Air quality implementation plans; approval and promulgation; various States: California,

[Federal Register: June 4, 2002 (Volume 67, Number 107)]

[Proposed Rules]

[Page 38453]

From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]

[DOCID:fr04jn02-29]

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[CA 264-0346b; FRL-7219-3]

Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, Ventura County Air Pollution Control District

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve a revision to the Ventura County Air Pollution Control District (VCAPCD) portion of the California State Implementation Plan (SIP). This revision concerns volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions from surface cleaning and degreasing. We are proposing to approve the local rule to regulate these emission sources under the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990.

DATES: Any comments on this proposal must arrive by July 5, 2002.

ADDRESSES: Mail comments to Andy Steckel, Rulemaking Office Chief (AIR- 4), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105-3901.

You can inspect copies of the submitted SIP revisions and EPA's technical support document (TSD) at our Region IX office during normal business hours. You may also see copies of the submitted SIP revisions at the following locations:

California Air Resources Board, Stationary Source Division, Rule Evaluation Section, 1001 ``I'' Street, Sacramento, CA 95812. Ventura County Air pollution Control District, 669 County Square Dr., 2nd FL., Ventura, CA 93003.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Charnjit Bhullar, Rulemaking Office (Air-4), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, (415) 972- 3960.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This proposal addresses local rule, VCAPCD 74.6. In the Rules and Regulations section of this Federal Register, we are approving this local rule in a direct final action without prior proposal because we believe this SIP revision is not controversial. If we receive adverse comments, however, we will publish a timely withdrawal of the direct final rule and address the comments in subsequent action based on this proposed rule. Anyone interested in commenting should do so at this time, as we do not plan to open a second comment period. If we do not receive adverse comments, no further activity is planned. For further information, please see the direct final action.

Dated: May 13, 2002. Keith Takata, Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.

[FR Doc. 02-13799Filed6-3-02; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P