Submission for OMB Review; Data Collection for a National Evaluation of the American Rescue Plan

Published date02 April 2024
Record Number2024-06913
Citation89 FR 22726
CourtGeneral Services Administration
SectionNotices
Federal Register, Volume 89 Issue 64 (Tuesday, April 2, 2024)
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 64 (Tuesday, April 2, 2024)]
                [Notices]
                [Pages 22726-22727]
                From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
                [FR Doc No: 2024-06913]
                =======================================================================
                -----------------------------------------------------------------------
                GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
                [OMB Control No. 3090-XXXX; Docket No. 2023-0001; Sequence No. 8]
                Submission for OMB Review; Data Collection for a National
                Evaluation of the American Rescue Plan
                AGENCY: Office of Evaluation Sciences; General Services Administration
                (GSA).
                ACTION: Notice of request for comments regarding a request for a new
                OMB clearance.
                -----------------------------------------------------------------------
                SUMMARY: Under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, OES is
                proposing new data collection activities conducted for the National
                Evaluation of the American Rescue Plan (ARP). The objective of this
                project is to provide a systematic look at the contributions of
                selected ARP-funded programs toward achieving equitable outcomes to
                inform program design and delivery across the Federal Government. The
                project will include in-depth, cross-cutting evaluations and data
                analysis of selected ARP programs, especially those with shared
                outcomes, common approaches, or overlapping recipient communities; and
                targeted, program-specific analyses to fill critical gaps in evidence
                needs.
                DATES: Submit comments on or before May 2, 2024.
                ADDRESSES: Written comments and recommendations for this information
                collection should be sent within 30 days
                [[Page 22727]]
                of publication of this notice to www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain.
                Find this particular information collection by selecting ``Currently
                under Review--Open for Public Comments'' or by using the search
                function.
                FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Martin, Program Manager,
                267-455-8556 at [email protected].
                SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
                A. Purpose
                 The goal of this study is to look systematically across the
                selected subset of ARP programs, to provide an integrated account of
                whether, how, and to what extent their implementation served to achieve
                their intended outcomes, particularly with respect to advancing equity.
                More specifically, the study aims to learn how lessons from examination
                of ARP programs and interventions with shared outcomes, common
                approaches, or overlapping recipient communities may inform equitable
                program design and delivery across the Federal Government. The study
                aims to address these overarching evaluation questions:
                 To what extent did ARP investments and policy
                interventions advance equitable outcomes for those they were designed
                to serve?
                 What strategies contributed to the successes, and where
                are different strategies needed?
                 Where multiple ARP programs aim to reach similar outcomes,
                especially among a shared population:
                 [cir] To what extent is there coordination across programs in their
                administration, customer experience strategies, or performance or
                outcome measurement practices?
                 [cir] To what extent are there collective impacts that could be
                attributed to more than one program? What kinds of impacts, if any, are
                observed?
                 [cir] What kinds of secondary effects are observed that may not be
                captured in targeted outcome measures?
                 The list of 32 programs covered in the May 2022 White House report
                ``Advancing Equity through the American Rescue Plan'' provided the
                scope of programs included in the National Evaluation. A partnership
                between the Office of Management and Budget Evidence Team and GSA's
                Office of Evaluation Sciences, this study is also guided by leadership
                from the White House ARP Implementation Team, who participate on the
                Steering Committee, as well as a team of agency experts across the
                Federal Government.
                 To build evidence in support of the study goals, this project
                includes a series of up to five in-depth, cross-cutting evaluations of
                selected ARP programs or recipient communities of multiple ARP program
                investments with shared outcomes, common approaches, or overlapping
                recipient groups. These evaluations will be selected based on program,
                population, place, community, or a combination of these factors. A
                mixed-methods approach is anticipated in order to ensure that
                appropriate attention is paid to context and that data collection and
                analysis methods reflect the complexity of program implementation and
                address the specific evaluation questions identified through the
                ongoing planning and consultation process.
                 The ARP National Evaluation will use a multiple-phased approach for
                this proposed information collection activity. In Phase 1 (current
                request) the research team seeks approval to carry out consultations
                with the relevant state and local agencies, community-based
                organizations, and program participants, including the formal
                recruitment process to establish community advisory boards for each of
                the planned in-depth evaluations.
                 Under subsequent phases of the request, the project will update the
                information collection request for the instruments tailored to each in-
                depth evaluation, to reflect the specific evaluation design,
                information collection methods and instruments, and associated burden.
                The proposed information collection activities cover mixed-method
                approaches to implement primarily outcome and process evaluations. Data
                collection activities for these studies may include: (1) interviews
                with program administrators and staff; (2) focus groups, (3) short
                surveys of program participants and/or eligible non-participants, and
                (4) data requests.
                 Respondents: State and local program administrators, program staff,
                community-based program partners, and individuals who participate or
                are eligible to participate in the relevant ARP programs.
                B. Annual Burden Estimates
                 Currently, three cross-cutting in-depth evaluations are
                anticipated. The burden estimates below reflect the expectations for
                information collection and related activities associated with the
                conduct of those three studies, in addition to the anticipated burden
                for this initial, formative phase of the overall study. During Phase 1,
                we estimate the following: consultations with approximately 95 state
                and/or local program administrators or representatives from community-
                based organizations, recruitment of up to 9 participants for each of up
                to seven Community Advisory Groups established across the three
                studies, and the initiation of the group meetings.
                 The anticipated information collections to be undertaken in Phase 2
                are expected to vary in their approaches to data collection and sample
                size. The subsequent information collection requests will describe the
                specific study design and associated burden for each evaluation. The
                estimates below include our current expectations for the burden
                associated with these evaluations.
                 Total Respondents: 1,241.
                 Total Annual Responses: 15.
                 Average Burden Hours per Response: 1.9.
                 Total Burden Hours: 3,034.5.
                C. Public Comments
                 A 60-day notice published in the Federal Register at 88 FR 85621 on
                December 8, 2023. Two comments were received, but neither provided
                substantive comments relevant to this specific information collection
                request.
                 Obtaining Copies: Requesters may obtain a copy of the information
                collection documents from the GSA Regulatory Secretariat Division, by
                calling 202-501-4755 or emailing [email protected]. Please cite OMB
                Control No. 3090-XXXX, Data Collection for a National Evaluation of the
                American Rescue Plan.
                Lois Mandell,
                Director, Regulatory Secretariat Division, General Services
                Administration.
                [FR Doc. 2024-06913 Filed 4-1-24; 8:45 am]
                BILLING CODE 6820-TZ-P
                

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT