Privacy Act; implementation,

[Federal Register: September 24, 2002 (Volume 67, Number 185)]

[Proposed Rules]

[Page 59798]

From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]

[DOCID:fr24se02-17]

[[Page 59798]]

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

28 CFR Part 16

[AAG/A Order No. 288-2002]

Privacy Act of 1974; Implementation

AGENCY: Department of Justice.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

SUMMARY: The Department of Justice proposes to exempt a new Privacy Act system of records entitled ``Personnel Investigation and Security Clearance Records for the Department of Justice (DOJ), DOJ-006,'' as described in today's notice section of the Federal Register, from 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3) and (4); (d)(1), (2), (3), and (4); (e)(1), (2), (3), (5) and (8); and (g). The exemptions will be applied only to the extent that information in a record is subject to exemption pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(j) and (k). The Department also proposes to delete as obsolete provisions exempting two former Justice Management Division systems of records entitled ``Security Clearance Information System (SCIS) (JUSTICE/JMD-008),'' and ``Freedom of Information/Privacy Act Records System (JUSTICE/JMD-019).'' The records in JMD-019 are now covered by DOJ-004.

DATES: Submit any comments by October 24, 2002.

ADDRESSES: Address all comments to Mary Cahill, Management and Planning Staff, Justice Management Division, Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20530 (1400 National Place Building).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Cahill, (202) 307-1823.

This order relates to individuals rather than small business entities. Nevertheless, pursuant to the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, this order will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.

List of Subjects in 28 CFR Part 16

Administrative practices and procedures, Courts, Freedom of Information, Sunshine Act and Privacy.

Pursuant to the authority vested in the Attorney General by 5 U.S.C. 552a and delegated to me by Attorney General Order No. 793-78, it is proposed to amend 28 CFR part 16 as follows:

PART 16--[AMENDED]

1. The authority for Part 16 continues to read as follows:

   Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301, 552, 552a, 552b(g), and 553; 18 U.S.C. 4203(a)(1); 28 U.S.C. 509, 510, 534; 31 U.S.C. 3717, and 9701.

2. Section 16.76 is amended by removing paragraphs (c), (d), (e), (f), (g) and (h).

3. Section 16.132 is added to read as follows:

   Sec. 16.132 Exemption of Department of Justice System--Personnel Investigation and Security Clearance Records for the Department of Justice (DOJ), DOJ-006.

   (a) The following Department of Justice system of records is exempted from subsections (c)(3) and (4); (d)(1), (2), (3) and (4); (e)(1), (2), (3), (5) and (8); and (g) of the Privacy Act pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(j) and (k): Personnel Investigation and Security Clearance Records for the Department of Justice (DOJ), DOJ-006. These exemptions apply only to the extent that information in a record is subject to exemption pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(j) and (k).

   (b) Exemption from the particular subsections is justified for the following reasons:

   (1) Subsection (c)(3). To provide the subject with an accounting of disclosures of records in this system could inform that individual of the existence, nature, or scope of an actual or potential law enforcement or counterintelligence investigation, and thereby seriously impede law enforcement or counterintelligence efforts by permitting the record subject and other persons to whom he might disclose the records to avoid criminal penalties, civil remedies, or counterintelligence measures.

   (2) Subsection (c)(4). This subsection is inapplicable to the extent that an exemption is being claimed for subsection (d).

   (3) Subsection (d)(1). Disclosure of records in the system could reveal the identity of confidential sources and result in an unwarranted invasion of the privacy of others. Disclosure may also reveal information relating to actual or potential criminal investigations. Disclosure of classified national security information would cause damage to the national security of the United States.

   (4) Subsection (d)(2). Amendment of the records could interfere with ongoing criminal or civil law enforcement proceedings and impose an impossible administrative burden by requiring investigations to be continuously reinvestigated.

   (5) Subsections (d)(3) and (4). These subsections are inapplicable to the extent exemption is claimed from (d)(1) and (2).

   (6) Subsection (e)(1). It is often impossible to determine in advance if investigatory records contained in this system are accurate, relevant, timely and complete, but, in the interests of effective law enforcement and counterintelligence, it is necessary to retain this information to aid in establishing patterns of activity and provide investigative leads.

   (7) Subsection (e)(2). To collect information from the subject individual could serve notice that he or she is the subject of a criminal investigation and thereby present a serious impediment to such investigations.

   (8) Subsection (e)(3). To inform individuals as required by this subsection could reveal the existence of a criminal investigation and compromise investigative efforts.

   (9) Subsection (e)(5). It is often impossible to determine in advance if investigatory records contained in this system are accurate, relevant, timely and complete, but, in the interests of effective law enforcement, it is necessary to retain this information to aid in establishing patterns of activity and provide investigative leads.

   (10) Subsection e(8). To serve notice could give persons sufficient warning to evade investigative efforts.

   (11) Subsection (g). This subsection is inapplicable to the extent that the system is exempt from other specific subsections of the Privacy Act.

   Dated: September 12, 2002. Robert F. Diegelman, Acting Assistant Attorney General for Administration.

   [FR Doc. 02-24207Filed9-23-02; 8:45 am]

   BILLING CODE 4410-FB-P