Environmental statements; availability, etc.: Virginia Electric & Power Co.,
[Federal Register: March 24, 1999 (Volume 64, Number 56)]
[Notices]
[Page 14277-14278]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr24mr99-108]
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket No. 72-2]
Virginia Electric and Power Company, Issuance of Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact Regarding the Proposed Exemption From Requirements of 10 CFR Part 72
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the Commission) is considering issuance of an exemption, pursuant to 10 CFR 72.7, from the provisions of 10 CFR 72.72(d) to Virginia Electric and Power Company (Virginia Power or applicant). The requested exemption would allow Virginia Power to maintain a single set of spent fuel records at a records storage facility, that satisfies the requirements set forth in ANSI N45.2.9-1974, for the Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) at the Surry Power Station (Docket Nos. 50-280 and 50-281) in Surry County, Virginia.
Environmental Assessment (EA)
Identification of Proposed Action
By letter dated September 10, 1998, Virginia Power requested an exemption from the requirement in 10 CFR 72.72(d) which states in part that ``Records of spent fuel and high level radioactive waste in storage must be kept in duplicate. The duplicate set of records must be kept at a separate location sufficiently remote from the original records that a single event would not destroy both sets of records.'' The applicant proposes to maintain a single set of spent fuel records in storage at a records storage facility that satisfies the requirements set forth in ANSI N45.2.9-1974.
The proposed action before the Commission is whether to grant this exemption pursuant to 10 CFR 72.7.
Need for the Proposed Action
The applicant stated that, pursuant to 10 CFR 72.140(d), the Virginia Power Operational Quality Assurance (QA) Program Topical Report will be used to satisfy the QA requirements for the ISFSI. The QA Program Topical Report states that QA records are maintained in accordance with commitments to ANSI N45.2.9-1974. ANSI N45.2.9-1974 allows for the storage of QA records in a duplicate storage location sufficiently remote from the original records or in a records storage facility subject to certain provisions designed to protect the records from fire and other adverse conditions. The applicant seeks to streamline and standardize recordkeeping procedures and processes for the Surry Power Station and ISFSI spent fuel records. The applicant states that requiring a separate method of record storage for ISFSI records diverts resources unnecessarily.
ANSI N45.2.9-1974 provides requirements for the protection of nuclear power plant QA records against degradation. It specifies design requirements for use in the construction of record storage facilities when use of a single storage facility is desired. It includes specific requirements for protection against degradation mechanisms such as fire, humidity, and condensation. The requirements in ANSI N45.2.9-1974 have been endorsed by the NRC in Regulatory Guide 1.88, ``Collection, Storage and Maintenance of Nuclear Power Plant Quality Assurance Records,'' as adequate for satisfying the recordkeeping requirements of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B. ANSI N45.2.9-1974 also satisfies the requirements of 10 CFR 72.72 by providing for adequate maintenance of records regarding the identity and history of the spent fuel in storage. Such records would be subject to and need to be protected from the same types of degradation mechanisms as nuclear power plant QA records.
Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Action
Elimination of the requirement to store ISFSI records at a duplicate facility has no impact on the environment. Storage of records does not change the methods by which spent fuel will be handled and stored at the Surry Power Station and ISFSI and does not change the amount of any effluents, radiological or non-radiological, associated with the ISFSI.
Alternative to the Proposed Action
Since there are no environmental impacts associated with the proposed action, alternatives are not evaluated other than the no action alternative. The alternative to the proposed action would be to deny approval of the exemption and, therefore, not allow storage of ISFSI spent fuel records at a single qualified record storage facility. However, the environmental impacts of the proposed action and the alternative would be the same.
Agencies and Persons Consulted
On February 19, 1999, Mr. Les Foldesi from the State of Virginia Bureau of Radiological Health was contacted about the environmental assessment for the proposed action and had no comments.
[[Page 14278]]
Finding of no Significant Impact
The environmental impacts of the proposed action have been reviewed in accordance with the requirements set forth in 10 CFR Part 51. Based upon the foregoing EA, the Commission finds that the proposed action of granting an exemption from 10 CFR 72.72(d), so that Virginia Power may store spent fuel records at the ISFSI in a single record storage facility which meets the requirements of ANSI N45.2.9-1974, will not significantly impact the quality of the human environment. Accordingly, the Commission has determined that an environmental impact statement for the proposed exemption is not necessary.
The request for exemption was docketed under 10 CFR Part 72, Docket 72-2. For further details with respect to this action, see the application for an ISFSI license dated October 8, 1982, and the request for exemption dated September 10, 1998, which is available for public inspection at the Commission's Public Document Room, 2120 L Street, NW, Washington, DC 20555 and the Local Public Document Room at the College of William and Mary, Swem Library, Williamsburg, Virginia 23185.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 12th day of March 1999.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. E. William Brach, Director, Spent Fuel Project Office, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards.
[FR Doc. 99-7166Filed3-23-99; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
