Air quality implementation plans; approval and promulgation; various States: California,

[Federal Register: June 8, 2000 (Volume 65, Number 111)]

[Proposed Rules]

[Page 36397]

From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]

[DOCID:fr08jn00-33]

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[CA241-0238b; FRL-6709-2]

Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve a revision to the Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District (SBCAPCD) portion of the California State Implementation Plan (SIP). This revision concerns volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions from metal parts coating operations. We are proposing to approve a local rule to regulate these emission sources under the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act).

DATES: Any comments on this proposal must arrive by July 10, 2000.

ADDRESSES: Mail comments to Andy Steckel, Rulemaking Office Chief (AIR- 4), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105-3901.

You can inspect copies of the submitted SIP revision and EPA's technical support document (TSD) at our Region IX office during normal business hours. You may also see a copy of the submitted SIP revision at the following locations:

California Air Resources Board, Stationary Source Division, Rule Evaluation Section, 2020 ``L'' Street, Sacramento, CA 95812; and, Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District, 26 Castilian Drive, Suite B-23, Goleta, CA 93117.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jerald S. Wamsley, Rulemaking Office (Air-4), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, (415) 744- 1226.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This proposal concerns SBCAPCD Rule 330, Surface Coating of Metal Parts and Products. In the Rules and Regulations section of this Federal Register, EPA is approving this local rule in a direct final action without prior proposal because we believe this SIP revisions is not controversial. However, if we receive adverse comments, we will publish a timely withdrawal of the direct final rule and address the comments in subsequent action based on this proposed rule. We do not plan to open a second comment period, so anyone interested in commenting should do so at this time. If we do not receive adverse comments, no further activity is planned. For further information, please see the direct final action.

Dated: May 23, 2000. Felicia Marcus, Regional Administrator, Region IX.

[FR Doc. 00-14174Filed6-7-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P