Air quality implementation plans; approval and promulgation; various States: Maryland,

[Federal Register: June 14, 2004 (Volume 69, Number 113)]

[Proposed Rules]

[Page 32928-32932]

From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]

[DOCID:fr14jn04-28]

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[MD153-3109; FRL-7672-9]

Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Maryland; Revised Major Stationary Source Applicability for Reasonably Available Control Technology and Permitting and Revised Offset Ratios for the Washington Area

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted by the State of Maryland on December 1, 2003. This revision pertains to changes in Maryland's regulations for new source permitting for major sources of volatile organic compound (VOC) and nitrogen oxides (NOX) emissions and regulations requiring reasonably available control technology on major stationary sources of nitrogen oxides in the Washington, DC ozone nonattainment area. The revision modifies the currently approved SIP to make the following

[[Page 32929]]

changes applicable in the Washington, DC ozone nonattainment area: modify the emissions offset ratio; lower the applicability threshold of the new source review (NSR) permit program; and, lower the applicability threshold of the NOXreasonable available control technology (NOXRACT) rule. Maryland made these changes in response to the reclassification of the Washington, DC ozone nonattainment area to severe nonattainment. The intended effect of this action is to propose approval of these changes to Maryland's NSR permitting program and NOXRACT regulations for the Washington, DC ozone nonattainment area.

DATES: Written comments must be received on or before July 14, 2004.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by MD153-3109 by one of the following methods:

1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow

   the on-line instructions for submitting comments.

2. E-mail: morris.makeba@epa.gov.

3. Mail: Makeba Morris, Chief, Air Quality Planning Branch, Mailcode 3AP21, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.

4. Hand Delivery: At the previously-listed EPA Region III address. Such deliveries are only accepted during the Docket's normal hours of operation, and special arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed information.

   Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. MD153-3109. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in the public docket without change, including any personal information provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through regulations.gov or e- mail. The Federal regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without going through regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses.

   Copies of the documents relevant to this action are available for public inspection during normal business hours at the Air Protection Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103; Maryland Department of the Environment, 1800 Washington Boulevard, Suite 705, Baltimore, Maryland, 21230, Baltimore, Maryland 21224.

   FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher Cripps, (215) 814-2179, or by e-mail at cripps.christopher@epa.gov.

   SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On December 1, 2003, the Maryland Department of the Environment submitted a revision (MD SIP Revision Number 03-08) to the Maryland State Implementation Plan (SIP) for the Washington, DC ozone nonattainment area. This revision amends the approved Maryland SIP to: revise the definition of major stationary source in the Code of Maryland Regulations (COMAR) 26.11.17.01B(13); incorporate changes in the general provisions found in COMAR 26.11.17.03B(3) which require proposed new major stationary sources to obtain emission reductions, or offsets, of the same pollutant from existing sources in the area of the proposed source at a ratio of 1.3 tons of existing emissions for every 1 ton of proposed emissions; and change the threshold of applicability of Maryland's NOXRACT regulation, COMAR 26.11.09.08 to sources with emission of 25 or more tons per year of NOX.

   1. Background

1. What Is Nonattainment NSR?

   The major NSR program contained in parts C and D of title I of the Clean Air Act (the Act) is a preconstruction review and permitting program applicable to new or modified major stationary sources of air pollutants regulated under the Act. In areas not meeting health-based National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) and in ozone transport regions (OTR), the program is implemented under the requirements of part D of title I of the Act. We call this program the ``nonattainment NSR'' program. (The other provisions of part C of title I to the Act, that are applicable to areas meeting the NAAQS (``attainment'' areas) or for which there is insufficient information to determine whether they meet the NAAQS (``unclassifiable'' areas), are not the subject of this proposed rule.)

   The nonattainment NSR program applies only to new sources if the source is ``major.'' In a serious area a source is considered major if it has the potential to emit 50 or more tons per year of VOC or NOXemissions. In a severe area a source is considered major if it has the potential to emit 25 or more tons per year of VOC or NOXemissions. The minimum required offset ratio in a serious area is 1.2 to 1 but is 1.3 to 1 in a severe area.

2. What Is NOXRACT?

   The Act requires SIPs to require existing major stationary sources of VOC emissions to install and implement RACT in ozone nonattainment areas classified as moderate and worse.

   Section 182(f) of the Act requires that States impose the same requirements on major stationary sources of NOXas on major stationary sources of VOC.\1\ Section 182(f) specifies that major stationary sources of NOXare to be defined according to the definitions in sections 302 and 182(c), (d), and (e). In ozone nonattainment areas these definitions for NOXare the same as for VOC and, as such, vary from 10 to 100 tons per year according to the classification of the ozone nonattainment area. The thresholds for the applicability of rules requiring RACT on existing major stationary sources of NOXemissions (NOXRACT) in serious and severe areas are the same as for nonattainment NSR, that is, for serious areas the major source threshold is 50 tons per year potential emissions, and for severe areas the threshold is 25 tons per year potential emissions. (Like the nonattainment NSR requirements, the remainder of the state is subject to a 100 tons per year applicability threshold for NOXRACT.)

   \1\ Section 182(f) establishes conditions for the only exceptions to this requirement, none of which apply in the case of the Washington, DC area.

3. When Were Maryland's Regulations for Nonattainment NSR and NOXRACT for the Washington, DC Area Approved?

   On February 8, 2001 (66 FR 9522), EPA approved Maryland's NOXRACT rule COMAR 26.11.0.08. On February 12, 2001 (66 FR 9766) EPA approved a revision to the Maryland State Implementation Plan (SIP) that consisted of Maryland's nonattainment NSR permitting requirements. At the time of these final actions, the Washington, DC area was classified as a serious ozone nonattainment area.

   [[Page 32930]]

4. What Changes Were Necessary to Maryland's Nonattainment NSR and NOXRACT Rules as a Result of the Reclassification of the Washington, DC Area to Severe Nonattainment?

   On January 24, 2003 (68 FR 3410), EPA reclassified the Washington, DC ozone nonattainment area from serious nonattainment to severe nonattainment. Among the new requirements mandated by section 182(d) of the Act are the requirements to make the following changes to the Maryland SIP for the Washington, DC ozone nonattainment area:

   (1) Lower to 25 tons per year the threshold for applicability of new source review permitting requirements for major stationary sources of VOC and NOXfrom the 50 tons per year level required in serious areas,

   (2) Increase the offset ratio to 1.3 to 1 from the 1.2 to 1 ratio required in serious areas, and,

   (3) Lower to 25 tons per year the threshold for application of RACT on existing major stationary sources of NOXfrom the 50 tons per year level required in serious areas.

   On December 1, 2003, the Maryland Department of the Environment submitted a revision (MD SIP Revision Number 03-08) to the Maryland State Implementation Plan (SIP) to amend the approved Maryland SIP to meet these new requirements. The revision consists of a revised definition of major stationary source in COMAR 26.11.17.01B(13), a change in the general provisions found in COMAR 26.11.17.03B(3) which require proposed new major stationary sources to obtain emission reductions, or offsets, of the same pollutant from existing sources in the area of the proposed source at a ratio of 1.3 tons of existing emissions for every 1 ton of proposed emissions, and change the threshold of applicability of Maryland's NOXRACT regulation, COMAR 26.11.09.08 to sources with emission of 25 or more tons per year of NOX.

   2. New Source Permitting Requirements

1. What Were the Nonattainment NSR Applicability Threshold and Offset Ratio in the Maryland SIP Prior To Adoption of the December 1, 2003, SIP Revision?

   On February 12, 2001 (66 FR 9766) EPA approved a revision to the Maryland State Implementation Plan (SIP) that consisted of Maryland's nonattainment NSR permitting requirements. This revision required major new sources and major modifications to existing sources of VOC or NOXemissions to meet nonattainment NSR permitting requirements if they are proposing to locate or are located within the State of Maryland. These nonattainment NSR requirements apply not only in those portions of Maryland designated as ozone nonattainment areas, but throughout the State of Maryland because the entire state is located within the Ozone Transport Region (OTR).\2\ As a result of the 1990 amendments to the Act, Maryland's permitting programs for major new source and major modifications had to cover serious and severe ozone nonattainment areas, the OTR requirements and requirements for carbon monoxide (CO) nonattainment areas.\3\

   \2\ The Act imposes the OTR requirements on the entire State, but those portions of the State that are classified as serious or severe nonattainment must implement the more stringent serious or severe requirements.

   \3\ Neither the OTR nor CO requirements would be impacted by this proposed rule. These requirements are noted to provide background and context for excerpts of the pertinent COMAR test in which the OTR and CO requirements to be found elsewhere in this document.

   The requirements that are pertinent to this proposed rule are the new source review permitting requirements for serious and severe ozone nonattainment areas. Specifically, among the numerous requirements for nonattainment NSR permitting requirements the pertinent requirements are those relating to the thresholds for applicability of the regulations and offset ratios. The following table compares these requirements for OTR, serious and severe areas.

   Table of Major Source Applicability Thresholds and Offset Ratios

   Type of Area Requirement

   -------------------------------------------------------------------------- OTR

   Serious

   Severe

   Major new source threshold for VOC 50 tons per year....... 50 tons per year....... 25 tons per year sources. Major new source threshold for NOX 100 tons per year...... 50 tons per year....... 25 tons per year sources. Offset ratio......................... 1.15 to 1.............. 1.2 to 1............... 1.3 to 1

   Prior to the reclassification, Maryland's new source permitting rules contained both the serious and severe ozone nonattainment area requirements as well as the ozone transport region requirements that were applicable in portions of the State that were not classified as serious or severe.\4\ The serious ozone nonattainment area requirements were applicable in the Maryland portion--Calvert, Charles, Frederick, Montgomery, and Prince George's counties--of the Washington, DC serious ozone nonattainment area. The severe ozone nonattainment area requirements were applicable in the Baltimore area--Baltimore City, and, Anne Arundel, Baltimore, Carroll, Cecil, Harford, and Howard counties, and, applicable in the Maryland portion, Cecil County, of the Philadelphia-Wilmington-Trenton severe ozone nonattainment areas.

   \4\ And the Maryland Regulations also covered carbon monoxide nonattainment area requirements as well.

2. How Did Maryland Change the Applicability Threshold for Major Stationary Sources and What Is EPA's Evaluation of the Changes?

   Maryland's regulations set the threshold for major stationary sources by listing which counties were subject to the 100 tons per year of NOXthreshold for those areas subject only to the OTR requirement, which counties are subject to the 50 tons per year VOC threshold applicable in serious areas and the OTR, and which counties are subject to the 25 tons per year of NOXor VOC threshold applicable in severe areas. In Maryland's regulations this is done through the definition of ``major stationary source'' in COMAR 26.11.17.01B(13)(a). Prior to adoption of the December 1, 2003, SIP revision, this section B(13)(a) read as follows:

   (a) ``Major stationary source'' means any stationary source of air pollution which emits or has the potential to emit:

   (i) 25 tons or more per year of VOC or NOXfor sources located in Baltimore City or Anne Arundel, Baltimore, Carroll, Cecil, Harford, or Howard counties;

   (ii) 50 tons or more per year of VOC for sources located in Allegany, Calvert, Caroline, Charles, Dorchester, Frederick, Garrett, Kent, Montgomery, Prince George's Queen Anne's, St. Mary's, Somerset, Talbot, Washington, Wicomico, or Worcester counties;

   (iii) 50 tons or more per year of NOXfor sources located in Calvert, Charles, Frederick, Harford, Howard, Montgomery, or Prince George's counties;

   (iv) 100 tons or more per year of NOXfor sources located in Allegany, Caroline, Dorchester, Garrett, Kent, Queen Anne's, St. Mary's, Somerset, Talbot, Washington, Wicomico, or Worcester counties; or

   (v) 100 tons or more per year of carbon monoxide for sources located in the areas designated as nonattainment for carbon monoxide in 40 CFR 81.321, 1991 edition, as amended on page 56733 of the Federal Register, Vol. 56, No. 215, dated November 6, 1991.

   [[Page 32931]]

   (The inclusion of the thresholds for NOXand VOC sources located in Allegany, Caroline, Dorchester, Garrett, Kent, Queen Anne's, St. Mary's, Somerset, Talbot, Washington, Wicomico, and Worcester counties is due the OTR requirements of section 184 of the Act.)

   On December 1, 2003, Maryland submitted a revision to the definition of ``major stationary source'' in COMAR 26.11.17.01B that added: (1) The Washington area counties of Calvert, Charles, Frederick, Montgomery, and Prince George's to section B(13)(a)(i) thus making 25 tons per year or more of VOC or NOXfor sources the major source threshold in this area, deleted section B(13)(iii) that contained the 50 tons per year threshold for NOXsources applicable to only serious areas, deleted the Washington area counties of Calvert, Charles, Frederick, Montgomery, and Prince George's from section (13)(a)(ii), and renumbered sections B(13)(a)(c)(iv) and (v) to section B(13)(A)(iii) and (iv). The revised section B(13)(a) now reads:

   (a) ``Major stationary source'' means any stationary source of air pollution which emits or has the potential to emit:

   (i) 25 tons or more per year of VOC or NOXfor sources located in Baltimore City or Anne Arundel, Baltimore, Calvert, Carroll, Cecil, Charles, Frederick, Harford, Howard, Montgomery, or Prince George's counties;

   (ii) 50 tons or more per year of VOC for sources located in Allegany, Caroline, Dorchester, Garrett, Kent, Queen Anne's, St. Mary's, Somerset, Talbot, Washington, Wicomico, or Worcester counties;

   (iii) 100 tons or more per year of NOXfor sources located in Allegany, Caroline, Dorchester, Garrett, Kent, Queen Anne's, St. Mary's, Somerset, Talbot, Washington, Wicomico, or Worcester counties; or

   (iv) 100 tons or more per year of carbon monoxide for sources located in the areas designated as nonattainment for carbon monoxide in 40 CFR 81.321, 1991 edition, as amended on page 56733 of the Federal Register, Vol. 56, No. 215, dated November 6, 1991.

   EPA has concluded that the December 1, 2003, SIP revision has properly implemented the necessary change in the applicability threshold for the Washington, DC ozone nonattainment area necessitated by the January 24, 2003, reclassification action. The changes to the definition of ``major stationary source'' in COMAR 26.11.17.01B now requires that all new stationary sources whose potential emissions of VOC or NOXemissions are 25 tons per year or greater are now classified as major sources subject to the provisions of COMAR 26.11.1.7.

3. How Did Maryland Change the Offset Ratio and What Is EPA's Evaluation of the Changes?

   In a manner similar to the nonattainment NSR applicability threshold for major stationary sources, Maryland's regulations set the offset ratio by listing which counties were subject to the 1.15 to 1 OTR requirement, which to the 1.2 to 1 ratio for serious areas, and which to the 1.3 to 1 ratio for severe areas. This is found at COMAR 26.11.17.03B(3). Prior to adoption of the December 1, 2003, SIP revision, this section read as follows:

   (3) The applicant has met the reasonable further progress requirements in section 173(a)(1)(A) of the Clean Air Act by obtaining emission reductions (offsets) of the same pollutant from existing sources in the area of the proposed source, whether or not under the same ownership, in accordance with the following ratios, at a minimum:

   (a) 1.3 to 1 for sources of VOC or NOXin Baltimore City, or Anne Arundel, Baltimore, Carroll, Cecil, Harford, or Howard counties,

   (b) 1.2 to 1 for sources of VOC or NOXin Calvert, Charles, Frederick, Montgomery, or Prince George's counties,

   (c) 1.15 to 1 for sources of VOC or NOXin Allegany, Caroline, Dorchester, Garrett, Kent, Queen Anne's, Somerset, St. Mary's, Talbot, Washington, Wicomico, or Worcester counties,

   (d) 1.1 to 1 for sources of CO in CO nonattainment areas specified in Regulation .01B(13) of this chapter;

   On December 1, 2003, Maryland submitted a revision to COMAR 26.11.17.03B(3) that added the Washington area counties to section B(3)(a), deleted section B(3)(b) and renumbered the remaining sections to result in a section B(3) that reads as follows:

   (3) The applicant has met the reasonable further progress requirements in section 173(a)(1)(A) of the Clean Air Act by obtaining emission reductions (offsets) of the same pollutant from existing sources in the area of the proposed source, whether or not under the same ownership, in accordance with the following ratios, at a minimum:

   (a) 1.3 to 1 for sources of VOC or NOXin Baltimore City, or Anne Arundel, Baltimore, Calvert, Carroll, Cecil, Charles, Frederick, Harford, Howard, Montgomery, or Prince George's counties,

   (b) 1.15 to 1 for sources of VOC or NOXin Allegany, Caroline, Dorchester, Garrett, Kent, Queen Anne's, Somerset, St. Mary's, Talbot, Washington, Wicomico, or Worcester counties,

   (c) 1.1 to 1 for sources of CO in CO nonattainment areas specified in Regulation .01B(13) of this chapter;

   EPA has concluded that the December 1, 2003, SIP revision has properly implemented the necessary change in the offset ratio for the Washington, DC ozone nonattainment area necessitated by the January 24, 2003, reclassification action. The changes to COMAR 26.11.17.03B(3) now require that the 1.3 to 1 offset ratio be applied in the Washington, DC area.

   3. How Did Maryland Change the Applicability Threshold for NOX RACT and What Is EPA's Evaluation of the Changes?

      On February 8, 2001 (66 FR 9522), EPA approved Maryland's NOXRACT rule COMAR 26.11.0.08. As is done for the nonattainment NSR applicability threshold, Maryland's regulations set the applicability threshold for NOXRACT by listing which counties were subject to the 100 tons per year threshold for those areas subject only to the OTR requirement, which counties are subject to the 50 tons per year threshold for serious areas, and which counties are subject to the 25 tons per year threshold for severe areas. These provisions are found in COMAR 26.11.09.08A(1). Prior to adoption of the December 1, 2003, SIP revision, COMAR 26.11.09.08A(1) read as follows:

      (1) This regulation applies to a person who owns or operates an installation that causes emissions of NOXand is located at premises that have total potential to emit:

      (a) 25 tons or more per year of NOXand is located in Baltimore City, or Anne Arundel, Baltimore, Carroll, Cecil, Harford, or Howard counties; or

      (b) 50 tons or more per year of NOXand is located in Calvert, Charles, Frederick, Montgomery, or Prince George's counties; or

      (c) 100 tons or more per year of NOXand is located in Allegany, Caroline, Dorchester, Garrett, Kent, Queen Anne's, St. Mary's, Somerset, Talbot, Washington, Wicomico, or Worcester counties.

      On December 1, 2003, Maryland submitted a revision to COMAR 26.11.09.08A(1) that added the Washington area counties to section A(1)(a), deleted section A(1)(b) and renumbered the remaining section to result in a section A(1) that reads as follows:

      (1) This regulation applies to a person who owns or operates an installation that causes emissions of NOXand is located at premises that have total potential to emit:

      (a) 25 tons or more per year of NOXand is located in Baltimore City, or Anne Arundel, Baltimore, Calvert, Carroll, Cecil, Charles, Frederick, Harford, Howard, Montgomery, or Prince George's counties; or

      (b) 100 tons or more per year of NOXand is located in Allegany, Caroline, Dorchester, Garrett, Kent, Queen Anne's, St. Mary's, Somerset, Talbot, Washington, Wicomico, or Worcester counties.

      EPA has concluded that the December 1, 2003, SIP revision has properly implemented the necessary change in the applicability threshold for the

      [[Page 32932]]

      Washington, DC ozone nonattainment area necessitated by the January 24, 2003, reclassification action. The revised COMAR 26.11.09.08A(1) now requires that all stationary sources in the Washington, DC area of NOXemissions be subject to Maryland's NOXRACT rule if the emissions of NOXare 25 tons or more per year.

   4. Proposed Action

      EPA's review of this submittal indicates that Maryland has revised its nonattainment NSR rules and its NOXRACT rules as required by the reclassification of the Washington DC area to severe ozone nonattainment. EPA is proposing to approve the Maryland SIP revision, which was submitted on December 1, 2003, that revised definition of major stationary source found in COMAR 26.11.17.01B(13), that changed the general emission offset provisions found in COMAR 26.11.17.03B(3), and, that changed COMAR 26.11.09.08A(1) to add the Washington area counties to the areas where NOXRACT is required on stationary sources emitting 25 tons or more per year. EPA is soliciting public comments on the issues discussed in this document. These comments will be considered before taking final action.

   5. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

      Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this proposed action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and therefore is not subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211, ``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355 (May 22, 2001)). This action merely proposes to approve state law as meeting Federal requirements and imposes no additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that this proposed rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this rule proposes to approve pre- existing requirements under state law and does not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by state law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4). This proposed rule also does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), nor will it have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999), because it merely proposes to approve a state rule implementing a Federal standard, and does not alter the relationship or the distribution of power and responsibilities established in the Clean Air Act. This proposed rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not economically significant.

      In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. In this context, in the absence of a prior existing requirement for the State to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority to disapprove a SIP submission for failure to use VCS. It would thus be inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it reviews a SIP submission, to use VCS in place of a SIP submission that otherwise satisfies the provisions of the Clean Air Act. Thus, the requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. As required by section 3 of Executive Order 12988 (61 FR 4729, February 7, 1996), in issuing this proposed rule, EPA has taken the necessary steps to eliminate drafting errors and ambiguity, minimize potential litigation, and provide a clear legal standard for affected conduct. EPA has complied with Executive Order 12630 (53 FR 8859, March 15, 1988) by examining the takings implications of the rule in accordance with the ``Attorney General's Supplemental Guidelines for the Evaluation of Risk and Avoidance of Unanticipated Takings'' issued under the executive order. This proposed rule to approve Maryland's December 1, 2003, SIP revision that changes its approved SIP pertaining to new source review permitting and NOXRACT for the Washington, DC area does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).

      List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

      Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.

      Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

      Dated: June 3, 2004. Abraham Ferdas, Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.

      [FR Doc. 04-13285 Filed 6-10-04; 8:45 am]

      BILLING CODE 6560-50-P