Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan: San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District

Federal Register: June 8, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 108)

Proposed Rules

Page 27084-27085

From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]

DOCID:fr08jn09-10

Proposed Rules

Federal Register

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.

Page 27084

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52

EPA-R09-OAR-2009-0296; FRL-8914-3

Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, San

Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve revisions to the San Joaquin

Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District (SJVUAPCD) portion of the

California State Implementation Plan (SIP). These revisions concern volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions from organic solvent cleaning and degreasing operations. We are approving local rules that regulate these emission sources under the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). We are taking comments on this proposal and plan to follow with a final action.

DATES: Any comments must arrive by July 8, 2009.

ADDRESSES: Submit comments, identified by docket number EPA-R09-OAR- 2009-0296, by one of the following methods: 1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions. 2. E-mail: steckel.andrew@epa.gov. 3. Mail or Deliver: Andrew Steckel (Air-4), U.S. Environmental

Protection Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105-3901.

Instructions: All comments will be included in the public docket without change and may be made available online at http:// www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided, unless the comment includes Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.

Information that you consider CBI or otherwise protected should be clearly identified as such and should not be submitted through http:// www.regulations.gov or e-mail. http://www.regulations.gov is an

``anonymous access'' system, and EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment.

If you send e-mail directly to EPA, your e-mail address will be automatically captured and included as part of the public comment. If

EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment.

Docket: The index to the docket for this action is available electronically at http://www.regulations.gov and in hard copy at EPA

Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California. While all documents in the docket are listed in the index, some information may be publicly available only at the hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted material), and some may not be publicly available in either location

(e.g., CBI). To inspect the hard copy materials, please schedule an appointment during normal business hours with the contact listed in the

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nicole Law, EPA Region IX, (415) 947- 4126, Law.Nicole@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us'' and

``our'' refer to EPA.

Table of Contents

1. The State's Submittal

   1. What Rules Did the State Submit?

   2. Are There Other Versions of These Rules?

   3. What Is the Purpose of the Rule Revisions?

2. EPA's Evaluation and Action

   1. How Is EPA Evaluating the Rules?

   2. Do the Rules Meet the Evaluation Criteria?

   3. EPA Recommendations To Further Improve the Rules

   4. Public Comment and Final Action

3. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

1. The State's Submittal

   1. What Rules Did the State Submit?

      Table 1 lists the rules addressed by this proposal with the dates that they were adopted by the local air agency and submitted by the

      California Air Resources Board.

      Table 1--Submitted Rules

      Local agency

      Rule No.

      Rule title

      Adopted

      Submitted

      SJVUAPCD..................................

      4662 Organic Solvent Degreasing

      09/20/07

      03/07/08

      Operations.

      SJVUAPCD..................................

      4663 Organic Solvent Cleaning,

      09/20/07

      03/07/08

      Storage, and Disposal.

      On April 17, 2008, EPA determined that these rule submittals met the completeness criteria in 40 CFR part 51, appendix V, which must be met before formal EPA review.

   2. Are There Other Versions of These Rules?

      We approved versions of Rules 4662 and 4663 into the SIP on July 27, 2002. The San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District adopted revisions to the SIP-approved rules on September 20, 2007 and

      CARB submitted these to us on March 7, 2008. CARB has not submitted any other revisions to these rules since 2002.

   3. What Is the Purpose of the Rule Revisions?

      VOCs help produce ground-level ozone and smog, which harm human health and the environment. Section 110(a) of the CAA requires States to submit regulations that control VOC emissions. The revised rules limit VOC emissions from organic solvent degreasing operations, organic solvent cleaning and from the storage and disposal of solvents and waste solvent materials. The most significant changes in the rules are reductions of the VOC limits on organic solvents to 25 grams of VOC per liter solvent. EPA's technical support documents (TSDs) have more information about these rules.

      Page 27085

2. EPA's Evaluation and Action

   1. How Is EPA Evaluating the Rules?

      Generally, SIP rules must be enforceable (see section 110(a) of the

      Act), must require Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) for each category of sources covered by a Control Techniques Guidelines

      (CTG) document as well as each major source in nonattainment areas (see sections 182(a)(2) and (b)(2)), and must not relax existing requirements (see sections 110(l) and 193). The San Joaquin Valley

      Unified Air Pollution Control District regulates an ozone nonattainment area for both the 1-hr and the 8-hr ozone standard (see 40 CFR part 81), so Rules 4662 and 4663 must fulfill RACT.

      Guidance and policy documents that we use to evaluate enforceability and RACT requirements consistently include the following: 1. Portions of the proposed post-1987 ozone and carbon monoxide policy that concern RACT, 52 FR 45044, November 24, 1987. 2. ``Issues Relating to VOC Regulation Cutpoints, Deficiencies, and

      Deviations,'' EPA, May 25, 1988 (the Bluebook). 3. ``Guidance Document for Correcting Common VOC & Other Rule

      Deficiencies,'' EPA Region 9, August 21, 2001 (the Little Bluebook). 4. ``Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Solvent Metal

      Cleaning,'' EPA-450/2-77-022, November 1977. 5. ``Control Techniques Guidelines for Industrial Cleaning

      Solvents,'' EPA-453/R-06-001, September 2006. 6. ``Organic Solvent Cleaning and Degreasing Operations,'' CARB,

      July 18, 1991. 7. ``Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) Demonstration for Ozone State Implementation Plans (SIP)'' SJVAPCD, April 16, 2009. 8. ``State Implementation Plans, General Preamble for the

      Implementation of Title I of the Clean Air Amendments of 1990,'' 57 FR 13498 (April 16, 1992). 9. ``Preamble, Final Rule to Implement the 8-hour Ozone National

      Ambient Air Quality Standard'' 70 FR 71612 (November 29, 2005). 10. Letter from William T. Hartnett to Regional Air Division

      Directors, ``RACT Qs & As--Reasonable Available Control Technology

      (RACT) Questions and Answers,'' May 18, 2006.

   2. Do the Rules Meet the Evaluation Criteria?

      We believe these rules are consistent with the relevant policy and guidance regarding enforceability, RACT, and SIP relaxations. The TSDs have more information on our evaluation.

   3. EPA Recommendations To Further Improve the Rules

      The TSDs describe additional rule revisions that do not affect

      EPA's current action but are recommended for the next time the local agency modifies the Rules.

   4. Public Comment and Final Action

      Because EPA believes the submitted rules fulfill all relevant requirements, we are proposing to fully approve them as described in section 110(k)(3) of the Act. We will accept comments from the public on this proposal for the next 30 days. Unless we receive convincing new information during the comment period, we intend to publish a final approval action that will incorporate these rules into the Federally enforceable SIP.

3. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

   Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a

   SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).

   Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve State choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.

   Accordingly, this action merely approves State law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by State law. For that reason, this action:

   Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);

   Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);

   Is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory

   Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);

   Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded

   Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);

   Does not have Federalism implications as specified in

   Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);

   Is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);

   Is not a significant regulatory action subject to

   Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);

   Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the

   National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; and

   Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under

   Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).

   In addition, this rule does not have Tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because the

   SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in the State, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct costs on

   Tribal governments or preempt Tribal law.

   List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

   Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Intergovernmental relations, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.

   Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

   Dated: May 21, 2009.

   Jane Diamond,

   Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.

   FR Doc. E9-13331 Filed 6-5-09; 8:45 am

   BILLING CODE 6560-50-P