750
29
Arkansas
257
195
Florida
302
166
Georgia
892
56
Louisiana
650
77
Mississippi
310
161
Missouri
267
187
New
Mexico
2,115
24
North
Carolina
242
207
Oklahoma
163
307
Texas
426
117
Source:
NASS.
Table
10.
Entities
Exempt
and
Assessed
at
De
Minimis
Threshold
Entities
Total
Assessed
Exempt
Producers
1
15,608
990
14,618
Importers
2
190
71
119
Total
15,798
1,061
14,737
Sources:
1NASS,
2017;
2
Customs
and
Border
Protection,
2014-2019
average.
59623
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 184 / Tuesday, September 22, 2020 / Proposed Rules
2
For quantifying the number of domestic
producers of pecans, data from the 2017 Census of
Agriculture, representing a single year, is the best
resource available to USDA. The Census of
Agriculture is only published every five years.
Regarding importers, USDA used a six-year average
to maintain consistency across analyses in this
proposal.
3
In its proposal, NPF estimated that 4,300
growers would be subject to assessment under this
proposed Order, and that assessment revenue
would range from $10.5 million to $11.6 million.
The variance in the number of assessed growers and
the amount of assessment revenue estimated by
USDA and by NPF is due to differing methods of
analysis, and different assumptions made.
Using NASS data, USDA estimates
2017 pecan production to amount to
more than 316 million pounds, inshell.
Customs data shows total imports of
shelled and inshell pecans to average
244.5 million pounds, on an inshell
basis, from 2014 to 2019.
2
Together,
total volume of pecans in the U.S.
market is almost 561 million pounds,
inshell, as shown in Table 11. Assessed
volume amounts to 251 million pounds,
inshell, for producers and 244 million
pounds, inshell, for importers. Total
assessed volume multiplied by the
assessment rate of $0.02 per pound of
inshell pecans (equivalent to $0.04 per
pound of shelled pecans) results in a
total assessment revenue of nearly $10
million.
3
In addition to the proposed
exemption of 50,000 pounds of pecans
on an inshell basis or 25,000 pounds of
pecans on a shelled basis, USDA
considered other options for a de
minimis threshold. First, USDA
considered a de minimis exemption for
growers with less than 30 acres of
pecans, aligning with one of the
definitions of producer or grower in the
FMO. A de minimis exemption of less
than 30 acres could not apply to pecan
importers, and therefore would not be
fairly applied to all those subject to the
program. Thus, this exemption is not
contained in this proposal.
In the pecan FMO, handlers who
handle at least 1,000 pounds of pecans,
on an inshell basis, are subject to
assessment. If this de minimis
exemption of less than 1,000 pounds of
pecans, on an inshell basis, were
applied to pecan growers, then about 50
percent of growers would be subject to
assessment. Of these assessed growers,
nearly half would operate between 5
and 15 bearing acres of pecans, therefore
placing a significant burden on smaller
growers to fund the program. Thus, this
exemption is not contained in this
proposal.
Finally, USDA considered a de
minimis exemption which mirrors the
definition of a small pecan grower and
small pecan importer according to the
Small Business Administration (SBA).
The SBA size standard for a small pecan
grower is annual sales receipts of no
more than $1 million. The SBA size
standard for small pecan importer
(equivalent to ‘‘Postharvest crop
activities’’) is annual receipts equal to
no more than $30 million. Tying the de
minimis exemption to these differing
SBA size standards becomes
problematic when considering equitable
contributions to the proposed program.
This is true not only when evaluating
contributions from each sector but also
within the respective sectors. A de
minimis exemption tied to annual sales
receipts may overly burden growers and
importers who produce or import high
annual sales receipts of pecans.
AMS seeks comments on the
proposed de minimis exemption,
particularly on whether the proposed
level is appropriate to ensure equitable
contribution and representation from
both domestic producers and importers,
or if modification to the exemption level
is needed. Please provide data to
substantiate any recommendation.
Exemptions
The proposed Order would provide
for two exemptions. First, as described
in the previous section, producers who
produce domestically and importers
that import less than 50,000 pounds of
inshell pecans (25,000 pounds of
shelled pecans) on average for four
fiscal periods (the fiscal period for
which the exemption is claimed and the
previous three fiscal periods) would be
exempt.
Producers or importers seeking an
exemption would apply to the Board for
an exemption prior to the start of the
fiscal period. This would be an annual
exemption; entities would have to
reapply each year. They would have to
certify that they expect to produce
domestically or import less than 50,000
pounds of inshell pecans (25,000
pounds of shelled pecans) on average
for four fiscal periods (the fiscal period
for which the exemption is claimed and
the previous three fiscal periods). The
Board could request documentation to
support the exemption claim, such as
past sales or import data. The Board
would then issue, if deemed
appropriate, a certificate of exemption
to the eligible producer or importer.
Producers and importers who
received an exemption but domestically
produced or imported more than 50,000
pounds of inshell pecans (25,000
pounds of shelled pecans) on average
for four fiscal periods (the fiscal period
for which the exemption is claimed and
the previous three fiscal periods) during
the fiscal period would be obligated to
pay the applicable assessments.
Producers and importers who are
exempt from assessments would be
eligible for a refund of assessments
collected. Requests for assessment
refunds would be submitted to the
Board within 90 days of the last day of
the fiscal period when assessments were
collected. The Board would refund such
assessments no later than 60 calendar
days after receipt of information
justifying the exemption.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:29 Sep 21, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\22SEP2.SGM 22SEP2
EP22SE20.035</GPH>
Table
11.
Estimated
Volume
and
Assessment
Revenue
Entities
Volume
(Lbs.,
Inshell
Basis)
Assessment
Total
Assessed
Revenue
Producers
1
316,171,267
251,309,740
$
5,026,195
Importers
2
244,539,780 243,662,767
$
4,873,255
Total
560,711,047
494,972,508
$
9,899,450
Sources:
1NASS,
2017;
2
Customs
and
Border
Protection,
2014-2019
average.
59624
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 184 / Tuesday, September 22, 2020 / Proposed Rules
The Board could develop additional
procedures to administer the exemption
as appropriate. Such procedures would
be implemented through rulemaking by
the Secretary.
The second exemption under the
proposed Order would be for organic
pecans. Under section 501 of the
Federal Agriculture Improvement and
Reform Act of 1996 (FAIR Act) (7 U.S.C.
7401), a producer who operates under
an approved National Organic Program
(NOP) (7 CFR part 205) system plan, and
domestically produces pecans that are
certified ‘‘organic’’ or ‘‘100 percent
organic’’ (as defined in the NOP) would
be eligible for exemption. The
exemption would apply to all certified
‘‘organic’’ or ‘‘100 percent organic’’
pecans regardless of whether the pecans
are produced by a person who produces
conventional or nonorganic pecans.
Likewise, an importer who imports
pecans that are certified as ‘‘organic’’ or
‘‘100 percent organic’’ under the NOP,
or certified as ‘‘organic’’ or ‘‘100 percent
organic’’ under a U.S. equivalency
arrangement established under the NOP,
would be exempt from the payment of
assessments.
Refunds From Escrow Account
Pursuant to section 517 of the 1996
Act, § 1223.54 of the proposed Order
would specify the refund procedures if
the initial referendum does not pass.
The NPF has proposed that the
proposed Order be voted in a
referendum of producers and importers
no later than three years after
assessments first begin under the Order.
The Board shall establish an interest
bearing escrow account with a financial
institution that is a member of the
Federal Reserve System and would
deposit into such account an amount
equal to ten percent of the assessments
collected during the period beginning
on the effective date of the Order and
ending on the date the Secretary
announces the results of the required
referendum.
If the required referendum fails, the
Board shall promptly pay refunds of
assessments to all producers and
importers that have paid assessments
during the period beginning on the
effective date of the Order and ending
on the date the Secretary announces the
results of the required referendum in the
manner specified in the proposed Order.
Producers and importers shall notify the
Board, in a manner specified by the
Secretary, within 60 days after the
announcement of the referendum of
their demand to receive a refund.
If the amount deposited in the escrow
account is less than the amount of all
refunds that producers and importers
subject to the Order have a right to
receive, the Board shall prorate the
amount deposited in such account
among all producers and importers who
desire a refund of assessments paid no
later than 90 days after the required
referendum results are announced by
the Secretary.
If the proposed Order is approved by
the required referendum conducted
under this section, the Board would
close the escrow account and all funds
would be available to the Board under
§ 1223.50.
Promotion, Research and Information
Pursuant to section 516 of the 1996
Act, §§ 1223.55 through 1223.57 of the
proposed Order would detail
requirements regarding promotion,
research and information programs,
plans and projects authorized under the
Order. The Board would develop and
submit to the Secretary for approval
programs, plans and projects regarding
promotion, research, education, and
other activities, including consumer and
industry information and advertising
designed to, among other things,
maintain and expand markets for
pecans, and develop new uses for
pecans. The Board would be required to
evaluate each plan and program to
ensure that it contributes to an effective
promotion program. The Order would
also require that, at least once every five
years, the Board fund an independent
evaluation of the effectiveness of the
Order and programs conducted by the
Board.
Finally, the Order would specify that
any patents, copyrights, trademarks,
inventions, product formulations and
publications developed through the use
of funds received by the Board would be
the property of the U.S. Government, as
represented by the Board. These along
with any rents, royalties and the like
from their use would be considered
income subject to the same fiscal,
budget, and audit controls as other
funds of the Board, and could be
licensed with approval of the Secretary.
Reports, Books and Records
Pursuant to section 515 of the 1996
Act, §§ 1223.60 through 1223.62 specify
the reporting and recordkeeping
requirements under the proposed Order
as well as requirements regarding
confidentiality of information.
Producers and first handlers would be
required to submit periodically to the
Board certain information as the Board
may request. Since first handlers would
be obligated to collect and remit
assessments owed to the Board, the first
handlers would be required to submit a
report at the time assessments are
remitted. Producers who are acting as
their own first handler would also be
required to submit a report at the time
assessments are remitted. Specifically,
the report submitted to the Board would
include, but is not be limited to, the
producer and handlers’ name, address,
and telephone number; the pounds
produced or handled; and the pounds of
pecans for which assessments were
paid. Producers who received a
certificate of exemption from the Board
would not have to submit such a report
to the Board.
Likewise, importers who pay their
assessments directly to the Board would
be required to submit a report to the
Board that would include, but not be
limited to, the importer’s name, address,
and telephone number; the pounds of
pecans imported to the United States;
the pounds of pecans for which
assessments were paid. Importers would
submit this report at the same time they
remit their assessments to the Board.
Importers who paid their assessments
through Customs would not have to
submit such reports because Customs
would collect this information upon
entry.
Additionally, producers, first
handlers and importers including those
who were exempt, would be required to
maintain books and records needed to
verify any required reports. Such books
and records would be required to be
made available during normal business
hours for inspection by the Board’s or
USDA’s employees or agents. Producers,
first handlers, and importers would be
required to maintain such books and
records for three years beyond the
applicable fiscal period.
The Order would also require that all
information obtained from persons
subject to the Order as a result of
proposed recordkeeping and reporting
requirements would be kept
confidential by all officers, employees,
and agents of the Board and USDA.
Such information could only be
disclosed if the Secretary considered it
relevant, and the information were
revealed in a judicial proceeding or
administrative hearing brought at the
direction or at the request of the
Secretary or to which the Secretary or
any officer of USDA were a party. Other
exceptions for disclosure of confidential
information would include the issuance
of general statements based on reports
or on information relating to a number
of persons subject to the Order, if the
statements did not identify the
information furnished by any person, or
the publication, by direction of the
Secretary, of the name of any person
violating the Order and a statement of
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:29 Sep 21, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\22SEP2.SGM 22SEP2
59625
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 184 / Tuesday, September 22, 2020 / Proposed Rules
the particular provisions of the Order
violated.
Miscellaneous Provisions
Referenda
Pursuant to section 518 of the 1996
Act, § 1223.71(a)(1) of the proposed
Order specifies that the program would
be implemented, and a referendum
conducted not later than three years
after assessments first begin under the
Order. The Order would continue if
approved by a majority of producers and
importers voting in the referendum
who, during a representative period
determined by the Secretary, were
engaged in the production or
importation of pecans into the United
States.
Section 1223.71(b) of the proposed
Order specifies criteria for subsequent
referenda. Under the Order, a
referendum would be held to ascertain
whether the program should continue,
be amended, or terminated. This section
specifies that a referendum would be
held every seven years to determine
whether producers and importers favor
continuation of the Order. The Order
would continue if favored by a majority
of producers and importers voting in the
referendum. Additionally, a referendum
could be conducted at the request of the
Board. A referendum could also be
conducted at the request of 10 percent
or more of the number of persons
eligible to vote in a referendum under
the Order. Finally, a referendum could
be conducted at any time as determined
by the Secretary.
Other Miscellaneous Provisions
Sections 1223.70 and 1223.72 through
1223.78 describe the rights of the
Secretary; authorize the Secretary to
suspend or terminate the Order when
deemed appropriate; prescribe
proceedings after termination; address
personal liability, separability, and
amendments; and provide OMB control
numbers. These provisions are common
to all research and promotion program
authorized under the 1996 Act.
Referenda Procedures
Sections 1223.100 through 1223.107
of the proposed Order would specify
procedures for the conduct of referenda.
The sections cover the definitions,
voting instructions, use of subagents,
ballots, the referendum report, and
confidentiality of information.
Producers and importers eligible to vote
in the referenda would mean any
person, during the representative
period, that was subject to the Order.
Each eligible producer or importer
would be entitled to cast only one
ballot. USDA would conduct the
referenda. USDA would announce the
voting period; mail ballots to eligible
producers and importers; tabulate the
results; prepare a report; and announce
the results to the public. The ballots and
other information or reports that would
disclose any person’s vote would be
held confidential. The procedures
would be applicable for the initial
referendum and future referenda.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to the requirements set forth
in the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601–612), USDA has considered
the economic impact of this action on
small entities. USDA has prepared this
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis,
the purpose of which is to fit regulatory
actions to the scale of businesses subject
to such actions in order that small
businesses would not be unduly or
disproportionately burdened.
Need for Regulation
NPF stated in its proposal that the
greatest challenge facing the pecan
industry is supply outpacing demand.
Based on worldwide planting and crop
data, NPF estimates that supply would
exceed demand by 15 percent in 2027.
NPF believes that the establishment of
a national research and promotion
program for pecans, funded by
assessments on both domestic producers
and importers, would help the industry
address this challenge.
In 2016, the U.S. pecan industry
favored the establishment of a marketing
order for pecans grown in Alabama,
Arkansas, Arizona, California, Florida,
Georgia, Kansas, Louisiana, Missouri,
Mississippi, North Carolina, New
Mexico, Oklahoma, South Carolina, and
Texas. The program authorizes
collection of industry data; research and
promotion activities; regulations on
grade, size, quality, pack and container;
and is financed by assessments paid by
handlers of pecans grown in the
production area. Over the past several
years, the marketing order program has
launched marketing campaigns to
increase demand for pecans.
According to the NPF, the proposed
research and promotion program will
benefit domestic producers and
importers of pecans, thereby justifying
the collection of assessments on both
domestic production and imports. The
NPF proposal indicates that imported
product accounts for approximately 39
percent of pecans being supplied to the
United States. With mandatory
assessments applied to both domestic
production and imports, the proposed
Order would be able to fund marketing
campaigns focused on creating
increased demand for pecans in the
United States and globally. The NPF
concluded that the marketing order
would continue to have an important
role within the industry and the intent
is that the two programs would work
together for the benefit of the entire
pecan industry. The research and
promotion program would concentrate
its efforts on activities that would
maintain and expand markets for
pecans, strengthening its position in the
marketplace. The marketing order
would continue its primary
responsibility of collection and
distribution of industry data to
empower stakeholders with accurate
and timely information. Additionally,
the marketing order provides the
authority for the pecan industry to
recommend on grade, size, quality, pack
and container requirements.
Objectives of the Action
The purpose of the program would be
to strengthen the position of pecans in
the marketplace, maintain and expand
markets for pecans, and develop new
uses for pecans.
Legal Basis for Action
The proposed Order is authorized
under the 1996 Act which authorizes
USDA to establish agricultural
commodity research and promotion
orders which may include a
combination of promotion, research,
industry information, and consumer
information activities funded by
mandatory assessments. These programs
are designed to maintain and expand
markets and uses for agricultural
commodities.
USDA currently administers a
marketing order for pecans grown in
Alabama, Arkansas, Arizona, California,
Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Louisiana,
Missouri, Mississippi, North Carolina,
New Mexico, Oklahoma, South
Carolina, and Texas which is authorized
under the Agricultural Marketing
Agreement Act of 1937. The purpose of
marketing orders, in general, is to
stabilize market conditions, allowing
industries to work together to solve
marketing problem, improving
profitability. Marketing order programs’
mandatory assessments are paid by
handlers within the designated
production areas. The pecan marketing
order authorizes collection of industry
data; research and promotion activities;
regulations on grade, size, quality, pack
and container; and is financed by
assessments paid by handlers of pecans
grown in the production area.
The proposed pecan research and
promotion program is national in scope,
financed by an assessment on pecan
producers and importers, and authorizes
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:29 Sep 21, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\22SEP2.SGM 22SEP2
59626
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 184 / Tuesday, September 22, 2020 / Proposed Rules
research and promotion activities. The
purpose of the proposed Order would be
to strengthen the position of pecans in
the marketplace, maintain and expand
markets for pecans, and develop new
uses for pecans. USDA has not
identified any relevant Federal rules
that duplicate, overlap, or conflict with
this proposed rule.
Potentially Affected Small Entities
In 13 CFR part 121, the Small
Business Administration (SBA) defines
the threshold at which an operation
would be considered ‘‘small’’ based on
its North American Industry
Classification System (NAICS) Code. For
Tree Nut Farming operations (NAICS
Code 111335) and Fruit and Tree Nut
Combination Farming operations
(NAICS Code 111336), an operation is
considered to be ‘‘small’’ if its annual
receipts total no more than $1 million.
This standard applies to U.S. pecan
producers.
Importers and first handlers of inshell
and shelled pecans (HTS Codes
0802901000 and 0802901500,
respectively) belong to the industry
classification of Postharvest Crop
Activities (NAICS Code 115114).
‘‘Postharvest crop activities’’ include
nut hulling and shelling, sorting,
grading, packing, and cooling. An
operation that meets this definition is
considered to be ‘‘small’’, per the SBA,
if its annual receipts equal no more than
$30 million. Table 12 depicts the
number of pecan producers, importers,
and handlers that would be considered
small under these SBA standards.
According to the 2017 Census of
Agriculture, published by NASS in
2019, there were 15,608 farms with
pecan bearing acreage. Of these 15,608
farms, 440 sold pecans whose market
value met or exceeded $1 million. Based
on these figures, 97 percent of U.S.
pecan producers are considered to be
‘‘small’’ under the SBA standards.
USDA recognizes the potential
inclusion in its count of ‘‘small’’ farms
those farms whose sales of pecans were
exactly $1 million in market value;
however, USDA lacks the data to
remedy this, and the number of farms
who meet this criterion is likely quite
small.
According to data from Customs,
there were 190 importers of inshell and
shelled pecans from 2014 to 2019. Of
these, four importers had a six-year
average sales value of pecans which
exceeded $30 million. The portion of
pecan importers that would be
considered to be ‘‘small’’ under the SBA
standards, therefore, is 98 percent.
The definition of a ‘‘small’’ importer
also applies to a first handler; that is,
annual receipts which exceed $30
million. According to the American
Pecan Council (APC), there were 104
first handlers who reported pecans
handled in crop year 2018. Of these, the
APC estimates that about 75 percent
recorded annual receipts exceeding $30
million.
Of the 15,902 total entities expected
to be impacted by this action, including
producers, importers, and first handlers,
about 97 percent would be considered
to be ‘‘small’’ according to their
respective SBA size standards.
Compliance Requirements
This proposal would impose a
reporting and recordkeeping burden on
producers, importers, and first handlers
of pecans. Producers and importers who
domestically produce or import less
than 50,000 pounds of inshell pecans
(25,000 pounds of shelled pecans) on
average for four fiscal periods (the fiscal
period for which the exemption is
claimed and the previous three fiscal
periods) could submit to the Board an
application for exemption from paying
assessments. Of the 15,168 domestic
producers considered to be small under
SBA standards, 14,618 of them, or 96
percent, produced less than 50,000
pounds, inshell, of pecans, and would
be exempt from assessment. Of the 186
importers considered to be small under
SBA standards, 119 of them, or 64
percent, imported less than 50,000
pounds, inshell of pecans, and would
also be exempt from assessment. The
reporting and recordkeeping burden to
file an application for exemption from
assessment would impact a total of
14,737 producers and importers
considered to be small under their
respective SBA size standards.
Importers, and first handlers, who
collect the assessments from producers,
would be required to file a report listing
pecans imported or received from each
producer. This report would place a
reporting and recordkeeping burden on
a total of 149 importers and first
handlers considered to be small under
their SBA size standard of annual
receipts of no more than $30 million.
These forms are being submitted to
OMB for approval under OMB Control
No. 0581–NEW. Specific burdens for the
forms are detailed later in this
document in the section titled
Paperwork Reduction Act. As with all
Federal promotion programs, reports
and forms are periodically reviewed to
reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public
sector agencies.
Alternatives To Minimize Impacts of
the Rule
Regarding alternatives, USDA
considered de minimis exemptions of
30 acres of pecans, 1,000 pounds,
inshell, of pecan volume, and $1 million
in annual pecan sales receipts. These
alternatives, which are fully discussed
in the section titled De Minimis, were
rejected in favor of the industry-
proposed de minimis exemption of
50,000 pounds, inshell, or 25,000
pounds, shelled. USDA also considered
the alternative of no action; that is, the
status quo. This alternative, however,
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:29 Sep 21, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\22SEP2.SGM 22SEP2
EP22SE20.036</GPH>
Table
12.
Entities
Considered
Small
According
to
SBA
Size
Standards
Entities
Total
Small
Large
Producers
1
15,608
15,168
440
Importers
2
190
186
4
Handlers
3
104
78
26
Total
15,902 15,432
470
Sources:
1
NASS
2017
Census
of
Agriculture;
2
Customs
and
Border
Protection,
2014-2019
average;
3
American
Pecan
Council,
2018
crop
year.
Notes:
1
Small
is
annual
receipts
no
greater
than
$1
million;
2'3
Small
is
annual
receipts
no
greater
than
$30
million.
59627
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 184 / Tuesday, September 22, 2020 / Proposed Rules
would leave the pecan industry without
the tools of a research and promotion
program to strengthen the position of
pecans in the marketplace, maintain and
expand markets for pecans, and develop
new uses for pecans. In place of a
research and promotion program, the
NPF discussed amending the
Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act
of 1937, which provides authority for
the pecan marketing order. The NPF
stated in its proposal for a pecan
research and promotion program that it
decided not to move forward with this
alternative due to the time and costs
involved in amending U.S. law.
Outreach
Regarding outreach efforts, NPF
conducted sessions earlier in 2020
throughout the United States in
different States and regions. Many were
held in conjunction with regional and
state organization meetings where both
pecan producers and importers
participated. They also presented at the
National Pecan Shellers Association
(NPSA) mid-winter conference. NPSA
supports and promotes the interest of
pecan shellers and the global industry.
Approximately 13 sessions were held
across the United States. NPF also had
information regarding the proposed
program published in April 2020
editions of the ‘‘The Pecan Grower’’ and
‘‘Pecan South’’ magazines. ‘‘The Pecan
Grower’’ is the official publication of the
Georgia Pecan Growers Association,
with nearly three-thousand subscribers
including growers, researchers,
extension agents and agribusinesses.
‘‘Pecan South’’ is a magazine for
growers, processors, commercial
vendors, and those interested in pecans.
It provides to its forty-six hundred plus
subscribers U.S. pecan production
information; industry news and events;
and market-related issues, both
domestic and international. In the
articles, NPF elaborated the work it has
been doing to establish a research and
promotion program for pecans that
would assess producers and importers.
AMS is committed to complying with
the E-Government Act, to promote the
use of the internet and other
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), AMS announces its
intention to request an approval of a
new information collection and
recordkeeping requirements for the
proposed pecan program.
Title: Advisory Committee or
Research and Promotion Background
Information.
OMB Number for background form
AD–755: (Approved under OMB No.
0505–0001).
Expiration Date of Approval: 03/31/
2022.
Title: National Research, Promotion,
and Consumer Information Programs.
Expiration Date of Approval: 3 years
from approval date.
Type of Request: New information
collection for research and promotion
programs.
Abstract: The information collection
requirements in the request are essential
to carry out the intent of the 1996 Act.
The information collection concerns a
proposal received by USDA for a
national research and promotion
program for the pecan industry. The
program would be financed by an
assessment on pecan producers and
importers and would be administered
by a board of industry members selected
by the Secretary. The program would
provide for an exemption for producers
who produce domestically and
importers that import less than 50,000
pounds of inshell pecans (25,000
pounds of shelled pecans) on average
for four fiscal periods (the fiscal period
for which the exemption is claimed and
the previous three fiscal periods). A
referendum would be held among
eligible producers and importers to
determine whether they favor
implementation of the program not later
than three years after assessments first
begin under the Order. The purpose of
the program would be to strengthen the
position of pecans in the marketplace,
maintain and expand markets for
pecans, and develop new uses for
pecans within the United States.
In summary, the information
collection requirements under the
program concern Board nominations,
exemption applications, the collection
and refund of assessments, and
referenda. For Board nominations,
producers and importers interested in
serving on the Board would be asked to
submit a ‘‘Nomination Form’’ to the
Board indicating their desire to serve or
to nominate another industry member to
serve on the Board. Interested persons
could also submit a background
statement outlining qualifications to
serve on the Board. Except for the initial
Board nominations, producers and
importers would have the opportunity
to submit a ‘‘Nomination Ballot’’ to the
Board where they would vote for
candidates to serve on the Board.
Nominees would also have to submit a
background information form, ‘‘AD–
755,’’ to the Secretary to ensure they are
qualified to serve on the Board.
Organizations representing importers
would be able to be certified by the
Secretary and have an opportunity to
nominate importer members. Those
such organizations would submit form
‘‘Application for Certification of
Organization.’’
Regarding assessments, producers and
importers who domestically produce
and import less than 50,000 pounds of
inshell pecans (25,000 pounds of
shelled pecans) on average for four
fiscal periods (the fiscal period for
which the exemption is claimed and the
previous three fiscal periods), would be
exempt from assessments. Producers or
importers would apply to the Board for
an exemption prior to the start of the
fiscal period. This would be an annual
exemption; entities would have to
reapply each year. Producers or
importers could submit a request,
‘‘Application for Exemption from
Assessments,’’ to the Board for an
exemption from paying assessments.
Producers and importers who would
qualify as ‘‘organic’’ or ‘‘100 percent
organic’’ under the NOP could submit
an ‘‘Organic Exemption Form’’ to the
Board and request an exemption from
assessments.
First handlers who receive
assessments from producers would be
asked to submit a ‘‘First Handler/
Importer Report’’ that would accompany
their assessments paid to the Board and
report the quantity of pecans received
during the applicable period, the
quantity for which assessments were
paid, contact information for whom they
collected the assessment, and the
country of export (for imports).
Additionally, only importers who pay
their assessments directly to the Board
would be required to submit a report. As
previously mentioned, the majority of
importer assessments would be
collected by Customs. Customs would
remit the funds to the Board and the
other information would be available
from Customs (i.e., country of export,
quantity of pecans imported).
Importers and producers who are
exempt and whose assessments were
collected, either by Customs or a first
handler, could also request a refund of
any assessments paid to the Board.
Producers and importers would also file
a form to request a refund of
assessments paid if the referendum fails
to pass. A referendum is proposed to be
conducted three years after the
assessments first begin to determine if
producers and importers favor
continuance of the Order.
Lastly, producers and importers
eligible to vote in a referendum would
have to complete a ballot to determine
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:29 Sep 21, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\22SEP2.SGM 22SEP2
59628
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 184 / Tuesday, September 22, 2020 / Proposed Rules
whether the research and promotion
program would continue.
Information collection requirements
that are included in this proposal
include:
(1) Nomination Form
Estimate of Burden: Public
recordkeeping burden for this collection
of information is estimated to average
0.25 hour per application.
Respondents: Producers and
importers.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
50.
Estimated Number of Responses per
Respondent: 1.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on
Respondents: 12.5 hours.
(2) Background Statement
Estimate of Burden: Public
recordkeeping burden for this collection
of information is estimated to average
0.25 hour per application.
Respondents: Producers and
importers.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
50.
Estimated Number of Responses per
Respondent: 1.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on
Respondents: 12.5 hours.
(3) Nomination Ballot
Estimate of Burden: Public
recordkeeping burden for this collection
of information is estimated to average
0.25 hour per application.
Respondents: Producers and
importers.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
900.
Estimated Number of Responses per
Respondent: 1.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on
Respondents: 225 hours.
(4) Background Information FormAD–
755 (OMB Form No. 0505–0001)
Estimate of Burden: Public reporting
for this collection of information is
estimated to average 0.5 hour per
response for each Board nominee.
Respondents: Producers and
importers.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 11
(34 for initial nominations to the Board,
0 for the second year, and up to 11
annually thereafter).
Estimated Number of Responses per
Respondent: 1 every 3 years. (0.3)
Estimated Total Annual Burden on
Respondents: 17 hours for the initial
nominations to the Board, 0 hours for
the second year of operation, and up to
5.5 hours annually thereafter.
(5) Application for Certification of
Organization
Estimate of Burden: Public reporting
burden for this collection of information
is estimated to average 0.25 hour.
Respondents: Importer organizations.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 5.
Estimated Number of Responses per
Respondent: 1.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on
Respondents: 2.5 hours.
(6) Application for Exemption From
Assessments
Estimate of Burden: Public reporting
burden for this collection of information
is estimated to average 0.25 hour per
producers or importer reporting on
pecans produced domestically or
imported. Upon approval of an
application, producers and importers
would receive exemption certification.
Respondents: Producers and
importers who produce or import less
than 50,000 pounds of inshell pecans
(25,000 pounds of shelled pecans) on
average for four fiscal periods (the fiscal
period for which the exemption is
claimed and the previous three fiscal
periods).
Estimated Number of Respondents:
14,737.
Estimated Number of Responses per
Respondent: 1.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on
Respondents: 3,684 hours.
(7) Organic Exemption Form
Estimate of Burden: Public
recordkeeping burden for this collection
of information is estimated to average
0.5 hours per exemption form.
Respondents: Organic producers and
importers.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
50.
Estimated Number of Responses per
Respondent: 1.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on
Respondents: 25 hours.
(8) First Handler/Importer Report
Estimate of Burden: Public reporting
burden for this collection of information
is estimated to average 0.5 hour per first
handler or importer.
Respondents: First handlers who
collect assessments from producers who
produce over 50,000 pounds of inshell
pecans (25,000 pounds of shelled
pecans) on average for four fiscal
periods (the fiscal period for which the
exemption is claimed and the previous
three fiscal periods) and importers that
do not remit through Customs.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
175.
Estimated Number of Responses per
Respondent: 12.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on
Respondents: 1,050 hours.
(9) Application for Reimbursement of
Assessments
Estimate of Burden: Public reporting
burden for this collection of information
is estimated to average 0.25 hour.
Respondents: Producers and
importers.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
170.
Estimated Number of Responses per
Respondent: 1.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on
Respondents: 42.5 hours.
(10) Application for Refund of
Assessments Paid From Escrow
Estimate of Burden: Public reporting
burden for this collection of information
is estimated to average 0.25 hour.
Respondents: Producers and
importers.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
900.
Estimated Number of Responses per
Respondent: 1.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on
Respondents: 225 hours.
(11) Referendum Ballot
Estimate of Burden: Public reporting
burden for this collection of information
is estimated to average 0.25 hour.
Respondents: Producers and
importers.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
900.
Estimated Number of Responses per
Respondent: 0.14 (after first referendum
they would occur once every 7 years).
Estimated Total Annual Burden on
Respondents: 31.50 hours.
(12) A Requirement To Maintain
Records Sufficient To Verify Reports
Submitted Under the Order
Estimate of Burden: Public
recordkeeping burden for keeping this
information is estimated to average 0.5
hours per record keeper maintaining
such records.
Recordkeepers: Producers, first
handlers and importers.
Estimated number of recordkeepers:
15,902.
Estimated total recordkeeping hours:
7,951 hours.
As noted above, under the proposed
program, producers through first
handlers, and importers would be
required to pay assessments and file
reports with and submit assessments to
the Board (importers through Customs).
While the proposed Order would
impose certain recordkeeping
requirements on producers, first
handlers, and importers, information
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:29 Sep 21, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\22SEP2.SGM 22SEP2
59629
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 184 / Tuesday, September 22, 2020 / Proposed Rules
required under the proposed Order
could be compiled from records
currently maintained. Such records
shall be retained for at least three years
beyond the fiscal period of their
applicability.
An estimated 15,902 respondents
would provide information to the Board
(15,608 producers, 104 first handlers,
and 190 importers). The estimated cost
of providing the information to the
Board by respondents would be
$630,994. This total has been estimated
by multiplying 13,278.5 hours by
($36.08 hourly wage × 0.317 benefits =
$11.44 (benefits) + $36.08 (wage) =
$47.52), $47.52 for the average mean
hourly earnings of producers and
importers plus benefits.
Data for computation of the hourly
rate for producers (Occupation Code 11–
9013: Farmers, Ranchers, and other
Agricultural Managers = $38.63) and
importers (Occupation Code 13–1020:
Buyers and Purchasing Agents = $33.53)
was obtained from the U.S. Department
of Labor’s Bureau of Labor Statistics.
The average of the producer and
importer wages is $36.08. Data for
computation of this hourly wage were
obtained from the U.S. Department of
Labor Statistics’ publication, ‘‘May 2019
National Occupation Employment and
Wage Estimates in the United States,’’
updated May 31, 2019. This publication
can also be found at the following
website: https://www.bls.gov/oes/
current/oes_nat.htm#45-0000. Data for
the benefit costs of 31.7 percent was
obtained by U.S. Department of Labor’s
Bureau of Labor Statistics press release
dated Dec. 14, 2018.
The proposed Order’s provisions have
been carefully reviewed, and every
effort has been made to minimize any
unnecessary recordkeeping costs or
requirements, including efforts to utilize
information already submitted under
other programs administered by USDA
and other state programs. USDA
currently oversees a marketing order for
pecans grown in Alabama, Arkansas,
Arizona, California, Florida, Georgia,
Kansas, Louisiana, Missouri,
Mississippi, North Carolina, New
Mexico, Oklahoma, South Carolina, and
Texas, which is authorized under the
Marketing Agricultural Agreement Act
of 1937. This program collects
information to facilitate the
administration of the program. The
information collected by the marketing
order has been carefully reviewed and it
was determined that the information
collected could not be utilized to
facilitate the administration of the
research and promotion program. The
proposed forms would require the
minimum information necessary to
effectively carry out the requirements of
the program, and their use is necessary
to fulfill the intent of the 1996 Act. Such
information can be supplied without
data processing equipment or outside
technical expertise. In addition, there
are no additional training requirements
for individuals filling out reports and
remitting assessments to the Board. The
forms would be simple, easy to
understand, and place as small a burden
as possible on the person required to file
the information.
Collecting information monthly
would coincide with normal industry
business practices. The timing and
frequency of collecting information are
intended to meet the needs of the
industry while minimizing the amount
of work necessary to fill out the required
reports. The requirement to keep
records for three years is consistent with
normal industry practices. In addition,
the information to be included on these
forms is not available from other sources
because such information relates
specifically to individual producers,
first handlers and importers who are
subject to the provisions of the 1996
Act. Therefore, there is no practical
method for collecting the required
information without the use of these
forms.
Request for Public Comment Under the
Paperwork Reduction Act
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of functions of the proposed Order and
USDA’s oversight of the proposed
Order, including whether the
information would have practical
utility; (b) the accuracy of USDA’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used; (c) the accuracy of
USDA’s estimate of the principal
producing areas in the United States for
pecans; (d) the accuracy of USDA’s
estimate of the number of producers,
first handlers and importers of pecans
that would be covered under the
program; (e) ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (f) ways
to minimize the burden of the collection
of information on those who are to
respond, including the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
Comments concerning the
information collection requirements
contained in this action should
reference OMB No. 0581–NEW. In
addition, the docket number, date, and
page number of this issue of the Federal
Register also should be referenced.
Comments should be sent to the same
addresses referenced in the
ADDRESSES
section of this rule.
OMB is required to make a decision
concerning the collection of information
contained in this rule between 30 and
60 days after publication. Therefore, a
comment to OMB is best assured of
having its full effect if OMB receives it
within 30 days of publication.
USDA made modifications to the
proponent’s proposal to conform with
other similar national research and
promotion programs implemented
under the 1996 Act.
While the proposal set forth below
has not received the approval of USDA,
it is determined that this proposed
Order is consistent with and would
effectuate the purposes of the 1996 Act.
A 60-day comment period is provided
to allow interested persons to respond
to this proposal. All written comments
received in response to this rule by the
date specified will be considered prior
to finalizing this action.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 1223
Administrative practice and
procedure, Advertising, Consumer
information, Marketing agreements,
Pecan promotion, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, it is proposed that title 7,
chapter XI of the Code of Federal
Regulations be amended by adding part
1223 to read as follows:
PART 1223—PECAN PROMOTION,
RESEARCH, AND INFORMATION
ORDER
Subpart A—Pecan Promotion, Research,
and Information Order
Definitions
Sec.
1223.1 Act.
1223.2 American Pecan Council.
1223.3 American Pecan Promotion Board.
1223.4 Conflict of interest.
1223.5 Customs or CBP.
1223.6 Department or USDA.
1223.7 First handler.
1223.8 Fiscal period.
1223.9 Importer.
1223.10 Information.
1223.11 Inshell pecans.
1223.12 Market or marketing.
1223.13 Order.
1223.14 Part and subpart.
1223.15 Pecans.
1223.16 Person.
1223.17 Producer.
1223.18 Programs, plans, and projects.
1223.19 Promotion.
1223.20 Research.
1223.21 Secretary.
1223.22 Shelled pecans.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:29 Sep 21, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00021 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\22SEP2.SGM 22SEP2
59630
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 184 / Tuesday, September 22, 2020 / Proposed Rules
1223.23 Suspend.
1223.24 Terminate.
1223.25 United States.
American Pecan Promotion Board
1223.40 Establishment and membership.
1223.41 Nominations and appointments.
1223.42 Term of office.
1223.43 Vacancies.
1223.44 Procedure.
1223.45 Compensation and reimbursement.
1223.46 Powers and duties.
1223.47 Prohibited activities.
Expenses and Assessments
1223.50 Budget and expenses.
1223.51 Financial statements.
1223.52 Assessments.
1223.53 Exemption procedures.
1223.54 Refund escrow accounts.
Promotion, Research, and Information
1223.55 Programs, plans, and projects.
1223.56 Independent evaluation.
1223.57 Patents, copyrights, trademarks,
information, publications, and product
formulations.
Reports, Books, and Records
1223.60 Reports.
1223.61 Books and records.
1223.62 Confidential treatment.
Miscellaneous
1223.70 Right of the Secretary.
1223.71 Referenda.
1223.72 Suspension and termination.
1223.73 Proceedings after termination.
1223.74 Effect of termination or
amendment.
1223.75 Personal liability.
1223.76 Separability.
1223.77 Amendments.
1223.78 OMB control numbers.
Subpart B—Referendum Procedures
1223.100 General.
1223.101 Definitions.
1223.102 Voting.
1223.103 Instructions.
1223.104 Subagents.
1223.105 Ballots.
1223.106 Referendum report.
1223.107 Confidential information.
Subpart C—Administrative Provisions
1223.520 Late payment and interest charges
for past due assessments.
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 7411–7425; 7 U.S.C.
7401.
Subpart A—Pecan Promotion,
Research, and Information Order
Definitions
§ 1223.1 Act.
Act means the Commodity Promotion,
Research, and Information Act of 1996
(7 U.S.C. 7411–7425), and any
amendments thereto.
§ 1223.2 American Pecan Council.
American Pecan Council or APC
means that governing body of the
Federal Marketing Order established
pursuant to 7 CFR part 986 unless
otherwise noted.
§ 1223.3 American Pecan Promotion
Board.
American Pecan Promotion Board or
the Board means the administrative
body established pursuant to § 1223.40.
§ 1223.4 Conflict of interest.
Conflict of interest means a situation
in which a member or employee of the
Board has a direct or indirect financial
interest in a person who performs a
service for, or enters into a contract
with, the Board for anything of
economic value.
§ 1223.5 Customs or CBP.
Customs or CBP means Customs and
Border Protection, an agency of the
United States Department of Homeland
Security.
§ 1223.6 Department or USDA.
Department or USDA means the U.S.
Department of Agriculture, or any
officer or employee of the Department to
whom authority has heretofore been
delegated, or to whom authority may
hereafter be delegated, to act in the
Secretary’s stead.
§ 1223.7 First handler.
First handler means any person who
receives, shells, cracks, accumulates,
warehouses, roasts, packs, sells,
consigns, transports, exports, or ships
(except as a common or contract carrier
of pecans owned by another person), or
in any other way puts inshell or shelled
pecans in the stream of commerce. The
term first handler includes a producer
who handles or markets pecans of the
producer’s own production.
§ 1223.8 Fiscal period.
Fiscal period means October 1 to
September 30, or such other period as
recommended by the Board and
approved by the Secretary.
§ 1223.9 Importer.
Importer means any person who
imports pecans into the United States as
a principal or as an agent, broker, or
consignee of any person who produces
or handles pecans outside of the United
States for sale in the United States, and
who is listed in the import records as
the importer of record for such pecans.
§ 1223.10 Information.
Information means information and
programs that are designed to increase
efficiency in processing and to develop
new markets, marketing strategies,
increase market efficiency, and
activities that are designed to enhance
the image of pecans on a national or
international basis. These include:
(a) Consumer information, which
means any action taken to provide
information to, and broaden the
understanding of, the general public
regarding the consumption, use,
nutritional attributes, and care of
pecans; and
(b) Industry information, which
means information and programs that
will lead to the development of new
markets, new marketing strategies, or
increased efficiency for the pecan
industry, and activities to enhance the
image of the pecan industry.
§ 1223.11 Inshell pecans.
Inshell pecans are nuts whose kernel
is maintained inside the shell.
§ 1223.12 Market or marketing.
(a) Marketing means the sale or other
disposition of pecans in any channel of
commerce.
(b) To market means to sell or
otherwise dispose of pecans in
interstate, foreign, or intrastate
commerce.
§ 1223.13 Order.
Order means an order issued by the
Secretary under section 514 of the Act
that provides for a program of generic
promotion, research, and information
regarding agricultural commodities
authorized under the Act.
§ 1223.14 Part and subpart.
This part is comprised of all rules,
regulations, and supplemental orders
issued pursuant to the Act and the
Order. The Pecan Promotion, Research,
and Information Order comprises
subpart A of this part.
§ 1223.15 Pecans.
Pecans means and includes any and
all varieties or subvarieties, inshell or
shelled, of the Genus, species: Carya
illinoinensis grown or imported into the
United States.
§ 1223.16 Person.
Person means any individual, group
of individuals, partnership, corporation,
association, cooperative, or any other
legal entity.
§ 1223.17 Producer.
Producer is synonymous with grower
and means any person engaged in the
production and sale of pecans in the
United States who owns, or who shares
in the ownership and risk of loss of such
pecans.
§ 1223.18 Programs, plans, and projects.
Programs, plans, and projects mean
those research, promotion, and
information programs, plans, or projects
established pursuant to this subpart.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:29 Sep 21, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00022 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\22SEP2.SGM 22SEP2
59631
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 184 / Tuesday, September 22, 2020 / Proposed Rules
§ 1223.19 Promotion.
Promotion means any action taken to
present a favorable image of pecans to
the general public and the food industry
for the purpose of improving the
competitive position of pecans both in
the United States and abroad and
stimulating the sale of pecans. This
includes paid advertising and public
relations.
§ 1223.20 Research.
Research means any type of test,
study, or analysis designed to advance
the image, desirability, use,
marketability, production, product
development, or quality of pecans,
including research relating to
nutritional value, cost of production,
new product development, varietal
development, nutritional value, health
research, and marketing of pecans.
§ 1223.21 Secretary.
Secretary means the Secretary of
Agriculture of the United States, or any
officer or employee of the Department to
whom authority has heretofore been
delegated, or to whom authority may
hereafter be delegated, to act in the
Secretary’s stead.
