Ports and waterways safety: Lake Erie, Monroe, MI; Enrico Fermi nuclear power plant; security zone,
[Federal Register: October 12, 2001 (Volume 66, Number 198)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 52039-52041]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr12oc01-9]
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[CGD09-01-135]
RIN 2115-AA97
Security Zone; Lake Erie, Monroe, MI
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DOT.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary security zone
[[Page 52040]]
encompassing navigable water of Lake Erie in the vicinity of the Enrico Fermi nuclear power plant. This security zone is necessary to prevent damage to the nuclear power plant. Entry into, transit through or anchoring within this security zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Coast Guard Captain of the Port Toledo or the designated on scene representative.
DATES: This rule is effective from September 28, 2001 through June 15, 2002.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in the docket are part of docket [CGD09-01-135] and are available for inspection or copying at U.S. Coast Guard Marine Safety Office Toledo, 420 Madison Ave, Suite 700, Toledo, Ohio, 43604 between 9:30 a.m. and 2 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: LT Herb Oertli, Chief of Port Operations, Marine Safety Office, Toledo, Ohio, (419) 418-6050.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
As authorized by 5 U.S.C. 553, we did not publish a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for this regulation. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good cause exists for not publishing an NPRM, and, under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), good cause exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after publication in the Federal Register. The Coast Guard had insufficient advance notice to publish an NPRM followed by a temporary final rule. Publication of a notice of proposed rulemaking and delay of effective date would be contrary to the public interest because immediate action is necessary to prevent possible loss of life, injury, or damage to property.
Background and Purpose
A temporary security zone is necessary to ensure the security of Enrico Fermi nuclear power plant, as a result of the terrorist attacks on the United States on September 11, 2001. The security zone consists of all navigable waters of Lake Erie within a line beginning from position 41 deg.58.5' N, 083 deg.14.8' W; southeast to 41 deg.58.2' N, 083 deg.13.7' W; south to 41 deg.56.7' N, 083 deg.14.8' W; west to 41 deg.56.7' N, 083 deg.15.3' W; back to the beginning point. Entry into, transit through or anchoring within this security zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Coast Guard Captain of the Port Toledo or the designated on scene representative. The designated on scene representative will be the Patrol Commander and may be contacted via VHF Channel 16.
Regulatory Evaluation
This rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not reviewed it under that order. It is not ``significant'' under the regulatory policies and procedures of the Department of Transportation (DOT) (44 FR 11040, February 26, 1979). This finding is based on the historical lack of vessel traffic during this time of year. Also, vessels can pass safely around the security zone and vessels may request permission from the Captain of the Port Toledo to transit through the security zone.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
This rule will affect the following entities, some of which may be small entities: the owners and operators of vessels intending to transit or anchor in a portion of Lake Erie.
This security zone will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities for the following reasons: Vessel traffic can pass safely around the security zone and commercial vessels may request permission from the Captain of the Port Toledo to transit through the security zone.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offered to assist small entities in understanding the rule so that they could better evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process. If the rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please contact Marine Safety Office Toledo (see ADDRESSES.)
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR (1-888-734-3247).
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13132 and have determined that this rule does not have implications for federalism under that Order.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) governs the issuance of Federal regulations that require unfunded mandates. An unfunded mandate is a regulation that requires a State, local, or tribal government or the private sector to incur direct costs without the Federal government having first provided the funds to pay those costs. This rule will not impose an unfunded mandate.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of private property or otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and does not concern an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may disproportionately affect children.
[[Page 52041]]
Environment
The Coast Guard considered the environmental impact of this rule and concluded that under figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(g), of Commandant Instruction M16475.lC, this rule is categorically excluded from further environmental documentation. A ``Categorical Exclusion Determination'' is available in the docket for inspection or copying where indicated under ADDRESSES.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations that Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use of energy. It has not been designated by the Administrator of the office of Information and Regulatory Affairs as a significant energy action. Therefore, it does not require a statement of Energy Effects under Executive Order 13211.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
-
The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191, 33 CFR 1.05-1(g), 6.04-6, 160.5; 49 CFR 1.46.
-
A new temporary Sec. 165.T09-135 is added as follows:
Sec. 165.T09-135 Security zone: Lake Erie, Toledo, Ohio.
(a) Location. This security zone consists of all navigable waters of Lake Erie within a line beginning from position 41 deg.58.5' N, 083 deg.14.8' W; southeast to 41 deg.58.2' N, 083 deg.13.7' W; south to 41 deg.56.7' N, 083 deg.14.8' W; west to 41 deg.56.7' N, 083 deg.15.3' W; back to the beginning point. All geographic coordinated are North American Datum of 1983 (NAD 1983).
(b) Effective period. This section is effective from September 28, 2001 through June 15, 2002.
(c) Regulations. In accordance with the general regulations in Sec. 165.23 of this part, entry into this zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port.
Dated: September 28, 2001. David L. Scott, Commander, U.S. Coast Guard Captain of the Port.
[FR Doc. 01-25649Filed10-11-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P
