Variance for Certain Requirements for the Electric Drive Vehicle Battery, etc.
Federal Register: June 26, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 122)
Notices
Page 30558-30559
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
DOCID:fr26jn09-51
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Variance for Certain Requirements for the Electric Drive Vehicle
Battery and Component Manufacturing Initiative Under the Department of
Energy's National Environmental Policy Act Implementing Procedures
AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy.
ACTION: Notice of variance.
SUMMARY: This notice announces the Department of Energy's (DOE's) decision, pursuant to 10 CFR 1021.343(c), that it is in the interest of public welfare to grant a variance from certain requirements of its
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Implementing Procedures (10
CFR part 1021) in regard to the review of applications under the
Electric Drive Vehicle Battery and Component Manufacturing Initiative funded by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Recovery
Act). The variance is limited to certain requirements identified in 10
CFR 1021.216, Procurement, Financial Assistance, and Joint Ventures.
The variance in no way affects the requirement to prepare an environmental assessment or environmental impact statement for any application selected for funding. The merit review of applications in response to this funding opportunity will include consideration of the potentially significant environmental impacts of the projects proposed for funding that are within the competitive range. By providing this variance, DOE can reduce the time needed to select applications for possible future funding consistent with the sense of urgency underpinning the Recovery Act.
DATES: Effective date: June 26, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. R. Paul Detwiler, Director, Office of Project Facilitation and Compliance, National Energy Technology
Laboratory, 626 Cochrans Mill Road, P.O. Box 10940, Pittsburgh, PA 15236-0940 or Ralph.Detwiler@netl.doe.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The purposes of the Recovery Act are to: (1) Preserve and create jobs and promote economic recovery; (2) assist those most impacted by the recession; (3) provide investments needed to increase economic efficiency by spurring technological advances in science and health;
(4) invest in transportation, environmental protection, and other infrastructure that will provide long-term economic benefits; and (5) stabilize State and local government budgets, in order to minimize and avoid reductions in essential services and counterproductive state and local tax increases. Federal departments must manage and expend funds made available through the Recovery Act to achieve these purposes,
``including commencing expenditures and activities as quickly as possible consistent with prudent management.'' (Recovery Act, Section 3)
In the Recovery Act, the Congress appropriated $2 billion for DOE to provide grants to manufacturers of advanced battery systems and vehicle batteries to be produced in the United States, including advanced lithium ion batteries, hybrid electrical systems, component manufacturers, and software designers. (Recovery Act, Title IV) To implement this provision, DOE issued a financial assistance funding opportunity announcement on March 19, 2009, for the Electric Drive
Vehicle Battery and Component Manufacturing Initiative. (DE-FOA- 0000026)
This initiative is critical to the development and production of electric drive vehicle systems that will substantially reduce petroleum consumption. In addition, as stated in the funding opportunity announcement, the grants will meaningfully aid in the nation's economic recovery by creating U.S. based manufacturing jobs.
The funding opportunity announcement is a competitive solicitation, and DOE has received more applications than it expects to be able to fund. DOE is now reviewing the merits of the applications in order to select those to which it may provide funding. Criterion 4 of the merit review criteria includes consideration of anticipated environmental impacts. As with environmental reviews under NEPA, the focus will be on potentially significant environmental impacts. As part of the application process, each applicant was required to complete an environmental questionnaire, which will be considered during the merit review. Consideration of potential environmental impacts will be facilitated by the participation of a DOE NEPA Compliance Officer as a resource to the merit review panel and the selection official.
DOE's NEPA implementing procedures, at 10 CFR 1021.216, establish a process for the consideration of potential environmental impacts prior to selection. The central element of this process is preparation by DOE of an environmental critique containing, among other things, a ``brief comparative evaluation of the potential environmental impacts of the offers, which will address direct and indirect effects, short-term and long-term effects, proposed mitigation measures, adverse effects that cannot be avoided, areas where important environmental information is incomplete and unavailable, unresolved environmental issues and practicable mitigating measures not included in the offeror's proposal.'' (10 CFR 1021.216(g)(3)) This environmental critique forms the basis for an environmental synopsis, which is made available to the public and is incorporated into any environmental assessment or environmental impact statement prepared. (10 CFR 1021.216(h)) Another feature of the environmental critique is that, in addition to information provided by the applicant, ``it may also evaluate supplemental information developed by DOE as necessary for a reasoned decision.'' (10 CFR 1021.216(f)) This contrasts with the merit review process, which is limited to information provided in the application.
Some other components of an environmental critique (e.g., brief discussion of the purpose of the funding opportunity and of the applicants' proposals) repeat information that is already part of the
Merit Review Report that is prepared for the selection official. (The
Merit Review Report is not publicly available.)
Page 30559
DOE's existing NEPA regulations provide for certain variances
``soundly based on the interests of national security or the public health, safety, or welfare.'' (10 CFR 1021.343(c)) Any such variance must have the advance written approval of the General Counsel,\1\ and
DOE must publish a notice in the Federal Register specifying the variance granted and the reasons.
\1\ DOE's NEPA regulations state at 10 CFR 1021.343(c) that the
Secretary of Energy must provide written approval of any variance under that section. However, this authority has been delegated to the General Counsel pursuant to Department of Energy Delegation
Order No. 00-015.00A to the General Counsel.
Variance
Pursuant to 10 CFR 1021.343(c), I have determined that granting a variance from the requirements of 10 CFR 1021.216(c) through (h) with respect to the Department's funding opportunity for the Electric Drive
Vehicle Battery and Component Manufacturing Initiative (DE-FOA-0000026) is soundly based on the interests of public welfare. Expediting the award of funding to promising proposals will accelerate development and production of electric drive vehicles. In addition, it will facilitate the nation's economic recovery by creating and retaining jobs and by transforming the nation's industrial infrastructure.
I have concluded that the Department's process for making these funding awards will provide the selecting official with sufficient information regarding potential environmental impacts in the Merit
Review Report, which will summarize the strengths and weaknesses of the proposals according to the merit review criteria, including but not limited to environmental impacts. This report also will provide certain other information called for in 10 CFR 1021.216(g).
This variance does not affect the requirements imposed by 10 CFR 1021.216(i). If projects selected for funding require preparation of an environmental assessment or environmental impact statement, these NEPA reviews will be completed before DOE takes any action that would have an adverse environmental impact or limit the choice of reasonable alternatives. In addition, consistent with the openness provisions of 10 CFR 1021.216(h), any such environmental assessment or environmental impact statement will describe the environmental factors noted in the
Merit Review Report that are relevant to the proposal being analyzed.
Issued in Washington, DC, on June 22, 2009.
Scott Blake Harris,
General Counsel.
FR Doc. E9-15126 Filed 6-25-09; 8:45 am
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