§ 1223.22 Shelled pecans.
Shelled pecans are pecans whose
shells have been removed leaving only
edible kernels, kernel pieces or pecan
meal. One pound of shelled pecans is
the equivalent of two pounds inshell
pecans.
§ 1223.23 Suspend.
Suspend means to issue a rule under
section 553 of title 5, U.S.C., to
temporarily prevent the operation of an
order or part thereof during a particular
period of time specified in the rule.
§ 1223.24 Terminate.
Terminate means to issue a rule under
section 553 of title 5, U.S.C., to cancel
permanently the operation of an order
or part thereof beginning on a date
certain specified in the rule.
§ 1223.25 United States.
United States means collectively the
50 states, the District of Columbia, the
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and the
territories and possessions of the United
States.
American Pecan Promotion Board
§ 1223.40 Establishment and membership.
(a) Establishment of the American
Pecan Promotion Board. There is hereby
established an American Pecan
Promotion Board, called the Board in
this part, comprised of seventeen (17)
members, appointed by the Secretary
from nominations as follows:
(1) Ten (10) producer members: Three
(3) each from the Eastern Region and
Central Region and four (4) from the
Western Region as follows:
(i) Eastern Region shall mean the
States of Alabama, Florida, Georgia,
North Carolina, South Carolina plus any
states in the United States, the majority
of whose land mass is in the Eastern
Time Zone, plus any U.S. territories in
the Atlantic Ocean;
(ii) Central Region shall mean the
States of Arkansas, Kansas, Louisiana,
Mississippi, Missouri, Oklahoma, Texas
plus any states in the United States, the
majority of whose land mass is in the
Central Time Zone; and
(iii) Western Region shall mean the
States of Arizona, California, New
Mexico plus any states in the United
States, the majority of whose land mass
is in the Mountain or Pacific Time
Zones, plus Alaska and Hawaii and any
U.S. territories in the Pacific Ocean.
(2) Seven (7) importers.
(b) Adjustment of membership. At
least once every five years, the Board
will review the geographical
distribution of United States production
of pecans and the quantity or value of
imports. The review will be conducted
through an audit of state crop
production and Customs figures and
Board assessment records. If warranted,
the Board will recommend to the
Secretary that the membership on the
Board be altered to reflect any changes
in the geographical distribution of
domestic pecan production and the
quantity or value of imports. If the level
of imports fluctuates versus domestic
pecan production, importer members
may be added to or reduced from the
Board.
(c) Board’s ability to serve the
diversity of the industry. When making
recommendations for appointments, the
industry should take into account the
diversity of the population served and
the knowledge, skills, and abilities of
the members to serve a diverse
population, size of the operations,
methods of production and distribution,
and other distinguishing factors to
ensure that the recommendations of the
Board take into account the diverse
interest of persons responsible for
paying assessments, and others in the
marketing chain, if appropriate.
§ 1223.41 Nominations and appointments.
(a) Initial nominations for producers
will be submitted to the Secretary by the
American Pecan Council (APC), or the
Department if appropriate. Before
considering any nominations, the APC
shall publicize the nomination process,
using trade press or other means it
deems appropriate, to reach out to all
known producers for the U.S. market.
The APC may use regional caucuses,
mail or other methods to elicit potential
nominees. The APC shall submit the
nominations to the Secretary and
recommend two nominees for each
Board position specified in paragraph
(a)(1) of § 1223.40. The Department will
conduct initial nominations for the
importer members. The Secretary shall
appoint the members of the Board.
(b) Subsequent nominations shall be
conducted as follows:
(1) Nomination of producer members
will be conducted by the Board. The
Board staff will seek nominations for
each vacant producer seat from each
region from producers who have paid
their assessments to the Board in the
most recent fiscal period and who
produced more than 50,000 pounds of
inshell pecans (25,000 pounds of
shelled pecans) on average for four
fiscal periods (the fiscal period for
which nominations are being conducted
and the previous three fiscal periods).
Producers who produce pecans in more
than one region may seek nomination
only in the region in which they
produce the majority of their pecans.
Nominations will be submitted to the
Board office and placed on a ballot that
will be sent to producers in each region
for a vote. Producers may only vote in
the region in which they produce the
majority of their pecans. The votes shall
be tabulated for each region with the
nominee receiving the highest number
of votes at the top of the list in
descending order by vote. Two
candidates for each position shall be
submitted to the Secretary; and
(2) Nomination of importer members
will be conducted by the Board. All
qualified national organizations
representing importer interests will
have the opportunity to nominate
members to serve on the Board. If the
Secretary determines that there are no
qualified national organizations
representing importer interests,
individual importers who have paid
assessments to the Board in the most
recent fiscal period and imported more
than 50,000 pounds of inshell pecans
(25,000 pounds of shelled pecans) on
average for four fiscal periods (the fiscal
period for which nominations are being
conducted and the previous three fiscal
periods) may submit nominations. The
names of importer nominees shall be
placed on a ballot and mailed to
importers for a vote. The votes shall be
tabulated with the nominee receiving
the highest number of votes at the top
of the list in descending order by vote.
Two candidates for each importer Board
position shall be submitted to the
Secretary. To be certified by the
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:29 Sep 21, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00023 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\22SEP2.SGM 22SEP2
59632
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 184 / Tuesday, September 22, 2020 / Proposed Rules
Secretary as a qualified national
organization representing importer
interests, an organization must meet the
following criteria, as evidenced by a
report submitted by the organization to
the Secretary:
(i) The organization’s voting
membership must be comprised
primarily of importers of pecans;
(ii) The organization has a history of
stability and permanency and has been
in existence for more than one year;
(iii) The organization must derive a
portion of its operating funds from
importers;
(iv) The organization must
demonstrate it is willing and able to
further the Act and Order’s purposes;
and
(v) To be certified by the Secretary as
a qualified national organization
representing importer interests, an
organization must agree to take
reasonable steps to publicize to non-
members the availability of open Board
importer positions.
(c) Producer and importer nominees
may provide the Board a short
background statement outlining their
qualifications to serve on the Board.
(d) Nominees must be in compliance
with the applicable provisions of this
subpart.
(e) The Board must submit
nominations to the Secretary at least six
months before the new Board term
begins. The Secretary shall appoint the
members of the Board.
(f) No two members shall be
employed by a single corporation,
company, partnership, or any other legal
entity.
(g) The Board may recommend to the
Secretary modifications to its
nomination procedures as it deems
appropriate. Any such modifications
shall be implemented through
rulemaking by the Secretary.
§ 1223.42 Term of office.
(a) With the exception of the initial
Board, each Board member will serve a
three-year term or until the Secretary
selects his or her successor. Each term
of office shall begin on October 1 and
end on September 30. No member may
serve more than two consecutive terms,
excluding any term of office less than
three years.
(b) For the initial board, the terms of
Board members shall be staggered for
two, three, and four years.
Determination of which of the initial
members shall serve a term of two,
three, or four years shall be determined
at random. Those members serving an
initial term of two, three, or four years
may serve one successive three-year
term.
§ 1223.43 Vacancies.
(a) In the event that any member of
the Board ceases to work for or be
affiliated with the category of members
from which the member was appointed
to the Board, such position shall
automatically become vacant.
(b) If a member of the Board
consistently refuses to perform the
duties of a member of the Board, or if
a member of the Board engages in acts
of dishonesty or willful misconduct, the
Board may recommend to the Secretary
that the member be removed from office.
If the Secretary finds the
recommendation of the Board shows
adequate cause, the Secretary shall
remove such member from office.
(c) Without recommendation of the
Board, a member may be removed by
the Secretary upon showing of adequate
cause, including the continued failure
by a member to submit reports or remit
assessments required under this part, if
the Secretary determines that such
member’s continued service would be
detrimental to the achievement of the
purposes of the Act.
(d) Should the position of a member
become vacant, successors for the
unexpired terms of such member shall
be appointed in the manner specified in
§§ 1223.40 and 1223.41, except that said
nomination and replacement shall not
be required if said unexpired terms are
less than six months.
§ 1223.44 Procedure.
(a) At a Board meeting, it will be
considered a quorum when a majority of
members are present.
(b) At the start of each fiscal period,
the Board will select a chairperson and
vice chairperson who will conduct
meetings and appoint committee
membership throughout that period.
(c) All Board and committee members
will receive a minimum of 10 days
advance notice of all Board and
committee meetings, unless an
emergency meeting is declared by the
Chairperson.
(d) Each member of the Board will be
entitled to one vote on any matter put
to the Board, and the motion will carry
if supported by one vote more than 50
percent of the total votes represented by
the Board members present.
(e) It will be considered a quorum at
a committee meeting when at least one
more than half of those assigned to the
committee are present. Committees may
also consist of individuals other than
Board members and such individuals
may vote in committee meetings. These
committee members shall be appointed
by the Chairperson and shall serve
without compensation but shall be
reimbursed for reasonable travel
expenses, as approved by the Board.
(f) In lieu of voting at a properly
convened meeting and, when in the
opinion of the Chairperson of the Board
such action is considered necessary, the
Board may take action if supported by
one vote more than 50 percent of the
members by mail, telephone, electronic
mail, facsimile, or any other means of
communication, and all telephone votes
shall be confirmed promptly in writing.
In that event, all members and the
Secretary must be notified and all
members must be provided the
opportunity to vote. Any action so taken
shall have the same force and effect as
though such action had been taken at a
properly convened meeting of the
Board. All votes shall be recorded in
Board minutes.
(g) There shall be no voting by proxy.
(h) The Chairperson shall be a voting
member.
(i) The organization of the Board and
the procedures for the conducting of
meetings of the Board shall be in
accordance with its bylaws, which shall
be established by the Board and
approved by the Secretary.
§ 1223.45 Compensation and
reimbursement.
The members of the Board when
acting as members, shall serve without
compensation but shall be reimbursed
for reasonable travel expenses, as
approved by the Board, incurred by
them in the performance of their duties
as Board members.
§ 1223.46 Powers and duties.
The Board shall have the following
powers and duties:
(a) To administer this subpart in
accordance with its terms and
conditions and to collect assessments;
(b) To develop and recommend to the
Secretary for approval such bylaws as
may be necessary for the functioning of
the Board, and such rules as may be
necessary to administer this subpart,
including activities authorized to be
carried out under this subpart;
(c) To meet, organize, and select from
among the members of the Board a
chairperson, other officers, committees,
and subcommittees, as the Board
determines to be appropriate;
(d) To employ persons, other than the
Board members, or to enter into
contracts, other than with Board
members, as the Board considers
necessary to assist the Board in carrying
out its duties and to determine the
compensation and specify the duties of
such persons, or to determine the
contractual terms of such parties;
(e) To develop programs and projects,
and enter into contracts or agreements,
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:29 Sep 21, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00024 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\22SEP2.SGM 22SEP2
59633
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 184 / Tuesday, September 22, 2020 / Proposed Rules
which must be approved by the
Secretary before becoming effective, for
the development and carrying out of
programs or projects of research,
information, or promotion, and the
payment of costs thereof with funds
collected pursuant to this subpart. Each
contract or agreement shall provide that
any person who enters into a contract or
agreement with the Board shall develop
and submit to the Board a proposed
activity; keep accurate records of all of
its transactions relating to the contract
or agreement; account for funds
received and expended in connection
with the contract or agreement; make
periodic reports to the Board of
activities conducted under the contract
or agreement; and make such other
reports available as the Board or the
Secretary considers relevant. Any
contract or agreement shall provide that:
(1) The contractor or agreeing party
shall develop and submit to the Board
a program, plan, or project together with
a budget or budgets that shall show the
estimated cost to be incurred for such
program, plan, or project;
(2) The contractor or agreeing party
shall keep accurate records of all its
transactions and make periodic reports
to the Board of activities conducted,
submit accounting for funds received
and expended, and make such other
reports as the Secretary or the Board
may require;
(3) The Secretary may audit the
records of the contracting or agreeing
party periodically; and
(4) Any subcontractor who enters into
a contract with a Board contractor and
who receives or otherwise uses funds
allocated by the Board shall be subject
to the same provisions as the contractor;
(f) To prepare and submit for approval
of the Secretary fiscal period budgets in
accordance with § 1223.50;
(g) To invest assessments collected
under this part in accordance with
§ 1223.50;
(h) To maintain such records and
books and prepare and submit such
reports and records from time to time to
the Secretary as the Secretary may
prescribe; to make appropriate
accounting with respect to the receipt
and disbursement of all funds entrusted
to it; and to keep records that accurately
reflect the actions and transactions of
the Board;
(i) To cause its books to be audited by
a competent auditor at the end of each
fiscal period and at such other times as
the Secretary may request, and to
submit a report of the audit directly to
the Secretary;
(j) To give the Secretary the same
notice of meetings of the Board as is
given to members in order that the
Secretary’s representative(s) may attend
such meetings, and to keep and report
minutes of each meeting of the Board to
the Secretary;
(k) To act as intermediary between the
Secretary and any producer, first
handler, or importer;
(l) To furnish to the Secretary any
information or records that the Secretary
may request;
(m) To receive, investigate, and report
to the Secretary complaints of violations
of this subpart;
(n) To recommend to the Secretary
such amendments to this subpart as the
Board considers appropriate; and
(o) To work to achieve an effective,
continuous, and coordinated program of
promotion, research, consumer
information, evaluation, and industry
information designed to strengthen the
pecan industry’s position in the
marketplace; maintain and expand
existing markets and uses for pecans;
and to carry out programs, plans, and
projects designed to provide maximum
benefits to the pecan industry.
§ 1223.47 Prohibited activities.
The Board may not engage in, and
shall prohibit the employees and agents
of the Board from engaging in:
(a) Any action that would be a conflict
of interest; and
(b) Using funds collected by the Board
under this subpart to undertake any
action for the purpose of influencing
legislation or governmental action or
policy, by local, state, national, and
foreign governments, other than
recommending to the Secretary
amendments to this subpart.
(c) No program, plan, or project
including advertising shall be false or
misleading or disparaging to another
agricultural commodity. Pecans of all
origins shall be treated equally.
Expenses and Assessments
§ 1223.50 Budget and expenses.
(a) At least 60 days prior to the
beginning of each fiscal period, and as
may be necessary thereafter, the Board
shall prepare and submit to the
Secretary a budget for the fiscal period
covering its anticipated expenses and
disbursements in administering this
subpart. Each such budget shall include:
(1) A statement of objectives and
strategy for each program, plan, or
project;
(2) A summary of anticipated revenue,
with comparative data for at least one
preceding year (except for the initial
budget);
(3) A summary of proposed
expenditures for each program, plan, or
project; and
(4) Staff and administrative expense
breakdowns, with comparative data for
at least one preceding year (except for
the initial budget).
(b) Each budget shall provide
adequate funds to defray its proposed
expenditures and to provide for a
reserve as set forth in this subpart.
(c) Subject to this section, any
amendment or addition to an approved
budget must be approved by the
Secretary, including shifting funds from
one program, plan, or project to another.
Shifts of funds which do not cause an
increase in the Board’s approved budget
and which are consistent with
governing bylaws need not have prior
approval by the Secretary.
(d) The Board is authorized to incur
such expenses, including provision for
a reasonable reserve, as the Secretary
finds are reasonable and likely to be
incurred by the Board for its
maintenance and functioning, and to
enable it to exercise its powers and
perform its duties in accordance with
the provisions of this subpart. Such
expenses shall be paid from funds
received by the Board.
(e) With approval of the Secretary, the
Board may borrow money for the
payment of administrative expenses,
subject to the same fiscal, budget, and
audit controls as other funds of the
Board. Any funds borrowed by the
Board shall be expended only for
startup costs and capital outlays and are
limited to the first year of operation of
the Board.
(f) The Board may accept voluntary
contributions, but these shall only be
used to pay expenses incurred in the
conduct of programs, plans, and
projects. Such contributions shall be
free from any encumbrance by the donor
and the Board shall retain complete
control of their use.
(g) The Board may also receive funds
provided through the Department’s
Foreign Agricultural Service or from
other sources, for authorized activities.
(h) The Board shall reimburse the
Secretary for all expenses incurred by
the Secretary in the implementation,
administration, and supervision of this
subpart, including all referendum costs
in connection with this subpart.
(i) For fiscal periods beginning three
(3) or more years after the date of the
establishment of the Board, the Board
may not expend for administration,
maintenance, and functioning of the
Board in any fiscal period an amount
that exceeds 15 percent of the
assessments and other income received
by the Board for that fiscal period.
Reimbursements to the Secretary
required under paragraph (h) of this
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:29 Sep 21, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00025 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\22SEP2.SGM 22SEP2
59634
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 184 / Tuesday, September 22, 2020 / Proposed Rules
section are excluded from this
limitation on spending.
(j) The Board may establish an
operating monetary reserve and may
carry over to subsequent fiscal periods
excess funds in any reserve so
established: Provided that the funds in
the reserve do not exceed the last two
fiscal periods’ budget of expenses.
Subject to approval by the Secretary,
such reserve funds may be used to
defray any expenses authorized under
this part.
(k) Pending disbursement of
assessments and all other revenue under
a budget approved by the Secretary, the
Board may invest assessments and all
other revenues collected under this part
in:
(1) Obligations of the United States or
any agency of the United States;
(2) General obligations of any State or
any political subdivision of a State;
(3) Interest bearing accounts or
certificates of deposit of financial
institutions that are members of the
Federal Reserve System;
(4) Obligations fully guaranteed as to
principal interest by the United States;
or
(5) Other investments as authorized
by the Secretary.
§ 1223.51 Financial statements.
(a) The Board shall prepare and
submit financial statements to the
Secretary on a monthly or quarterly
basis or at any other time as requested
by the Secretary. Each such financial
statement shall include, but not be
limited to, a balance sheet, income
statement, and expense budget. The
expense budget shall show expenditures
during the time period covered by the
report, year-to-date expenditures, and
the unexpended budget.
(b) Each financial statement shall be
submitted to the Secretary within 30
days after the end of the time period to
which it applies.
(c) The Board shall submit annually to
the Secretary an annual financial
statement within 90 days after the end
of the fiscal period to which it applies.
§ 1223.52 Assessments.
(a) The funds to cover the Board’s
expenses shall be paid from assessments
on producers and importers, other
income of the Board, and other funds
available to the Board including those
collected pursuant to § 1223.57 and
subject to the limitations contained in
§ 1223.57.
(b) Each producer shall pay an
assessment per pound of pecans
produced in the United States. The
collection of assessments on pecans
produced in the United States will be
the responsibility of the first handler
receiving the pecans from producers. In
the case of the producer acting as its
own first handler, the producer will be
required to collect and remit its
individual assessments.
(1) First handlers may remit
assessments to a third-party collection
agent under this subpart.
(2) First handlers may also remit
assessments directly to the Board.
(c) Such assessments shall be levied at
$0.02 per pound on all inshell pecans
and $0.04 per pound on all shelled
pecans. The assessment rate may be
reviewed and modified with the
approval of the Secretary. A change in
the assessment rate is subject to
rulemaking by the Secretary.
(d) All assessment payments and
reports will be submitted to the office of
the Board. All assessment payments for
a fiscal period are to be received no later
than the 10th of the month following the
end of the previous month. A late
payment charge shall be imposed on
any producer and importer who fails to
remit to the Board, the total amount for
which any such producer and importer
is liable on or before the due date
established by the Board on forms
approved by the Secretary. In addition
to the late payment charge, an interest
charge shall be imposed on the
outstanding amount for which the
producer and importer is liable. The rate
of interest shall be prescribed in
regulations issued by the Secretary.
(e) Each importer of pecans shall pay
an assessment to the Board on pecans
imported for marketing in the United
States, through Customs.
(1) The assessment rate for imported
pecans shall be the same or equivalent
to the rate for pecans produced in the
United States.
(2) The import assessment shall be
uniformly applied to imported pecans
that are identified by the number
0802.90.10.00 and 0802.90.15.00 in the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS) of
the United States or any other numbers
used to identify pecans in that schedule.
(3) In the event that any HTS number
is subject to assessment is changed and
such change is merely a replacement of
a previous number and has no impact
on the description of pecans, assessment
will continue to be collected based on
the new numbers.
(4) The assessment due on imported
pecans shall be paid when they enter, or
are withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption in the United States.
(5) If Customs does not collect an
assessment from an importer, the
importer is responsible for paying the
assessment directly to the Board no later
than the 10th of the month following the
end of the previous month after the
assessed pecans were imported into the
United States.
(f) Persons failing to remit total
assessments due in a timely manner
may also be subject to actions under
Federal debt collection procedures.
(g) The Board may authorize other
organizations to collect assessments on
its behalf with the approval of the
Secretary.
§ 1223.53 Exemption procedures.
(a) De minimis. An exemption from
payment of assessments as provided in
§ 1223.52, shall be provided to
producers that domestically produce
and importers that import less than
50,000 pounds of inshell pecans (25,000
pounds of shelled pecans) on average
for four fiscal periods (the fiscal period
for which the exemption is claimed and
the previous three fiscal periods) as
follows:
(1) Any producer who desires to claim
an exemption from assessments shall
file an application on a form provided
by the Board, for a certificate of
exemption for each fiscal period
claiming an exemption. Such producer
shall certify that it will domestically
produce less than 50,000 pounds of
inshell pecans (25,000 pounds of
shelled pecans) on average for four
fiscal periods (the fiscal period for
which the exemption is claimed and the
previous three fiscal periods). It is the
responsibility of the producer to retain
a copy of the certificate of exemption.
(2) Any importer who desires to claim
an exemption from assessments shall
file an application on a form provided
by the Board, for a certificate of
exemption for each fiscal period
claiming an exemption. Such importer
shall certify that it will import less than
50,000 pounds of inshell pecans (25,000
pounds of shelled pecans) on average
for four fiscal periods (the fiscal period
for which the exemption is claimed and
the previous three fiscal periods). It is
the responsibility of the importer to
retain a copy of the certificate of
exemption.
(3) On receipt of an exemption
application, the Board shall determine
whether an exemption may be granted
for that fiscal period. The Board will
then issue, if deemed appropriate, a
certificate of exemption to the producer
or importer which is eligible to receive
one covering that fiscal period. The
Board may request persons applying for
the exemption to provide supporting
documentation, such as past sales
receipts or import data.
(4) The Board, with the Secretary’s
approval, may require persons receiving
an exemption from assessments to
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:29 Sep 21, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00026 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\22SEP2.SGM 22SEP2
59635
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 184 / Tuesday, September 22, 2020 / Proposed Rules
provide to the Board reports on the
disposition of exempt pecans and, in the
case of importers, proof of payment of
assessments.
(5) The exemption will apply
immediately following the issuance of
the certificate of exemption.
(6) Producers and importers who
received an exemption certificate from
the Board but domestically produced or
imported more than 50,000 pounds of
inshell pecans (25,000 shelled of
pecans) on average for four fiscal
periods (the fiscal period for which the
exemption is claimed and the previous
three fiscal periods) during the fiscal
period shall pay the Board the
applicable assessments owed and
submit any necessary reports to the
Board pursuant to § 1223.60.
(b) Assessment refunds. Importers and
producers who are exempt from
assessment shall be eligible for a refund
of assessments collected, either by
Customs or a first handler. Requests for
such assessment refunds must be
submitted to the Board within 90 days
of the last day in the fiscal period when
assessments were collected on such
producer’s or importer’s pecans. No
interest will be paid on such
assessments. The Board shall refund
such assessments no later than 60
calendar days after receipt by the Board
of information justifying the exemption
from assessment.
(c) Organic. (1) A producer who
domestically produces pecans under an
approved National Organic Program (7
CFR part 205) (NOP) organic production
system plan may be exempt from the
payment of assessments under this part,
provided that:
(i) Only agricultural products certified
as ‘‘organic’’ or ‘‘100 percent organic’’
(as defined in the NOP) are eligible for
exemption;
(ii) The exemption shall apply to all
certified ‘‘organic’’ or ‘‘100 percent
organic’’ (as defined in the NOP)
products of a producer regardless of
whether the agricultural commodity
subject to the exemption is produced by
a person that also produces
conventional or nonorganic agricultural
products of the same agricultural
commodity as that for which the
exemption is claimed;
(iii) The producer maintains a valid
certificate of organic operation as issued
under the Organic Foods Production Act
of 1990 (7 U.S.C. 6501–6522) (OFPA)
and the NOP regulations issued under
OFPA (7 CFR part 205); and
(iv) Any producer so exempted shall
continue to be obligated to pay
assessments under this part that are
associated with any agricultural
products that do not qualify for an
exemption under this section.
(2) To apply for exemption under this
section, an eligible producer shall
submit a request to the Board on an
Organic Exemption Request Form (Form
AMS–15) at any time during the fiscal
period initially, and annually thereafter
on or before the start of the fiscal period,
for as long as the producer continues to
be eligible for the exemption.
(3) A producer request for exemption
shall include the following:
(i) The applicant’s full name,
company name, address, telephone and
fax numbers, and email address;
(ii) Certification that the applicant
maintains a valid certificate of organic
operation issued under the OFPA and
the NOP;
(iii) Certification that the applicant
produces organic products eligible to be
labeled ‘‘organic’’ or ‘‘100 percent
organic’’ under the NOP;
(iv) A requirement that the applicant
attach a copy of their certificate of
organic operation issued by a USDA-
accredited certifying agent;
(v) Certification, as evidenced by
signature and date, that all information
provided by the applicant is true; and
(vi) Such other information as may be
required by the Board, with the
approval of the Secretary.
(4) If a producer complies with the
requirements of this section, the Board
will grant an assessment exemption and
issue a Certificate of Exemption to the
producer within 30 days. If the
application is disapproved, the Board
will notify the applicant of the reason(s)
for disapproval within the same
timeframe.
(5) An importer who imports pecans
that are eligible to be labeled as
‘‘organic’’ or ‘‘100 percent organic’’
under the NOP, or certified as ‘‘organic’’
or ‘‘100 percent organic’’ under a U.S.
equivalency arrangement established
under the NOP, may be exempt from the
payment of assessments. Such importer
may submit documentation to the Board
and request an exemption from
assessment on certified ‘‘organic’’ or
‘‘100 percent organic’’ pecans on an
Organic Exemption Request Form (Form
AMS–15) at any time initially, and
annually thereafter on or before the
beginning of the fiscal period, as long as
the importer continues to be eligible for
the exemption. This documentation
shall include the same information
required of a producer in paragraph
(c)(3) of this section. If the importer
complies with the requirements of this
section, the Board will grant the
exemption and issue a Certificate of
Exemption to the importer within the
applicable timeframe. Any importer so
exempted shall continue to be obligated
to pay assessments under this part that
are associated with any imported
agricultural products that do not qualify
for an exemption under this section.
(6) If Customs collects the assessment
on exempt product under paragraph
(c)(5) of this section that is identified as
‘‘organic’’ by a number in the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule, the Board
must reimburse the exempt importer the
assessments paid upon receipt of such
assessments from Customs. For all other
exempt organic product for which
Customs collects the assessment, the
importer may apply to the Board for a
reimbursement of assessments paid, and
the importer must submit satisfactory
proof to the Board that the importer
paid the assessment on exempt organic
product.
(7) The exemption will apply
immediately following the issuance of
the Certificate of Exemption.
§ 1223.54 Refund escrow accounts.
(a) The Board shall establish an
interest bearing escrow account with a
financial institution that is a member of
the Federal Reserve System and will
deposit into such account an amount
equal to 10 percent of the assessments
collected during the period beginning
on the effective date of the Order and
ending on the date the Secretary
announces the results of the required
referendum.
(b) If the Order is not approved by the
required referendum, the Board shall
promptly pay refunds of assessments to
all producers and importers that have
paid assessments during the period
beginning on the effective date of the
Order and ending on the date the
Secretary announces the results of the
required referendum in the manner
specified in paragraph (c) of this
section.
(c) If the amount deposited in the
escrow account is less than the amount
of all refunds that producers and
importers subject to this subpart have a
right to receive, the Board shall prorate
the amount deposited in such account
among all producers and importers who
desire a refund of assessments paid no
later than 90 days after the required
referendum results are announced by
the Secretary.
(d) Any producer or importer
requesting a refund shall submit an
application on the prescribed form to
the Board within 60 days from the date
the results of the required referendum
are announced by the Secretary. The
producer and importer shall also submit
documentation to substantiate that
assessments were paid. Any such
demand shall be made by such producer
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:29 Sep 21, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00027 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\22SEP2.SGM 22SEP2
59636
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 184 / Tuesday, September 22, 2020 / Proposed Rules
or importer in accordance with the
provisions of this subpart and in a
manner consistent with the regulations
in this part.
(e) If the Order is approved by the
required referendum conducted under
§ 1223.71 then:
(1) The escrow account shall be
closed; and,
(2) The funds shall be available to the
Board for disbursement under § 1223.50.
Promotion, Research, and Information
§ 1223.55 Programs, plans, and projects.
(a) The Board shall receive and
evaluate, or on its own initiative
develop, and submit to the Secretary for
approval any program, plan, or project
authorized under this subpart. Such
programs, plans, or projects shall
provide for:
(1) The establishment, issuance,
effectuation, and administration of
appropriate programs for promotion,
research, and information, including
producer and consumer information,
with respect to pecans; and
(2) The establishment and conduct of
research with respect to the use,
nutritional value, sale, distribution, and
marketing of pecans, and the creation of
new products thereof, to the end that
the marketing and use of pecans may be
encouraged, expanded, improved, or
made more acceptable and to advance
the image, desirability, or quality of
pecans.
(b) No program, plan, or project shall
be implemented prior to its approval by
the Secretary. Once a program, plan, or
project is so approved, the Board shall
take appropriate steps to implement it.
(c) Each program, plan, or project
implemented under this subpart shall be
reviewed or evaluated periodically by
the Board to ensure that it contributes
to an effective program of promotion,
research, or information. If it is found by
the Board that any such program, plan,
or project does not contribute to an
effective program of promotion,
research, or information, then the Board
shall terminate such program, plan, or
project.
§ 1223.56 Independent evaluation.
The Board shall, not less often than
every five years, authorize and fund,
from funds otherwise available to the
Board, an independent evaluation of the
effectiveness of the Order and other
programs conducted by the Board
pursuant to the Act. The Board shall
submit to the Secretary, and make
available to the public, the results of
each periodic independent evaluation
conducted under this section.
§ 1223.57 Patents, copyrights, trademarks,
information, publications, and product
formulations.
Patents, copyrights, trademarks,
information, publications, and product
formulations developed through the use
of funds received by the Board under
this subpart shall be the property of the
U.S. Government as represented by the
Board and shall, along with any rents,
royalties, residual payments, or other
income from the rental, sales, leasing,
franchising, or other uses of such
patents, copyrights, trademarks,
information, publications, or product
formulations, inure to the benefit of the
Board; shall be considered income
subject to the same fiscal, budget, and
audit controls as other funds of the
Board; and may be licensed subject to
approval by the Secretary. Upon
termination of this subpart, § 1223.73
shall apply to determine disposition of
all such property.
Reports, Books, and Records
§ 1223.60 Reports.
(a) Each first handler, producer, or
importer subject to this subpart shall be
required to provide to the Board
periodically such information as
required by the Board, with the
approval of the Secretary, which may
include but not be limited to the
following:
(1) First handler must report or
producer acting as its own first handler:
(i) Number of pounds handled;
(ii) Number of pounds on which an
assessment was collected;
(iii) Name, address and other contact
information from whom the first
handler has collected the assessments
on each pound handled; and
(iv) Date collection was made on each
pound handled.
(2) Unless provided by Customs,
importer must report:
(i) Number of pounds imported;
(ii) Number of pounds on which an
assessment was paid;
(iii) Name, address, and other contact
information of the importer; and
(iv) Date assessment was paid on each
pound imported.
(b) These reports shall accompany the
payment of the collected assessments.
§ 1223.61 Books and records.
Each producer, first handler, and
importer subject to this subpart shall
maintain and make available for
inspection by the Secretary such books
and records as are necessary to carry out
the provisions of this part, including
such records as are necessary to verify
any reports required. Such records shall
be retained for at least 3 years beyond
the fiscal period of their applicability.
§ 1223.62 Confidential treatment.
All information obtained from books,
records, or reports under the Act and
this part shall be kept confidential by all
persons, including all employees and
former employees of the Board, all
officers and employees and former
officers and employees of contracting
and subcontracting agencies or agreeing
parties having access to such
information. Such information shall not
be available to Board members,
producers, importers, or first handlers.
Only those persons having a specific
need for such information to effectively
administer the provisions of this subpart
shall have access to such information.
Only such information so obtained as
the Secretary deems relevant shall be
disclosed by them, and then only in a
judicial proceeding or administrative
hearing brought at the direction, or on
the request, of the Secretary, or to which
the Secretary or any officer of the
United States is a party and involving
this subpart. Nothing in this section
shall be deemed to prohibit:
(a) The issuance of general statements
based upon the reports of the number of
persons subject to this subpart or
statistical data collected therefrom,
which statements will not identify the
information furnished by any person;
and
(b) The publication, by direction of
the Secretary, of the name of any person
who has been adjudged to have violated
this subpart, together with a statement
of the particular provisions of this
subpart violated by such person.
Miscellaneous
§ 1223.70 Right of the Secretary.
All fiscal matters, programs, plans, or
projects, rules or regulations, reports, or
other substantive actions proposed and
prepared by the Board shall be
submitted to the Secretary for approval.
§ 1223.71 Referenda.
(a) Required referendum. For the
purpose of ascertaining whether the
persons subject to this subpart favor the
continuation, suspension, amendment,
or termination of this subpart, the
Secretary shall conduct a referendum
among persons subject to assessments
under § 1223.52 who, during a
representative period determined by the
Secretary, have engaged in the
production or importation of pecans:
(1) The required referendum shall be
conducted not later than 3 years after
assessments first begin under the Order;
and
(2) The Order will be approved in a
referendum if a majority of producers
and importers vote for approval in the
referendum.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:29 Sep 21, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00028 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\22SEP2.SGM 22SEP2
59637
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 184 / Tuesday, September 22, 2020 / Proposed Rules
(b) Subsequent referenda. The
Secretary shall conduct subsequent
referenda:
(1) For the purpose of ascertaining
whether producers and importers favor
the continuation, suspension, or
termination of the Order;
(2) Every seven years the Secretary
shall hold a referendum to determine
whether producers and importers of
pecans favor the continuation of the
Order. The Order shall continue if it is
favored by a majority of producers and
importers voting for approval in the
referendum who have been engaged in
the production or importation of pecans;
(3) At the request of the Board
established in this subpart;
(4) At the request of 10 percent or
more of the number of persons eligible
to vote in a referendum as set forth
under the Order; or
(5) At any time as determined by the
Secretary.
§ 1223.72 Suspension and termination.
(a) The Secretary shall suspend or
terminate this part or subpart or a
provision thereof if the Secretary finds
that this part or subpart or a provision
thereof obstructs or does not tend to
effectuate the purposes of the Act, or if
the Secretary determines that this part
or subpart or a provision thereof is not
favored by persons voting in a
referendum conducted pursuant to the
Act.
(b) The Secretary shall suspend or
terminate this subpart at the end of the
fiscal period whenever the Secretary
determines that its suspension or
termination is approved or favored by a
majority of producers and importers
voting for approval who, during a
representative period determined by the
Secretary, have been engaged in the
production or importation of pecans.
(c) If, as a result of a referendum the
Secretary determines that this subpart is
not approved, the Secretary shall:
(1) Not later than 180 days after
making the determination, suspend or
terminate, as the case may be, collection
of assessments under this subpart; and
(2) As soon as practical, suspend or
terminate, as the case may be, activities
under this subpart in an orderly
manner.
§ 1223.73 Proceedings after termination.
(a) Upon the termination of this
subpart, the Board shall recommend not
more than three of its members to the
Secretary to serve as trustees for the
purpose of liquidating the affairs of the
Board. Such persons, upon designation
by the Secretary, shall become trustees
of all of the funds and property then in
the possession or under control of the
Board, including claims for any funds
unpaid or property not delivered, or any
other claim existing at the time of such
termination.
(b) The said trustees shall:
(1) Continue in such capacity until
discharged by the Secretary;
(2) Carry out the obligations of the
Board under any contracts or
agreements entered into pursuant to this
subpart;
(3) From time to time account for all
receipts and disbursements and deliver
all property on hand, together with all
books and records of the Board and the
trustees, to such person or persons as
the Secretary may direct; and
(4) Upon request of the Secretary
execute such assignments or other
instruments necessary and appropriate
to vest in such person’s title and right
to all funds, property, and claims vested
in the Board or the trustees pursuant to
this subpart.
(c) Any person to whom funds,
property, or claims have been
transferred or delivered pursuant to this
subpart shall be subject to the same
obligations imposed upon the Board and
upon the trustees.
(d) Any residual funds not required to
defray the necessary expenses of
liquidation shall be turned over to the
Secretary to be disposed of, to the extent
practical, to the pecan producer
organizations in the interest of
continuing pecan promotion, research,
and information programs.
§ 1223.74 Effect of termination or
amendment.
Unless otherwise expressly provided
by the Secretary, the termination of this
part, or the issuance of any amendment
to this part, shall not:
(a) Affect or waive any right, duty,
obligation, or liability which shall have
arisen, or which may thereafter arise in
connection with any provision of this
part; or
(b) Release or extinguish any violation
of this part; or
(c) Affect or impair any rights or
remedies of the United States, or of the
Secretary or of any other persons, with
respect to any such violation.
§ 1223.75 Personal liability.
No member or employee of the Board
shall be held personally responsible,
either individually or jointly with
others, in any way whatsoever, to any
person for errors in judgment, mistakes,
or other acts, either of commission or
omission, as such member or employee,
except for acts of dishonesty or willful
misconduct.
§ 1223.76 Separability.
If any provision of this subpart is
declared invalid or the applicability
thereof to any person or circumstances
is held invalid, the validity of the
remainder of this subpart or the
applicability thereof to other persons or
circumstances shall not be affected
thereby.
§ 1223.77 Amendments.
Amendments to this subpart may be
proposed from time to time by the Board
or by any interested person affected by
the provisions of the Act, including the
Secretary.
§ 1223.78 OMB control numbers.
The control number assigned to the
information collection requirements by
the Office of Management and Budget
pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35, is
OMB control number 0581–NEW,
except for the Board nominee
background statement form which is
assigned OMB control number 0505–
0001.
Subpart B—Referendum Procedures
§ 1223.100 General.
Referenda to determine whether
eligible pecan producers and importers
favor the issuance, amendment,
suspension, or termination of the Pecan
Promotion, Research, and Information
Order shall be conducted in accordance
with this subpart.
§ 1223.101 Definitions.
(a) Administrator means the
Administrator of the Agricultural
Marketing Service, with power to
redelegate, or any officer or employees
of the U.S. Department of Agriculture to
whom authority has been delegated or
may hereafter be delegated to act in the
Administrator’s stead.
(b) Eligible importer means any
person who, during the representative
period, was subject to the Order and
required to pay assessments on pecans
imported into the United States.
(c) Eligible producer means any
person who, during the representative
period, was subject to the Order and
required to pay assessments on pecans
produced in the United States.
(d) Order means subpart A of this
part, the Pecan Promotion, Research,
and Information Order.
(e) Pecans means and includes any
and all varieties or subvarieties, inshell
and shelled, of Carya illinoinensis
grown or imported into the United
States.
(f) Person means any individual,
group of individuals, partnership,
corporation, association, cooperative, or
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:29 Sep 21, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00029 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\22SEP2.SGM 22SEP2
59638
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 184 / Tuesday, September 22, 2020 / Proposed Rules
any other legal entity. For the purpose
of this paragraph (f), the term
‘‘partnership’’ includes, but is not
limited to:
(1) A husband and a wife who have
title to, or leasehold interest in, a pecan
farm as tenants in common, joint
tenants, tenants by the entirety, or,
under community property laws, as
community property; and
(2) So-called ‘‘joint ventures’’ wherein
one or more parties to an agreement,
informal or otherwise, contributed land
and others contributed capital, labor,
management, or other services, or any
variation of such contributions by two
or more parties.
(g) Referendum agent or agent means
the individual or individuals designated
by the Secretary to conduct the
referendum.
(h) Representative period means the
period designated by the Secretary.
(i) United States means collectively
the 50 states, the District of Columbia,
the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and
the territories and possessions of the
United States.
§ 1223.102 Voting.
(a) Each person who is an eligible
producer or an eligible importer, as
defined in this subpart, at the time of
the referendum and during the
representative period, shall be entitled
to cast only one ballot in the
referendum. However, each producer in
a landlord-tenant relationship or a
divided ownership arrangement
involving totally independent entities
cooperating only to produce pecans, in
which more than one of the parties is a
producer, shall be entitled to cast one
ballot in the referendum covering only
such producer’s share of the ownership.
(b) Proxy voting is not authorized, but
an officer or employee of a corporate
producer or importer, or an
administrator, executor, or trustee or an
eligible entity may cast a ballot on
behalf of such person. Any individual
so voting in a referendum shall certify
that such individual is an officer or
employee of the eligible entity, or an
administrator, executive, or trustee of an
eligible entity and that such individual
has the authority to take such action.
Upon request of the referendum agent,
the individual shall submit adequate
evidence of such authority.
(c) All ballots are to be cast by mail,
overnight delivery, electronic mail,
facsimile, or by other means as
instructed by the Secretary.
§ 1223.103 Instructions.
The referendum agent shall conduct
the referendum, in the manner provided
in this section, under the supervision of
the Administrator. The Administrator
may prescribe additional instructions,
not inconsistent with the provisions in
this section, to govern the procedure to
be followed by the referendum agent.
Such agent shall:
(a) Determine the period during
which ballots may be cast.
(b) Provide ballots and related
material to be used in the referendum.
The ballot shall provide for recording
essential information, including that
needed for ascertaining whether the
person voting, or on whose behalf the
vote is cast, is an eligible voter.
(c) Give reasonable public notice of
the referendum:
(1) By utilizing available media or
public information sources, without
incurring advertising expense, to
publicize the dates, places, method of
voting, eligibility requirements, and
other pertinent information. Such
sources of publicity may include, but
are not limited to, print and radio; and
(2) By such other means as the agent
may deem advisable.
(d) Mail to eligible producers and
eligible importers whose names and
addresses are known to the referendum
agent, the instructions on voting, a
ballot, and a summary of the terms and
conditions of the proposed Order. No
person who claims to be eligible to vote
shall be refused a ballot.
(e) At the end of the voting period,
collect, open, number, and review the
ballots and tabulate the results in the
presence of an agent of a third party
authorized to monitor the referendum
process.
(f) Prepare a report on the referendum.
(g) Announce the results to the public.
§ 1223.104 Subagents.
The referendum agent may appoint
any individual or individuals necessary
or desirable to assist the agent in
performing the referendum agent’s
functions listed in this subpart. Each
individual so appointed may be
authorized by the agent to perform any
or all of the functions which, in the
absence of such appointment, shall be
performed by the agent.
§ 1223.105 Ballots.
The referendum agent and subagents
shall accept all ballots cast. However, if
the agent or subagent deems that a ballot
should be challenged for any reason, the
agent or subagent shall endorse above
their signature, on the ballot, a
statement to the effect that such ballot
was challenged, by whom challenged,
the reasons therefore, the results of any
investigations made with respect
thereto, and the disposition thereof.
Ballots invalid under this subpart shall
not be counted.
§ 1223.106 Referendum report.
Except as otherwise directed, the
referendum agent shall prepare and
submit to the Administrator a report on
the results of the referendum, the
manner in which it was conducted, the
extent and kind of public notice given,
and other information pertinent to the
analysis of the referendum and its
results.
§ 1223.107 Confidential information.
The ballots and other information or
reports that reveal, or tend to reveal, the
vote of any person covered under the
Act and the voting list shall be held
confidential and shall not be disclosed.
Subpart C—Administrative Provisions
§ 1223.520 Late payment and interest
charges for past due assessments.
(a) A late payment charge will be
imposed on any producer, first handler
or importer who fails to make timely
remittance to the Board of the total
assessments for which they are liable.
The late payment will be imposed on
any assessments not received within 30
calendar days of the date when
assessments are due. This one-time late
payment charge will be 5 percent of the
assessments due before interest charges
have accrued.
(b) In addition to the late payment
charge, 1 percent per month interest on
the outstanding balance, including any
late payment and accrued interest, will
be added to any accounts for which
payment has not been received within
30 calendar days of the date when
assessments are due. Interest will
continue to accrue monthly until the
outstanding balance is paid to the
Board.
Bruce Summers,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 2020–19031 Filed 9–21–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:29 Sep 21, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00030 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\22SEP2.SGM 22SEP2

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT