Air quality implementation plans; approval and promulgation; various States: Georgia,

[Federal Register: December 2, 1999 (Volume 64, Number 231)]

[Rules and Regulations]

[Page 67491-67495]

From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]

[DOCID:fr02de99-11]

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[GA-40-9929a; FRL-6473-1]

Approval and Promulgation of Revisions to the Georgia State Implementation Plan

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Direct final rule.

SUMMARY: The EPA is approving the State Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions submitted by the State of Georgia on July 10, 1998. These revisions adopt two new rules for reducing nitrogen oxides emissions in the Atlanta ozone nonattainment area: a rule requiring specific gasoline formulation in 25 counties and a rule establishing unit- specific emission limits at certain Georgia Power generating units. The revisions also incorporate federal requirements related to permitting and wood furniture finishing and cleaning operations and make technical corrections to certain air quality rules. In addition, the revisions clarify requirements of Georgia's Clean Fueled Fleets Program. EPA will act on the rule requiring specific gasoline formulation in 25 counties and revisions submitted for regulating air emissions and operating practices of existing hospital/medical/infectious waste incinerators that commenced construction, reconstruction or modification on or before June 20, 1996 in a separate Federal Register notice at a later date.

DATES: This direct final rule is effective January 31, 2000 without further notice, unless EPA receives adverse comments by January 3, 2000. If adverse comments are received, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of the direct final rule in the Federal Register and inform the public that the rule will not take effect.

ADDRESSES: All comments should be addressed to: Michele Notarianni, Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides, and Toxics Management Division, EPA Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303.

Copies of the documents relative to this action are available for inspection at the following locations during normal business hours. Interested persons wanting to examine these documents should make an appointment with the appropriate office at least 24 hours before the visiting day.

EPA Region 4, Air Planning Branch, 61 Forsyth Street, SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303. (To make an appointment, please contact Michele Notarianni at 404-562-9031.) Air Protection Branch, Georgia Environmental Protection Division, Georgia Department of Natural Resources, 4244 International Parkway, Suite 120, Atlanta, Georgia 30354.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michele Notarianni, Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides, and Toxics Management Division, EPA Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303. The telephone number is 404-562-9031.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

  1. Background

    On July 10, 1998, the Georgia Environmental Protection Division (EPD) submitted a revision to Georgia's State Implementation Plan (SIP) incorporating revisions to the Rules for Air Quality Control, Chapter 391-3-1;

    [[Page 67492]]

    the Rules for Clean Fueled Fleets (CFF), Chapter 391-3-22; and the narrative for the revision to the CFF Program. Two public hearings on these revisions were held on March 20, 1998 and May 20, 1998. These revisions adopt two new rules for reducing nitrogen oxides emissions in the Atlanta ozone nonattainment area: a rule requiring specific gasoline formulation in 25 counties and a rule establishing unit- specific emission limits at certain Georgia Power generating units. The revisions also incorporate federal requirements related to permitting and wood furniture finishing and cleaning operations and make technical corrections to certain air quality rules. In addition, the revisions clarify requirements of Georgia's CFF Program. EPA will act on the rule requiring specific gasoline formulation in 25 counties and revisions submitted for regulating air emissions and operating practices of existing hospital/medical/infectious waste incinerators that commenced construction, reconstruction or modification on or before June 20, 1996 in a separate Federal Register document at a later date.

  2. Revisions Approved by EPA

    EPA is approving all revisions to the Georgia SIP included in the July 10, 1998, submittal. Below is a summary of the approved revisions.

    Air Quality Control, Rule 391-3-1

    ‹bullet› Rule 391-3-1-.01(nnnn): A new subparagraph, (nnnn), is added to adopt the current, January 2, 1998, version of the Georgia Department of Natural Resources Procedures for Testing and Monitoring Sources of Air Pollutants manual.

    Adopting the January 2, 1998, manual adds test methods and monitoring procedures for waste sample analysis, methanol emissions from stationary sources, electric utility steam generating units, and medical waste incinerators.

    ‹bullet› Rule 391-3-1-.02(2)(c)(6): The revisions provide exemptions for specific categories of incinerators subject to other, more specific regulations.

    ‹bullet› Rule 391-3-1-.02(2)(fff): A new subparagraph, (fff), is added to regulate particulate matter emissions from yarn spinning operations.

    ‹bullet› Rule 391-3-1-.02(2)(hhh): A new subparagraph, (hhh), is added to adopt federal requirements limiting volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions from wood furniture finishing and cleaning operations with potential emissions of VOCs exceeding 25 tons per year which are located in the 13-county Atlanta ozone nonattainment area. This area is comprised of the following counties: Cherokee, Clayton, Cobb, Coweta, DeKalb, Douglas, Fayette, Forsyth, Fulton, Gwinnett, Henry, Paulding, and Rockdale.

    ‹bullet› Rule 391-3-1-.02(2)(jjj): A new subparagraph, (jjj), is added to limit nitrogen oxides (NO‹INF›X‹/INF›) emissions from coal- fired electric utility steam-generating units with a maximum heat input greater than 250 million British thermal units per hour (mmbtu/hr) located in the 13-county Atlanta ozone nonattainment area. The compliance period is based on a 30-day rolling average beginning May 1 and ending September 30 of each year. Effective May 1, 1999, NO‹INF›X‹/INF› emissions from regulated units cannot exceed the alternative emission limits established by the EPD for each unit in its Title V permit. If a facility does not comply with all alternative emission limits for its regulated units, the facility must demonstrate that the NO‹INF›X‹/INF› emissions averaged over all regulated units do not exceed 0.34 pounds of NO‹INF›X‹/INF› per mmbtu heat input. Effective May 1, 2000, if a facility does not comply with all, established alternative emission limits for its regulated units, the facility must demonstrate that the NO‹INF›X‹/INF› emissions averaged over all regulated units do not exceed 0.30 pounds of NO‹INF›X‹/INF› per mmbtu heat input. By December 31, 1999, owners/operators of regulated units must submit actual operating performance data, with natural gas technologies in place and optimized, for all regulated units. EPD may revise this rule based on its review of submitted performance data to determine if the NO‹INF›X‹/INF› emission limits effective May 1, 2000 are technically achievable.

    ‹bullet› Rule 391-3-1-.02(3) and (6): The revisions delete references to the August 15, 1997 version of the testing procedures manual in subparagraphs (3)(a), (6)(a)2.(v)(I), (6)(a)(vii)2.(II)I, and (6)(b)1.(vi).

    ‹bullet› Rule 391-3-1-.02(7)(b): The revisions insert the word ``Deterioration'' into the heading as follows: ``Prevention of Significant Deterioration Standards.''

    ‹bullet› Rule 391-3-1-.02(11): A new paragraph, (11), entitled ``Compliance Assurance Monitoring'' is added to incorporate and adopt 40 CFR part 64 and to require any stationary source subject to any requirement under 40 CFR part 64 to comply with these provisions.

    ‹bullet› Rule 391-3-1-.03(6): The revisions modify the list of source types exempt from securing permits to construct and operate new sources by adding municipal solid waste landfills which meet the following three criteria: (a) total design capacity less than or equal to 2.756 million tons or 3.27 million cubic yards of solid waste; (b) the emissions of VOCs are less than 25 tons per year for landfills located in the 13-county Atlanta ozone nonattainment area; and (c) emissions of NO‹INF›X‹/INF› from operations other than the final control device are less than 50 tons per year for landfills located within the 13-county Atlanta ozone nonattainment area.

    ‹bullet› Rule 391-3-1-.03(8): The revisions add a new subparagraph, (f), to clarify that all requirements for obtaining a permit, as specified in 391-3-1-.02(9)(b)16, must be met to secure a permit to construct a new stationary source or modify an existing stationary source.

    Clean Fueled Fleets, Rule 391-3-22

    ‹bullet› Rule 391-3-22-.01: The revisions to Chapter 391-3-22, Georgia's CFF Rule, add five definitions, correct, modify, and clarify existing definitions, and re-number the list of definitions.

    ‹bullet› Rule 391-3-22-.02: The revisions clarify that the requirements of the CFF Program in Chapter 391-3-22 are applicable to motor vehicles operated in the covered area, which is the 13-county Atlanta ozone nonattainment area.

    ‹bullet› Rule 391-3-22-.03: The revisions clarify that the requirements of Chapter 391-3-22 do not apply to regulated fleets that are simply garaged in the covered area. The revisions also extend the rule's applicability to covered fleet operators which lease covered fleet vehicles.

    ‹bullet› Rule 391-3-22-.04: The revisions to paragraph (1) correct the upper limit of the gross vehicle weight rating of covered heavy duty vehicles from 26,000 to 26,001 pounds. Vehicles not operated in the covered area are added to the list of exempted vehicles in paragraph (3).

    ‹bullet› Rule 391-3-22-.05(1): Subsections (b)1., (b)6., and (c) are revised to clarify the procedure for determining whether a vehicle is capable of being centrally fueled, correct a reference to ratio calculations for this determination, and correct the model year to 1999 to reflect a one-year delay in rule implementation.

    ‹bullet› Rule 391-3-22-.06: The revisions clarify that purchase requirements for CFFs can be met through purchasing clean fueled vehicles, converting existing vehicles to clean fueled vehicles, and/or using purchase credits. For flex-fuel and dual fuel vehicles, a provision is added to allow vehicle operation on a fuel not meeting the clean fuel definition for manufacturer recommended maintenance.

    [[Page 67493]]

    ‹bullet› Rule 391-3-22-.07: Minor word changes are made to paragraphs (1) and (2) for clarity. In Table B, the non-methane hydrocarbon plus NO‹INF›X‹/INF› emission standard for heavy duty trucks which meets the low emission vehicle emission standards is amended from 3.15 to 3.8 grams/brake horsepower-hour to conform to the current, federal CFF standard.

    ‹bullet› Rule 391-3-22-.08(1): Under subparagraph (a), subsections 1, 7, and 13, are revised to, respectively, provide purchase credits for both covered and non-covered fleet operators, clarify operational requirements for flex-fuel and dual fuel vehicles during maintenance, and specify that the selling or trading of vehicles used to meet purchase requirements or generate purchase credits is not allowed in the model year in which the vehicle was originally purchased. Subparagraphs (b)1., (c), and (d) are revised to, respectively: clarify the conditions for generating credit for purchases prior to the required acquisition date, provide for credits for clean fueled vehicles purchased in exempt categories, and clarify the use of purchase credits.

    ‹bullet› Rule 391-3-22-.08(2): Subparagraphs (d), (i), and (j) are revised to, respectively, modify the time for non-covered fleet operators to obtain purchase credits, clarify and modify reporting requirements for covered and exempt vehicles, and delete a record keeping requirement for keeping monthly fueling records and routine maintenance records for covered and exempt vehicles.

    ‹bullet› Rule 391-3-22-.11: A provision is added to allow EPD to grant exemptions or extensions to covered fleet operators not complying with purchase requirements upon considering vehicle and fuel availability issues.

  3. Final Action

    EPA is approving the aforementioned changes to the Georgia SIP because they are consistent with requirements of EPA guidance and the Clean Air Act.

    The EPA is publishing this rule without prior proposal because the Agency views this as a noncontroversial submittal and anticipates no adverse comments. However, in the proposed rules section of this Federal Register publication, EPA is publishing a separate document that will serve as the proposal to approve the SIP revision should adverse comments be filed. This rule will be effective January 31, 2000 without further notice unless the Agency receives adverse comments by January 3, 2000.

    If the EPA receives such comments, then EPA will publish a document withdrawing the final rule and informing the public that the rule will not take effect. All public comments received will then be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period. Parties interested in commenting should do so at this time. If no such comments are received, the public is advised that this rule will be effective on January 31, 2000, and no further action will be taken on the proposed rule.

  4. Administrative Requirements

    1. Executive Order 12866

      The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted this regulatory action from Executive Order (E.O.) 12866, entitled ``Regulatory Planning and Review.''

    2. Executive Orders on Federalism

      Under E.O. 12875, EPA may not issue a regulation that is not required by statute and that creates a mandate upon a state, local, or tribal government, unless the Federal government provides the funds necessary to pay the direct compliance costs incurred by those governments. If the mandate is unfunded, EPA must provide to the Office of Management and Budget a description of the extent of EPA's prior consultation with representatives of affected state, local, and tribal governments, the nature of their concerns, copies of written communications from the governments, and a statement supporting the need to issue the regulation.

      In addition, E.O. 12875 requires EPA to develop an effective process permitting elected officials and other representatives of state, local, and tribal governments ``to provide meaningful and timely input in the development of regulatory proposals containing significant unfunded mandates.'' Today's rule does not create a mandate on state, local or tribal governments. The rule does not impose any enforceable duties on these entities. Accordingly, the requirements of section 1(a) of E.O. 12875 do not apply to this rule.

      On August 4, 1999, President Clinton issued a new executive order on federalism, Executive Order 13132, (64 FR 43255 (August 10, 1999),) which will take effect on November 2, 1999. In the interim, the current Executive Order 12612, (52 FR 41685 (October 30, 1987),) on federalism still applies. This rule will not have a substantial direct effect on States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 12612. The rule affects only one State, and does not alter the relationship or the distribution of power and responsibilities established in the Clean Air Act.

    3. Executive Order 13045

      Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), applies to any rule that: (1) Is determined to be ``economically significant'' as defined under E.O. 12866, and (2) Concerns an environmental health or safety risk that EPA has reason to believe may have a disproportionate effect on children. If the regulatory action meets both criteria, the Agency must evaluate the environmental health or safety effects of the planned rule on children, and explain why the planned regulation is preferable to other potentially effective and reasonably feasible alternatives considered by the Agency.

      This rule is not subject to E.O. 13045 because it does not involve decisions intended to mitigate environmental health or safety risks.

    4. Executive Order 13084

      Under E.O. 13084, EPA may not issue a regulation that is not required by statute, that significantly affects or uniquely affects the communities of Indian tribal governments, and that imposes substantial direct compliance costs on those communities, unless the Federal government provides the funds necessary to pay the direct compliance costs incurred by the tribal governments. If the mandate is unfunded, EPA must provide to the Office of Management and Budget, in a separately identified section of the preamble to the rule, a description of the extent of EPA's prior consultation with representatives of affected tribal governments, a summary of the nature of their concerns, and a statement supporting the need to issue the regulation.

      In addition, E.O. 13084 requires EPA to develop an effective process permitting elected and other representatives of Indian tribal governments ``to provide meaningful and timely input in the development of regulatory policies on matters that significantly or uniquely affect their communities.'' Today's rule does not significantly or uniquely affect the communities of Indian tribal governments. Accordingly, the requirements of section 3(b) of E.O. 13084 do not apply to this rule.

      [[Page 67494]]

    5. Regulatory Flexibility Act

      The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) generally requires an agency to conduct a regulatory flexibility analysis of any rule subject to notice and comment rulemaking requirements unless the agency certifies that the rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. Small entities include small businesses, small not-for-profit enterprises, and small governmental jurisdictions.

      This final rule will not have a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities because SIP approvals under section 110 and subchapter I, part D of the Clean Air Act do not create any new requirements but simply approve requirements that the State is already imposing. Therefore, because the Federal SIP approval does not create any new requirements, I certify that this action will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.

      Moreover, due to the nature of the Federal-State relationship under the Clean Air Act, preparation of flexibility analysis would constitute Federal inquiry into the economic reasonableness of state action. The Clean Air Act forbids EPA to base its actions concerning SIPs on such grounds. Union Electric Co., v. U.S. EPA, 427 U.S. 246, 255-66 (1976); 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2).

    6. Unfunded Mandates

      Under section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (``Unfunded Mandates Act''), signed into law on March 22, 1995, EPA must prepare a budgetary impact statement to accompany any proposed or final rule that includes a Federal mandate that may result in estimated annual costs to State, local, or tribal governments in the aggregate; or to private sector, of $100 million or more. Under section 205, EPA must select the most cost-effective and least burdensome alternative that achieves the objectives of the rule and is consistent with statutory requirements. Section 203 requires EPA to establish a plan for informing and advising any small governments that may be significantly or uniquely impacted by the rule.

      EPA has determined that the approval action promulgated does not include a Federal mandate that may result in estimated annual costs of $100 million or more to either State, local, or tribal governments in the aggregate, or to the private sector. This Federal action approves pre-existing requirements under State or local law, and imposes no new requirements. Accordingly, no additional costs to State, local, or tribal governments, or to the private sector, result from this action.

    7. Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General

      The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register. This rule is not a ``major'' rule as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).

    8. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act

      Section 12 of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) of 1995 requires Federal agencies to evaluate existing technical standards when developing a new regulation. To comply with NTTAA, EPA must consider and use ``voluntary consensus standards'' (VCS) if available and applicable when developing programs and policies unless doing so would be inconsistent with applicable law or otherwise impractical.

      The EPA believes that VCS are inapplicable to this action. Today's action does not require the public to perform activities conducive to the use of VCS.

  5. Petitions for Judicial Review

    Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filedin the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by January 31, 2000. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)

    List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide, Hydrocarbons, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides.

    Dated: October 12, 1999. A. Stanley Meiburg, Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.

    Part 52 of chapter I, title 40, Code of Federal Regulations, is amended as follows:

    PART 52--[AMENDED]

    1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

      Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

      Subpart L--Georgia

    2. a. In the table in Sec. 52.570(c), the following entries are removed: 391-3-21-.01, 391-3-21-.02, 391-3-21-.03, 391-3-21-.04, 391-3- 21-.05, 391-3-21-.06, 391-3-21-.07, 391-3-21-.08, 391-3-21-.09, 391-3- 21-.10, 391-3-21-.11.

      1. In the table in Sec. 52.570(c), the following entries are added: 391-3-1-.02(2)(fff), 391-3-1-.02(2)(hhh), 391-3-1-.02(2)(jjj), 391-3- 1-.02(11), 391-3-22.

      2. In the table in Sec. 52.570(c), the following entries are revised: 391-3-1-.01, 391-3-1-.02(2)(c), 391-3-1-.02(3), 391-3- 1-.02(6), 391-3-1-.02(7), 391-3-1-.03.

      The additions and revisions read as follows:

      Sec. 52.570 Identification of plan.

      * * * * *

      (c) * * *

      EPA Approved Georgia Regulations

      State State citation

      Title/subject effective date

      EPA approval date

      Explanation

      *

      *

      *

      *

      *

      *

      * 391-3-1-.01.......................... Definitions.............

      6/15/98

      12/2/99

      [[Page 67495]]

      *

      *

      *

      *

      *

      *

      * 391-3-1-.02(2)(c).................... Incinerators............

      6/15/98

      12/2/99

      *

      *

      *

      *

      *

      *

      * 391-3-1-.02(2)(fff).................. Particulate Matter

      6/15/98

      12/2/99 Emissions from Yarn Spinning Operations.

      *

      *

      *

      *

      *

      *

      * 391-3-1-.02(2)(hhh).................. Wood Furniture Finishing

      6/15/98

      12/2/99 and Cleaning Operations.

      *

      *

      *

      *

      *

      *

      * 391-3-1-.02(2)(jjj).................. NO‹INF›X‹/INF› Emissions from

      6/15/98

      12/2/99 Electric Utility Steam Generating Units. 391-3-1-.02(3)....................... Sampling................

      6/15/98

      12/2/99

      *

      *

      *

      *

      *

      *

      * 391-3-1-.02(6)....................... Source Monitoring.......

      6/15/98

      12/2/99 391-3-1-.02(7)....................... Prevention of

      6/15/98

      12/2/99 Significant Deterioration of Air Quality.

      *

      *

      *

      *

      *

      *

      * 391-3-1-.02(11)...................... Compliance Assurance

      6/15/98

      12/2/99 Monitoring. 391-3-1-.03.......................... Permits.................

      6/15/98

      12/2/99

      *

      *

      *

      *

      *

      *

      * 391-3-22............................. Clean Fueled Fleets.....

      6/15/98

      12/2/99

      *

      *

      *

      *

      *

      *

      *

      [FR Doc. 99-29445Filed12-1-99; 8:45 am]

      BILLING CODE 6560-50-P

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT