Medical devices: Patent extension; regulatory review period determinations— Ray Threaded Fusion Cage,

[Federal Register: October 13, 1998 (Volume 63, Number 197)]

[Notices]

[Page 54719-54720]

From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]

[DOCID:fr13oc98-93]

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. 97E-0087]

Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent Extension; Ray Threaded Fusion Cage‹SUP›TM‹/SUP›

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has determined the regulatory review period for Ray Threaded Fusion Cage‹SUP›TM‹/SUP› and is publishing this notice of that determination as required by law. FDA has made the determination because of the submission of an application to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks, Department of Commerce, for the extension of a patent which claims that medical device.

ADDRESSES: Written comments and petitions should be directed to the Dockets Management Branch (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brian J. Malkin, Office of Health Affairs (HFY-20), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-6620.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984 (Pub. L. 98-417) and the Generic Animal Drug and Patent Term Restoration Act (Pub. L. 100-670) generally provide that a patent may be extended for a period of up to 5 years so long as the patented item (human drug product, animal drug product, medical device, food additive, or color additive) was subject to regulatory review by FDA before the item was marketed. Under these acts, a product's regulatory review period forms the basis for determining the amount of extension an applicant may receive.

A regulatory review period consists of two periods of time: A testing phase and an approval phase. For medical devices, the testing phase begins with a clinical investigation of the device and runs until the approval phase begins. The approval phase starts with the initial submission of an application to market the device and continues until permission to market the device is granted. Although only a portion of a regulatory review period may count toward the actual amount of extension that the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks may award (half the testing phase must be subtracted as well as any time that may have occurred before the patent was issued), FDA's determination of the length of a regulatory review period for a medical device will include all of the testing phase and approval phase as specified in 35 U.S.C. 156(g)(3)(B).

FDA recently approved for marketing the medical device Ray Threaded Fusion Cage‹SUP›TM‹/SUP›. Ray Threaded Fusion Cage‹SUP›TM‹/SUP› is indicated for use with autogenous bone graft in patients with degenerative disk disease (DDD) at one or two levels from L2 to S1. These DDD patients may also have up to Grade 1 spondylolisthesis at the involved level(s). Subsequent to this approval, the Patent and Trademark Office received a patent term restoration application for Ray Threaded Fusion Cage‹SUP›TM‹/SUP› (U.S. Patent No. 4,961,740) from United States Surgical Corp., and the Patent and Trademark Office requested FDA's assistance in determining this patent's eligibility for patent term restoration. In a letter dated April 11, 1997, FDA advised the Patent and Trademark Office that this medical device had undergone a regulatory review period and that the approval of Ray Threaded Fusion Cage‹SUP›TM‹/SUP› represented the first permitted commercial marketing or use of the product. Shortly thereafter, the Patent and Trademark Office requested that FDA determine the product's regulatory review period.

FDA has determined that the applicable regulatory review period for Ray Threaded Fusion Cage‹SUP›TM‹/SUP› is 1,861 days. Of this time, 1,357 days occurred during the testing phase of the regulatory review period, while 504 days occurred during the approval phase. These periods of time were derived from the following dates:

1. The date a clinical investigation involving this device was begun: September 27, 1991. The applicant claims that the investigational device exemption (IDE) required under section 520(g) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the act) (21 U.S.C. 360j(g)) for human tests to begin became effective on November 15, 1991. However, FDA records indicate that the IDE was determined substantially complete for clinical studies to have begun on September 27, 1991, which represents the IDE effective date.

2. The date the application was initially submitted with respect to the device under section 515 of the act (21 U.S.C. 360e): June 14, 1995. FDA has verified the applicant's claim that the premarket approval application (PMA) for Ray Threaded Fusion Cage‹SUP›TM‹/SUP› (PMA P950019) was initially submitted June 14, 1995.

3. The date the application was approved: October 29, 1996. FDA has verified the applicant's claim that PMA P950019 was approved on October 29, 1996.

This determination of the regulatory review period establishes the maximum potential length of a patent extension. However, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office applies several statutory limitations in its calculations of the actual period for patent extension. In its application for patent extension, this applicant seeks 742 days of patent term extension.

Anyone with knowledge that any of the dates as published is incorrect may, on or before December 14, 1998, submit to the Dockets Management Branch (address above) written comments and ask for a redetermination. Furthermore, any interested person may petition FDA, on or before April 12, 1999, for a determination regarding whether the applicant for extension acted with due diligence during the regulatory review period. To meet its burden, the petition must contain sufficient facts to merit an FDA investigation. (See H. Rept. 857, part 1, 98th Cong., 2d sess., pp. 41-42, 1984.) Petitions should be in the format specified in 21 CFR 10.30.

Comments and petitions should be submitted to the Dockets Management Branch (address above) in three copies (except that individuals may submit single copies) and identified with the

[[Page 54720]]

docket number found in brackets in the heading of this document. Comments and petitions may be seen in the Dockets Management Branch between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.

Dated: September 28, 1998. Thomas J. McGinnis, Deputy Associate Commissioner for Health Affairs.

[FR Doc. 98-27284Filed10-9-98; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-01-F